Determine conservation objects: biodiversity objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 2 © Christina Lehmann 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Page 1 The Ecosystem Services Approach and TEEB in the context of German Development Cooperation TEEB Country Studies – Learning from Experience and how.
Advertisements

Systematic Conservation Planning, Land Use Planning and SEA in South Africa Sustainable development embodied in Constitution Secure ecologically sustainable.
Recommendations to Inform Development of a Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Watershed Climate Change Adaptation Strategy for the Lake Simcoe.
Community consultation 3 September – 10 December 2012 Draft ACT Nature Conservation Strategy.
Determine conservation objects: (biodiversity-dependent) human wellbeing objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 3 © Christina Lehmann.
Analysis of systemic activity and the strategic relevance of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis.
Wiltshire Green Infrastructure Strategy. What is green infrastructure? The Wiltshire Green Infrastructure Strategy Wiltshire’s existing green infrastructure.
Analysis of the future criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 12 © Pierre Ibisch.
Operational planning and implementation of measures Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 25 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Problem Definition Exercise. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service General Summary Responses from ½ of those surveyed (n=14/31) Broad and narrow in scope Narrow.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
Understand the relevant actors and stakeholders Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 15 © Christina Lehmann 2015.
Strategic Planning & the Duty to Co-operate Andrew Pritchard Director of Policy & Infrastructure.
Analysis of knowledge and manageability of stresses, threats and contributing factors Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre.
APAPDC National Safe Schools Framework Project. Aim of the project To assist schools with no or limited systemic support to align their policies, programs.
Monitoring of results, impacts and research Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 26 © CEEM 2014.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
Page 1 FICCI MSME Workshop /10/2015 Making BDS Market Work For MSEs Amit Kumar, GIZ Private Sector Development.
Implementation of TARGET 2 of the EU 2020 Biodiversity Strategy Claudia Olazábal Unit – Biodiversity DG ENV European Commission Nature Directors Meeting.
Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Region Stavroula Tournaki, Chemical Engineer MSc, ΕU Projects Manager Konstantinos Voumvourakis,
Stakeholder consultations Kyiv May 13, Why stakeholder consultations? To help improve project design and implementation To inform people about changes.
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements.
Jonathan Long and Carl Skinner With Contributions from the Science Synthesis Team USDA FS Pacific Southwest Research Station SocialEcological.
Revision and validation Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 16 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
1 Examples on Natura 2000 forest management on private areas Timo Soininen, M.Sc. Forestry Forestry Development Centre Tapio
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Identification of existing strategies and “strategy mapping” Phase III Evaluation, prioritisation and strategy formulation Step 17 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Knowledge and non-knowledge management Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 27 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Exercise: Pros and Cons of National Climate Funds.
Results webs, goal and objective setting and monitoring design Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation Step 24 © Pierre.
Mbombela Climate Change Workshop 2 5 November 2015 Civic Centre Hall, Mbombela.
Analysis and filling of strategic gaps: the development of complementary strategies Phase III Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation.
Define the geographical scope of management Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 1 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Organise, revise and complete the systemic conceptual model Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014.
Regional biodiversity planning The Regional Plan – making it work for the SW Naomi Brookes South West Regional Biodiversity Co-ordinator.
Evaluation and revision of the underlying concept Phase IV Implementation and (non)-knowledge management Step 29 © Pierre Ibisch 2013.
Spatial analysis and priority setting Phase II Systemic risk and vulnerability analysis Step 9 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
© 2014 Core Knowledge Foundation. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
CEPF Strategic Funding Direction 3 Meeting: 28 th June, 2006 Outcomes Monitoring: Status & trends in biodiversity Establishing standard regional monitoring.
Short overview of the legal framework of protected sites and status of existing ecological networks in Serbia.
Define the initial management vision Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 4 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
Company LOGO. Company LOGO PE, PMP, PgMP, PME, MCT, PRINCE2 Practitioner.
Challenges in conservation Alan Law, Director for Biodiversity Delivery, Natural England.
3rd EIONET workshop on Climate Change Impacts, Vulnerability and Adaptation EEA, 30 June 2009 SEBI 2010, climate change and connectivity Katarzyna Biała.
1 IUCN GL GLPA Standard Framework Matthew Wenban-Smith (Technical Support to Green List PA Steering Group) 25 th February 2014.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Results Chains. Copyright and Use Terms Under this license, you are free to share this presentation and adapt it for.
2A.Develop a Formal Action Plan: Goals & Strategies © Foundations of Success December 2008.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
Assessment of the current status of the biodiversity objects Phase II Systemic Vulnerability and Risk Analysis Step 5 © Christina Lehmann 2014.
19th Council of Europe Meeting of the Workshops for the Implementation of the European Landscape Convention The implementation of the European.
Identifying contributing factors to threats
Assessment and prioritization of existing strategies
Phase II Systemic Risk and Vulnerability Analysis Step 6
Visualisation of systemic relationships
Assess criticality of stresses, threats and contributing factors
Module 0.1 Participants introduction / Preliminary stocktaking Trainer: [Name] Note to trainer:   During the NAP country-level training, the participants.
Module V.2 NAP as a living document Trainer: [Name]
Water and Marine Directors meeting Spa, 2-3 December 2010
Visualisation of systemic relationships I
Comprehensive evaluation, prioritization and strategy formulation
DG Environment, Nature Protection Unit (D3)
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
Ecology: Sustainable Ecosytems
Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD)
River Basin Management Plans
EU Marine Strategy DG Environment B.1.
EU biodiversity policy: Towards a post-2010 strategy
Green Infrastructure and Natura 2000
Conception for lands of high natural value – international agreements
FINANCING NATURA 2000 Agenda item 2.1 CGBN Co-ordination Group
Presentation transcript:

Determine conservation objects: biodiversity objects Phase I Preparation and Initial Conceptualisation Step 2 © Christina Lehmann 2014

Credits and conditions of use 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects2 You are free to share this presentation and adapt it for your use under the following conditions: You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the authors (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). You may not use this work for commercial purposes. If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you must remove the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management logo, and you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar conditions to this one. © Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, 2014 The Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management strongly recommends that this presentation is given by experts familiar with the adaptive management process in general (especially as designed as the Conservation Measures Partnership’s Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation) as well as the MARISCO Method itself. This material was created under the leadership and responsibility of Prof. Dr. Pierre Ibisch and Dr. Peter Hobson, co- directors of the Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, which was jointly established by Eberswalde University for Sustainable Development and Writtle College. Compare: Ibisch, P.L. & P.R. Hobson (eds.) (2014): The MARISCO method: Adaptive MAnagement of vulnerability and RISk at COnservation sites. A guidebook for risk-robust, adaptive, and ecosystem-based conservation of biodiversity. Centre for Econics and Ecosystem Management, Eberswalde (ISBN ). 195 pp. - The Powerpoint Presentation was conceived by Christina Lehmann and Pierre Ibisch. Authors of graphs and photographs are indicated on the corresponding slides. Supported by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH on behalf of the Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung (BMZ).

2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects3

Learning objectives Participants understand the crucial strategic contribution of this step shaping the further planning process as all further analysis and strategies developed in the ongoing process will aim at the conservation of these biodiversity conservation targets; and further identified human wellbeing targets are depending on it. Participants have the skills to guide a team through the process of identifying important systems of the conservation site that represent compositional elements of an ecosystem, but also the processes, structures and dynamics that govern them. ´Participants dispose of the skills to facilitate the visualization of the relations and nested-ness of the selected biodiversity conservation objects. 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects4

? Outline What does determining biodiversity objects mean? Why do we determine biodiversity objects? How do we determine biodiversity objects? Practical Tips 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects5

? What does determining biodiversity objects mean? Analysis of ecosystems of the studied region Agreement on and selection of certain (elements of the analysed) ecosystems that deserve a special focus in their conservation Could be either this or/and that 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects6 © Christina Lehmann 2014

? Why do we determine biodiversity objects? Limitation on focus objects out of an infinitive variety of biodiversity Recognition of nestedness of conservation- and biodiversity objects Focus on most important repre- sentatives of biodi- versity objects that have been agreed on 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects7 © Christoph Nowicki 2013 © Pierre Ibisch 2011 © Christoph Nowicki 2013 © Christina Lehmann 2012 © Christoph Nowicki 2013 © Christoph Nowicki 2013, Pierre Ibisch 2011, Christina Lehmann 2012 © Christina Lehmann 2012

? How do we determine biodiversity objects? Gather knowledge of the area’s specific, prioritised biodiversity from participants Take into account not just specific measures such as species, habitats and population but also their connections, processes, structures and dynamics of the system they create and belong to o E.g. consider types and amount of vegetation, rivers, water bodies but also energy-, material- and water providing and retention systems 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects8 © Pierre Ibisch 2014 …

? How do we determine biodiversity objects? Write biodiversity objects on green cards EDA serves as input → which systems provide energy, material, water, retention or other elements or services? Identification of spatial units at landscape scale (contain most important ecological processes) and their subsystems (terrestrial, aquatic) Focus on subsystems that significantly contribute to the larger system’s functionality 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects9 © CEEM 2014

? How do we determine biodiversity objects? 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects10 © CEEM 2014 Identification of species (groups or individuals) that are of special importance for the functionality of the ecosystem Cluster and order biodiversity objects Basis for visual interpretation →recognise connections, lever points, foci, role in ecosystem

? Practical Tips Some participants may have a certain connection to certain elements of their ecosystems – whenever you feel like an element seems to have a special (emotional) value for people, include it into the model Try to organise these elements into categories already, if possible (e.g. terrestrial, hydric, forests, agro-ecosystems etc.) 2. Determine conservation objects - biodiversity objects11