Successfully Developing & Managing Wastewater Pipeline/ Manhole Condition Assessment & Rehabilitation Programs Presented from a municipal perspective…

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Facilities Capital Planning and Management A program management overview prepared for Ferndale School Districts Facilities Planning Committee.
Advertisements

Ninth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 pm, Thursday, September 13
Presented by: Ronald O. Nichols LADWP General Manager
Pavement Management Program Overview February 10, 2015 Presented By: Christopher J. Ott, E.I.
Counties General Services Association Spring 2014 Conference Always On Through Anticipating Facilities Issues.
Darton Ito Manager, Long Range & Capital Planning Drew Howard
Gwinnett County’s Post Development Stormwater Management Program
Department of Environmental Conservation
Farnsworth GROUP Rocky Mountain Section - American Water Works Association 2002 Joint Annual Conference CONDITION ASSESSMENT of Pinery Water and Wastewater.
QUALITY MANAGEMENT DEFINITIONS AND CONCEPTS QUALITY MANAGEMENT TOOLS QA / QC PROCESS COMPUTERS AND PROJECT QUALITY.
Copyright © 2007 Advantica Inc. (USA Only) and Advantica Ltd. (Outside USA). All rights reserved by the respective owner. Benefits of an Integrated Compliance.
Advancing Construction and Program Management Worldwide 1 Expanding Facility Condition Assessment in the Information Age Michael D. Dell’Isola, PE, CVS,
Coatings & Lining for Underground Infrastructure.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
Bob Schneider & Kelly Green Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Revolving Loan Section.
PMSS Final SOW May 22 nd, Statement of Work 2 GLENN RESEARCH CENTER PROJECT MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES (PMSS) The Contractor shall provide expert.
1 IT Governance 2006 Strategy/Business Case Presentation Department of Human Services.
Unit 1 Community Capabilities
Short-term rehabilitation planning of water distribution networks Tomáš Kučera Ladislav Tuhovčák BRNO UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Faculty of Civil Engineering.
U.S Conference of Mayors August 2004 Mayor’s ’04 Metro Agenda Bipartisan Priorities Statement Directed for candidates in Presidential and Congressional.
Long Range Infrastructure Planning The Gilbert, Arizona Experience Kenneth C. Morgan, PE Public Works Director.
ANNUAL REPORT Monitoring Reports 2010 Monitoring Reports 2010  Every month SSD is required to send a monitoring data report to the State Water.
The View from Wall Street: A Capital Markets Perspective Debra G. Coy Svanda & Coy Consulting 2010 Mid-America.
New Decade - New Challenges Annual Conference September 2010 Water Services Training Group 14 th Annual Conference New Decade – New Challenges 9 th September.
SSES and GIS, A Great Partnership Cindy Fort, PE Technical Director Environmental Engineering and Jeff McCann GIS Coordinator.
Office of Facilities Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council Deferred Maintenance UTSA Strategic Resource Planning Council March.
Physical Building Audit Physical Building Audit By; Engr.Dr.Attaullah Shah PhD ( Civil) Engg, MSc Engg ( Strs), BSc Engg ( Gold Medalist),), MBA, MA (
1 Underground Asset Management Jonathan Mongie. 2 Asset Management ► Improved Asset Condition l Increased System Efficiency ► Prolonged Asset Life l Reduced.
Overview Asset Management (AM) is a systematic process of operating, maintaining, upgrading and disposing of assets cost- effectively while maintaining.
