Sue Cullen Program Manager, CSUN Universal Design Center Accessibility Network Product Testing Coordinator for the CSU ATNetwork Alen Davoudian Web Developer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accessibility, Joomla! Markup languages and you
Advertisements

LYDIA HARKEY EIR ACCESSIBILITY OFFICER TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY COMMERCE FALL Implementing Accessibility Strategically at Your Organization.
Strategies For Creating Accessible University Webpages Scot Close and Neil Torrefiel Web Services Unit San Jose State University.
WAHEP Website Check-up A Look at the Project Midway Website Evaluations.
Sue Cullen Program Manager, CSUN Universal Design Center Accessibility Network Product Testing Coordinator for the CSU ATNetwork.
Website Accessibility Testing Todd M. Weissenberger Web Accessibility Coordinator University of Iowa
An Evaluation and Discussion of the Web Accessibility of Academic Library Web Sites.
Integrating Accessibility into PDF Documents Sean Keegan Web Accessibility Instructor High Tech Center Training Unit for the California Community Colleges.
Web Accessibility Web Services Office of Communications.
2/23/ Enterprise Web Accessibility Standards Version 2.0 WebMASSters Presentation 2/23/2005.
Browser Toolbars You Shouldn’t Do Without How the WAT and WDT Can Help You Design Accessible Websites.
Introduction to Web Accessibility. What is Web Accessibility Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web Disabilities including.
Building Accessibility Into The Workflow Rick Ells Computing & Communications University of Washington Seattle, Washington
Thomas Johnson Director, Procurement & Contracts 3488 Accessibile Technology Compliance.
Accessibility of UW Information Technology Technology that works for all the ways people access UW services The same code that is best for Stephen Hawking’s.
Web Communications Division Fixing and Preventing Accessibility Errors in Microsoft PowerPoint Presentations.
Technology should be usable to everyone regardless of their individual characteristics.
WCAG 2.0 California State University, Los Angeles.
Electronic & Information Technology Purchases Process PAB Monday, December 12 th, 2011.
Accessible Technology Initiative
WEBINAR SERIES: ACCESSIBLE INTERACTIVE DOCUMENTS Week 3: Accessible Web Forms Norman Coombs
Implementing IT Accessibility on Your Campus: Sharing Strategies That Succeed.
Electronic and Information Resources (EIR) Accessibility in Cooperative Contracts Procurement June 2013.
Technology Access In Post-Secondary Education Ron Stewart Managing Consultant AltFormat Solutions LLC.
Making Web Content Accessible to Everyone Web Accessibility Team June 9, 2015.
Evaluation of Products for Accessibility: The CUDA Lab at CSULB and Technical Evaluation at the Campus Level Fred Garcia and Shawn Bates.
The Internet Writer’s Handbook 2/e Web Accessibility Writing for the Web.
The Online Experience: Accessibility & Usability for Everyone Richard W. Smith.
Ensuring Web Accessibility for ALL Students A Campus-wide Initiative NACADA – Southeast Regional Conference April 14, 2012 Margaret Turner, Director Jorja.
WEB DESIGN USING DREAMWEAVER. The World Wide Web –A Web site is a group of related files organized around a common topic –A Web page is a single file.
Design and Construction of Accessible Web Sites Michael Burks Chairman Internet Society SIG For Internet Accessibility for People with Disabilities June.
How to evaluate technology for accessibility Terrill Thompson Technology Accessibility Specialist University of
Emily Gibson The College of New Jersey An Evaluation of Current Software Tools* Evaluation & Repair Software.
Practical Accessibility Testing The High Tech + High Touch Recipe for Success Photo by StarsApart.
Software Project Documentation. Types of Project Documents  Project Charter  Requirements  Mockups and Prototypes  Test Cases  Architecture / Design.
WEB ACCESSIBILITY. WHAT IS IT? Web accessibility means that people with disabilities can use the Web. Web accessibility encompasses all disabilities that.
Chapter 9 Design guidance and design rationale. UIDE Chapter 9 Sources of Design Guidance Standards Standards –User interface standard Design Guidelines.
Taking on the Elephant in the Room: Implementing Innovation Procurement Processes.
Technical Communication A Practical Approach Chapter 14: Web Pages and Writing for the Web William Sanborn Pfeiffer Kaye Adkins.
Speakers: Sue Cullen – Assistant Director Accessible Technology Initiative, California State University Dawn Okinaka - Accessible Technology Specialist.
The Disability Resource Center Web Accessibility Assessment for Everyone.
 Accessibility & Information Architecture Presented by Liz Molleur INF385E April 5 th, 2009.
Nancy Egan, CUNY Electronic Resources Librarian, and Adina Mulliken, Hunter College Social Work Librarian May 6, 2016 CUNY Accessibility Conference Digital.
Web Accessibility June 2, 2016 Evaluation and Workflow.
Creating Section 508 Compliant Documents & Presentations
Section 508 Survived Year One, on to Year Two
Testing for Accessibility with Common Screen Readers
Section 508 At long last, two of the most looming accessibility questions in the United States have been answered.
Making your web site accessible a11yoz.com/maximise
Techniques, Tools and Resources for Making WordPress Website WCAG 2
Community Engagement Web Community Manger (WCM) - Schoolwires
Logistics Audio is also available over a phone line:
Sue Cullen Program Manager, CSUN Universal Design Center Accessible Product Testing Coordinator, California State University Accessible Technology Network.
Web Accessibility Technology should be usable to everyone regardless of their individual characteristics.
Introduction to Web Accessibility
Training program: simple manual evaluation of websites & use of automated testing tools — a blended approach Sue Cullen Assistant Director Accessible.
Procurement of Accessible ICT The Procurement Process
Implementing Digital Accessibility
Creating Section 508 Compliant Documents & Presentations
Colorado State University Web Accessibility
Web Content Accessibility Beata M. Ofianewska (DG COMM) 7 December 2006 December 2006 COMM C2.
Building Accessibility Into The Workflow
Creating Section 508 Compliant Documents & Presentations
International University of Japan
From compliance to usability
Accessibility Tips for Your Office
George Mason University
Demystifying Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
WebAIM Screen Reader Survey Results
Presentation transcript:

Sue Cullen Program Manager, CSUN Universal Design Center Accessibility Network Product Testing Coordinator for the CSU ATNetwork Alen Davoudian Web Developer / IT Consultant

UDC Mission Assist the campus community in creating pathways for individuals to learn, communicate, and share via information technology. Help the campus community design-in interoperability, usability, and accessibility into information technology so that individual learning and processing styles, or differences in physical characteristics are not barriers to accessing information.

UD Principles Resource:

UDC Services: Consultation/Training of Instructional Materials compliance and usability Web application developers training to design-in web compliance and usability evaluation Consultation regarding accessibility and usability policy Compliance and usability testing for purchased, promoted, or supported (PPS) campus software. (based on campus impact) Maintaining a vetted, centralized repository of ATI training material Research, identify or create compliance standard application coding techniques. Compliance testing of websites, software and electronic devices.

Cultural Change for Web Design Web Developers Design Standards Compliance Standards Usability Standards Integrate compliance standard skills into the everyday work habits and expectation of employees.

Finding your way through the maze of compliance standards Design/Evaluate/Repeat Compliant and Usable Technology

Fire Bug Wave Colour Contrast Analyser Juicy Studio Grayscale tool/odolflphhameojgliipcnahnipmogigo (Chrome) tool/odolflphhameojgliipcnahnipmogigo Web Developer Extension Compliance Sheriff Compliance-Sheriff-Limited-Feature-Guide.docx Compliance-Sheriff-Limited-Feature-Guide.docx Accessibility Evaluation Toolbar evaluation-toolb/

Protocols for Compliance & Usability Testing Level I Review VPAT information for confusing or unclear remarks and explanation resulting in significant barriers. Consider Campus or System Wide Impact of the product. If egregious issues found, conduct manual testing to validate claims or lack of accuracy based on Impact considerations. Share VPAT back to the vendor with additional UDC comments. Level II Limited criteria validation based on application type Examples: Web form applications (form fields labels, input mask, error handling) Basic web page (link & semantic requirements, tab order and images) Complex web navigation pages (all previously listed criteria plus keyboard accessibility, tables, CSS, navigation, scripting and Assistive Technology testing ). Concurrently: Run Compliance Sheriff (C.S.) level IV scan based on appropriate check points. Use as a guide for manual checking. Recommendations and resources provided. Level III Criteria validation based on CSU ATI Requirements and full UDC Testing Guide implementation. Comprehensive testing (all previously listed criteria plus usability testing ) Applications have coding that requires additional research and reiterative testing of coding solutions validation. Detailed recommendations and resources provided. Concurrently: Run C.S. level IV scan with manual testing. As needed provide actual coding or work around for end user.

UDC Evaluation Categories Section 508/WCAG 2.0 U.D. Principles Alternative Descriptions Images Image Map Scripting Multimedia Interactive Multimedia Screen Movement Structure Semantic Requirements Frames Tables Comprehensive Visual Display Visual Redability Stylesheet Color User Interface Navigation Keyboard Accessibility Timed Responce Forms Navigation Link Requirements

CSUN Universal Design Center Evaluation Clients VPAT Impact Validate Claims Level of Testing Test Cycle Decision Campus Clients CSUN websites CMS Development Environment Pioneering Tech Group Applications The Center for Visual Communication University Advancement Student Affairs Academic Web Team Division of Information Technology Other Clients CSU Chancellor’s Office CA Department of Rehabilitation CA Secretary of State Various Product Vendor Reviews

CSUN Universal Design Evaluation Clients - VPAT VPAT Impact Validate Claims Level of Testing Test Cycle Decision 1.Purchase Request E&IT Procurement Checklist CSU Guide to Completing the VPAT (Voluntary Product Evaluation Template) 2.Documentation regarding accessibility 3.Product User Guide/Manual 4.Confirm proper criteria reported

CSUN Universal Design Evaluation Clients - Impact VPAT Impact Validate Claims Level of Testing Test Cycle Decision 1.Impact (Customer, Campus, Users) 2.Product purpose and function 3.Area of use 4.Type of users 5.Deployment plan Two people today Enterprise tomorrow

CSUN Universal Design Evaluation Clients – Validate Claims VPAT Impact Validate Claims Level of Testing Test Cycle Decision 1.Review accessibility related criteria in VPAT 2.Analyze vendor’s remarks 3.Map vendor’s remarks to associated areas of functionality Based on information review of “Impact” 4.Validate claims and evaluate evidence 5.Clarify the extend of the support 6.Reject or confirm the claims 7.Conclude the level of testing to be conducted

CSUN Universal Design Evaluation Clients – Level of Testing VPAT Impact Validate Claims Level of Testing Test Cycle Decision Level I : Review VPAT information for confusing or unclear remarks and explanation resulting in significant barriers. Level II: Limited criteria validation based on application type Example: Web form applications (form fields labels, input mask, error handling) Level III: Criteria validation based on CSU ATI Requirements and full UDC Testing Guide implementation.

CSUN Universal Design Evaluation Clients – Test Cycle VPAT Impact Validate Claims Level of Testing Test Cycle Decision 5- Impact

CSUN Universal Design Evaluation Clients – Decision VPAT Impact Validate Claims Level of Testing Test Cycle Decision

Accordion Menu Solution Coding methodologies: ARIA Methods: to help user navigation and interaction jQuery Scripting: to control user interaction Example:

Important Negative Impact Improper Form Field Labeling and Error Message Handling Lack of full Keyboard Navigation Headers being chosen based on how they look rather than their structural value. Moving elements without a pause/play mechanism Data tables without proper mark up Image element in an anchor with no ALT text and no link text Same link text leading to different resources

User Interface How do you know if the form is missing ? Wave Toolbar or Compliance Sheriff Web Content Accessibility Issues:

Proper Use of Header Proper Use Improper Use Improper Use: Proper Use:

Moving elements without a pause/play mechanism Example:

Data Tables without proper markup Example:

Image Element in an Anchor without Alt Text and without Link Text Example:

Same Link Text leading to different resources Example (Web Content Accessibility Issues):

Compliance Sheriff Report View Example (Web Content Accessibility Issues):

UDC Evaluation Reports UDC Resources: