Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Efficient Pricing of Energy Conservation and Load Management Programs. August 9 th,2006 Kansas Corporation Commission Staff.
Advertisements

A tax on the energy utility for excessive residential electricity use.
Procuring Our Way to Compliance IEP 27 th Annual Meeting September 23, 2008 Fong Wan, PG&E.
Small Wind and Solar Systems Kristi Robinson Steele-Waseca Cooperative Electric.
Does owning a solar array make you a utility?...and other questions A presentation to the Kentucky Environmental Quality Commission Andrew Melnykovych.
Economic Framework for Assessing Solar PV In Electric Utility Industry Jim Cater Director, Economic &Financial Policy 1.
Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Discussion Net Metering and Interconnection Stakeholder Meeting September 21, 2012 Discussion of.
GENFLEX TARIFF AND INCOPORATION OF THE MEC INTO THE NMD RULES
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
By Dale A Gulden, Solar Direct CEO. Solar Electric – Basic Components 1. Modules – solar electric collectors. 3 basic types in the marketplace: Mono crystalline,
Take A Load Off, Texas SM is provided by Oncor Electric Delivery LLC as part of the company’s commitment to reduce energy consumption and demand. Frontier.
What - How Does Solar System Work? Grid-connected projects can apply for Net Metering (utility meter spins backwards)
Zero – Energy Building What constitutes a zero energy building? A building that uses a “net” of zero energy – typically producing excess energy via renewables.
Net Metering and Interconnection Requirements IMUA 2015 Annual Conference May 8, 2015 Delia Patterson General Counsel, APPA.
Small Renewable Net Metering - An Investor Owned Utility Perspective John R. Grimwade Senior Director Strategic Planning & Development Presentation to.
PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF CUSTOMER OWNED GENERATION A DISCUSSION OF INTERCONNECTION POLICIES, METERING STRATEGIES AND BILLING CONSIDERATIONS IMUA ANNUAL CONFERENCE.
1 RELIABILITY AFFORDABILITY ENVIRONMENTAL STEWARDSHIP Bringing Solar to the Community Jennifer Szaro, Orlando Utilities Commission.
Consideration of Public Utilities Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) Standards A Public Hearing- October 22, 2007.
E.ON on the Romanian Energy Market ZF Power Summit Bucharest, February 27, 2013 Frank Hajdinjak CEO E.ON România.
Interpreting HB 3693 Interstate Renewable Energy Council presentation to the ERCOT Distribute Generation Task Force December 4, 2007.
Distributed Generation Programs, Incentives and Interconnections Ian Loughran, P.Eng. DSM Program Leader Renewable Energy Programs
Managing Retail Rate Changes Presented by Walter Haynes, Sr. Project Manager, Patterson & Dewar Engineers Central District Power Accountants Association.
Discussion of Feed-in Tariff Pilot Programs September 18, 2013 Presentation to the Regulatory Flexibility Committee of the Indiana General Assembly 1.
Interconnection of Small Wind & Solar Systems to Distribution Utilities: A Cooperative Perspective Patrick Parke Midwest Energy Hays, KS September 26,
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
Creating A Cleaner Energy Future For the Commonwealth Focusing on Solar PV: Technology, Siting Considerations, Incentives Natalie Andrews Renewable Energy.
Green Energy Program Redesign Wilson Mallard – Georgia Power Company NARUC Staff Subcommittee on Accounting and Finance Fall Meeting October 13, 2008 Wilson.
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Presentation to the: Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission Demand-Side Response Working Group December 8, 2006 Gas Utility Decoupling in New Jersey A.
Submitted to Southeast Symposium on Contemporary Engineering Topics (SSCET) New Orleans, LA - August 31.
Strategies for Addressing Fixed Cost Recovery Issues Dan Hansen Christensen Associates Energy Consulting August
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
Why is WPL filing a rate case?  Last Base Case Rates were set January, 2007  Cost of our utility investments must be reflected in prices our customers.
VEC Stats Serve 10,000 members 11,500 meters 2,100 miles of line 5 members / mile 28 employees 7 counties (Vernon, LaCrosse, & Monroe)
Net Metering Technical Conference Docket No PacifiCorp Avoided Costs October 21, 2008 Presented by Becky Wilson Executive Staff Director Utah.
2 nd ACC Workshop June 20, 2014 The SSVEC Perspective David Bane, Key Account Manager
Energy Advisory Board February 2, 2005 Act 213 Proposed Technical Guidance Overview PA DEP.
Net Metering and Embedded Generation NB Climate Action Change Hub Advisory Committee Meeting – October 1, 2008 Saint John, NB Linda Berthelot.
Presented By: Diana Golis Energy Innovations Summit Small Hydro: Opportunities & Challenges Holy Cross Energy October 27, 2014.
Looking Ahead at Rooftop Solar in the Pacific Northwest Northwest Public Power Association Communications and Energy Innovations Conference Lake Tahoe,
Renewable Generation Interconnection Ken Brunkenhoefer Distributed Generation Consultant
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Southern California Edison SM Southern California Edison Company Proposed AB920 Net Surplus Compensation Rate [NSCR] July 9, 2010.
Chelan County PUD PURPA Hearing Fuel diversity Fossil fuel efficiency Chelan County PUD November 19, 2007.
1 Demand Response A 28 Year History of Demand Response Programs for the Electric Cooperatives of Arkansas by Forest Kessinger Manager, Rates and Forecasting.
WFEC and Its Rural Electric Cooperative Members Solar Power October 16, 2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting.
SDG&E’s Proposal to Implement AB 920 July 9, 2010.
We hear much about energy problems; supply shortages, pollution issues and high prices, but the solutions to these problems are here now in the form of.
INVOLAR Microinverters Evaluation of ROI of a 3 kW PV system.
1 Modeling Distributed Generation Adoption using Electric Rate Feedback Loops USAEE Austin, TX – November 2012 Mark Chew, Matt Heling, Colin Kerrigan,
2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting October 16, 2015 Fairo Mitchell Energy Policy Director, Public Utility Division Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
YVEA Solar Facts & Distributed Generation Requirements YVSC Talking Green November 17, 2015 Megan Moore-Kemp Key Accounts Rep.
POSITIVE ENERGY TOGETHER ® Industry Trends Discussion MEC Conference San Antonio Texas, October 19 th, 2009 Jesse B. Langston.
California Energy Commission 2015 IEPR Self-Generation Forecast Sacramento, CA 12/17/2015 Asish Gautam Demand Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division.
PV Panel Investment. Overview  Solar Global Trends and Growth  Solar Process and Net Metering  Sample System Breakdown  Personal System Details.
Energy is one of the most important files being dealt with in Jordan that are dealt with at the present time, for the big burden it puts on the national.
Program Overview Solar resource will be built by j uwi, (pronounced “you-vee”), a developer based out of Boulder, Colorado. Solar farm will be located.
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
1. 2 Residential Solar Valuation Project SPI 2012: Solar Energy's Positive Impacts on the Electric System Karl R. Rábago Rábago Energy LLC.
Interpreting HB 3693 Interstate Renewable Energy Council
Kaysville City, UT Electric Rate Study Results
Solar in NYC – Pratt SOLAR ENERGY SYSTEMS David Buckner President
The Net Metering Controversy
Distributed Generation Chau Nguyen, Pricing & Sales Support
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Session 27
Economic Development, Science and Innovation Committee
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Presented by Douglas Danley at
Island Energy Advisory Committee Board
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Session 23
Presentation transcript:

Welcome and Introductions

CoServ Presentation & Member Input

July 26, 2007—CoServ’s Board of Directors issued a final decision and order regarding the federal statutory requirement that CoServ consider implementing five new ratemaking standards added to the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (“PURPA”): Whether to implement a net metering service Fuel source diversity plans Fossil fuel generation efficiency plans Smart metering program An interconnection service for its Member-owners Distributed Generation

What is Net Metering? Net metering is most commonly accomplished by a single meter that runs forward when power is flowing from the utility to the customer and then runs backwards when power is flowing from the customer to the utility. Net metering would encourage the development of distributed generation by providing a means for customers with on-site generation to be compensated for their investment. Significant growth in the use of distributed generation by end-use customers could reduce the future and perhaps the existing generation requirements from CoServ’s wholesale power provider resulting in the conservation of energy supplied by the Cooperative. Providing net metering service would benefit those cooperative Members with on-site generation by providing a means of compensation that exceeds the actual value of the Member’s generation.

Conclusions  Net metering provides a small subsidy to the net metering customer and increases the rates of other customer classes. It appears to be contrary to the third purpose of the federal PURPA standards regarding equitable rates for consumers.  The PURPA net metering standard should be adopted with modifications that: (1) make the standard consistent with the DG Manual; (2) limit net metering to electric consumers with onsite qualifying facilities generating 50 kW or less; and (3) ensure the retail electric rates for electric consumers are cost based and designed to minimize subsidization by other electric consumers in the Cooperative’s electric rate classes.  CoServ’s net metering standard says, “retail rates for electric consumers receiving net metering service shall be cost based and designed to minimize subsidization by other CoServ Electric rate classes.”