October 22, 2004 Holistic Asset Management – It’s Not an Isolated Function 2004 Urban Water Council US. Conference of Mayors.
2008 Facility Plan Update May Purpose  Comprehensive Plan through 2033 –Builds on Past Work –Adjust for Changing Conditions  Identify Capacity,
System Engineering & Economy Analysis Lecturer Maha Muhaisen College of Applied Engineering& Urban Planning.
BIM Bridge Inspection and Maintenance Technical Standards Branch Class B Bridge Inspection Course Inspection Policies and Procedures INSPECTION POLICIES.
METRO WASTEWATER RECLAMATION DISTRICT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
Paper # LOS ANGELES COUNTY PRIORITIZATION OF SEWER REHABILITATION PROJECTS Fernando Villaluna, P.E. 1.
ASSOCIATED BENEFITS OF mSCOA IN THE ASSET LIFE CYCLE
WVSD SANITARY SEWER REHABILITATION PROGRAM 2006 Sewer Smart Summit Presented by Peter V. Sevcik, P.E. West Valley Sanitation District Campbell, California.
Active Corrosion Process Nisource – COH/CKY. Objectives  Understanding the terminology –Active Corrosion –& Suspected Areas of “Active Corrosion”  Developing.
MultiMedia by Stephen M. Peters© 2002 South-Western Control Techniques.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
ANNUAL REPORT Monitoring Reports 2011 Monitoring Reports 2011  Every month SSD is required to send a monitoring data report to the State Water.
Snohomish County Planning Commission Briefing August 26,
PROF. DR. FEVZİ YILMAZ Fatih Sultan Mehmet Vakıf University, Faculty of Engineering, İstanbul ICSG ISTANBUL 2015, APRIL.
1 Financial management for water, sewer, and storm water systems Most financial management of water, sewer, and storm water systems takes place in a government.
NC AWWA-WEA 95th Annual Conference
Digital Innovation and Data Integration Key to Successfully Managing Charlotte’s Sewer Rehab Program Aaron Frazier - Frazier Engineering Keith Shirley.
Equipment Life Optimization Program (ELOP) Doug Hilleman February 10, 2011.
ACEC National Energy and Environment Challenges in Asset Management? Brian Long Transmission Line Performance Xcel Energy August 15, 2015.
Mandy Holway Olver, P.E. Olver Associates Inc. Winterport, Maine.
Towards a dependable and sustainable National IT Infrastructure MANAGING IT INFRASTRUCTURE ASSETS: IMPLEMENTATION NEEDS.
ODOT Culvert Inventory & Inspection Program. Ohio defines a bridge as any structure with span or diameter equal to or greater than 10 feet as measured.
Asset Degradation Modelling at Townsville Water
Water & Sewer CCTV Inspection Methods & Techniques
Asset Management in the Arab Region and its Role in Improved Performance and Utility Efficiency Lina Sheqem Cowater International.
Pipeline Assessment Certification Program (PACP) Benefits of Version 7
AND AFTER INSTALLATION Technical Director, NASSCO
TRENCHLESS TECHNOLOGY (TT) IN SMART CITIES
Duffin Creek WPCP Optimized Renewal Planning & Decision-Making
Rehabilitation Program impact on Sewer Management
Kentucky Lead Workgroup Recommendations
Village of Ruidoso Water and Wastewater Systems
INTRODUCTION TO THE BRIDGE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE SYSTEM (BIM)
Gull lake sewer + water authority
Quality Assurance For Trenchless Pipeline Rehabilitation
The Asset Management Journey for Building Assets
WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT 19 September 2018
City of Greater Sudbury Lining Program Overview. Brittany Hallam, P
Managed Content Services
Bridging the Gap between Asset Performance, Cost of Service and Risk
Gary Fitzjarrell AIA, CHFM Brent Rutherford CEM, CHFM, CBCP
Presentation transcript:

Successfully Developing & Managing Wastewater Pipeline/ Manhole Condition Assessment & Rehabilitation Programs Presented from a municipal perspective… Presented by: Jeff Maier, P.E. Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Denver, Colorado

The challenges municipalities are facing:  ASCE’s 2009 Report Card for America’s Infrastructure: Grade for Wastewater Infrastructure is a “D –”  Cost effective asset management programs are more important than ever  Doing more with less is the new normal  Tighter EPA & CDPHE regulations  Funding issues & aging systems

The importance of condition assessment and rehabilitation  Understanding your system is vital – wastewater infrastructure is crumbling!  Out of site, out of mind is no longer acceptable  Critical component of successful asset management and budgeting  Regulatory compliance issues  Operation & Maintenance requirements  Knowledge about your system = good decision making

Benefits of effective condition assessment and rehabilitation  Reduces overflows, violations & failures  Prioritizes repair and maintenance efforts  Reduces emergency repairs or dig & replace  Modern technologies utilize trenchless condition assessment and rehabilitation techniques  Can save a lot of money!

Attributes of a successful condition assessment & rehab program  Goals and responsibilities are defined  Organized & methodical  Administered by qualified staff and/or consultants  Uses available modern technologies  QA/QC is paramount  Reduces risk  Helps asset management & maintenance efforts  Improves capital expenditure planning

Condition Assessment Technologies & Management Techniques Available  CCTV inspection  Advanced Pipe Condition Assessment Systems (Redzone, Cleanflow, PPR, etc.)  Pole Cameras  Manual and Entry Inspection Methods  Database systems for inspection information storage  GIS interfaces & state-of-the-art inspection software  Consistent rating systems (NASSCO’s PACP & MACP)

Rehabilitation Technologies Available Pipeline Rehabilitation:  CIPP Lining  UV-Cured CIPP Lining  Sliplining  Fold & Form Sliplining  Structural Epoxy lining  Spiral-Wound & Panel lining  Cementitious lining  Trenchless Point Repair Methods It’s critical to understand each of the technologies; especially of the technologies; especially strengths & limitations. strengths & limitations.

Rehabilitation Technologies Available Manhole Rehabilitation:  Epoxy Coating/ Lining  Poly-Urea Coating/ Lining  Urethane Coating Lining  Calcium Aluminate Mortar  Cured in Place Liners  Fiberglass Inserts  HDPE Manhole Inserts  Cementitious Lining  Polymer Mortars

Metro Wastewater’s Interceptor & Manhole Condition Assessment & Rehab Program  Systematic, consistent, & cost-effect approach to assessing & rehabilitating pipe and manhole conditions pipe and manhole conditions  In-house developed program  Collaborative effort between Engineering, Comprehensive Planning, and Operations & Maintenance (O&M) Departments  Balances operational, financial, and engineering needs

Metro Wastewater’s Interceptor & Manhole Condition Assessment Program  Pipes inspected mainly by using CCTV  In-house CCTV using MWRD crews  5-category pipe condition rating system  3-category manhole condition rating system  Manholes surface & entry inspected  Utilizes advanced condition assessment technologies Program utilizes customized database system and GIS interface

Defined Departmental Roles & Workflow  O&M Department – Televise pipelines (CCTV), inspect manholes/ structures, enter inspection info into database, initial condition rating  Engineering Department – Review CCTV footage, follow-up inspection of manholes, assign final condition rating, generate prioritization list & reports, design & manage rehabilitation project, research new technologies  Comprehensive Planning – Review rehabilitation prioritization lists & reports, update & manage Capital Expenditure Schedule Interdepartmental Cooperation & Responsibility: Results in successful in-house condition assessment and rehabilitation program. Interdepartmental Cooperation & Responsibility: Results in successful in-house condition assessment and rehabilitation program.

Program Components: CCTV Inspection  CCTV video inspections: Minimum of 10% of pipe segments annually  10 year video cycle for entire interceptor system  CCTV work performed in-house by O&M Department crews  In-house CCTV ensures consistency, eliminates scheduling issues, & ultimately saves money  Customized 5-category rating system

Program Components: CCTV Review, Condition Rating Classification & Reporting  5-category CCTV review criteria developed in- house  Rating criteria based on reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) conditions, but can be applied to all pipe materials  Rating system is comparable to NASSCO’s Pipeline Assessment & Certification Program (PACP), but meets specific needs of MWRD  Specific definitions of each category define rehabilitation urgency and time frame for rehabilitation completion

Program Components: CCTV Review, Condition Rating Classification & Reporting Good – No rehab at this time, maintain 10 yr cycle Good – No rehab at this time, maintain 10 yr cycle Fair – No rehab at this time, maintain 10 yr cycle Fair – No rehab at this time, maintain 10 yr cycle Fair-Poor – Rehab may be necessary (5-10 yrs) Fair-Poor – Rehab may be necessary (5-10 yrs) Poor – Rehab is necessary (2-5 yrs) Poor – Rehab is necessary (2-5 yrs) Very Poor – Rehab needed ASAP (0-2 yrs) Very Poor – Rehab needed ASAP (0-2 yrs) Pipeline Rehabilitation report cost estimates based on condition ratings of Fair-Poor, Poor, and Very Poor only.

Program Components: Manhole/ Structure Inspection Manhole surface & entry inspection examples:

Program Components: Manhole/ Structure Condition Rating Classification & Reporting Good – No rehab at this time, maintain 10 year inspection cycle year inspection cycle Fair – No rehab at this time, maintain 10 year cycle, monitor as needed cycle, monitor as needed Poor – Rehabilitation is necessary (1-3 yrs)

Program Components: GIS Mapping Example GIS Map & Legend

Program Components: Interceptor Infrastructure System Database (IIS)  CCTV & Manhole inspection data maintained real-time in IIS database  IIS database developed in-house  Oracle based system  Manages inspection data, physical pipe & manhole info, and GIS system  Streamlined condition assessment program  Access searchable pipe & manhole/ structure condition information

Program Components: Supplemental Pipe Coring Activities  Core drill sampling on selected pipe segments  Coring used to confirm remaining pipe thickness  Candidates for coring are pipe segments that may be rated in either category (i.e. fair-poor or poor)  Coring work done by outside contractor  Info entered into IIS database, compare to existing data & reevaluate current condition rating  Samples used to verify & check CCTV rating system

Research & Development New Condition Assessment Technologies  Ongoing research of non-destructive methods to determine pipe condition & wall thickness  Laser profiling, sonar systems, & combo assessment technologies (RedZone, CleanFlow. PPR)  Will replace supplemental coring  Will help improve rehabilitation prioritization CCTV will still provide majority of inspection information (CCTV ~90%, new method ~10%)

Research & Development Testing & Product Evaluation  MWRD’s 6-Step Manhole/ Concrete Rehabilitation Product Evaluation Program In-house developed program In-house developed program Evaluates products and applicators Evaluates products and applicators Helps ensure QA/QC Helps ensure QA/QC  Severe Wastewater Analysis Test (SWAT) Evaluates coating/lining effectiveness & longevity in severe wastewater headspace environments Evaluates coating/lining effectiveness & longevity in severe wastewater headspace environments Laboratory and real-life test comparisons Laboratory and real-life test comparisons Accelerated test chamber & electrical impedance tests Accelerated test chamber & electrical impedance tests

Long-term Capital Expenditure Planning Interceptor Pipes  Assumes pipes will be rehabilitated with CIPP lining for cost estimating purposes  Other rehab methods considered during design (slip lining, fold & form, epoxy-lined, etc.)  Cost estimates based on past MWRD rehab projects  Historical CIPP cost data for pipe sizes 8”-60”  Current MWRD CIPP cost estimate data (installed price): 8”- 30” = $3.75 per in/ft 31” – 41” = $4.50 per in/ft 42” – 60”+ = $6.00 per in/ft

Long-term Capital Expenditure Planning Manholes/ Structures  Assumes manholes will be be rehabilitated with epoxy coating/lining for cost estimating purposes  Other rehab methods considered during design (other coating/liner types, CAM, fiberglass, HDPE)  Cost estimates based on past MWRD rehab projects past MWRD rehab projects

Prioritization for Pipe & Manhole Rehabilitation Projects  Pipe segments rated “very poor” will be repaired on priority basis (i.e. next available rehab project)  Adjoining “poor” segments will be added when shared bypass pumping cost savings can be realized  Assumed that only 75% of “poor” and “fair-poor” rated pipes will ever reach “very poor” condition  Projected timing for when pipe segment or manhole will deteriorate and reach “poor” or “very poor” is considered  Manholes rated as “poor” will be repaired on priority basis (i.e. next available rehab project)  10-year Capital Expenditure Schedule updated accordingly

Conclusions  A well-run Condition Assessment & Rehabilitation Program provides a systematic, consistent, & cost- effective approach to asset management  Supports long term capital expenditure planning  Effective in forecasting future maintenance needs, prioritizing resource allocation, and costs based on inspection & condition assessment ratings  Reduces potential overflows, violations & failures  Utilizes trenchless technology  Can save a lot of money!

Questions? Jeff Maier, P.E. Metro Wastewater Reclamation District Denver, Colorado