KEK / Fujio Naito How J-PARC recovered from the big earthquake Outline About J-PARC The earthquake Damage on J-PARC Recovery plan Beam study results Summary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 J-PARC and T2K 1.Accelerator construction status and commissioning 2.Accelerator upgrade plan in first 5 years 3.Experiments with slow extracted beam.
Advertisements

Current Status of Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda,
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura On behalf of PRISM Target Group Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
Status of ATF/ATF2 and machine schedule in this fall Impact of the earthquake Recovery status, alignment Schedule in this fall N. Terunuma, KEK.
F.Brinker, DESY, July 17 st 2008 Injection to Doris and Petra Fitting the detector in the IP-region Radiation issues Beam optic, Target cell Polarisation.
Development of new power supplies for J-PARC MR upgrade Yoshi Kurimoto (KEK) for J-PARC accelerator group.
NOvA meeting PIP Update W. Pellico. PIP Goals and Scope (Provided in 2011 – Directorate S. H. / DOE Talk ) Goals: Specific to the issues surrounding the.
JHF2K neutrino beam line A. K. Ichikawa KEK 2002/7/2 Overview Primary Proton beamline Target Decay Volume Strategy to change peak energy.
J-PARC upgrade T. Nakadaira (KEK / J-PARC). Outline J-PARC overview & on-going program Motivation of future experiment in J-PARC Overview of future experiment.
1 T2K Beam Operation Summary (earthquake recovery and beamline survey) NBI 2012 T. Ishii (KEK) for the T2K beam group.
LINAC4 STATUS Alessandra M. Lombardi for the LINAC4 team 1.Motivation and goals 2.Status of Linac4 2 years after official start of the project ( )
June 20, 2008Shin'ya Fermilab E9061 J-PARC and Dimuon Experiments Shin’ya Sawada KEK (High Energy Accelerator Research Organization, Japan)
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy AGS Upgrade and Super Neutrino Beam DOE Annual HEP Program Review April 27-28, 2005 Derek I. Lowenstein.
Beam diagnostics control for J-PARC LINAC Guobao SHEN J-PARC Center Japan Atomic Energy Agency Mar
EPICS at APS in June.2006, n.kami, KEK J-PARC Status N. Kamikubota, KEK and J-PARC Control members * Try to enhance updates in the last 1 year.
Target & Capture for PRISM Koji Yoshimura Institute of Particle and Nuclear Science High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
Virtual Accelerator at J-PARC 3 GeV Rapid Cycling Synchrotron H. Harada*, K. Shigaki (Hiroshima University in Japan), H. Hotchi, F. Noda, H. Sako, H. Suzuki,
1 Status and Plans at J-PARC Linac Kazuo Hasegawa J-PARC Center/Japan Atomic Energy Agency Collaboration meeting between CERN and J-PARC December 18, 2013,
Q&A on T2K construction of beam line near detectors budget collaboration (contribution from each) T2KK.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
Future upgrade of the neutrino beam-line for multi-MW beam 5 th Hyper-Kamiokande open Vancouver July Yuichi Oyama (KEK) (for T2K neutrino.
KEK Plans for J-PARC Particle Physics at J-PARC CERN-KEK Committee March 29, 2010 at KEK Koichiro Nishikawa Institute for Particle and Nuclear Studies,
Secondary Particle Production and Capture for Muon Accelerator Applications S.J. Brooks, RAL, Oxfordshire, UK Abstract Intense pulsed.
J-PARC Accelerators Masahito Tomizawa KEK Acc. Lab. Outline, Status, Schedule of J-PARC accelerator MR Beam Power Upgrade.
Development of the beam loss monitor for beam halo measurement in the J-PARC RCS Masahiro Yoshimoto *, Hiroyuki Harada, Shinidhi Kato, Kota Okabe, Michikazu.
1 Status of Neutrino Beamline Construction K. Nishikawa IPNS, KEK 2006 . 12 . 4.
Monday, Feb. 19, 2007PHYS 5326, Spring 2007 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 5326 – Lecture #7 Monday, Feb. 19, 2007 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Neutrino Oscillation Experiments 2.Long.
