1 Pipeline Safety Program Identify & Reduce Risks Before They Cause Harm Northwest Area Committee Meeting March 10, 2011 David Lykken Director of Pipeline.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Akzo Nobel, Eka Chemicals Moses Lake, WA

Advertisements

Airport Emergency Plan - Overview

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Presentation to NACo Environment, Energy and Land Use Steering.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials.

1 Pipeline Security Presented to: Pipeline Safety Trust New Orleans, Louisiana November 5, 2010.

1 PHMSA Pipeline Incident and IM Data: What They Do and Do Not Tell Us Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Carol Parker.

Demonstration Grant PARTNERS FOR PIPELINE SAFETY WEB PAGES Develop interactive and informative webpage for residents, property owners, contractors and.

Facilitating a Dialog between the NSDI and Utility Companies J. Peter Gomez Manager, Information Requirements, Xcel Energy.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Spill Response Plans – Why Are They Developed? Alan K. Mayberry.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration NW Area Committee Meeting Focus on Pipelines PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS.

Increased Pipeline Safety Through Shared Planning Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans, LA November 15, 2007.

U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Ohio’s One-Stop Utility Resource Gas Pipeline Safety Pipelines - State and Local Issues Pete Chace GPS Program Manager (614)

AGA Perspectives on Current Pipeline Safety Regulations August 2014.

Railroad Commission of Texas Pipeline Safety Division.

Overview of Key Rule Features

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Safety Update Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration ~NPMS ~ National Pipeline Mapping System

The National Pipeline Mapping System -- Identifying Pipeline Segments that can Impact HCAs Steve FischerSam Hall GIS ManagerGIS.

Public Awareness and Pipeline Safety Pipeline Safety Trust November 15, 2007 Dan Kirschner Executive Director.

Stress Corrosion Cracking Overview & Introduction David Johnson December 2, 2003.

FDA Recalls Risk Communication Advisory Committee David K. Elder Director, Office of Enforcement.

Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness Grant Oregon SERC/LEPC Conference 2015 Oregon Office of State Fire Marshal 1.

Foster and sustain the environmental and economic well being of the coast by linking people, information, and technology. Center Mission Coastal Hazards.

Regulation of Pipelines

Why Annual Revaluation? 8/28/ What We Will Cover What is the Assessor’s job? Why do we have property tax? Brief history of property tax. What is.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration San Bruno – Lessons Learned Alan K. Mayberry, P.E. Deputy Associate.

This is an audio-enhanced PowerPoint presentation. To hear the audio, please open this presentation in “Slide Show” view.

Tom Cecich, CSP, CIH NC Chapter ASSE March 12, 2015.

THE RAILROAD COMMISSION OF TEXAS EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AND HOMELAND SECURITY A Collaborative Effort By: Team RRC Emergency Management Homeland Security.

Julie Halliday, Program Development DOT – PHMSA – OPS November 18, Pipeline Safety Trust Conference Pipeline Safety – Getting to Zero Pipeline.

Communicating Climate and Climate Change Information for Integrated Decision Support at the County and Regional Level Greg Dobson and Jim Fox October 2009.

Geographic Information Systems (GIS) An Introduction.

HAZUS-MH is a multi-hazard risk assessment and loss estimation software program developed by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). (animate on.

The National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS) Amy Nelson GIS Manager US Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration.

Pipeline Safety Trust Fort Worth Natural Gas Production Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.

PIPA IMPLEMENTATION What’s Been Happening in Washington State?

Protecting Communities Co-Chairs Cathy Pratt- City of St. Peters Greg Ford- Williams Gas Pipeline;INGAA.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipelines and Informed Planning Alliance (PIPA) Steve Fischer.

Protecting Communities Task Team Update Las Vegas January 14, 2009.

America’s Natural Gas Utilities’ Distribution Pipelines November 2, 2006 The Connection To the Customer.

Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee Pipeline Safety in Washington Oversight and Review of Washington’s Pipeline Safety Office Report Follow-up.

1 Hazardous Materials Background and Data Overview Talking Freight Seminar Washington D.C. October 18, 2006 Ron Duych Research and Innovative Technology.

