Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Hysterectomy The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA 2004;291:1701-1712.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Women's Health Initiative
Advertisements

Women’s Health Initiative - Summary of results DISCLAIMER Menopausetoday gives the following presentation for your information and.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Heart and Estrogen/progestin Replacement Study (HERS) and HERS II: Secondary Prevention.
Cardiovascular Disease in Women Module VI: Update on Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs)
Women’s Health Study: Vitamin E in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Julie E. Buring.
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
Women's Health Study: Low-Dose Aspirin in Primary Prevention Presented at American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. Dr.
TRANSCEND: Telmisartan Randomized AssesmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease ONTARGET / TRANSCEND Investigators Koon K. Teo,
JANET P. PREGLER, MD; CAROLYN J. CRANDALL, MD, MS. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE. 2011; 155: JULIANNA L. MURPHY PHARM.D. CANDIDATE PRECEPTOR: ALI RAHIMI,
Results of Monotherapy in ALLHAT: On-treatment Analyses ALLHAT Outcomes for participants who received no step-up drugs.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT)
A Randomized Trial of a Multivitamin in the Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease in Men: The Physicians’ Health Study II HD Sesso, WC Christen, V Bubes,
Hormonal Replacement Therapy for postmenopausal females: To give or not to give? Amna B. Buttar, MD, MS Assistant Professor of Clinical Medicine Indiana.
The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial ALLHAT study overview Double-blind, randomized trial to determine whether.
Clinical implications. Burden of coronary disease 56 millions deaths worldwide in millions deaths worldwide in % due to CV disease (~ 16.
1 Health Risks and Benefits 3 Years After Stopping Randomized Treatment With Estrogen and Progestin The WHI Investigators.
Cardiovascular Disease in Women Module V: Prognosis and Treatment Outcomes.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Women’s Health Initiative: Trial of Estrogen plus Progestin 16,608 women randomized 16,608.
Women’s Health Initiative: HRT Trial Baseline Data and Update on Follow-up Marcia L. Stefanick, Ph.D. Associate Professor of Medicine and of Obstetrics.
Lecture 17 (Oct 28,2004)1 Lecture 17: Prevention of bias in RCTs Statistical/analytic issues in RCTs –Measures of effect –Precision/hypothesis testing.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
PPAR  activation Clinical evidence. Evolution of clinical evidence supporting PPAR  activation and beyond Surrogate outcomes studies Large.
The Women’s Health Initiative Hormone Trials The Estrogen Only (women with a hysterectomy at baseline) and the Estrogen + Progestin (women with a uterus)
Antiplatelet Therapy Use and the Risk of Venous Thromboembolic Events in the Double-Blind Raloxifene Use for the Heart (RUTH) Trial C. Duvernoy 1, A. Yeo.
Estrogen plus Progestin, BMD and Fractures: Women’s Health Initiative Jane A. Cauley University of Pittsburgh JAMA 2003; 290 (13) :
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Best first ? The ATAC completed treatment analysis Professor Jack Cuzick Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK.
FDA Presentation ODAC Meeting July NDA Applicant: Eli Lilly Evista ® (Raloxifene Hydrochloride)
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
WHI CT Sample Size, Outcomes, Follow-up Women, aged Total CT = 68,133 Diet Modification (DM) Trial Primary Outcomes: Breast & Colorectal Cancer Secondary.
Copyleft Clinical Trial Results. You Must Redistribute Slides HYVET Trial The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
1 ENTEREG ® (Alvimopan) Special Safety Section Marjorie Dannis, M.D. Division of Gastroenterology Products Office of Drug Evaluation III CDER, FDA The.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
TRANSCEND: Telmisartan Randomized AssesmeNt Study in aCE iNtolerant Subjects with Cardiovascular Disease ONTARGET / TRANSCEND Investigators Koon K. Teo,
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
LIPID: Long-term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease Purpose To determine whether pravastatin will reduce coronary mortality and morbidity.
Food and Drug Administration Regulatory Implications of The WHI Study Eric Colman, MD Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Division of Metabolic and.
A Diabetes Outcome Progression Trial
Breast Cancer in the Women’s Health Initiative Trial of Estrogen Plus Progestin For the WHI Investigators Rowan T Chlebowski, MD., Ph.D.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
MENAPOUSE. Natural Surgical premature RETROSPECTIVE Cessation of menstruation for 12 months In the absence of other physiological or psychological.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) Design Sever PS et al. J Hypertens 2001;19:1139–1147.
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
1 Risk Benefit and Conclusions George Sledge, MD Indiana University School of Medicine.
DIABETES INSTITUTE JOURNAL CLUB CARINA SIGNORI, D.O., M.P.H. DECEMBER 15, 2011 Atherothrombosis intervention in metabolic syndrome with low HDL/High Triglycerides:
Presentation Title R3 이지영 / 김 수 중교 수 님. Introduction Lowering LDL cholesterol levels with statins : Reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease Vascular.
Date of download: 5/31/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Estrogen Plus Progestin and Breast Cancer Incidence.
Date of download: 6/2/2016 Copyright © 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. From: Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Health Outcomes During.
The JUPITER Trial Reference Ridker PM. Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2195–2207.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
1 Effect of Ramipril on the Incidence of Diabetes The DREAM Trial Investigators N Engl J Med 2006;355 FM R1 윤나리.
Date of download: 6/27/2016 From: Systematic Review: Comparative Effectiveness of Medications to Reduce Risk for Primary Breast Cancer Ann Intern Med.
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
The Rise and Fall of Hormone Replacement Therapy
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
The following slides highlight a presentation at the Late-Breaking Clinical Trials session of the American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November.
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
The following slides are from a Cardiology Scientific Update in which Dr. Gordon Moe reported and discussed an original presentation by Drs. Bjorn Dahlof,
Cardiovascular Disease in Women Module VI: Update on Menopausal Hormone Therapy and Selective Estrogen Receptor Modulators (SERMs) This slide set was.
Simvastatin in Patients With Prior Cerebrovascular Disease: HPS
Presentation transcript:

Effects of Conjugated Equine Estrogen in Postmenopausal Women with Hysterectomy The Women’s Health Initiative Randomized Controlled Trial JAMA 2004;291:

Postmenopausal Hormone Use Observational studies suggested –30%– 50% reduction in cardiac risk –8% – 30% increase in breast cancer –Strong benefit for osteoporosis In 1980’s – 90’s –Increasing use of hormone therapy for long-term cardiovascular disease prevention

WHI Hormone Trial Specific Aims Primary Endpoint: To test whether CEE reduces the incidence of CHD and other CVD –Definition of CHD: Nonfatal MI plus CHD death Primary Safety Endpoint: To assess whether CEE increases the risk of breast cancer Secondary Endpoints: To test whether CEE reduces the incidence of hip fractures and all osteoporosis-related fractures separately

Women’s Health Initiative Timeline

WHI Hormone Trial Design Hysterectomy CEE mg/d + medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) 2.5 mg/d E Alone N = 10,739 YES NO Placebo Conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) mg/d Placebo E + P N=16,608

Eligibility Age years at first screen Postmenopausal Likely to reside in clinic area for at least 3 years Providing written informed consent

Excluded if: Severely underweight Severe hypertension (>200/105) Severe menopausal symptoms Substance abuse, mental illness, dementia History of: –Cancer in last 10 years –Melanoma any time –Stroke or heart attack in last 6 months –Previous fractures treated with hormones Any condition likely to limit survival < 3 yrs So these were generally healthy women and this was a primary prevention trial

Follow-up Methods 6 weeks after randomization: phone contact –Assess symptoms –Reinforce adherence Every 6 months: phone or clinic contact –Assess adherence –Assess symptoms –Determine if outcomes had occurred Annually: clinic visit –Mammograms + clinical breast exams –Assess adherence –Assess symptoms –Determine if outcomes had occurred

Study Medication Use Intolerable symptoms e.g., breast tenderness –Reduced number of days of treatment –No unblinding for management Major event possibly related to hormones –Study meds stopped Temporarily for fracture, immobilization, surgery Permanently for breast CA, DVT/PE, malignant melanoma, meningioma, TG > 1000 mg/dl, if participant’s health provider prescribed open label hormones Resumption up to participant’s health provider for MI or stroke –No unblinding for discontinuation of medications

Ascertainment of Outcomes Self report of diagnosis/hospitalization Medical records obtained Local WHI physician adjudicated (coded) events (blinded to treatment assignment) Central adjudication (blinded to treatment assignment) –CHD –Stroke –VTE –Cancer –Hip fractures

