Passenger travel behavior model in railway network simulation Ting Li Eric van Heck Peter Vervest Jasper Voskuilen Dept. Of decision and information sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PARTIII: TRAVELER TRANSPORTATION.
Advertisements

1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PART I: CONTEXT, CONCEPTS AND CHARACTERIZATI ON.
Introduction to Transportation Systems. PART I: CONTEXT, CONCEPTS AND CHARACTERIZATION.
Smarter Travel Programmes– Financial impacts for Transport for London COLIN BUCHANAN
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
Anthony Sulistio 1, Kyong Hoon Kim 2, and Rajkumar Buyya 1 Managing Cancellations and No-shows of Reservations with Overbooking to Increase Resource Revenue.
Hub and Spoke vs. Point to Point Evan Demick February 28, 2013.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to Regional Transportation Plan Guidelines Work Group Meeting presented by Christopher Wornum Cambridge.
October 4-5, 2010 TCRP H-37: Characteristics of Premium Transit Services that Affect Choice of Mode Prepared for: AMPO Modeling Subcommittee Prepared by:
Time of day choice models The “weakest link” in our current methods(?) Change the use of network models… Run static assignments for more periods of the.
Consumer Equilibrium and Market Demand Chapter 4.
Enhanced analytical decision support tools The Scheme level Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
University of Minho School of Engineering Centre Algoritmi Uma Escola a Reinventar o Futuro – Semana da Escola de Engenharia - 24 a 27 de Outubro de 2011.
1 Integration as a competitiveness instrument for Public Transport in rural areas Helder Cristóvão, José M Viegas Integration as a Competitiveness Instrument.
Erasmus Center for Optimization in Public Transport 1 Shunting passenger train units: Practical planning aspects Ramon Lentink, Pieter-Jan Fioole, Dennis.
A Comparison of Price Patterns in Deregulated Markets Katherine Ying Li and Peter Flynn Dept. of Mechanical Eng. University of Alberta.
Estimating Congestion Costs Using a Transportation Demand Model of Edmonton, Canada C.R. Blaschuk Institute for Advanced Policy Research University of.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 15 Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western A firm is considered a monopoly if... it is the sole seller of its product. its.
Airline Revenue Management
Cook: Tourism: The Business of Travel, 3rd edition (c) 2006 Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River, NJ, All Rights Reserved Chapter Five: Transportation.
Market Research and Analysis Demand Forecasting Overview May 30, 2013 Agenda Overview of Demand Forecasting Model Demand Forecasting.
May 2009 Evaluation of Time-of- Day Fare Changes for Washington State Ferries Prepared for: TRB Transportation Planning Applications Conference.
Air Transportation Systems Lab Virginia Tech Oshkosh, WI July 29- August 3, 2003 Transportation Systems Analysis for the SATS Program.
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY San Francisco DTA Project: Model Integration Options Greg Erhardt DTA Peer Review Panel Meeting July 25 th,
Chapter 15 notes Monopolies.
A DSS Reshapes Revenue Management in Railway Networks Ting Li Department of Decision and Information Sciences Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University.
1 Research go bus Impact Study TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference Atlantic City, May 2015.
The First International Transport Forum, May , Leipzig INDUCING TRANSPORT MODE CHOICE BEHAVIORIAL CHANGES IN KOREA: A Quantitative Analysis.
Platzhalter für Bild, Bild auf Titelfolie hinter das Logo einsetzen Ann Melissa Campbell, Jan Fabian Ehmke 2013 Service Management and Science Forum Decision.
Modelling of Trips using Strategic Park-and-Ride Site at Longbridge Railway Station Seattle, USA, Oct th International EMME/2 Users Conference.
Results.
Simulation Analysis of Truck Driver Scheduling Rules Eric C. Ervin Russell C. Harris J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. 615 J.B. Hunt Corporate Drive P.O. Box 130.
Anders Peterson Fahimeh Khoshniyat Dept. of Science and Technology Linköping University, Norrköping, Sweden 6 th May 2014 Effects of Travel Time Dependent.
Characteristics of Weekend Travel in the City of Calgary: Towards a Model of Weekend Travel Demand JD Hunt, University of Calgary DM Atkins, City of Calgary.
Regional Transport Modelling Review. Who’s doing what? Planning National Planning Framework Strategic Development Plans Local Development Plans Transport.
GO Airport Shuttle Don Eames The GO Group, LLC Board Member President/CEO GO The Airport Shuttle AGTA Meeting Ft. Myers, FL.
PPA 419 – Aging Services Administration Lecture 10c – Public Transportation and Aging.
Consumer Equilibrium and Market Demand
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PART I: –CONTEXT, CONCEPTS AND CHARACTERIZATION.
Chapter 11 Pricing with Market Power. Chapter 11Slide 2 Topics to be Discussed Capturing Consumer Surplus Price Discrimination Intertemporal Price Discrimination.
AVIATION ECONOMICS CHAPTER 3 PASSENGER MOVEMENT: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PASSENGER LOAD FACTORS & STRATEGY FOR PASSENGER MARKETING.
Client Name Here - In Title Master Slide Data Requirements to Support Road Pricing Analyses Johanna Zmud, Ph.D. NuStats Partners, LP Expert Forum on Road.
Managing Travel for Planned Special Events: What, Why, & Benefits Walt Dunn, P.E. Dunn Engineering Associates, P.C. Talking Operations Seminar January.
Submission doc.: IEEE 11-10/0765r0 July 2012 Carl Kain, Noblis, Inc.Slide 1 Dynamic Mobility Integrated Dynamic Transit Operations Use Case for ISD Date:
Case study Oslo: PT optimisation under different rules for revenue use REVENUE final conference Brussels 29th - 30th November 2005 Jon-Terje Bekken Institute.
Chapter 4.2 Differential Pricing Greg Koch Objectives Differential pricing Willingness to Pay Market Segments Goals of Differential Pricing Traditional/
SHRP2 C10A Final Conclusions & Insights TRB Planning Applications Conference May 5, 2013 Columbus, OH Stephen Lawe, Joe Castiglione & John Gliebe Resource.
SCM-INTRODUCTION P.CHANDIRAN. What is a Supply Chain? Supply chain is a network of suppliers, manufacturing plants, warehouses, distribution centers,
Phase 2: Data Collection Findings and Future Steps.
Route and Network Planning
Household Activity Pattern Problem Paper by: W. W. Recker. Presented by: Jeremiah Jilk May 26, 2004 Jeremiah Jilk University of California, Irvine ICS.
Science & Engineering Research Support soCiety Special Issue Call for Papers Paper Submission The papers will be subject to the usual peer review process.
Copyright©2004 South-Western 15 Monopoly. Copyright © 2004 South-Western Monopoly While a competitive firm is a price taker, a monopoly firm is a price.
Marc IVALDI Workshop on Advances on Discrete Choice Models in the honor of Daniel McFadden Cergy-Pontoise – December 18, 2015 A Welfare Assessment of Revenue.
Public Transport Pricing Strategies using an Agent-based Simulation Platform (A Case study of Singapore and Lessons for Pakistan) Speaker : Dr. Muhammad.
Generated Trips and their Implications for Transport Modelling using EMME/2 Marwan AL-Azzawi Senior Transport Planner PDC Consultants, UK Also at Napier.
Strategies to cope with disruptions in urban public transportation networks Evelien van der Hurk Department of Decision and Information Sciences Complexity.
Price Discrimination A possible outcome in IMPERFECT COMPETITION.
HS2 - What tests should be applied in evaluating the final business case ? Chris Nash.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
A Modeling Framework for Flight Schedule Planning
Special Issue Call for Papers
System Control based Renewable Energy Resources in Smart Grid Consumer
A possible outcome in IMPERFECT COMPETITION (particularly MONOPOLY)
Tell me when you want to stay,
1.206J/16.77J/ESD.215J Airline Schedule Planning
Chapter 3 Supply Chain Drivers and Metrics
Sample ‘Scheduling Process’
Presentation transcript:

Passenger travel behavior model in railway network simulation Ting Li Eric van Heck Peter Vervest Jasper Voskuilen Dept. Of decision and information sciences RSM Erasmus University Freek Hofker Marketing Research and Advice Netherlands Railways Fred Jansma Incontrol Enterprise Dynamics

Overview Introduction Modeling Approach Simulation Framework Passenger Travel Behavior Model Conclusion

Introduction Public transportation is crowded during certain times. Transportation planners want to diffuse the concentration of the peak period travel:  Expand tracks, build more trains.  Scheduling.  Dynamic pricing. The objective is to evaluate the differentiated pricing impact on the passenger travel behavior, and further evaluate the overall network performance.

Introduction What is dynamic pricing?  Flexible pricing based on customers and others circumstance. Examples:  Online auction: eBay  Amazon DVD’s sale Dynamic pricing in transportation industry:  Airline ticket price varies depend on season

Introduction How to evaluate the effectiveness of the dynamic pricing:  How does demand change over time?  What is the capacity utilization?  Does revenue increase or decrease?

Introduction Reasons to use simulation:  This is a large problem that is beyond computational ability.  Simulation model can easily accommodate changes such as additional tracks, additional trains, or different pricings. How to simulate:  Modeling the supply  Stations, trains and tracks  Modeling the demand  Customers  Modeling the interactions between supply and demand

Modeling Approach Modeling supply:  Create a large network that may includes infrastructures such as stations, tracks, and trains  Ability to create time table, train schedules over the railway networks Modeling demand (customer travel behavior):  Ability to model a passenger with his/her attributes.  To model the decision of a passenger on time-shifting, mode choice, departure time choice, and route choice.  Track an individual passenger’s behavior changes under dynamic pricing Interaction between supply and demand:  Impacts of supply’s changes on demand (travel behavior.)  Impacts of behaviors on the operational supply.

Modeling Approach The supply simulation consists of 5,000 passenger trains on a network of 325,000 km railway. The crisscross network of 100 different train lines along nearly 400 stations. Model is designed and implemented by Incontrol Enterprise Dynamics using a simulation tool called SIMONE (Simulation MOdel of NEtwork.)

Modeling Approach A passenger is similar to an agent:  Autonomous (operate without human intervention)  Goal-oriented (act according to specific rules to accomplished a pre-defined goal)  Asynchronous (operate independently)  Reactivity (Perceive the environment and respond to changes)  Pro-activeness (have individual internal states and goals, acts through rules to meet its goals)

Simulation Framework

Demand Simulation Traveler is modeled as an individual agent, who has certain characteristics and travels according to his activity schedule. Traveler plans his trip based on a set of available options. These options include both public and private mode of travel. Traveler can respond to policy changes (e.g., price increase at a particular hour) based on pre-defined decision rules. Traveler makes decisions based on a utility maximization choice. Utility is the combination of passenger fare, maximum willingness-to-pay, ability to reschedule

Dynamic Pricing Strategy Time-based pricing (time-of-day): price varies according to different time-of-day (e.g., lower price before 7:00; higher price between 7:00-9:00). Time-based pricing (day-of-week): Weekday vs. weekend; Different day-of-week price. Spatial-based pricing (regional-based): a high density area vs. a not so high density area Spatial-based pricing (route-based): price varies according to the utilization of the specific route.

Dynamic Pricing Strategy Service-based pricing (class-based): 1st and 2nd class. Service-based pricing (different train types): price varies for international train, intercity and stop train. Profile-based pricing (travel in group): for example, travel in group is cheaper. Or the combination of different pricing policies.

Performance Metrics

Passenger Travel Behavior Model Travel choice process is one of the key components within the model  How does a passenger schedule his/her trip?  How does a passenger re-schedule his/her trip? The process includes two steps:  Generation of choices (schedule)  Making decision to pick a “best” choice

Passenger Travel Behavior Model

Passenger's characteristics  Age  Income  Education  Car ownership

Passenger Travel Behavior Model Activity Schedule:  Activity location  Timing  Duration  Purpose

Passenger Travel Behavior Model Decision Windows:  How does a passenger react to price change  Example: time-base price policy introduces an :afternoon peak price, meaning passengers who travel between 4PM:6PM will pay more  1. Time-shifting: shift their departure time to before 4PM or after 6PM in order to avoid the "afternoon-peak price“  2. Mode-change: leave railway and change to private transport (e.g., car)  3. No change, accept the price increase  4. Stop travel: it is more likely to happen for leisure travelers)

Passenger Travel Behavior Model Maximum willingness to pay: How much a passenger are willing to pay  Travel purpose  Income Passenger disutility:  auxiliary attributes

Passenger Travel Behavior Model Passenger choice set:  Possible schedule  A number of trip options are generated based on required departure time, arrival time, origin and destination...  Previous experience:  Crowdness of the train  Comfort of the trip  Delay and safety  Product and ticket type:  Discount for future trips

Passenger Travel Behavior Model Passenger decision:  Passenger follows his decision rule to make choices on departure time, route, mode and fare.  The decision rule is to minimize generalized cost of travel or minimize the time of travel and number of transfers.

Conclusion This paper proposes a Passenger Railway Network Simulation for policy evaluation (dynamic pricing.) The focus is on the design and modeling approach of the Travel Behavior Model. The project are currently in prototyping state.

Questions?

References Passenger travel behavior model in railway network simulation by Ting Li et al, Winter Simulation Conference 2006 Online Dynamic Pricing: Efficiency, Equity and the Future of E-commerce by Robert M. Weiss and Ajay K. Mehrotra, Virginia Journal of Law and Technology, 6 VA. J.L. & TECH. 11