Assessment Overview: Part 1. Overview Overview of IDEA Data – Not other college assessments like AACP surveys, experiential results, dashboards, etc.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA Course Evaluations New Faculty Academy Spring,
Advertisements

Outcomes Assessment- Full Implementation Meeting Fall 2009.
Criticism NICE Evidence Search Student Champion Scheme: Evaluating Student-Owned Learning Teaching Experience Background Peer-Peer Advice Evaluation “
SMART GOALS APS TEACHER EVALUATION. AGENDA Purpose Balancing Realism and Rigor Progress Based Goals Three Types of Goals Avoiding Averages Goal.
Teaching Methods Related to Student Progress in Lower-level STEM Courses Steve Benton, Ph.D. Senior Research Officer IDEA Emeritus Professor, Kansas State.
Indiana State University Assessment of General Education Objectives Using Indicators From National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)
Overview Locating Teaching Case Studies Inheriting Teaching Cases and Integrating Them into a Curriculum Tailoring Teaching Cases for Particular Student.
Using Student Ratings to Improve Program Quality and Student Learning Dr. Randi Hagen, Flagler College Dr. Sarah Logan, Angelo State University Dr. William.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction: A Diagnostic Guide for Improvement Dr. Kristi Roberson-Scott.
Using the IDEA Student Ratings System: An Introduction University of Saint Thomas Fall
Understanding and Using Your IDEA Evaluation Results Nina Campanicki & Ernie Linsay Faculty Development Day March 20, 2010.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Update Carrie Ahern and Lynette Molstad Selected slides reproduced with permission of Dr. Amy Gross from The IDEA Center.
IDEA What it is and How to Implement the System Texas A & M, February 2013 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Senior Educational Consultant.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Peer Reviewer Training The SLN Quality Matters Initiative Continuous Improvement in Teaching and Learning.
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Insight Improvement Impact ® Loyola University of Chicago April 10-11, 2013 Steve Benton, PhD Senior Research Officer.
Structured Learning Assistance (SLA) and Training for Success Jim Valkenburg Delta College.
Kontos1 Principles of Quality Instruction in Web Classes George Kontos, Ed.D. Assistant Professor
Scholarship of Teaching: An Introduction New Fellows Orientation April 17, 2008 SoTL Fellows
Analyzing and Improving College Teaching: Here’s an IDEA Alan C. Lacy, Associate Dean College of Applied Science and Technology Illinois State University.
Interpreting IDEA reports Diagnostic Form Short Form
HSTW Southern Regional Education Board Orientation to HSTW Goals and Key Practices.
Tuesday, January 8, 2013, 12:30pm-3:30 pm Hollywood Road Education Services - Room 2.
1 Teacher Evaluation Institute July 23, 2013 Virginia Department of Education Division of Teacher Education and Licensure.
METHODS Study Population Study Population: 224 students enrolled in a 3-credit hour, undergraduate, clinical pharmacology course in Fall 2005 and Spring.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS Overview Scholarship highlights of College Status of Annual Surveys Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide.
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Assessment Overview Drake CPHS. Overview Overview of IDEA Data Assessing college-wide teaching goal Advising Results Q&A.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and SACS University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Office of Institutional Research, Planning and Assessment January 24, 2011 UNDERSTANDING THE DIAGNOSTIC GUIDE.
Is PeerMark a useful tool for formative assessment of literature review? A trial in the School of Veterinary Science Duret, D & Durrani,
IDEA Making an Old Enemy Your Friend. MYTH or REALITY?  IDEA is a for-profit corporation.
The Genetics Concept Assessment: a new concept inventory for genetics Michelle K. Smith, William B. Wood, and Jennifer K. Knight Science Education Initiative.
Faculty Portfolios Cindy C. Wilson, Ph.D., C.H.E.S. Professor Department of Family Medicine Uniformed Services University.
College Algebra: An Overview of Program Change Dr. Laura J. Pyzdrowski Dr. Anthony S. Pyzdrowski Dr. Melanie Butler Vennessa Walker.
Improving the Teaching of Academic Genres in High-Enrollment Courses across Disciplines: A Three-Year Reiterative Study Chris Thaiss University of California,
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.
The role of course evals in faculty reviews: One perspective John Petraitis CAFE March 25, 2011.
Alison Morrison-Shetlar Kaleidoscopic Learning: looking at learning through different lenses.
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Dakota State University.
Prepared by M.A. Sana Yousif Ahmed College of Languages English Department Evening Classes.
University Teaching Symposium January 9,  Individual Development and Educational Assessment  Kansas State University  A diagnostic to.
 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Texas A & M University February 2013.
IDEA & Campus Labs Partnership Loyola University Chicago - Fall 2015 September 14, 2015.
Effective Grading Strategies Alison Morrison-Shetlar Faculty Center for Teaching and Learning Adapted from the book Effective Grading by Barbara Walvoord.
College Level Cooperatively Taught Information Literacy and Subject Area Course Background and Assignments.
IDEA STUDENT EVALUATION REPORTS Insight Improvement Impact ® Using IDEA as a Tool for Reflection about Your Teaching Raritan Valley Community College January.
Using IDEA for Assessment Howard Community College August 17, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
Summary of CPHS Course Evaluations: AY and Chuck Phillips August 2009.
New Faculty Orientation Institutional Research and Accountability Sarah Logan August 18, 2011.
Using IDEA for Assessment, Program Review, and Accreditation Texas A & M University November 8, 2012 Shelley A. Chapman, PhD.
2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt 2pt 3 pt 4 pt 5 pt 1 pt 2 pt 3 pt 4pt 5 pt 1pt Category 1 Category 2Category 3Category.
Example single slide insert for lectures You can amend the text of these slides, and adjust the text boxes, as you wish. The more personalised and relevant.
DEVELOPED BY MARY BETH FURST ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR, BUCO DIVISION AMY CHASE MARTIN DIRECTOR OF FACULTY DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL MEDIA UNDERSTANDING.
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
USING STUDENT EVALUATIONS AT STOCKTON Heather McGovern Director of the Institute for Faculty Development Associate Professor of Writing January 2012.
Your feedback matters when you provide it. New course evaluations online at the end of term! See: uoft.me/courseevaluations for more information.
Barbara Quintiliano Presented at ACRL/DVC Fall Program November 12, 2010.
Making an Old Enemy Your Friend
Classroom Observations
Teaching Goal Overview Drake CPHS
Assessment Workshop Design Program Portfolio & Presentation / ART- 230
Classroom Observations
Qualtrics Proposal Gwen Gorzelsky, Executive Director, TILT
Rubrics for academic assessment
Assignment Design Workshop
IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction
2017 Postgraduate Research Experience Survey (PRES) Results
Presentation transcript:

Assessment Overview: Part 1

Overview Overview of IDEA Data – Not other college assessments like AACP surveys, experiential results, dashboards, etc. Assessing college-wide teaching goal Curricular Review uses Scholarship highlights Q&A

Drake Background IDEA System – Course evaluation system: Heavily researched – Used by ~ 7 SOP/COP; 320 institutions – Measures progress against faculty objectives IDEA at Drake – Since 2004 – Paper and on-line (35-40 courses/semester)

IDEA Background Students' feedback on their own learning progress, effort, and motivation, Student perceptions of the instructor's use of teaching methods and strategies. Rather than teaching style or personality, IDEA focuses on student learning and the methods used to facilitate it.

I. Teaching Goal Great Universities measure what they value (anonymous) This is one piece of teaching review

Progress on Relevant Objectives vs. IDEA National Database Converted Scores Much Higher (10% of courses) 1.6%1.4%1.1% Higher (20% of courses) 26.6%18.3%24.2% Similar (40% of courses) 43.8%57.8%50.6% Lower (20% of courses) 15.6%15.5%15.4% Much Lower (10% of courses) 12.5%7.0%8.8% Goal Progress72%77.5%75.9%

Action: Faculty Development What’s the ‘appropriate group’ to review? – CAC and Chairs – Education on selecting and teaching to these objectives: Bill Pallett program Are low scores related to new, first-time- taught courses? Faculty thoughts? Needs?

Actions What actions have been taken? – Faculty Development & meetings on: Soul searching on what I’m trying to achieve How to choose objectives (right ones, right number) Should Teaching methods be adjusted? Linking content and methods to the objective More use of IDEA resources (POD notes, etc.) Tie action to faculty annual goals Good discussions and culture of assessment Others?

Primary Instructional Approach (09-10)

Instructor Related Course Requirements (Some or Much required) Reading and memorization were new categories in

Percent of CPHS classes selecting objective as either Essential or Important (FIF) ??

1=no progress 2=slight progress 3=moderate progress 4=substantial progress 5=exceptional progress Student ratings of progress on objectives chosen as Essential or Important

AY AY AY Average% of classes below 3.0 % of classes 4.0 or above Amount of Reading CPHS % 41% 46% 8% 16% 22% IDEA3.233%15% Amount of work in other (non-reading) assignments CPHS % 32% 39% 28% 20% 8% IDEA3.421%18% Difficulty of subject matter CPHS % 33% 35% 33% 31% 26% IDEA3.420%18% Values are similar if within 0.3 1=Much less than most courses, 2=less than most, 3=about average, 4=more than most, 5=much more Amount and Difficulty of Course work: Student Ratings

Easier Process in 2010 Less faculty work – No more downloading rosters for on-line – No more gathering your own paper evaluations – Pre-marked FIFs (just finish your choices) – One, on-line form for setting up courses On-line or paper? Start date for evals? – in mid-August

A few scholarship/service highlights: peer reviewed publications 32 peer reviewed podium and poster presentations 15 non-peer reviewed publications 43 invited or non-peer reviewed presentations and posters 5 book chapters $90,000 in new funding 16 undergraduate research projects 18 health care sites where faculty provide services Wide involvement in the peer review of manuscripts

Questions/Discussion