Events during the Hormone Trial April 2000 – Participants notified of increase in CV events during first 2 years July 2001 – Participants informed risk does not disappear after 2 years July 2002 – –E+P trial intervention terminated due to increased breast cancer risk and overall risks exceeding benefits; Principal results published (JAMA 2002;288: ). –E alone trial is continued. February 2004 – NIH terminates E-alone intervention due to increased stroke risk and absence of CHD benefit March 1, 2004 – E- alone participants stop study pills

Baseline Characteristics of women in the WHI Estrogen alone trial

Age at entry CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = (30.8)1673 (30.8) (45.0)2465 (45.4) (24.2)1291 (23.8)

Age of E-alone participants at entry Percent

Race/Ethnicity Percent

Age at hysterectomy CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 < (39.8)2149 (39.8) (43.2)2275 (42.2) (9.5)566 (10.5) > (7.6)404 (7.5)

Bilateral Oophorectomy CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Bilateral Oophorectomy 1938 (39.5)2111 (42.0)

History of Hormone Use CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Never2769 (52.2)2770 (51.1) Past1871 (35.2)1948 (35.9) Current (3 month wash-out before randomization) 669 (12.6)708 (13.0)

Duration of prior hormone use CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 < 5 yrs1352 (53.2)1412 (53.1) 5-10 yrs469 (18.5)515 (19.4) > 10 yrs720 (28.3)732 (27.5)

Body Mass Index CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 < (21.0)1096 (20.3) (34.0)1912 (35.5) > (45.0)2383 (44.2) Mean BMI30.1

Smoking Status CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Never2739 (51.9)2705 (50.4) Past1986 (37.8)2089 (38.9) Current542 (10.3)571 (10.6)

Medical History CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Prior MI * 165 (3.1)172 (3.2) CABG/PTCA * 120 (2.3)114 (2.1) Angina308 (5.8)306 (5.7) Stroke76 (1.4)92 (1.7) DVT/PE87 (1.6)84 (1.5) * 441 (4.1%) women with “hard” CHD events prior to enrollment (> 6mos)

CHD Risk Status at Entry CEE N = 5310 Placebo N = 5429 Diabetes treatment410 (7.7)411 (7.6) Hypertension (Rx or > 140/90) 2386 (48.0)2387 (47.4) Elevated Cholesterol (on Rx) 694 (14.5)766 (15.9) Statin Use394 (7.4)427 (7.9) Aspirin Use1030 (19.4)1069 (19.7)

Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment NMeanSDNMeanSD Age (yrs) at screening BMI (kg/m 2 ) Systolic BP (mm Hg) Diastolic BP (mm Hg) CEE Placebo

Ethnicity White Black Hispanic American Indian Asian/Pacific Islander Unknown CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

Treated diabetes Treated for hypertension or BP > 140/90 High cholesterol requiring pills Statin use at baseline Aspirin (>80mg) use at baseline CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

History of MI History of angina History of CABG/PTCA History of stroke History of DVT or PE CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

Hormone use Never Past Current Duration of prior hormone use (years) < CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

Parity Never pregnant / no term pregnancy >1 term pregnancy Age at first birth < CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

Female relative had breast cancer CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

Fracture at age Falls in last 12 months or more CEEPlacebo N%N%N%N% Baseline Characteristics of E-alone Participants (N=10,739) by Randomization Assignment

Cumulative Drop-out and Drop-in Rates by Randomization Assignment and Follow-up Time

Intermediate Outcomes

Lipid Levels (8.6% subsample) Percent change, 1 yr

Clinical Outcomes

CEE and Coronary Heart Disease Events (Annualized %) by randomization assignment CHD † 177(0.49%)199(0.54%)0.91(0.75,1.12)(0.72,1.15) CHD Death54(0.15%)59(0.16%)0.94(0.65,1.36)(0.54,1.63) Non-fatal MI132(0.37%)153(0.41%)0.89(0.70,1.12)(0.63,1.26) * Adjusted for multiple comparisons across time (OBF procedures). A Bonferroni adjustment for 6 outcomes was applied to all outcomes other than CHD, Breast Cancer and the global Index. † CHD includes acute MI requiring hospitalization, silent MI determined from serial electrocardiograms and coronary deaths. There were 14 silent MIs. 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted *

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for CHD CHD HR, % nCI,

CHD events by years since randomization YearCEEPlaceboHR P-value for trend with time, 0.02.