Damage Prevention – Are States as engaged as they need to be ? Pipeline Safety Trust Meeting November 20, 2008 New Orleans, LA Glynn Blanton, PHMSA State.

Pipeline Safety Different Pathways to a Common Goal New Orleans, Louisiana November 4 th & 5 th, 2010.

U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

1 November 3, 2006 David Knoelke API Public Awareness Committee Chair (BP Pipelines N.A.) Greater Public Involvement – What does that mean?

Creating Situational Awareness for First Responders david blankinship senior gis analyst, colorado springs fire department.

Pipelines study – final report European Commission, DG Environment Industrial Emissions, Air quality & Noise Unit 1.

What’s Wrong with Integrity Management? How Do We Improve Integrity Management? Terry Boss Senior Vice President Safety Environment and Operations PST.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PHMSA HMEP Grant Program ~ PHMSA Overview NASTTPOAnnualConference.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.

Pipeline Safety – 2015 Year in Review. Large PHMSA Budget Increase Pipeline Safety spending in 2015 was increased $26.9 million. Main areas of expansion.

How Old is too Old? Who Makes that Decision? Alan Mayberry New Orleans, Louisiana Pipeline Safety Trust Annual Conference

Rulemaking Process and Cost Benefit Analysis

Pipeline Safety Trust (PST) Conference New Orleans, Louisiana November 19 – 20, 2015 Alan Rathbun Pipeline Safety Director WA Utilities & Transportation.

Public Awareness Programs for Pipeline Operators WESTERN REGIONAL GAS CONFERENCE August 21, 2007 Presented by: Ross Reineke.

U. S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration

Pipeline Maps Tim Sweeney Pipeline Safety Trust Conference New Orleans November 2,

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Improvements to the National Pipeline Mapping System Amy Nelson,

Response to Secretary’s Call to Action. NAPSR The National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives (NAPSR) is a non-profit organization.

Restoring Trust in Pipeline Safety Katie Hansen, Board of Directors Pipeline Safety Trust.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration PREVENTION & PREPAREDNESS May 11, 2016 REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM.

Jim Doherty MRSC Legal Consultant

Community Pipeline Safety Initiative – St. Helena 1 Community Pipeline Safety Initiative City of St. Helena Tree Commission May 12, 2016.

U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.

Pipeline Safety Trust Public Awareness Issues John W. Pepper Project Manager Office of Pipeline Safety Southwest Region, Houston, Texas.

Risks and Hazards to Consider Unit 3. Visual 3.1 Unit 3 Overview This unit describes:  The importance of identifying and analyzing possible hazards that.

ZeraWare Safety Software is a sustainable safety management system for managing the core components of a sound safety program. Our user- friendly software.

Unit 14 Emergency Planning IS 235

Presentation transcript:

1 Pipeline Safety Program Identify & Reduce Risks Before They Cause Harm Northwest Area Committee Meeting March 10, 2011 David Lykken Director of Pipeline Safety

2 Utilities & Transportation Commission Pipeline Safety Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Geographic Information Systems (GIS)

3 In 2000, following the Bellingham pipeline incident, the WA State Legislature passed the Pipeline Safety Act (Chapter RCW). This legislation required the Utilities and Transportation Commission (UTC), Pipeline Safety Section to develop and implement a comprehensive pipeline safety program for gas and hazardous liquid pipelines including mapping of pipeline locations. The legislation specifically mandates that the UTC collect information from the pipeline operators “Sufficient to meet the needs of the First Responders, and to provide pipeline information and maps to local governments”. Establishment of the Utilities and Transportation Commission Pipeline GIS

4 UTC GIS Functions Developing mobile applications to increase the efficiency of pipeline inspections Developing pipeline map atlases for first responders Collecting data from pipeline operators & GIS data from other sources Increasing the accuracy of pipeline GIS data using GPS technology and ortho-photography The UTC Pipeline Safety GIS Program is : *** Not a substitute for Call Before You Dig. *** Mapping transmission pipelines, natural gas pipelines over 250psig, and hazardous liquid pipelines

5 Samples of Commission GIS Use New construction overview map The UTC Pipeline Safety Section uses the pipeline GIS for additional tasks such as: Mapping proposed new construction projects Environmental Analysis Public Awareness Community outreach City annexation map HCA map Reroutes Inspection tracking Incident Investigation

6 Landslide maps can give indications of historically active areas and their proximity to existing or proposed pipelines.

