LIFE – Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/000267 1Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Input for Geological Risk Assessment Johannes Klein & Jaana Jarva April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hydrology Rainfall - Runoff Modeling (I)
Advertisements

Soil Information Working Group (SIWG) ESBN Plenary, London, 2005 Identifying Risk Areas for Landslides Florence Carre (JRC, Subgroup leader), D. Seebach,
Establishing Basic Parameters: Risk Assessment
INSPIRE and flood directive reporting: important issues to raise Manuela Pfeiffer WISE GIS/IT-Workshop 7.5./ Copenhagen.
GIS IN GEOLOGY Miloš Marjanović Lesson
Regional Scale Ground-Water Vulnerability Assessments in the Mid-Atlantic Region Based on Statistical Probability Models A Multi-Scale and Multi-Threshold.
Design Parameters.
Environmental Modeling Basic GIS Modeling Suitability Index Modeling.
2 nd International Conference Graz, October 10 th, 2012 SHARP PP 2: Region of Western Macedonia Fig. 1: Vulnerability map for Florina Basin GIS-based Vulnerability.
Chapter 15 & 16 Review. Question # 1 The rock and other material that a stream carries is known as its ….. Stream load.
Workshop UN ECE Gerald Laheij | March 8 th 2006 Risk assessment on pipelines The Dutch approach.
WP-10 Satellite based flood monitoring system of pilot areas of China and India Progress of BNU Part (2008 May – 2009 April ) LIU Zhingang, JIANG Weiguo,
Informational and technical structure of the regional geological database I.Bogatyrev, SC Mineral GeoInforM.
Raster Based GIS Analysis
Application of GIS on Landslide Susceptibility and risk mapping
URBAN FLOODS IN GREECE Current situation and major research and development needs in Urban Flood Management Cost meeting, Warsaw, 29-31/5/2008 Vassilopoulos.
L-THIA Long-Term Hydrologic Impact Assessment Model ….provides relative estimates of change of runoff and non point source pollutants caused due to land.
From NOAA CD Ch 5: Natural Hazards. Natural events causing great loss of life or property damage Dangerous natural processes Impact risks, depending.
ABSTRACT Co-seismic landslides are associated with significant infrastructure damage and human casualties in earthquake- prone areas of the world. These.
CE HYDRAULICS ENGINEERING
By virtue of the sloping topography of the region and the quality of the soil, as well as its proximity to the Dead Sea fault, region is exposed to.
Day 1-3. Variable Selection and GIS Processing 1.Discuss V mapping goals, targeted system (what is vulnerable?), framework 2.Choose data layers (criteria:
Designation of Nitrate Vulnerable Zones in Romania Catalin Simota Research Institute for Soil Science and Agrochemistry Bucharest - Romania.
Introduction to Environmental Geology
Ground water flow modeling. Input data preparation. D.Frank-Kamenetsky (Committee) I.Bogotyrev (Mineral) G.Savenkova (Mineral) M.Naumovets (Mineral) G.Bogdanova.
1 Flood Risk Management Session 3 Dr. Heiko Apel Risk Analysis Flood Risk Management.
Ground Water Systems.
Earthquake Loss Estimation
Eurosion and Conscience projects - brief overview Tom Bucx (Deltares) 9 June 2011 EEA Expert meeting Methods and tools for assessing.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Application of GIS for multi- hazard risk assessment.
Economic Cooperation Organization Training Course on “Drought and Desertification” Alanya Facilities, Antalya, TURKEY presented by Ertan TURGU from Turkish.
1 Swedish Geotechnical Institute 1 Geoprocessing in landslide risk assessment and mapping Mats Oberg, SGI ESRI International.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise 5: Landslide risk assessment. Cees van Westen.
Mikael Pedersen, GEUS – WP2 leader Katy Lee, BGS – WP3 leader EGDI-Scope Full Consortium Meeting, Vienna 28 th April 2014.
Earthquake Vulnerability and Exposure Analysis Session 2 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis Earthquake Risk Analysis 1.
Content of the Fund of Geological Information I.Bogatyrev, SC Mineral G.Sergeyeva, CEP GeoInforM.
Chapter 27 Minerals and the Environment. Importance of Minerals to Society Standard of living increases with availability –Success in locating, extracting,
UN ECE CEP Working Group on Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 7th Session Geneva 27 – 29 November 2006 Item 5(a) Guidelines for the Application of.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) Cost-benefit analysis exercise RiskCity Cees van Westen
Environmental Toolbox. Technical Module Introduction.
High Risk Zones. Hazards: –Earthquakes –Volcanoes –Landslides –Floods –Drought –Cyclones.
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Spatial Multi Criteria Evaluation for Vulnerability.
Chapter 17 Hazards and Risks. Questions for Today What is Risk and how do we handle Risk? What is a Hazard? What is Toxicology? What affects Toxicity?
Development of Spatial Probability Models to Estimate, Integrate, and Assess Ground- Water Vulnerability at Multiple Scales Earl A. Greene and Andrew E.
Second National Communication of the Argentine Republic to the Conference of the Parties to the UNFCC. 2.
Key Words in disaster Management Dhammika Mahendre.
UNU Campus Worldwide.
RISK DUE TO AIR POLLUTANTS
International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC) ISL 2004 RiskCity Exercise: Quantitative annual multi hazard risk assessment.
Project management and executive planning of activities Управление проектом и планирование выполнения работ М.А. Коробейникова Marina Korobeinikova Life.
Project Members Funded by EIONET Workshop on Adaptation, Copenhagen, Oct. 9/10, 2008 Adaptation to Climate Change Impacts and Water Resource Problems in.
Upgrade PO M. Tyndel, MIWG Review plans p1 Nov 1 st, CERN Module integration Review – Decision process  Information will be gathered for each concept.
Risk assessment and Natural Hazards. Concept of vulnerability (e.g. fatalities in two contrasting societies) Deaths 1 …………………………………………
Mountain Risks: A Marie Curie Research & Training Network J. Corominas and the ‘Mountain-Risks’ research team Department of Geotechnical Engineering.
Colorado River Water Resources Vulnerability Project for Hill Country Conservancy Daniel Zavala Araiza.
NGR: Postcode: © Crown Copyright All rights reserved. Image reproduced with permission of Ordnance Survey and Ordnance Survey of Northern Ireland.
Sustainability Assessment of Family House - Case Study
Karstovo-suffozionnye failures
DISASTER VULNERABILITY, RISK AND CAPACITY
SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL ANALYSIS OF THE DEGRADATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
Infrastructure planning and management
Hazards Planning and Risk Management Risk Analysis and Assessment
Proximity to airports via the road network
Mauricio Santillana April 28, 2005
Groundwater area protection plans in water management
GWB delineation in Finland
The inventory of Finnish groundwater resources
Flood hazard maps and Flood risk maps (Guidance and Schema)
TOP 5d) Floods Directive reporting - INSPIRE progress -
Green urban areas Assessing the proximity of green areas for the population of major cities By Hugo Poelman – Veerle Martens.
Presentation transcript:

LIFE – Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Input for Geological Risk Assessment Johannes Klein & Jaana Jarva April 2008, St. Petersburg

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Risk (technical approach) Risk = Hazard x Consequence Exposure & Vulnerability The probability of harmful consequences, or expected losses (deaths, injuries, property, livelihoods, economic activity disrupted or environment damaged) resulting from interactions between natural or human-induced hazards and vulnerable conditions. Conventionally risk is expressed by the notation Risk = Hazards x Vulnerability. Some disciplines also include the concept of exposure to refer particularly to the physical aspects of vulnerability. (UNISDR 2004)

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Input for the Risk Components Hazard: –Type of hazard (geological instability, erosion, radon, flood….) –Probability of occurrence –Extent and magnitude Exposure: –No. of people affected –No. of buildings affected –Length of affected network infrastructure (roads, pipelines, water supply…) Vulnerability: –Sensitivity –Value

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Examples for Vulnerability Buildings’ vulnerability (sensitivity) to geological instabilities: Vulnerability = construction type + age of building + height of building + maintenance + single house or row of houses Road network’s vulnerability to geological instabilities: Vulnerability = length + importance (+condition) People’s vulnerability to Radon: Vulnerability = construction type of building + drinking water source & consumption or radon in air

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Input data Geological Hazards: –Probability, Extent, Magnitude Exposure and Vulnerability –Cadastral data (no. & type of houses, infrastructure) –Population density –Other: condition of infrastructure & houses, distribution of population at day/night CEP? SC Mineral?

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Table of Geological Risks and Vulnerability Geological Hazard Hazard Parameter Exposed Element ExposureVulnerabilityParameters and Indexes Explanatio n Sources RadonRadon concentration in air over threshold PopulationPopulation in radon prone area No. of people in “unprotected” houses Foundation types: Slab-on-grade, house with basement, crawl space Vuotilainen, A. and I. Mäkeläinen, 1993: Radon Risk Mapping using Indoor Monitoring Data, Indoor Air 19943, 3, Radon concentration in drinking water over threshold PopulationPeople using drinking water with radon concentratio n over threshold Amount of consumed radon affected drinking water Daily drinking water consumption: Adults: 140 ml/day Children: 200 ml/day Ingestion-dose- factor: Adults: 1x Sv/Bq Children: 2x Sv/Bq UNSCEAR 1993: Soruces and Effects of Ionizing Radiation – UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly Geological Instability Mapping of ground stability BuildingsNo. of Buildings Height of buildings, age, construction type, maintenance, aggregation of buildings … … … See handed out table for more details

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Radon Risk Map -1 Very low2 Low3 Medium4 High5 Radon hazard forecast (taken from the radon-hazard map) Buildings’ vulnerability (building’s function & no. of floors) Very low1 Low2 Medium3 High4 Very high5 X = Radon Risk

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Buildings’ Vulnerability (first estimates)

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Radon Risk Map

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Weighting of hazards – the Delphi method Investigations of opinions and ratings from hazard and spatial planning experts on importance of certain hazard on European scale Three round => average estimation Another application on regional scale

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Multi-hazard (multi-risk) mapping Summing up of single hazard grid layers => classification of multi-hazards into five classes (very high, high, medium, low, very low) Using the method of summing up the grids makes it possible to look backwards what is the data behind the qualitative risk assessment See simplified example from Finland used to classify construction suitability on the regional scale

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Construction suitability data (simplified example from Finland) All data is converted to 25x25 metre grid Soil types have classes 1-20, and other mapping elements have classes –6 = clay, 60 = water Slope steepness have classes – 30 % = 400 Thickness of fine-grained sediments have classes – 25 m = 5000

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Construction suitability data (2) End result: Raster map where Quaternary geological mapping data + slope steepness + thickness of fine-grained sediments are summed up Coding of grids: – thickness – slope steepness – soil type Example: Grid-code = 3106 –thickness of fine-grained sediments 3000 (= 4,5-13 m) –slope steepness 100 (= <5%) –soil type 6 (= clay)

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva MURLUMSS Multi-Risk Land Use Management Support System Map and scenario selection Hazard analysis Exposed elements analysis Vulnerability analysis Multiple criteria risk evaluation Coping capacity analysis Outputs Output comparisons between scenarios To be partly tested in GeoInforM –project?

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Risk factors, hazards (1) Geological instability –Quaternary deposits –Engineering geology Surface, 10 meters level, 20 meters level Lithological groups (sand, gravel, peat etc.) => properties + thickness Sub-groups of rocks –Hydrogeological properties Groundwater level in different aquifers (changes) Location of main aquifers Piezometric heights –Neotectonics Zones (calculated according to observed events) –Paleovalleys Pre-quaternary reliefs

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Risk factors, hazards (2) Radon hazard –4 classes (very low, low, medium, high) Nature gas generation –Areas with known natural gas generation –Areas recommended to be studied further –Areas with buried hydrological systems (lakes, river channels, also artificial formed areas) –Gas collector wells (risk management) (point data) –Gas generation events (known risk) (point data)

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Risk factors, hazards (3) Nature gas generation (4 classes?) –Areas with known risk –Areas where further studies are needed –Areas with buried hydrological systems (natural and artificial) –Areas with managed risk Karst formations –Location Surface erosion –Relevant documents, datasets will be provided by SC Mineral

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Risk factors, vulnerability (4) Master plan –Current situation of land use –Land use in 2015 –Land use in 2025 Buildings –Use of building –Number of floors –Type of building Population density (three options) –Number of registered residents in buildings –Estimations based on type of building –Distribution of population density in the city

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Further work The attribute information of selected.shp-files will be translated to English English translations will be delivered by SC Mineral to GTK either as separate tables or as.shp-files without any Cyrillic writing by the end of May GTK will first make proposal for classification of geologic instability Multi-hazard maps? Weighting of hazards; Delphi-method?

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Relevance of geological risks Results from questionnaire developed in Task 2 The most important risk according to four interviewed groups: flooding caused by groundwater Other relevant risks: karst formations and radon hazard Geological instability?

LIFE-Third Countries GeoInforM LIFE06 TCY/ROS/ Johanne Klein & Jaana Jarva Discussion Difference between options of experts and people Promotion needed