Risk of CHD events by prior disease CEEPlaceboHR95% CI Prior MI or revascularization (N=441) No prior disease

CEE and Stroke Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Stroke158(0.44%)118(0.32%)1.39(1.10,1.77)(0.97,1.99) Fatal stoke15(0.04%)14(0.04%)1.13(0.54,2.34)(0.38,3.36) Non-fatal stroke114(0.32%)85(0.23%)1.39(1.05,1.84)(0.91,2.12) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Stroke Stroke HR, % nCI,

Risk of stroke by prior disease CEEPlaceboHR95% CI Prior stroke (N=168) No prior stroke

CEE and Venous Thromboembolic Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment VTE † 101(0.28%)78(0.21%)1.33(0.99,1.79)(0.86,2.08) DVT † 77(0.21%)54(0.15%)1.47(1.04,2.08)(0.87,2.47) PE † 48(0.13%)37(0.10%)1.34(0.87,2.06)(0.70,2.55) † VTE, venous thromboembolic disease; DVT, deep vein thrombosis; PE, pulmonary embolism 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for PE PE HR, % nCI

CEE and Cardiovascular Disease Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Total CVD811(2.25%)746(2.01%)1.12(1.01,1.24)(0.97,1.30) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

CEE and Cancer Incidence (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Invasive breast94(0.26%)124(0.33%)0.77(0.59,1.01)(0.57,1.06) cancer Colorectal cancer61(0.17%)58(0.16%)1.08(0.75,1.55)(0.63,1.86) Total cancer372(1.03%)408(1.10%)0.93(0.81,1.07)(0.75,1.15) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Breast Cancer Invasive Breast Cancer HR, % nCI,

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Colorectal Cancer Colorectal Cancer HR, % nCI,

CEE and Fracture Events (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Hip fracture38(0.11%)64(0.17%)0.61(0.41,0.91)(0.33,1.11) Vertebral fracture39(0.11%)64(0.17%)0.62(0.42,0.93)(0.34,1.13) Total fracture503(1.39%)724(1.95%)0.70(0.63,0.79)(0.59,0.83) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Hip Fracture Hip Fracture HR, % nCI,

CEE Summary Measures (Annualized %) By randomization assignment Death from other193(0.53%)185(0.50%)1.08(0.88,1.32)(0.79,1.46) causes Total death291(0.81%)289(0.78%)1.04(0.88,1.22)(0.81,1.32) † Global index is the first event for each participant from among the following types: CHD; stroke; PE; breast cancer; colorectal cancer; hip fracture; and death from other causes. Global index † 692(1.92%)705(1.90%)1.01(0.91,1.12)(0.89,1.14) 95% CI CEEPlaceboHazard RatioNominalAdjusted

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Death Death HR, % nCI,

Kaplan-Meier Estimates of Cumulative Hazards for Global Index Global Index HR, % nCI,

Causes of Death (Annualized Percentages) by Randomization Assignment CEEPlacebo Number randomized Mean follow-up time (months) Total deaths291(0.81%)289(0.78%) Adjudicated deaths278(0.77%)272(0.73%) Cardiovascular93(0.26%)95(0.26%) Breast cancer4(0.01%)8(0.02%) Other cancer110(0.30%)118(0.32%) Other known cause51(0.14%)38(0.10%) Unknown cause20(0.06%)13(0.04%)

CEE Effects on Cardiovascular Outcomes by Age

CEE Effects on Cancer Outcomes by Age

CEE Effects on Hip Fracture by Age

Summary Measures of CEE Effects by Age

Sensitivity Analyses HR (compliers)HR (int. to treat) Stroke PE Total Mortality CHD Breast CA Colorectal CA Hip fracture Higher risk; Lower risk

Women’s Health Initiative Trial of E–Alone Summary

Absolute risk differences per 10,000 person/years with CEE 12 more strokes (p =.007) 6 fewer hip fractures (p =.01) –56 fewer osteoporotic fractures at any site (p <.001) 7 more VTE events (ns) 7 fewer breast cancers (ns) 5 fewer CHD events (ns) No difference in colorectal cancer No difference in total mortality No difference in pre-defined global index

WHI E-Alone: summary 1 st large-scale, long-term, randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled trial to test unopposed estrogen on rates of chronic diseases finds that CEE –Increases risk of stroke –Reduces hip and other fractures –Does not significantly affect CHD rates –Does not increase risk of breast cancer risk

Implications CEE provides no clear benefit for chronic disease prevention Overall findings support current FDA recommendations to use postmenopausal hormone therapy for severe symptoms, at the lowest effective dose, for the shortest time. Women should be counseled about stroke risk, but no increased risk of heart disease or breast cancer for 6.8 years of use.