RADAR SPECTRUM ENGINEERING CRITERIA (RSEC) A Comprehensive Review

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications ITU-R Developments on UWB B. Gracie, Chairman, RAG/ITU-R SOURCE:ITU-R TITLE:ITU-R Developments on.
Advertisements

New Radar Technology MHz Band
ITU-R Working Party 8B Thomas Ewers RegTP Germany Chairman WP8B.
Overview of Regulatory Body Thomas Ewers BNetzA Germany Chairman WP8B.
1 Ground Based Meteorological Radars Presented By: David Franc NOAAs National Weather Service September 2005.
ACD A ITU Working Party 8B Activities Presented By John Mettrop UK Civil Aviation Authority.
FEBRUARY 2005ICAO AMCP WG F ULTRA WIDE BAND A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE Presented by: John Mettrop, UK CAA Dale Stacey, Eurocontrol.
National Weather Service 1 Results of Operational Compatibility Studies between ASR, Meteorological Radars and IMT Systems Operating in the –
Interference Effects and Interference- Limit Criteria for Radar Receivers IEEE Electromagnetic Compatibility Conference Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 26 July 2010.
Technical Challenges to Spectrum Sharing Between Radars and Non-Radar (Communication) Systems 7th Annual ISART Boulder, Colorado 1 March 2005 Frank Sanders.
Protecting RNSS Spectrum Domestic and International Activities Karl B. Nebbia Associate Administrator Office of Spectrum Management National Telecommunications.
1 ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB) A POSSIBLE AREA FOR STANDARDS BILL LUTHER FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C
NTIA TRANSMIT SPECTRUM REQUIREMENTS FOR THE REVISED DCPRS CERTIFICATION STANDARDS DCS MANUFACTURERS MEETING NOVEMBER 10, 2004 Peter Woolner Mitretek Systems.
CJK IMT 28 Xi’an, China 2-3 Jun CJK IMT 28, Xi’an, China 1/4 CJK-IMT Possible contribution for Revision of Rec. ITU-R M.1580/1581 ATARASHI,
1 Fully Digital HF Radios Phil Harman VK6APH Dayton Hamvention – 17 th May 2008.
SPECTRUM REGULATION IN EUROPE, ECC ACTIVITIES RELEVANT FOR UTILITIES Bruno ESPINOSA, ECO
Review of ITU-R Study Group Activities Kevin A. Hughes Radiocommunication Bureau.
SE35presentation.ppt France Telecom R&D CEPT ERC SE35 activities on compatibility between radio services and PLT (Power Line Telecommunications) Dubrovnik,
ESE – Andrew Rusek Applications of Computer Modeling in Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Tests (Part1) P8. Field Pattern of Three Radiating.
NBTC/ITU Workshop on Cross-Border Frequency Coordination June , 2015 Bangkok, Thailand.
COST286 meeting Barcelona 14/15 April BUTE Part 1 Conducted and radiated disturbance regulations for PLC devices János Löcher; György Varjú BUTE.
What’s Going on in Canada?
Development of Active Phased Array Weather Radar
Radar: Acronym for Radio Detection and Ranging
Radar 101 Rick Reaser May 19, 2010.
Overview of ITU-T Study Group 5 “Environment and Climate Change” Cristina Bueti, Adviser, ITU.
Radio Interference Calculations
TRANSMIT SPECTRUM ISSUES MANUFACTURERS MEETING AUGUST 2004 Peter Woolner Mitretek Systems
WMO Workshop on Radio Frequencies for Meteorology Meteorological Satellite Services David F. McGinnis U.S. Dept. of Commerce, NOAA 7 October 2002 Geneva,
National Science Foundation 1 Dr. Tomas E. Gergely Electromagnetic Spectrum Manager National Science Foundation Registration of Radio.
Proposed revision of ITU-R Recommendation providing EESS (active) Performance and Interference Criteria May 13, 2015 Committee On Radio Frequencies Thomas.
Doc.: IEEE /015r1 Submission January 2000 Bob Huang, Panasonic/MatsushitaSlide 1 The ITU-R Structure and Process Bob Huang Matsushita/Panasonic.
Doc.: IEEE 802.RR-01/017-r1 Submission November 2001 Vic Hayes, Agere SystemsSlide 1 Opening report Radio Regulations to Radio Working Groups November.
Meteorological Spectrum Issues- Outcome of the 2003 World Radiocommunication Conference Presented By: David Franc National Weather Service December 2,
Review of Study Group Activities Kevin A. Hughes Radiocommunication Bureau.
Sg-whitespace SubmissionRashid A. Saeed, Telekom MalaysiaSlide 1 February 2009 Slide 1 Work in the ITU: Focus on how 802 can best leverage.
Committed to Connecting the World For the last 25 years, ITU has been coordinating the development of a global broadband multimedia international mobile.
1 Emerging issues Titus Spoelstra ESF Committee on Radio Astronomy Frequencies P.O.Box 2, 7990AA Dwingeloo, Netherlands
1 ITU–R Task Group 1/8 The Bush Administration’s Commitment to Implementing New Technologies Michael D. Gallagher Assistant Secretary for Communications.
CSMAC Spectrum Sharing Sub- Committee Discussion Materials March 2012.
November 14, 2005Doc: IEEE a Li, Takizawa, Rikuta, Hara, Ikegami, Kohno Slide1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
RALI FX3 Microwave Fixed Services Frequency Coordination Glenn Odlum Senior Engineer Spectrum Engineering Section
Detection and the impact of man-made interference on EES (passive) operations Thomas vonDeak NASA Spectrum Management Office 28-October-2004 “Active Protection.
1 U.S. STUDY RADAR EMISSION MASKS A Review of the Radar Spectrum Engineering Criteria (RSEC) ROBERT L. HINKLE United States Department of Commerce National.
Doc.: IEEE /503r0 Submission September 2004 McCorkle & Welborn, FreescaleSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
Nairobi, Kenya September 2007 Preparations for WRC-07 Overview of Regional and National proposals as of 13 September 2007 Presented by Robert Witzen.
March 14, 2002 (revised 2/13/2002) 1 Version of CISPR 22 used in the United States by the FCC William S. Hurst Office of Engineering and Technology Federal.
1 ITU–R Task Group 1/8 “Bush Administration’s Commitment to Responsible Development and Deployment of Ultra Wideband” Michael D. Gallagher Acting Assistant.
Bryan HUNEYCUTT (NASA/JPL) WMO, Geneva, Switzerland March 2006
Doc.: IEEE /455r0 Submission July 2002 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Harmonized Standard from BRAN#29 Mika Kasslin.
Wireless Theory and Regulations For unlicensed wireless networks Presentation by Wyatt Zacharias Except where otherwise noted this work is licensed under.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission January, 2004 CRL & CRL-UWB ConsortiumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area.
1 John McCloskey NASA/GSFC Chief EMC Engineer Code Effects of Rise/Fall Times on Signal Spectra.
A study on the coexistence between Direct Air to Ground Communication (DA2GC) and Radars in the 5 GHz band Peter Trommelen, Rob van Heijster, Arne Theil.
Doc.: IEEE a Submission November, 2003 CRL-UWB ConsortiumSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
CRAF POSITION ON WRC-19 AGENDA ITEMS RELEVANT TO RADIO ASTRONOMY Talayeh Hezareh - CRAF FM Max Planck Institute for Radio astronomy Bonn, Germany MAY 20,
Agenda Item: 1.12 Title: Extension of current worldwide allocation to the Earth exploration–satellite (active) service in the frequency band 9300– 9900.
August, 2012 MBANS FCC Rules Summary Information document for SRD/MG on the FCC adopted MBAN rules under part 95 MedRadio service on 24 May 2012.
ULTRA WIDE BAND A EUROPEAN PERSPECTIVE Presented by: John Mettrop, UK CAA Dale Stacey, Eurocontrol FEBRUARY 2005 ICAO AMCP.
How does a klystron work? TE-MPE Section Meeting Karolina Kulesz
ITU Working Party 8B Activities
RADIO SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT
ITS-Related Work Items in ITU-R Study Group 5, Working Party 5A
Open Rack Specification 2.1 Update
Chap II. Radar Hardware (PART 1)
Submission Title: [Regulatory Update]
François Rancy Director, ITU Radiocommunication Bureau
World Radiocommunications Conference
Possible Future Agenda Items
Agenda Item Overview & draft India proposal
Presentation transcript:

RADAR SPECTRUM ENGINEERING CRITERIA (RSEC) A Comprehensive Review ROBERT L. HINKLE Alion Science and Technology 185 Admiral Cochrane Drive Annapolis, MD 21401

PURPOSE ● Ensure an acceptable degree of electromagnetic compatibility among radar systems, and between such systems and those of other radio services sharing the frequency spectrum. ● Promote efficient use of the spectrum.

● Last major review of RSEC conducted in 1973-1977 time frame REASON FOR RSEC REVIEW ● Last major review of RSEC conducted in 1973-1977 time frame ● New generation of radar systems more complex  Waveform characteristics change pulse-to-pulse  Dynamic PRF pulse trains ● Trend toward solid state output devices ● Increase in interference from radars ● ITU-R Working Party 8B (Radiodetermination) has set up a radar group to investigate feasibility of more stringent emission masks than contained in ITU-R Recommendation SM1541, Annex 8, by 2006 Radiocommunication Assembly meeting.  Work Program developed by ITU-R Working Party 8B

APPROACH  Develop a software program that will provide current and optional emission masks.  Identify, through measurements, emission characteristic of radars with various types of output devices, filters and antennas. Apply software program (emission masks) to measured emission characteristics to assess feasibility of establishing a more spectrum efficient emission mask. Engage the radar manufacturers and radar output device manufacturers to identify state-of-the-art capabilities. Through the IRAC/TSC, in coordination with Federal agencies, reach agreement regarding draft revised emission masks for future radar systems. This coordination is in progress.

RADAR CHARACTERISTICS ADDRESSED IN THE RSEC ● Emission bandwidth (40 dB) ● Emission levels ● Tuning Range ● Antenna patterns ● Frequency tolerance ● Receiver selectivity ● Image and spurious rejection ● Local-oscillator radiation

RSEC EMISSION MASK

AIRPORT SURVEILLANCE RADAR (Klystron Output device) (radiated measurement in far field of antenna)

WEATHER RADAR (Klystron output Device) (radiated measurement in far field of antenna)

RADIONAVIGATION RADAR (Coaxial Magnetron WO Filter) (radiated measurement in far field of antenna)

RADIONAVIGATION RADAR (Coaxial Magnetron With Filter) (radiated measurement in far field of antenna)

RADIONAVIGATION RADAR (Coaxial Magnetron, Slotted Array Antenna) (radiated measurement in far field of antenna)

OVERVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED ● Add the following to Group A (Exempt from RSEC).  Maritime Radionavigation 2900-3100 MHz  Radionavigation 5460-5650 MHz  Aeronautical Radionavigation 15.4-15.7 GHz These radars are, for the most part, not under Government control and are widely used by the private sector.

RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED OVERVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED ● Group B (Criteria B)  Retain 40 dB bandwidth formulas  Assess feasibility of roll-off slopes of 30/40 dB per decade  Propose to change X (dB) floor level to: X (dB) =10LogP(Watts) + 30 Where: 60 dB ≤ X (dB) ≤ 80 dB Current RSEC (X) level is dependent on the power, pulse width, and prf of the radar (see section 5.5.2 of NTIA Manual of Regulations & Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management).

RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED OVERVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED ● Group C (Criteria C)  Retain 40 dB bandwidth formulas  Assess feasibility of roll-off slopes of 30/40 dB per decade  Propose to change X (dB) Level to 60 dB for near term, and consider phasing in X (dB) floor of: X (dB) =10LogP(Watts) + 30 Where: 60 dB ≤ X (dB) ≤ 80 dB Current RSEC (X) level is dependent on the power, pulse width, and prf of the radar (see section 5.5.3 of NTIA Manual of Regulations & Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management).

RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED OVERVIEW OF RSEC CHANGES BEING CONSIDERED ● Group D (Criteria D)  Retain all of Criteria D except change harmonic levels to 80 dB  New solid state radars can not meet Criteria D without filters ● Group E (Criteria E)  No proposed changes

RELATED ITU-R ACTIVITIES Proposed Formation of JRG 1A/1C/8B Rec. ITU-R SM.1541: Out-of-Band emissions Rec. ITU-R M.1314: Methods to reduce radar unwanted emissions Recommendation ITU-R M.1177: Techniques for measurement of radar unwanted emissions 