Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College November 30, 2011 Critical Design Review RockSat- C.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Arduino?  Arduino is a ATMEL 168 micro-controller kit designed specially for small projects  User friendly IDE(Integrated Development Environment)
Advertisements

Developing a tool to monitor and help prevent concussions Instrumented Football Helmet Development Team Joseph Jackson (ME) Adam McCauley (ECE) Shawn Kachnowski.
Data Acquisition Risanuri Hidayat.
RockSat-C 2012 CoDR Minnesota Sound Wreckers Conceptual Design Review University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson.
Home Area Networking for the Smart Grid Erik Cates David Green Daniel Han Justin Michela ECE 4007 Koblasz/Maxwell Fall 2010 In Conjunction With: Unmesh.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew.
Protocol & Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Proposal Analysis Review NMSGC Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Data Test Review Spaceport America Student Launch University/Institution Team Members Date.
Flight Readiness Review New Mexico Space Grant Consortium University/Institution Team Members Date.
P08009 Audible Memo Board Phase II Friday, February 22, 2008 P08009: Audible Memo Board Phase II Sponsor: Dr. Hopkins Advisor: Professor Slack Jon GosligaElectrical.
Stevens Institute of Technology - New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Critical Design Review Mike Giglia, Ethan Hayon Robert Hopkins.
S.W.A.T (Security Watching All the Time) Jeff Shin Tyler Stubbs Paul Kasemir Pavel Mayyak.
Preliminary Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Critical Design Review Northwest Nazarene University Advisor: Dr. Lawrence Chad Larson Ben Gordon Seth Leija David Vinson Zach Thomas Drew Johnson.
Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date.
Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College October 3, 2011 Conceptual Design Review RockSat- C.
University of Wyoming Charles Galey, Nicholas Roder, Peter J. Jay, William Ryan 10/14/
Good Vibrations Conceptual Design Review University of Wyoming James Richey, Justin Thornton, Luke Voss, Jake Thatcher, Tony Allais Oct 27, 2008.
Space Cowboys. Mission Overview Objective – Accurately measure flight parameters including ambient and skin temperatures, pressure, acceleration, spin.
RockSat-C 2011 CoDR CSU RocketSat-C Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Isaiah Franka Jordan Rath Abby Wilbourn Mike Yeager 10/1/10 1.
Conceptual Design Review Metro State College of Denver Daniel Bass, Matt Hanley
LSU 10/09/2007System Design1 Project Management Unit #2.
Full Mission Simulation Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium at Stevens Institute of Technology and Rutgers University Ethan Hayon, Mark Siembab, Mike.
Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011 Individual Subsystem Testing Report.
(PDR ) University of Northern Colorado Nathan and Casey 11/14/08.
Critical Design Review Team Name University/Institution Team Members Date.
Group Members: Brad Cox Kevin Burkett Tera Cline Arthur Perkins CS10 Battery Management System.
The Pursuit for Efficient S/C Design The Stanford Small Sat Challenge: –Learn system engineering processes –Design, build, test, and fly a CubeSat project.
2014 CDR Team Name Critical Design Review CDR CDR Delieverables 1.Mechanical drawings in pdf format 2.Electrical schematics in pdf format 3.Completed.
RamRack Preliminary Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
MINNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Tom Thoe Bryce Doug Carlson 11/14/2008.
Kaitlin Peranski Spencer Wasilewski Kyle Jensen Kyle Lasher Jeremy Berke Chris Caporale.
Texas Integrated Energy Solutions. Development Team, Background, Objective, & Justification 2.
Team Members Jordan Bennett Kyle Schultz Min Jae Lee Kevin Yeh.
MUEV Phase III By: Kevin Jaris & Nathan Golick. Introduction Petroleum is a finite resource. Demand for clean energy is driving the increase in the production.
Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College October 26, 2011 Preliminary Design Review RockSat- C.
SDMAY11-01 Advisor: Dr. Ajjarapu Team Members: Luke Rupiper Shonda Butler Andrew Nigro Ryan Semler Chad Hand.
Hy-V.1 Skin Friction Sensor Experiment Presenters: Ryan F. Johnson Mitchell Foral-Systems November 24, 2008 University of Virginia.
Individual Subsystem Testing Report New Jersey Space Grant Consortium with Rutgers University Stevens Institute of Technology 2/13/2012.
TREADS Semester Review Dec. 14, Objectives Assess and Communicate Current Design Identify interfaces Approve the System Requirement Specification.
Michael Lisoski Leblanc Meneses Jason Schaer Bryan Staton.
RockSat-C 2012 SITR Full Mission Simulation Report University of Minnesota Alexander Richman Jacob Schultz Justine Topel Will Thorson 4/23/2012.
A.L.F. Enterprise n Electrical Parameters Measurement Component (EPMC) n Boris Fradkin ©A.L.F.Enterprise Boris Fradkin.
Incoming Power Grid Monitor TEAM #3: JAMES MCCORMICK, ZHIHOUG QIAN, JACOB JEBB, VICTOR EZENWOKO, ALEX LANGE FACILITATOR: DR. ASLAM SPONSOR: GREAT LAKES.
Home Area Networking for the Smart Grid Erik Cates David Green Daniel Han Justin Michela ECE 4007 Koblasz/Maxwell Fall 2010 In Conjunction With: Unmesh.
The Design of an Electronic Bicycle Monitor (EBM) Team P118: Gary Berglund Andrew Gardner Emrys Maier Ammar Mohammad.
Path The purpose of this project is to design a universal data recording device to monitor the health of a Dresser-Rand compressor during operation. In.
Subsystem Design Review P16203 Andre Pelletreau, Kerry Oliviera, Jeremy Willman, Vincent Stowbunenko, Kai Maslanka.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
MNROCK CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REVIEW University of Minnesota William Ung Scott Balaban Bryce Schaefer Tom Thoe 11/3/2008.
Launch Readiness Review
2013 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Section 2: The Payload! User’s Guide Compliance Beta Prototype Testing Section 3: Check-In.
BlackBox Sat Critical Design Review Colorado State University-Pueblo April 2, 2004 Greg Barela Jose Segovia Enrique Cornejo.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Preliminary Design Review Metro State College of Denver Matthew Hanley, Daniel Bass 14 November 2008.
CAPS FID Interface Board Midterm Presentation I Odai Ali James Owens Joshua Roybal.
Strain Sensing at High Altitude Annual Arizona Space Grant Consortium ASCEND! Andy Gee Pima Community College Mentor: Mike Sampogna Pima Community.
RamRack Conceptual Design Review Colorado State University Zach Glueckert Christopher Reed Timothy Schneider Brendan Sheridan Christina Watanuki Advisor:
Instrumented Walker Skyler Bullington Tommy Frankenberger Larson Stacy
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
JASMM Conceptual Design Review
Hawkeye Mechanical Design Snapshot
MOOG EMA Installation MSD1 - P12251
Digital Acquisition of Analog Signals – A Practical Guide
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
Solar Generation System
Detailed Design Review: P18001
Presentation transcript:

Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College November 30, 2011 Critical Design Review RockSat- C

Mission Overview Design Description Prototyping/Analysis Manufacturing Plan Testing Plan Outline of Presentation Risks User Guide and Compliance Project Management Plan

Mission Overview Erin Wilson

Mission Overview Goal Statement: Our goal is to design and implement various generators to passively collect energy for possible use for space based instrumentation. We expect to harvest energy from the flight of the rocket, solar, magnetic and other various sources.

Mission Overview Mission Requirements: For each transducer, voltage across a known resistor will be measured and data will be stored. ○ Some transducers may require amplification of voltage. The power used by COTS sensing package will be measured and stored. Measurable data from the COTS sensing package will be saved.

Mission Overview Discovery & Benefit: Expect to transduce available energy to electrical energy and possibly provide significant energy to supply space based instrumentations. Results may lower cost and power requirements for space science by reducing the weight of electrical system.

Mission Overview Organizational Chart

Mission Overview Concepts of Operations

Expected Results Transducers: Aubade- less than 5 volts Grow Hot- 5 volts maximum Crusher- 5 volts maximum Diving Board- 5 volts maximum Elvis millivolts Bristol- 0-5 volts Jerk- 0-5 volts EM Pendulum- 0-5 volts Electrical System: Collect voltage from transducers Save data to SD-card COTS Sensing Package (Purchased): Collect physical data throughout the flight of the rocket Save information to SD card

Design Description Mechanical Michael Brown

Mechanical Design De-Scopes & Off Ramps Most transducers are to be completed as designed. Diving Board may off ramp from a piezoelectric cantilever beam to an aluminum beam with externally mounted piezo actuator, based on budget constraints. Full scale rocket has been de-scoped to a kit as opposed to a custom build. May implement a fractal design coil to harvest the earth’s electromagnetic field.

Mechanical Design Dimensions of Diving Board Neodymium Block: 1/4” x 1/4” x 1/2” Cristal Quartz Cantilever: 1” x 3” x 1/4”, 1/2” x 3/4” (notch removed) 6061 Aluminum Base: 1/2” x 1” x 1” base; 1/4” x 1” x 1” cap 30 Gauge Magnet Wire Coil: 1/4” x 5/8” diameter

Mechanical Design Dimensions of EM Pendulum Bowl ○ Height: 1 1/4”, Top: 2 1/2”, Bottom: 0.500” Magnet ○ Height: 0.88”, OD: 0.39” Ball Joint ○ Plate: 0.40”, 30 Gauge Magnet Wire Coil: 1/16” around bowl

Mechanical Design Dimensions of Bristol Neodymium Sphere: 1/2” 6 Layers of 30 Gauge Magnet Wire: 1/16” 6061 Aluminum Torus ○ Outer Diameter: 3” ○ Inner Diameter: 2 1/8” ○ Mounting Fixtures with 0.116” hole: 1/4” x 1/4” x 3/4"

Mechanical Design Dimensions of Jerk 1” Outer Diameter x 3/4” Inner Diameter Height: 4.5” 30 Gauge Magnet Wire Coil: 2” length and 6 layers (at 1/16”)

Mechanical Design Dimensions of Elvis Lavalier Microphone 11.9 mm x 5.3 mm x 2.8 mm Dimensions of Aubade Photovoltaic Panel: 2.9” x 3” Dimensions of Crusher Piezoelectric Block: 1” x 1” x 1 1/2"

Mechanical Design Overview- Physical Model

Design in Canister Right ViewLeft ViewFront View

Plates Bottom Plate

Plates Middle Plate Arduino’s Not Visible

Design Description Electrical Dylan Stobbe

Electrical Design De-Scopes No de-scopes have occurred to date or are currently planned. Off Ramps Change COTS sensing system if availability becomes an issue. Use alternative data logging system if OpenLog to Arduino interfacing becomes impossible.

Subsystem Overview- Block Diagram

Schematics for PCB’s

Electrical Design Major Functions Transducers supply voltage during flight profile. Op Amps amplify voltage. Rectifiers convert AC to DC. Low pass filters remove high frequency noise. Resistors allow calculation of power and current. Arduinos measure scaled voltage. COTS sensing package provides information on voltage used to allow comparison of transducer effectiveness. Open-logs store information from Arduinos and COTS sensing package.

System Level Software Flow Chart

Electrical Design Pseudo Code Int inputVoltage = 0; //declare variables Void setup() { Serial.begin(300); } void loop() { //read voltages int voltage=analogRead(inputVoltage); //display voltages in serial monitor Serial.print(inputVoltage); }

Design Description Test/Software John Benfield

Test Design De-Scopes & Off Ramps No de-scopes to date. Off Ramps: ○ Include using a component rocket only if problems arise with the full-scale rocket. ○ Using a vibration analysis demonstrator for shake table analog. Changes Since PDR Will purchase a kit rather than building a full-scale rocket.

Prototyping & Analysis Nathan Keller

Prototyping & Analysis Arduino Prototyping Tested Arduino at multiple baud rates with multiple sources of voltage. ○ Measured Arduino’s own 5v and 3.3v outputs as well as an external 4.8v NiMH battery. ○ Arduino returned accurate values for each trial.

Prototyping & Analysis Key Results Accurately read DC voltage from various sources. Data procured at acceptable baud rates demonstrated that the Arduino Mega is an acceptable microcontroller.

Prototyping & Analysis Prototypes Completed to Date 4 inch diameter scale rocket 42 inch length

Test Completed to Date Grow-Hot produced voltage. Aubade produced voltage. Elvis produced voltage. Jerk produced voltage.

Testing Completed to Date Key Results Elvis ○ Produced milivolts maximum. Aubade ○ A single solar cell will produce milivolts maximum. Jerk ○ Produced volts maximum. Grow-Hot ○ Produced milivolts maximum.

Prototypes Completed to Date Jerk Aubade Grow Hot Elvis

Prototyping Completed to Date Key Results Jerk ○ Completed a nominal design. Bench tested and produced reasonable voltage. Grow Hot ○ Acquired prototype TEC and determined test methodology with results obtained. Aubade ○ Acquired multiple solar cells, determined test methodology with results obtained. Elvis ○ Acquired multiple microphones and tested over a wide range of input frequencies and amplitudes.

Prototyping & Analysis PEGASIS Mass Budget SubsystemTotal Mass (lb) BSTL.26 (by hand) EMPD.08 DVBD.18 (by hand) JERK.35 CRSH.11 ABDE.02 ELVS.01 Total1.01 Over/Under (including electrical & hardware) 0.78

Prototyping & Analysis Detailed Power Budget SubsystemQuantityVoltage (V)Current (A)Time in Use (min) Amp- Hours ARD BB OL OpA Total:0.155 Amp- Hours

Manufacturing Plan Mechanical Gary Staggers

Mechanical Manufacturing Plan Need to be manufactured: Makrolon Plates Bowl base of EM Pendulum Housing of Bristol Mounting the base of Diving Board Test canister in plastic

Mechanical Manufacturing Plan Still need to be procured: Neodymium magnets for Diving Board and Bristol Piezoelectric cantilever beam 4-40 bolts Photovoltaic panel Microphone (Elvis) Angle brackets

Mechanical Manufacturing Plan Manufacturing Plan 1/9: Flights Awarded 1/20: Jerk, Aubade, Grow Hot, Crusher, Elvis procured 1/25: Parts received, ready to assemble EM Pendulum, Bristol and Diving Board 1/30: Online progress report 3 due 2/10: Remaining transducers completed 2/11: Shake table/ spin tests 2/12: Test data analysis 2/13: Individual subsystem test due

Manufacturing Plan Electrical Dylan Stobbe

Electrical Manufacturing Plan Manufacturing Plan 1/9: Flights Awarded 1/25: Interface Arduinos to OpenLogs; procure remaining electrical system components 1/30: Progress Report Due 2/10: Remaining electrical components completed 2/11: Shake table/ spin tests 2/12: Test data analysis 2/13: Individual subsystem test due

Manufacturing Plan Software Dylan Stobbe

Software Manufacturing Plan Discrete Blocks of Code Arduino to OpenLog interface code. Explore voltage measuring further. ○ Simultaneous voltage measurements from each transducer COTS sensing package to slave Arduino interfacing code. Countdown timer program to run in background.

Software Manufacturing Plan Code co-dependencies: ○ The DataLogging blocks of code will be the backbone of the experiments success, special attention must be paid to this part of the software. Create beta version of payload software by mid February to allow time for reiterations and testing of mechanical components.

Testing Plan System Level Derek Spencer

Testing Plan Verify payload can withstand high G forces and strong vibrational forces. Hardware mounts, electrical connectors, circuit boards and transducer prototypes will need to remain functional after testing. Test will include a mock-up payload (containing legacy equipment) in conjunction with a full-scale rocket measuring 10” in diameter and 98” long and incorporating a Cesaroni J1520 motor to provide valuable insight into survivability of components during flight. Mock-up payloads will be tested on custom-built shake tables (high & low frequency).

Test Rocket

Testing Plan Mechanical Level Derek Spencer

Mechanical Testing Plan Tests will be conducted for structural integrity. Individual components will be tested on a small-scale rocket and shake tables. Measurements of G forces and vibrational forces will be taken to decide if the components retain their functionality and structure during flight simulation.

Testing Plan Electrical Level Derek Spencer

Electrical Testing Plan Tests to include: ○ Magnetic interference ○ How to shield from interference ○ Shrink wrap and tie durability when under stress and increased heat ○ Current flow ○ Connections between transducers/sensors and Arduinos ○ Individual components tested on a small-scale rocket & shake tables

Testing Plan Software Level Derek Spencer

Software Testing Plan Testing and debugging will be conducted by the electrical team in conjunction with electrical systems test. Testing of software components will be conducted on a scale rocket flight, shake table, and bench top testing. Software tests will be incorporated into some of the mechanical tests to determine compatibility.

Risks Bradley Hager

Risks Since PDR RareUnlikelyPossibleLikely CriticalBCF.RSK GSM.RSK CatastrophicRTC.RSK MSD.RSK  RTC.RSK: Rocket CATO  MSD.RSK: MicroSD card fixturing ineffective  BCF.RSK: Battery cell fails(internal delamination, overcurrent shorts battery, etc…)  GSM.RSK: G-force issues on surface mount electronics Mitigation  Rocket CATO is out of our control  Shake Table Testing of fixturing for MircoSD Card  Proper testing and ensuring that wiring is properly grounded  Shake table testing of surface mount electronics

New Risks RareUnlikelyPossibleLikely MarginalARF.RSK Critical CatastrophicRTC.Risk  RTC.Risk: Rocket CATO  ARF.RSK: Anomalies in rocket flight  UPE.RSK: Unforeseen programming errors Mitigation  No mitigation available  Debug and test Arduinos for program  Bench test and testing on full scale rocket will reveal programming errors

User Guide Compliance Beau Brinkley

User Guide Compliance The mass of the payload, including canister, is lbs. The center of mass of our canister is within the 1”x1”x1” envelope requirement, verified using Autodesk Inventor. The payload will be powered by a 7.2 volt NiMH battery. Design of payload will utilize a 1.SYS.1 activation.

Sharing Logistics PEGASIS will be partnering with the New Jersey Space Grant. They plan to collect and analyze data for future space research through various experiments. Planned communication will take place via teleconferences, Google Chat & Google Docs along with Vyew. Pegasis will leave the top plate clear for the New Jersey Space Grant Team. Allowing for variable capability to move CG and adapt in z & theta without constraining our partner. Scheduled teleconference with New Jersey Space Grant December 5th

Project Management Plan Beau Brinkley

Management Budget Overview

Management Milestone Schedule

Management Work Package Schedule

Management Task Schedule

Management Work Breakdown Structure Project Phase 1 Timeline 8/15/2011 – 1/9/2012 Project Phase 1 Deliverables Conceptual Design Review Preliminary Design Review Critical Design Review

Conclusion Plan of Action Order any parts that still need to be procured to complete prototypes. Finish all prototypes. Fly scale rocket and record data from flight. Objects to Finished Before Winter Break Prototype. Save test data to open logs.