IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama. Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Background studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC GDE Baseline Assessment Workshop SLAC, January 18-21, 2011.
Advertisements

Joanne Beebe-Wang 7/27/11 1 SR in eRHIC IR Synchrotron Radiation in eRHIC IR and Detector Background Joanne Beebe-Wang Brookhaven National Laboratory 10/
Background effect to Vertex Detector and Impact parameter resolution T. Fujikawa(Tohoku Univ.) Feb LC Detector Meeting.
GUINEA-PIG: A tool for beam-beam effect study C. Rimbault, LAL Orsay Daresbury, April 2006.
1 Vacuum Requirements in the Detector Region from Beam Gas and other Considerations Takashi Maruyama (SLAC) LCWA 2009, Albuquerque October 2, 2009.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Snowmass July 2001.
Super-B Factory Workshop April 20-23, 2005 Super-B IR design M. Sullivan 1 Status on an IR Design for a Super-B Factory M. Sullivan for the Super-B Factory.
Summary of wg2a (BDS and IR) Deepa Angal-Kalinin, Shigeru Kuroda, Andrei Seryi October 21, 2005.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Jeff Gronberg/LLNL For the Beam Delivery Group LCWS - October 25, 2000.
Background Studies Takashi Maruyama SLAC ALCPG 2004 Winter Workshop January 8, 2004.
27 June 2006Ken Moffeit1 Comparison of 2mrad and 14/20 mrad extraction lines Ken Moffeit ILC BDS 27 June 06.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC IR Layout and Background Estimates Tom Markiewicz/SLAC Snowmass 2001, 05 July 2001 LCD Meeting, 25 September.
LCWS ’05 Machine Detector Interface Design Updates Tom Markiewicz SLAC 22 March 2005.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Working Group Summary Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Workshop, UCSC June 29, 2002.
Background comparison between 20 mrad and 2 mr crossings Takashi Maruyama SLAC Machine-Detector Interface Workshop SLAC January 6-8, 2005.
Backgrounds and Forward Region Backgrounds and Forward Region FCAL Collaboration Workshop TAU, September 18-19, 2005 Christian Grah.
Status of ongoing studies for comparing 2-mrad and 20-mrad IRs T. Maruyama SLAC.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Background in the CILD01fw Weekly Detector Meeting May 5, 2009 André Sailer CLIC_01_ILD.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
1 LumiCal Optimization and Design Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, Boulder, September 18, 2008.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting
Backgrounds in the NLC BDS ISG9 December 10 – Takashi Maruyama SLAC.
Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Page 1 Overview and Issues of the MEIC Interaction Region M. Sullivan MEIC Accelerator Design Review September 15-16, 2010.
LCWS2004 Paris 1 Beam background study for GLC Tsukasa Aso, Toyama College of Maritime Technology and GLC Vertex Group H.Aihara, K.Tanabe, Tokyo Univ.
Collimation and Backgrounds Summary N. Mokhov,T. Tauchi, N. Watson.
Beam-Beam Background and the Forward Region at a CLIC Detector André Sailer (CERN PH-LCD) LC Physics School, Ambleside 22st August, 2009.
Hongbo Zhu, Qinglei Xiu, Xinchou Lou (IHEP) On behalf of the CEPC study group ICFA Advanced Beam Dynamics Workshop: Higgs Factory (HF2014) 9-12 October.
1 Muon Collider Backgrounds Steve Geer Fermilab Steve Geer MC Detector & Physics DOE June 24, 2009.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project IR Geometries & Constraints on Forward Detectors Tom Markiewicz SLAC ALCPG SLAC 08 January 2004.
Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov
Interaction Region Backgrounds M. Sullivan for the MEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2015.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
Collimation Baseline Configuration and Collimation Studies Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Machine-Detector Interface Tom Markiewicz LC R&D Opportunities, SLAC May 21, 2002.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
ILC-GDE Meeting Beijing Feb Effect of MDI Design on BDS Collimation Depth Frank Jackson ASTeC Daresbury Laboratory Cockcroft Institute.
Simulation on beam loss from radiative Bhabha process Y. Funakoshi KEK.
Re-evaluating the Need for a anti-DID in SiD T. Markiewicz/SLAC SiD Optimization Meeting Updated
1 M. Sullivan IR update IR Update M. Sullivan for the 3 rd SuperB workshop SLAC June14-16, 2006.
SiD Collaboration Meeting Highlights Tom Markiewicz/SLAC ILC BDS Meeting 08 May 2007.
L. Keller 3/18/02 Beam-Gas-Bremsstrahlung and Coulomb Scattering in the NLC Beam Delivery System Conditions for Calculation: 1. Program is DECAY TURTLE.
1 Simulation of Neutron Backgrounds in the ILC Extraction Line Beam Dump Siva Darbha Supervisors: Lewis Keller and Takashi Maruyama.
1/24 SiD FCAL Takashi Maruyama Tom Markiewicz SLAC TILC’09, Tskuba, Japan, April 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K.
ILC IP SR and PEP-II M. Sullivan for the ILC IR engineering workshop IRENG07 Sept 17-21, 2007.
1 O. Napoly ECFA-DESY Amsterdam, April 2003 Machine – Detector Interface : what is new since the TDR ? O. Napoly CEA/Saclay.
1 LoI FCAL Takashi Maruyama SLAC SiD Workshop, SLAC, March 2-4, 2009 Contributors: SLAC M. BreidenbachFNALW. Cooper G. Haller K. Krempetz T. MarkiewiczBNLW.
MDI Simulations at SLAC Takashi Maruyama, Lew Keller, Thomas Markiewicz, Uli Wienands, SLAC MAP Collaboration Meeting, FNAL June 21, 2013.
Beampipe design F.Raffaelli G.Calderini, M.Marchiori, M.Mazur, E.Paoloni Framework for Geant4 Interaction Region simulation.
MAIN DUMP LINE: BEAM LOSS SIMULATIONS WITH THE TDR PARAMETERS Y. Nosochkov E. Marin, G. White (SLAC) LCWS14 Workshop, Belgrade, October 7, 2014.
Design challenges for head-on scheme Deepa Angal-Kalinin Orsay, 19 th October 2006.
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
M. Sullivan for the SLAC SuperB Workshop Jan , 2009
M. Sullivan International Review Committee November 12-13, 2007
Layout of Detectors for CLIC
The MDI at CEPC Dou Wang, Hongbo Zhu, Huamin Qu, Jianli Wang, Manqi Ruan, Qinglei Xiu, Sha Bai, Shujin Li, Weichao Yao, Yanli Jin, Yin Xu, Yiwei Wang,
Neutron and Photon Backscattering from the ILC Beam Dump
ILC Baseline BDS Collimation Depth Calculations
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Local double ring MDI Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Background Simulations at Fermilab
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting Work summary Sha Bai CEPC AP meeting
Presentation transcript:

IR Beamline and Sync Radiation Takashi Maruyama

Collimation No beam loss within 400 m of IP Muon background can be acceptable. No sync radiations directly hitting the detector Spoilers SP2 and SP4 are set at the collimation depth. Energy collimation Betatron collimation SP2 SP4 Final Focus collimation

Collimation studies Particle tracking and interaction simulation – Decay TURTLE – STRUCT – GEANT3 – GEANT4 – MuCarlo – MARS 1480 m 295 cm sp1 sp2 a2 sp3 a3 sp4 a4 E-slit FF Collimators IP GEANT3

SiD Forward Region Beampipe LumiCal W Mask BeamCal Borated Poly Support Tube

Pair background Beam-beam interaction generates ~75 K e+/e-/BX No material can be placed inside the pairs. Mask M1 contains the pairs and protects the detector from back splash. Want to place the vertex detector at R=1.4 cm. Want a hermetic detector to small polar angles. Conventional sync radiation masks are not compatible with these requirements. Collimate the beam so that no sync radiations directly hit the detector.

14 mrad crossing geometry Apertures: Low ZQD1S R=1.0 m

Sync radiation from Soft Bend Drozhdin 90 m

Soft Bend Sync Radiation Mask 1 Mask 2 ±7.8 mm ±7.4 mm  k  = 32 keV N  = 3  10 8 / BX R (cm)  (  rad) IP Mask Pass IP The edge scattering from Mask 2 is a potential source of detector background, which is not estimated yet.

Quadrupole sync radiation and Collimation depth Find collimation settings at SP2 and SP4. Collimation depth – (n x  x, n y  y ) Back track particles from IP to QF1. x y  = n   IP  x = 31  rad  y = 14  rad  Track particles from QF1 to IP, while generating SR. Find Nx and Ny that generate SR hitting the detector.

Collimation Depth from Exit aperture Ny Nx Nx = 17 Ny = 100 QF1 aperture limit

No. photons per e- - Exit aperture Ny Nx Collimation depth: (nx,ny)=(12, 71)

Other apertures BeamCal 1.5 cmIP 1.2 cm Ny Nx

Collimation performance Jackson (PAC07) Halo: uniform over 1.5x collimation depth. Drozhdin 1/x halo model Collimation performance depends on the halo model. Set the collimators at (nx,ny) = (12, 71) Find # particles outside the collimation window. Nx=10

Beam Halo Simulation finds 3×10 -5 halo. Burkhardt (PAC07) Jlab beam halo is small.

Possible SR studies Assume a halo uniformly distributed over 1.5x collimation depth. Assume halo (2  10 7 /BX) Find SR rate