Application of HAZUS TM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project Prepared for: Federal Emergency Management Agency Central US Earthquake Consortium Prepared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMERGENCY PLANNING FOR LONG TERM CARE FACILITIES Joseph B. Phillips Director Division of Emergency Medical Services.
Advertisements

A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
Kentucky Impact Overview Capstone 14 Exercise. General Impact Overview Total Structures Damaged68,400 Total Injured6,000 + Total Fatalities300 Total Seeking.
Missouri Impact Overview Capstone 14 Exercise. General Impact Overview Total Structures Damaged 87,000 Total Injured13,444 Total Fatalities 654 Total.
Illinois Impact Overview Capstone 14 Exercise. General Impact Overview Total Structures Damaged 18, 347 Total Injured12,900 Total Fatalities382 Total.
The Day After The Shakeout Place your Counties Logo Here MT DES Exercises.
GIS & Emergency Management
Wind Hazard Modeling and the HAZUS Wind Model. Major Stakeholders Local, state and federal government agencies Humanitarian organizations Insurance industry.
Session12 New Methods of Planning for Catastrophic Disasters Jasmine Ruback PhD Scott Wells Rick Bissell, PhD.
OWENSBORO: LIVING WITH EARTHQUAKES IN THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE OWENSBORO: LIVING WITH EARTHQUAKES IN THE NEW MADRID SEISMIC ZONE WALTER HAYS GLOBAL.
Earthquake Hazards in the Central U.S. Brian Blake Central U.S. Earthquake Consortium MEMA SAR Planning Meeting July 24, 2013 Senatobia, Mississippi.
FEMA HAZUS Risk Assessment Capabilities Project, SCEC Presentation Damage Estimation for Buildings and Lifelines Brian Kehoe, S.E. Wiss, Janney, Elstner.
State Debris Management Plan California the “Disney Land of Disasters”
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS A KEY ELEMENT OF BECOMING DISASTER RESILIENT Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina,
PRIMER Dr. Walter Hays Global Alliance For Disaster Reduction
 New Zealand Earthquake New Zealand Earthquake  6.3 Magnitude Earthquake  185 Deaths  injuries  Over 1,400 buildings were red or yellow tagged.
Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.
REMEMBERING CHINA’S EARTHQUAKE DISASTER. Part I MAY 12, 2008 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North Carolina, USA.
Rapid Assessment A quick evaluation of a disaster/emergency impacted area.
Future Bay Area Earthquakes – Water & Sewer Issues JEANNE PERKINS ABAG Earthquake and Hazards Program Consultant.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Consequence Assessment for Dam Failure Simulations Kurt Buchanan, CFM Economist Mapping, Modeling, and Consequences.
Implementing HAZUS-MH in Pre-Disaster Mitigation
Structural Engineering Issues for a Large Cascadia Event.
Mississippi Emergency Management Agency Mississippi Impact Overview Capstone 14 Tom McAllister Response Director.
1 Washington Action on Climate Change Hedia Adelsman, Department of Ecology September 25, 2009.
Session 131 A community profile provides a base for overlay analysis and for discussing a hazard’s impacts on a community.
A 21 ST CENTURY LOOKBACK WILL SUSTAIN A COMMUNITY’S FOCUS ON DISASTER RESILIENCE Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, University of North.
TEXAS STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAM II UASI Grant Performance Period Why there cannot be extensions Liabilities Recommendations vs Required.
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
1 Emergency Management and Risk Analysis for Hazardous Materials Transport Shashi Nambisan Professor of Civil Engineering Dept of Civil & Environmental.
HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
Earthquakes within the Cascadia Region. Risk = Hazard x Vulnerability / Capabilities The Earthquake hazard (primary and secondary) The impact (what’s.
Risk Assessment Public Safety Geoscience Program – Earth Sciences Sector Centre for Natural Hazards Research Nicky Hastings, Bert Struik, Murray Journeay,
Bay Area Earthquake Impacts and Earthquake Impacts on Utilities and Transportation Systems Infrastructure Interdependencies Workshop I – Utilities and.
1 Earthquake Hazard Update April 21, 2015 NMSZ ROC.
Richard Butgereit GIS Administrator
EARTHQUAKE Preparing for and Responding to Disasters.
Estimation of Future Earthquake Annualized Losses in California B. Rowshandel, M. Reichle, C. Wills, T. Cao, M. Petersen, and J. Davis California Geological.
Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues Bay Area Earthquakes – Utility & Lifeline Issues JEANNE PERKINS Consultant, ABAG Earthquake and Hazards.
LESSONS FROM PAST NOTABLE EARTHQUAKES. Part IV Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
State of Alabama Emergency Management Agency Monique Smith.
Loss-Estimation Modeling of Earthquake Scenarios for Each County in Nevada Using HAZUS-MH Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 06-1 University.
1 Welcome North Dakota State University Emergency Management & Planning Donald Borgen ND Division of Emergency Services ND GIS Users Conference.
New Madrid Earthquake Scenario Water Sector – Impacts & Federal Support CAPT David M. Apanian, P.E., MSCEE U.S. Environmental Protection Agency – Region.
JASON MASTERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SENIOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES - PUBLIC POLICY AND MANAGEMENT.
Get Ready For an Exercise Update
MAGNITUDE 6.3 EARTHQUAKE STRIKES TAIWAN (7:02 pm, October 31, 2013) Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
Governor’s Office of Emergency Services Association of Bay Area Governments School & Health Care Systems School & Health Care Systems Bay Area Disaster.
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE PART 2: Informing Community Stakeholders About Global Earthquake Disaster Situations Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
Key Words in disaster Management Dhammika Mahendre.
1 Case Study: Pacific Gas & Electric Company San Francisco Lifelines Council Edwards Salas Senior Vice President, Engineering and Operations, PG&E February,
Moldova Floods Joint Government and Development Partners response Chisinau, July 29, State Chancellery Government of Moldova.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management September 2004 Prepared By: Marybeth Solesbee, CEM.
1868 Hayward Earthquake “the great San Francisco earthquake” Shaking intensities were strong from San Leandro south through Hayward towards Alvarado They.
Unit: P81 Unit P8 Public Works/Utilities Services Orientation.
LESSONS LEARNED FROM PAST NOTABLE DISASTERS. TAIWAN PART I: EARTHQUAKES Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction, Vienna, Virginia, USA.
HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN UPDATE CONCORD, VERMONT. GETTING STARTED EXERCISE Who lives in the Town of Concord? What buildings, infrastructure, or organizations.
New Madrid Seismic Zone and it’s impacts. History  “Major” earthquakes in the New Madrid region occurred on Dec. 16, 1811; Jan. 23, 1812; and Feb. 7,
Overview of HAZUS for Flood Loss Estimations
Magnitude 7.2 Metro Manila
MODERATE-MAGNITUDE EARTHQUAKE IMPACTS GREECE AND TURKEY 1:30 AM local time Friday, July 21, 2017 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
Indiana Impact Overview
JASON MASTERS UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA SENIOR
Application of HAZUSTM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project
Presentation to Coachella’s City Council October 8, 2014
EARTHQUAKE DISASTER RESILIENCE PART 3: Helping Community First Responders Prepare for Expected And Unexpected Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster.
Tennessee Impact Overview
The Great Gulf #5 Gov’t Emergency Agencies
Presentation transcript:

Application of HAZUS TM to the New Madrid Earthquake Project Prepared for: Federal Emergency Management Agency Central US Earthquake Consortium Prepared by: Risk Management Solutions, Inc. Michael Baker Corporation

New Madrid Earthquake Project Presentation Overview  Study Region Overview and Characteristics  HAZUS Level 1/2 Analysis for M6.5 earthquake  Results for 6 functional areas of the New Madrid Earthquake Project:  Health and medical services plan and implementation capability  Transportation plan and implementation strategy  Housing recovery strategy  Emergency management assistance compact  Post-disaster building inspection capability  HAZUS applications

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics  5 States  40 Counties  461 Census Tracts  23,000 sq. mi. Greater Memphis Area

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics  Population: 1.9 Million  Households: 700,000 Number of Residences (by distance from epicenter) Within 25 mi. :273, to 50 mi. : 78, to 75 mi. :164,000 Over 75 mi. : 91,000 Population Density

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics 5-State Region  Elementary/High Schools: 816  College/ Universities: 62  Large Hospitals: 20  Medium Hospitals: 31  Small Hospitals: 10 Essential Facilities Inventory

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics 5-State Region  Emergency Operations Centers: 28  Fire Stations: 214  Police Stations: 200 Emergency Response Inventory

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics 5-State Region  Highways:  7,800 Miles  $126 Billion Value  Bridges:  3,660 Simply Supported  490 Continuous  250 Major  $11 Billion Value  Aircraft Facilities:  93 Airports  9 Heliports  $763 Million Value Transportation Exposure

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics 5-State Region  Potable Water:  76 Facilities  5,900 mi. of Pipe  $3.7 Billion Value  Waste Water:  4 Major Facilities  $1.1 Billion Value  Electrical Power:  5 Major Plants  $2.2 Billion Value Utility Exposure

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics General Building Stock Exposure (by distance from source, $Millions) Residential: Commercial: Industrial: Total: Total Building Stock Exposure:$80.2 Billion Within 40 mi.Over 40 mi. $34,400 $25,800 $ 8,500 $ 4,300 $ 2,400 $ 2,100 $46,900 $33,300

New Madrid Earthquake Project Study Region Overview and Characteristics 5-State Region  Magnitude 6.5 in Downtown Memphis (35.1N 90.0W)  Project 97 East Coast Attenuation  Max. PGA = 0.95g Ground Shaking Intensity

New Madrid Earthquake Project Health and Medical Services Plan and Implementation Capability 5-State Region  Number of HAZMAT Sites by Shaking Intensity  Light: 54  Moderate: 238  Considerable: 221  Strong: 82  Severe: 81  Violent: 240 Hazardous Materials Sites and Ground Shaking Intensity

New Madrid Earthquake Project Health and Medical Services Plan and Implementation Capability 5-State Region  Number of Nighttime Injuries by Severity Basic Medical Aid: 2,810 Non-Life Threatening: 480 Life Threatening: 84 Fatal: 50 Nighttime Injuries vs. Hospital Functionality

New Madrid Earthquake Project Transportation Plan and Implementation Strategy Greater Memphis Region  Approx. 800,000 nighttime residents plus emergency personnel  50,000 vehicles/day average capacity for 430 area bridges Emergency Route Planning: Population vs. Route Capacity

New Madrid Earthquake Project Transportation Plan and Implementation Strategy Greater Memphis Region  Approx 15% of Bridges Operational  10 Operational  47 Operational w/ Damage  16 Restored w/in 30 Days  365 Restored after 30 Days  Surface Streets most viable Alternate Routes  Majority of 5-State Region Bridges are Undamaged Emergency Route Planning: Scenario Impact on Bridges

New Madrid Earthquake Project Housing Recovery Strategy 5-State Region  Displaced Households: 11,667  Shelter Locations (Schools)  Available: 549  Unavailable: 329  Nearest Available School is 15 mi. from Epicenter Displaced Households and Shelter Locations

New Madrid Earthquake Project Housing Recovery Strategy 5-State Region  Total Households: 700,000  Households Without Water: 320,000  Households Without Power: 469,000 Households without Water or Power

New Madrid Earthquake Project Emergency Management Assistance Compact Functionality: Emergency Response, Aircraft and Communications Facilities Emergency Response Aircraft Facilities Communications

New Madrid Earthquake Project Post-Disaster Building Inspection Capability 5-State Region  Total Structures: 625,000  Yellow Tags: 107,000 (17%)  Yellow Tags - Moderately to Extensively Damaged, Limited Access Projected No. of Yellow Tagged Structures

New Madrid Earthquake Project Post-Disaster Building Inspection Capability 5-State Region  Total Structures: 625,000  Red Tags: 25,000 (4%)  Red Tags - Extensive to Completely Damaged, Access Prohibited Projected No. of Red Tagged Structures

New Madrid Earthquake Project Post-Disaster Building Inspection Capability 5-State Region  Total: 4.7 Million tons  Brick/Wood: 2.5 Million tons  Steel/Concrete: 2.2 Million tons  Max. Debris in a Single Tract: 130,000 tons Estimated Amount of Debris Generated

New Madrid Earthquake Project HAZUS Applications General Building Stock Losses (by distance from source, $Millions) Residential: Commercial: Industrial: Total: Total Building Stock Loss: $14 Billion (17%) Within 40 mi. Over 40 mi. $ 7,400 (21%) $120 $ 5,000 (58%) $ 70 $ 320 (13%) $ 10 $13,800 (29%) $230

New Madrid Earthquake Project HAZUS Applications 5-State Region  Number of Dams: 953  Number of High 1 Hazard Dams by Shaking Intensity:  Light: 7  Moderate: 45  Considerable: 18  Strong: 16  Severe: 19  Violent: 5 1 USACE Hazard Classification Dam Inundation Potential