EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS FOR A DIGITAL AGE BY VIRGINIA E. GARLAND AND CHESTER TADEJA Chapter 1: Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
LAURA C. ALVIDREZ MARIA BARRAZA MARIA VILLARREAL OCTOBER 24, 2010 School Leaders and Technology.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Response to Intervention Milltown’s RtI model The Office of Curriculum and Instruction Rigorously Preparing our Students for a Successful Tomorrow.
Braiding Initiatives Steve Goodman, Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning Initiative (MiBLSi) April 16, :00PM – 3:30PM
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Introduction & Background Laurene Christensen National Center on Educational Outcomes National Center on Educational Outcomes (NCEO)
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS FOR A DIGITAL AGE BY VIRGINIA E. GARLAND AND CHESTER TADEJA Chapter 4: The Technology.
Chapter 6: Legal and Social Issues in Technology
Chapter 3: Teacher Supervision and Professional Development
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS FOR A DIGITAL AGE BY VIRGINIA E. GARLAND AND CHESTER TADEJA Chapter 5: Systemic.
Chapter 2: Leading Instruction with New Technologies
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
Dr.Mohamed E. Osman & Prof.Thuwayba A. Al Barwani With Dr.Abdo M. Al Mekhlafi Dr. Khalid Al Saadi Ms.Laila Alhashar Ms.Fathiya Al Maawali Ms.Zuhor Al lawati.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
National Secondary School Computer Fund (NSSCF)
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Learner-Ready Teachers  More specifically, learner-ready teachers have deep knowledge of their content and how to teach it;  they understand the differing.
Ensuring America’s Future Productivity: Trends for Education Policy Trends for Education Policy Susan Sclafani Chartwell Education Group.
Brooke Bennett. *National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Teachers* 1. Facilitate & inspire student learning and creativity.
EFFECTIVE PRINCIPALS & LEADERSHIP TASK FORCE Staff Lead: Gia Truong.
Utilizing the School Restructuring Resources Lauren Morando Rhim & Bryan C. Hassel Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Segment 5: Sample Activities Federal Accountability Requirements School Leadership Instructional Supervision 1.
February 9, 2012  Partner with the community  Provide an effective educational experience  Prepare every student to find success in our complex society.
Strategic Technology Plan Lincoln High School Sarah Simmons ETEC 6223 University of Arkansas.
CCISD TECHNOLOGY PLAN by Patti Shields Cohort 10 EDLD 5362 Information Systems Management.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
Jonathan Cohen, Ph.D. National School Climate Center: Educating Minds and Hearts Because the Three Rs’ Are Not Enough; Teachers College, Columbia University.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Asma Khalfan Al-Yahyai Mithaa Abdullah Al-Amri. NETS (NETSS) (NETST) (NETSA) (NETSC) (NETSCSE)
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Transforming lives through learning Sheila Quigley Development Officer Assessment, Qualifications, Quality assurance & Moderation
Maryland and National Standards Nicholas Cranford.
Making Plans for the Future April 29, 2013 Brenda M. Tanner, Ed.D.
BACK TO SCHOOL Welcome Back! Evaluation Task Force Findings.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Rapides Parish School District February 2, 2011.
NCCE 2009 Administrator/IT Summit Strategy Session: Leadership.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
Office of Service Quality
State Systemic Improvement Plan (SSIP) Office of Special Education January 20, 2016.
NH Professional Development Center Network Task Force Report to State Board of Education on August 21, 2002.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Excellence for Each Student Utah State Board of Education Strategic Plan.
SIX PLUS ONE COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS IMPLEMENTATION MODEL OF PARENT ENGAGEMENT = 7.
PRESENTED BY DIANE DUGAS, DIRECTOR OF CURRICULUM JON LAMBERT, DIRECTOR OF TECHNOLOGY GRANBY THREE YEAR TECHNOLOGY PLAN.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Teaching and Learning with Technology, 4e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Technology, Teaching, and You Teaching and Learning.
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Technology, Teaching, and You
Collaborative Leadership
Jersey Shore Area School District Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

EDUCATIONAL LEADERSHIP IN TECHNOLOGY: PREPARING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS FOR A DIGITAL AGE BY VIRGINIA E. GARLAND AND CHESTER TADEJA Chapter 1: Technology Planning

CHAPTER 1: SYNOPSIS NETP Goal 5: “Productivity: Redesign and Transform” NETS.A Standard 1: “Visionary Leadership” Leadership skills and new roles for school administrators in the digital age Technology planning and funding Sample technology plan Leader survey for Chapter 1 skill sets Discussion questions

CHAPTER 1: LEADER REFLECTION Key points in this case study from a curriculum director: Need for expertise due to complexity Funding issues for large and small districts Goal-setting before writing Key stakeholders Bridging curriculum and technology Self-evaluation and needs assessments

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION Strategic planning for technology-infused instruction requires visionary educational leadership skills on all school district levels, by all administrators, including technology coordinators and school business administrators NETP Goal 5: “Productivity: Redesign and Transform” NETS.A Standard 1: “Visionary Leadership” Wireless revolution and its impact on school district infrastructure Model programs to engage digital-age learners

NETP GOAL 5: TRANSFORMING PRODUCTIVITY School leaders must recognize and use the “power of technology” to improve student productivity while making more efficient use of time and resources Traditional forms of schooling have failed many of our students as students become disengaged Reducing dropout rates: o Virtual schooling and NH model o Extended learning time and MA model o Knowledge is Power Program (KIPP) in schools o Competency-based instruction and NH model

ISTE NETS.A STANDARD 1: VISIONARY LEADERSHIP Collaboration for a shared vision of technology in the school district: o Stakeholders are school administrators, teachers, students, educational specialists, technology coordinators, community members, and others o Communities of Learners and Professional Learning Communities research and apply technology planning Teachers vs. iGeneration technology use Link between technology plans and No Child Left Behind Act ( NCLB)

CHAPTER 1: TECHNOLOGY LEADERSHIP SELF-ASSESSMENT SURVEY Self-scoring survey Based on National Education Technology Plan (NETP) Goal 5 (NETP 5.1 to 5.4) and National Educational Technology Standards and Performance Indicators for Administrators (NETS.A) Standard 1 (NETS.A 1.a, 1.b, 1.c) Ratings of 1 or 2 indicate areas of needed professional growth Assessment can also be used to create an individualized e-portfolio

CHAPTER 1: TIPS FOR LEADERS 1. Use expert advice from the state department of education to assist in setting criteria for the technology plan before writing it. 2. Have multiple stakeholders’ input in writing the technology plan, such as representatives from the district, building, and community levels. 3. Consider that technical and funding aspects are as important as curriculum, so include the technology coordinator and the business manager in the technology planning. 4. Do a needs assessment before writing the technology plan to ascertain what the district does and does not have in place.

CHAPTER 1: TIPS FOR LEADERS 5. Link the technology plan to the district mission statement in order to more fully meet the needs of all students. Refer to the Pomona Unified School District Technology Mission Statement and observe how it is the driving force for this district’s technology use plan. 6. Rethink traditional assumptions about schooling in planning for technology use and in ensuring student progress to graduation; and learn about the newer competency-based instruction models. 7. Investigate the E-Rate discounts in order to obtain funding for wireless access devices to the Internet in your school district.

CHAPTER 1: DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 1. Considering critical analysis and practical advice for both professors and practitioners alike, what would you consider are some of the most important aspects of implementing technology standards in your organization? 2. Thinking globally, what are some of the emerging technologies your organization is faced with and how will you utilize these to meet the needs of the professional to help prepare student learners? 3. Describe the kind of technology plan that you have now in your organization. How did you promote collaboration amongst all stakeholders in writing your plan?

CHAPTER 1: DISCUSSION QUESTIONS 4. The leader’s self-reflection for this chapter indicates that there are many challenges in implementing an effective three-year technology plan. Discuss similar or different challenges which you or your district might face as a technology plan is being developed. 5. Based on your responses to the self-assessment, what are the next steps you might take in technology planning for your school or district? What technology resources would you need in your own professional e-portfolio in order to assist you in achieving your goals?