Issues with DG and Net Metering DG and Net Metering can cause:  under-recovery of distribution COS fixed costs  non-DG Members to subsidize the DG Members

DG (behind the meter) causes a significant reduction in kWh sales  Our current retail rates recover approximately 2/3 of the distribution COS fixed cost in the variable component of the rate, i.e.: in the energy charge  A significant reduction in kWh usage means under-recovery of distribution COS fixed costs, ultimately requiring a rate increase  If the retail rate does not recover from each DG Member the costs caused by that Member, those costs are recovered from other Members causing the non-DG Members to subsidize the DG Members Issues with DG and Net Metering

 Net metering allows the Member to use CoServ as a “bank” for kilowatt hours. This is the equivalent of borrowing money (kilowatt hours) and paying it back with no interest.  “Borrowing” kilowatt hours causes expense with no ability for CoServ to recover that cost. Issues with DG and Net Metering

Net Metering compounds under-recovery of distribution COS fixed costs and creates additional subsidy by non-DG Members for the benefit of DG Members  Net Metering will result in under-recovery of wholesale power costs from the DG Member Since the meter is permitted to run forward and backward, energy is “borrowed” from CoServ during high cost periods and “returned” during low cost periods. 100% of wholesale power cost is recovered by CoServ through the PCRF Wholesale power cost under-recovered from DG Members flows through to all other Members via the PCRF  Wind and Solar DG is intermittent  Permitting excess DG production to be credited on the next billing or paying for excess production increases the subsidy Issues with DG and Net Metering

CoServ’s Current DG Policy  October 1, CoServ began charging an additional $10 for any Member with a net metered DG system $10 customer charge per month plus a $10 DG charge  Net metering with no purchase of excess DG production, i.e.: CoServ does not pay for or provide a credit for excess kWh flowing onto the distribution system Member cannot “bank” excess production as a credit on the next billing month  The Member’s DG output is netted against that which is provided from CoServ and they pay the retail rate for anything over what they produce. In the event a Member produces more than they use, they don’t receive any additional payment for the excess.

Is Distributed Generation Tariff – “Penalty or Disincentive”? We’ve been listening!  Members with DG perceive that the additional $10 charge is a “penalty” or providing a “disincentive” for others looking to install this technology  Some Members say that CoServ should provide a subsidy to DG Members to encourage development of renewable technology  Members feel that they should be compensated for excess kWh provided to CoServ

Proposed DG Policy - proactive approach  Eliminate perception that CoServ is “anti-DG” while providing for the full recovery of fixed costs  Minimize rate subsidization  Fair and equitable to everyone (Non-DG & DG Members)

 Recover 100% of fixed cost in Customer Charge with lower kWh charge  Provide two options for handling DG output: Net Metering with no payment or credit for excess kWh No Net Metering with an avoided wholesale energy cost payment for excess kWh, single meter that measures kWh delivered by CoServ and received by CoServ (from the DG), allows DG production to reduce kWh purchased from CoServ but will not “run backwards” Proposed DG Policy - proactive approach

 Based on latest cost of service study, CoServ’s Residential customer charge should be ~$30 per month  Currently we charge $10 customer charge and collect the additional fixed cost in the per/kWh charge (variable component) Proposed DG Policy - proactive approach

Option 1- Net Metering with no payment for excess kWh Example of rate options for Residential DG

Option 2- No Net Metering with payment for excess kWh Payment for excess generation at CoServ’s average annual avoided wholesale energy cost (approx. $0.05 /kWh) Example of rate options for Residential DG

Sample DG Flow Diagram Transformer Service Panel DWHVACRefrig Pool Pump FreezerTV DG Inverter

Estimated Excess Power Production (PV Watts) Note: Excess Power Production occurs when power production exceeds energy consumption and power flows backwards onto distribution system. Annual Excess Wind Power Production, 2400 watt Annual Excess Solar Power Production, 2400 watt Annual Excess Solar Power Production, 3200 watt Annual Excess Solar Power Production, 4000 watt Annual Res kWh Annual Wind kWh output, 2400 watt Annual Solar kWh output, 2400 watt Annual Solar kWh, 3200 watt Annual Solar kWh, 4000 watt 18,0102,6903,3684,4915,614 CoServ Avg Residential kWh/meter 2400 watt Excess Wind Power Production 2400 watt Excess Solar Power Production 3200 watt Excess Solar Power Production 4000 watt Excess Solar Power Production

Rate impact for Member (Std. Rate, Current DG rate & Proposed DG rate)

Q & A

Next Steps:  If proposed approach is approved by Board of Directors: Develop edits to Tariff and DG Manual and present to Board for approval 4 th Quarter 2012 Test rate changes Provide written notice to affected DG Members Notice could provide opportunity for feedback and comments prior to implementation Implement 1 st Quarter 2013 Monitor Member impact and feedback

Distributed Generation, Rebates & Rate Strategy December 2011 Thank you for attending the CoServ Electric Distributed Generation (DG) Focus Group August 30, 2012