7 Areas of current landslide locations can be easily visualized in relationship to pipelines and the area’s location within the watershed shown to help decision makers mitigate hazards.

8 Bellevue Pipeline Incident Pipeline Safety GIS supports incident investigations and helps decision makers quickly understand unique characteristics of a remote location

9 Pipeline Map Atlas Map books can quickly inform a user where oil and gas pipelines are located, what’s around the pipeline, and help support more informed initial assessments for planning purposes or during a pipeline incident. Pipeline Map Atlas Specifications 8 ½ x 11” Rugged plastic cover with waterproof map sheets Areas divided by counties Distributed to fire districts and local governments near pipelines

10 NPMS : National Pipeline Mapping System NPMS Website: Provides general locations and selected attributes of major natural gas transmission lines, hazardous liquid pipelines, and liquefied natural gas facilities in the United States including offshore. The NPMS is a repository for pipeline GIS data from pipeline operators U.S. Department of Transportation PHMSA/OPS GIS Program

11 U.S. Department of Transportation PHMSA/OPS GIS Program Users can only view one county at a time for security reasons. A Web-based program that provides up-to-date information on pipeline locations and their proximity to safety sensitive areas. GIS data can be viewed but not downloaded.

UTC Public Map Viewer 12

13 UTC Public Map Viewer

14 UTC Public Map Viewer

15

PHMSA Incident Database 16

PHMSA Incident Database 17

PHMSA Data Mart 18

PHMSA Data Mart 19

20 Pipeline Reportable Significant Incidents Rates Actual Number of Incidents Key Performance Measure Analysis To what goal is this measure linked? Increase Public Safety Our goal is zero reportable incidents each year in Washington. How does the measure support the goal? Compares our incident rate with the overall national rate, and with the rate of the four other states which have similar jurisdictions and operations. Compare and explain target versus the actual measure. Washington’s experience is equal to or better than the comparison incident rates. Indicates equal or better pipeline safety environment. What needs to be done as a result of this analysis? We need to continue monitoring, assessing the highest risk situations leading to incidents and work with operators and communities to identify and reduce the seriousness of precursor events. National Count WashingtonArizonaMinnesotaNew YorkVirginia

Pipeline Reportable Serious Incidents Rates 21 Key Performance Measure Analysis To what goal is this measure linked? Increase Public Safety Our goal is zero reportable incidents each year in Washington. How does the measure support the goal? Compares our incident rate with the overall national rate, and with the rate of the four other states which have similar jurisdictions and operations. Compare and explain target versus the actual measure. Washington’s experience is equal to or better than the comparison incident rates. Indicates equal or better pipeline safety environment. What needs to be done as a result of this analysis? We need to continue monitoring, assessing the highest risk situations leading to incidents and work with operators and communities to identify and reduce the seriousness of precursor events. Actual Number of Incidents National Count WashingtonArizonaMinnesotaNew YorkVirginia

22 Internal Measure: Reportable Event Call Causes ( ) Key Performance Measure Analysis To what goal is this measure linked? Increase Public Safety How does the measure support the goal? In order to reduce risk and increase public safety, data must be used to focus our limited resources on the causes of unexpected natural gas and hazardous liquid releases. Discussion: Excavation third party damage is the leading contributor to unexpected natural gas and hazardous liquid releases. What needs to be done as a result of this analysis? Continue to monitor and verify causes of event calls. Increase accuracy of our recordkeeping and monitoring. Long term develop plans of action to minimize causes of the highest risk events. * from Pipeline Database

23

24 David Lykken Pipeline Safety Director Phone: WUTC Contact Information Rey Dejos GIS Analyst Phone: Joe Subsits Chief Pipeline Safety Engineer Phone: Jim Fernald Pipeline Operations Manager Phone: