SGAM-Template.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Smart Grid: an Ontario Perspective Brian Hewson, Senior Manager Regulatory Policy Hamilton May 8, 2013.
Advertisements

NAESB Smart Grid Task Force PAP 03 Update Robert B. Burke – NAESB Task Force Co-Chair Jim Northey.
World Class Standards Smart Grids ETSI Strategic Topic Philippe Lucas © ETSI All rights reserved ETSI Smart Grid workshop, June 14th 2010.
The Utility View: Electrical Vehicle Impact IEEE CCW October 25, 2010.
IEC WG 19 Meeting Geneva, CH 2012/May/11 Architectural Methodology Joint NIST-SGAC / EU-M.490 RAWG Efforts.
SEBGIS 2005, Agia Napa, Cyprus, October 31 - November 4, 2005 MECOSIG Adapted to the Design of Distributed GIS F. Pasquasy, F. Laplanche, J-C. Sainte &
September 30, 2011 OASIS Open Smart Grid Reference Model: Standards Landscape Analysis.
Xanthus Consulting International Smart Grid Cyber Security: Support from Power System SCADA and EMS Frances Cleveland
Overview of OASIS SOA Reference Architecture Foundation (SOA-RAF)
IntelliGrid: Enabling The Power Delivery System of the Future Don Von Dollen EPRI IntelliGrid Program 9th International Symposium on Power- Line Communications.
Creating Architectural Descriptions. Outline Standardizing architectural descriptions: The IEEE has published, “Recommended Practice for Architectural.
By Lauren Felton. The electric grid delivers electricity from points of generation to consumers, and the electricity delivery network functions via two.
1 Objective of today’s lesson S oftware engineering occurs as a consequence of a process called system engineering. Instead of concentrating solely on.
1 ACTA R1 Smart Grid Communications Overview Trone Bishop Service Provider Representative (Verizon) September 9, 2010.
Architectural Design Establishing the overall structure of a software system Objectives To introduce architectural design and to discuss its importance.
© ABB SG_Presentation_rev9b.ppt | 1 © ABB SG_Presentation_rev9b.ppt | 1 Smart Grid – The evolution of the future grid Karl Elfstadius,
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT HIS – Smart Grid Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association Document No: GSC17-PLEN-72 Source:
American Electric Power (AEP) Virtual Power Plant Simulator (VPPS) Tom Jones, Manger – Corporate Technology Development American Electric Power Grid-InterOp.
EU Commission Task Force for Smart Grids Expert Group 3: Roles and Responsibilities of Actors involved in the Smart Grids Deployment Samia Benrachi-Maassam.
P/1 NEMA/NFPA/UL LVDC Conference April 8, 2011 Product Standards Ken Boyce Underwriters Laboratories Inc.
Lecture slides prepared for “Business Data Communications”, 7/e, by William Stallings and Tom Case, Chapter 8 “TCP/IP”.
LOGISTICS OPERATION Industrial Logistics (BPT 3123)
2015 World Forum on Energy Regulation May 25, 2015
Developing Enterprise Architecture
John McDonald 05 November 2013 SGIP Members Meeting.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Valentinetti – IT – S6 – 0838 The recharging infrastructure to support the mobility development in Italy optimising.
Enable Energy Efficiency Green I.T.: Reduce energy use of I.T. “IT for Green”: Use IT to improve energy use in buildings, transportation, grids, industry.
FirstEnergy / Jersey Central Power & Light Integrated Distributed Energy Resources (IDER) Joseph Waligorski FirstEnergy Grid-InterOp 2009 Denver, CO November.
לירן קציר Connectivity in Computers IEC TC 57 - Power system management and associated information exchange Established in 1964 – with focus.
Chapter 8 Architecture Analysis. 8 – Architecture Analysis 8.1 Analysis Techniques 8.2 Quantitative Analysis  Performance Views  Performance.
Common Information Model and EPRI Smart Grid Research
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION © IEC:2007 PC118 WG1 Draft Framework China PC 118/WG1 Meeting, , Santa Clara.
ITEC224 Database Programming
Doc.: IEEE /0047r1 Submission SGIP Liaison Report to IEEE Following the SGIP (2.0) Inaugural Conference Nov 5-7, 2013 Date:
© 2008 OSIsoft, Inc. | Company Confidential Smart Grid, Smart Metering and DSM OSIsoft and Cisco systems Arjen Zwaag- Cisco Martin Otterson- OSIsoft.
Demand Response Use Case & Functional Requirements Development UCAIug Meeting Jan 6, 2009 Mark van den Broek.
Meter, Facility Interfaces
Electrical Energy Transfer The Power Grid.  It involves a lot more than just flipping a switch or plugging something into an outlet!  If you have ever.
E-government models Lecture 8.
Geneva, Switzerland, April 2012 Introduction to session 7 - “Advancing e-health standards: Roles and responsibilities of stakeholders” ​ Marco Carugi.
Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Iiro Rinta-Jouppi – Sweden – RT 3c – Paper 0210 COMMUNICATION & DATA SECURITY.
2011 International Wind-Diesel Conference March 9, 2011 Remote System Architecture: Designs and Concepts Jito Coleman TDX Power.
Dec UtilityAMI OpenHAN TF Requirements Working Group Specification Briefing January 2008.
© 2005 Prentice Hall1-1 Stumpf and Teague Object-Oriented Systems Analysis and Design with UML.
MODEL-BASED SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURES.  Models of software are used in an increasing number of projects to handle the complexity of application domains.
© 2013, published by Flat World Knowledge Chapter 10 Understanding Software: A Primer for Managers 10-1.
Architecture View Models A model is a complete, simplified description of a system from a particular perspective or viewpoint. There is no single view.
Steady State Analysis Of A Microgrid Connected To A Power System
1 SOA Seminar Seminar on Service Oriented Architecture SOA Reference Model OASIS 2006.
EXEMPLE Novare: Vehicle to Microgrid Antoni Sudrià, CITCEA-UPC 2a Jornada Anual d’UPC Alumni Casa Llotja de Mar, Barcelona, 17 d’abril de 2013 Vehicle.
Unrestricted. © Siemens AG All rights reserved. Open Innovation 2.0 Dr. Walter Weigel VP External Cooperations Corporate Technology I Dublin, June.
Demand Response Use Case & Functional Requirements Development UCAIug Meeting Jan 6, 2009 Mark van den Broek.
Energy Systems Integration Facility May Renewable and Efficiency Technology Integration ESIF Supports National Goals National carbon goals require.
Submitted By: Preeti 376/09 EE-7 th SEM D.A.V INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY Submitted to: Mr. Parminder Singh Mr. Sushil Prashar.
Évora demonstrator site
Eric Peirano, Ph.D., TECHNOFI, COO
Eric Peirano BRIDGE Support Team, Technofi
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
STANDARDS AND THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED ELECTRICITY
Next Generation Distribution System Platform (DSPx)
Breakout Session on Smart Grid Data Analytics
Presentation of the three technological pilots
Évora Demonstrator Site
CHAPTER 2 CREATING AN ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN.
The Management of Renewable Energy
Electricity Distribution Network Design Training & Courses
Design of Electric Power Systems and Utilities
Karen Bartleson, President, IEEE Standards Association
12th IEEE PES PowerTech Conference
The Global Forum Electricity Ancillary Services and Balancing | Berlin, SmartNet Pilots: The demonstration of the different TSO-DSO coordination.
Presentation transcript:

SGAM-Template

The Smart Grid Architecture Model (SGAM): General: The SGAM framework and its methodology are intended to present the design of smart grid use cases in an architectural but solution and technology neutral manner. In accordance to the present scope of the M/490 program, the SGAM framework allows the validation of smart grid use cases and their support by standards. Smart Grid Plane: In general power system management distinguishes between electrical process and information management viewpoints. These viewpoints can be partitioned into the physical domains of the electrical energy conversion chain and the hierarchical zones (or levels) for the management of the electrical process Layers: In order to allow a clear presentation and simple handling of the architecture model, interoperability aspects are aggregated into five abstract interoperability layers.

SGAM-Domains: SGAM-Zones: Domain Description Bulk Generation Representing generation of electrical energy in bulk quantities, such as by fossil, nuclear and hydro power plants, off-shore wind farms, large scale photovoltaic (PV) power– typically connected to the transmission system   Transmission Representing the infrastructure and organization which transports electricity over long distances Distribution Representing the infrastructure and organization which distributes electricity to customers DER Representing distributed electrical resources, directly connected to the public distribution grid, applying small-scale power generation technologies (typically in the range of 3 kW to 10.000 kW). These distributed electrical resources can be directly controlled by DSO Customer Premises Hosting both - end users of electricity, also producers of electricity. The premises include industrial, commercial and home facilities (e.g. chemical plants, airports, harbors, shopping centers, homes). Also generation in form of e.g. photovoltaic generation, electric vehicles storage, batteries, micro turbines… are hosted SGAM-Zones: Zone Description Process Including both - primary equipment of the power system (e.g. generators, transformers, circuit breakers, overhead lines, cables, electrical loads …) - as well as physical energy conversion (electricity, solar, heat, water, wind …). Station Representing the aggregation level for fields, e.g. for data concentration, substation automation… Operation Hosting power system control operation in the respective domain, e.g. distribution management systems (DMS), energy management systems (EMS) in generation and transmission systems, microgrid management systems, virtual power plant management systems (aggregating several DER), electric vehicle (EV) fleet charging management systems. Enterprise Includes commercial and organizational processes, services and infrastructures for enterprises (utilities, service providers, energy traders …), e.g. asset management, staff training, customer relation management, billing and procurement. Market Reflecting the market operations possible along the energy conversion chain, e.g. energy trading, mass market, retail market...

Market Enterprise Generation Operation Transmission Station SGAM-Layers: The layers will be described during the application process. Business Function Information Communication Component Market Enterprise Operation Station Field Process Generation Transmission Distribution DER Customer

Step 3 – Sub-functionality Analysis and SGAM Classification After identifying all information that should be visualized, the next step is to analyze which parts of the SGAM are of interest. This is a first estimation where to locate the relevant elements of the sub-functionality to be visualized within each SGAM layer. It aims at reducing the complexity by only focusing the required part of the SGAM layers. On the next slide it is explained how all cells of the SGAM can be labeled with a unique identifier by using the x-, y-, and z-axes of the SGAM-coordination systems: Layers: A - E Domains: 1 - 5 Zones: a - f After that, the next two slides will briefly describe the meaning of the layers – as previously done for the zones and domains. In order to simplify the realization of this step, the Business Layer of the SGAM is utilized. The original meaning of that layer is only vaguely described so that it can be used in different ways. In case of visualizing sub-functionalities the business aspects are not in the scope – but they will be later in the project. Due to that reason it is suggested to start with the Business Layer in order to identify the zones and domains that have to be considered for the specific sub-functionality. Due to that reason the Business Layer is already considered during this step. Besides the layer itself also a slide specifying a legend for the used semantics is provided. Finally, the last slide of this step includes a table that can be used to summarize the cell-element-pairs of the SGAM and the sub-functionality. This can be derived from the collected information related to the sub-functionality.

Zones f e d c b a 1 2 3 4 5 Domains Interoperability Layers E D C B A Identifier: D4c Zones f e d c b a 1 2 3 4 5 Domains

Component Layer (A): The emphasis of the component layer is the physical distribution of all participating components in the smart grid context. This includes actors, applications, power system equipment (typically located at process and field level), protection and telecontrol devices, network infrastructure (wired/wireless communication connections, routers, switches, servers), and any kind of computers. Communication Layer (B): The emphasis of the communication layer is to describe protocols and mechanisms for the interoperable exchange of information between components in the context of the underlying use case, function or service and related information objects or data models. Information Layer (C): The information layer describes the information that is being used and exchanged between functions, services, and components. It contains information objects and the underlying canonical data models. These information objects and canonical data models represent the common semantics for functions and services in order to allow an interoperable information exchange via communication means.

Function Layer (D): The function layer describes functions and services including their relationships from an architectural viewpoint. The functions are represented independent from actors and physical implementations in applications, systems, and components. The functions are derived by extracting the use case functionality, which is independent from actors. Business Layer (E): The business layer represents the business view on the information exchange related to smart grids. SGAM can be used to map regulatory and economic (market) structures and policies, business models, business portfolios (products & services) of market parties involved. Also business capabilities and business processes can be represented in this layer. In this way it supports business executives in decision making related to (new) business models and specific business projects (business case) as well as regulators in defining new market models.

Layer E: Business f e d c b a Market Enterprise Operation Station Field Process 1 2 3 4 5 Generation Transmission Distribution DER Customer Premise

Legend Layer E: Symbol Description business objectives, business processes, economic and regulatory constraints

Layer A: Component f e d c b a Market Enterprise Operation Station Field Process 1 2 3 4 5 Generation Transmission Distribution DER Customer Premise

Legend Layer A: Symbol Description computer (CRM, DMS, HES, etc.) gateway HMI data collector controller and IED transmitter generator substation information flow (wired) information flow (wireless) power grid bus power line

Layer B: Communication f e d c b a Market Enterprise Operation Station Field Process 1 2 3 4 5 Generation Transmission Distribution DER Customer Premise

Legend Layer B: Symbol Description component (from Component Layer) communication protocols for the data exchange (area) communication protocols for the data exchange (point-to-point)

Layer C: Information f e d c b a Market Enterprise Operation Station Field Process 1 2 3 4 5 Generation Transmission Distribution DER Customer Premise

Legend Layer C: Symbol Description component (from Component Layer) exchanged information objects canonical data model (standards)

Layer D: Function f e d c b a Market Enterprise Operation Station Field Process 1 2 3 4 5 Generation Transmission Distribution DER Customer Premise

Legend Layer D: Symbol Description function interrelation (exchanged information)

What did we achieve with that approach so far? A textual documentation of components, information, communication, functions, and business processes for a particular Smart Grid scenario, i.e., description of several architecture views for different stakeholders, e.g., addressing technical components, exchanged information or functionality available for business processes A model of elements used in the SGAM stories This serves as a basis for communication for among different Smart Grid scenarios Allows rough comparability of several scenarios Since one key issue in the DISCERN project is to share information, the SGAM application in terms of creating a common view on sub-functionalities facilitates two ways of sharing information: Among DSOs and Across different work packages A populated SGAM cube for analysis of overarching Smart Grid concerns