Asian Test Beam Facilities Satoru Uozumi Kyungpook National University Mar-29 th 2010 Beijing China IHEP Beijing TBF Russia.
Alexander Aleksandrov Oak Ridge National Laboratory
February 21-21, 2008JINR Scientific Council 103-d session IREN project status.
Overview of the KEK Neutrino Beam Facility and its Operation Summary after September 2000 FNAL) K.H. Tanaka for the KEK-PS Beam Channel Group.
PROTON LINAC FOR INDIAN SNS Vinod Bharadwaj, SLAC (reporting for the Indian SNS Design Team)
STATUS OF BNL SUPER NEUTRINO BEAM PRORAM W. T. Weng Brookhaven National Laboratory NBI2003, KEK November 7-11, 2003.
1 Current Status of The Control System for J-PARC Accelerator Complex Hiroshi YOSHIKAWA J-PARC Center at KEK/JAEA October 16, 2007 ICALEPCS2007 at Knoxville.
Development of The Klystrons for J-PARC Project
0 Plenty Energy Clean Environment Healthy Life Commissioning and Initial Operation of the KOMAC 100-MeV Proton Linac KOMAC / KAERI Kyung-Tae Seol
7 November 2003 Status of CNGS NBI presented by K. Elsener 1 Status of CNGS Konrad Elsener CERN – Accelerators+Beams Division.
1 Question to the 50GeV group 3GeV からの 54π と 81π 、 6.1π の関係 fast extraction 部の acceptance (81π?) Comments on neutrino beamline optics?
29 September 2006M.Sakuda NuFact06 Asian Regional Outlook (Japan) -by Y.Kuno (Osaka) (1) SuperBeam (T2K) (2) J-PARC current upgrade plan (3) T2HK or T2KK.
J-PARC Accelerator and Beam Simulations Sep. 7th, SAD2006 Masahito Tomizawa J-PARC Main Ring G., KEK Outline of J-PARC Accelerator Characteristics of High.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
Global Design Effort - CFS Oct IWLC ML Single Tunnel Cross Section GDE Asian Regional Team KEK A. Enomoto.
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
T2K Remote Handling T. Sekiguchi (KEK) on behalf of Tada (KEK) 2012/11/10.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
1 Heavy-Ion Physics at J-PARC Shoji Nagamiya RIKEN / KEK / JAEA January 20, 2016 Tokai 1) Motivation 2) J-PARC vs. FAIR.
SUPERKEKB MAIN RING TUNNEL MOTION M. Masuzawa, T. Adachi, H. Iinuma, T. Kawamoto and Y. Ohsawa, KEK Tsukuba, Japan
1 Investigation of vibration properties of the KEKB tunnel after the Great East Japan Earthquake Contents Situations after the earthquake Geological survey.
Status Report of the Realignment for J-PARC 3GeV RCS N. Tani, H. Hotchi, M. Yamamoto, J. Kamiya, K. Horino, M. Kinsho J-PARC Center, JAEA 1 Outline 1.
1 J-PARC Status - Conquering the earthquake disaster and a new step forward to MW J-PARC operation - Yujiro Ikeda J-PARC Center JAEA & KEK
ICFA mini-Workshop on Beam Commissioning for High Intensity Accelerators Yasuhiro Watanabe (J-PARC / JAEA) Tracking between bending and quadrupole families.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Ver. 1.1 [Nov.06]NBI2012, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland, 6 th – 10 th November 2012 Ishida et al. J-PARC/KEK J-PARC Upgrade Plan for Future and Beyond T2K.
Presenter : Yang Wu McMaster University Work conducted at IHEP.
PSI, Zurich February 29 – March Session classification : Accelerator Concepts Tuesday, March 1, 2016 Summary Vyacheslav Yakovlev Fermilab, USA.
J-PARC Site Visit Summary – 03/09 S. Childress (Accelerator, T2K Primary) J. Hylen (T2K Target Hall, Decay, Absorber & Near Detector)
HLS Installation at KEKB Main Ring after the Great East Japan Earthquake Takashi Kawamoto, Mika Masuzawa, Ryuhei Sugahara High Energy Accelerator Research.
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
Status of ATF/ATF2 and machine schedule in this fall
Current Status of the T2K Experiment
Operations Department
Operations Department
LAL meeting on e+ studies, Oct. 2010
A Superconducting Proton/Electron Linac
Lithium lens and window tests
SLHC-PP kick-off meeting, CERN 9 April 2008
Presentation transcript:

KEK / Fujio Naito How J-PARC recovered from the big earthquake Outline About J-PARC The earthquake Damage on J-PARC Recovery plan Beam study results Summary

2 Nuclear Transmutation (Phase 2) Joint Project between KEK and JAEA Materials and Life Science Experimental Facility (MLF) Hadron Beam Facility 500m Linac 181MeV(400MeV) Neutrino to Kamiokande (T2K) 3-GeV Rapid Cycle Synchrotron (RCS) (25 Hz, 270kW (1MW) ) 30(50)-GeV Main Synchrotron Ring (MR) ( 200kW (0.75 MW) ) J-PARC (Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex) Pacific Ocean

Main Synchrotron Ring (MR) (30 (50) GeV, Period: 2.6~6.0sec, φ500 m) : ν-beam line ( Super Conducting Mag. ) Rapid Cycle Synchrotron (RCS) ( 3GeV, 25Hz, φ100 m) Linac ( E:181MeV-> 400MeV (2013) L:120m -> 25 0 m )

→ Design beam power : 1MW for MLF & 750kW for T2K (current beam power is 0.2 MW for both experiments) Nuclear & Particle Physics at 30 GeV Materials & Life Sciences at 3 GeV Proton (p) 3 GeV, 30 GeV Goals at J-PARC

Disaster we had in March The biggest earthquake (Mar., 11, 14:46) 2.Tsunami near J-PARC (Mar., 11, 16:52) 3.First hydrogen explosion of the nuclear power plant in Fukushima (Mar., 12, 15:36) Beam was provided to all users from April Users run of JFY2010 was stopped as scheduled at 7:00 on March 11, Just linac group continued the beam study in the daytime…..

March 11, st 01:54 2 nd 06:45 3 rd 07:44 4 th 14: th 23:56 The Great East Japan Earthquake Seismic intensity map of the main shock on March 11, 2011, and epicenter distribution from March 11 to 18, by National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention (NIED)

Tsunami simulation result near J-PARC J-PARC Tsunami max height : 6.6 m Tsunami Protection : 8m Tokai nuclear power plant Tsunami max height : 5.4 m Tsunami Protection : 6.1m (On Mar , 3.3m -> 6.1m)

J-PARC Broken reactors Riken Air dose rate measured by an airplane (April 2011)

On March 17 the water level was only 1 cm, but it increased to 10 cm (100 tons) on March 24. The water was pumped out with a rented electric generator. PH=11 and tons of acid were necessary to neutralize water. Linac Tunnel on March 24, 2011

Linac measured position (Apr. 2011) Beam axis[mm] Horizontal direction [mm] Vertical direction [mm] Longitudinal direction[mm] ~0.03mrad Red broken line : New beam line after the earth-quake

4177 左の影が大きい Rapid Cycle Synchrotron (RCS, 3GeV) No serious damages on the equipment/instruments in RCS tunel. Position of all equipment/instruments were measured. The maximum displacement is 3.7mm vertically & 10mm horizontally. Blue : Reference positions of the magnet Red: Measured positions after the earthquake (Please note the magnitude of displacement is amplified x2000.)

4177 左の影が大きい Magnet displacement from the reference line Green : vertical direction Red : horizontal direction Blue : beam deirection Main Synchrotron Ring (MR, 30GeV) ・ There were no serious damages on all MR equipment/instruments, such as magnets. It, however, appeared they misaligned in both vertical and horizontal directions. ・ Some magnets misaligned greatly are re-aligned with replacing a stage. ・ Inspection of the RF power amplifying system has been completed. Orange : Reference positions of the magnet Blue & Red: Measured positions after the earthquake (Please note the magnitude of displacement is amplified x2000.) Amplified x2000

Demand from users (MLF, T2K) and the law fixed the MLF budget: Results: *Linac must be re-aligned but V-shape is approved. *RCS is usable without re-alignment if power ≤ 300kW *MR must be re-aligned. Beam simulation to keep the beam loss as same as before: Beam must be supplied to users during JFY2011 at least approximately two months. >> Minimum repair of the broken building has been done to resume the beam acceleration as soon as possible.

History of beam delivery from RCS to MLF In the last three days, 275 kW beam was delivered to MLF. Stable operation of 275 kW was successfully demonstarted.

History of beam delivery from MR to the T2K experiment Operation for beam delivery to the T2K before summer 2012 was finished on June 9. T2K accumulated the beam of ~3x10 20 POT.

Summary Although J-PARC had the big damage by the earthquake, it has been fixed in minimum to accelerate the beam. J-PARC resumed to accelerate beam from Dec., Experiments by user restarted in Jan., However a lot of troubles of the earthquake origin(?) still happen in the accelerators. Damage on the accelerator buildings of linac (wall, doors, cranes, floor) and MR (expansion joints, ground-water leakage) is not fixed yet. RCS will realign the all magnets in the summer of 2013.

Thank you very much!

Leaking water depth in the LINAC tunnel reached to 10 cm. After recovery LINAC The approach to the LINAC entrance subsided more than 1 m. In contrast, the front road raised a few 10s cm. Still under the construction The road around the 3 GeV subsided more than 1 m at many places. 3 GeV Synchrotron Re-leveled the basis The basis for transformers subsided ~1 m. After recovery Recovery Status of J-PARC from Damages by the 3.11 Earthquake Damages and Recovery Status of Accelerator Facilities  Fortunately no victims at J-PARC, but severe damages on the facilities, such as piping systems, power devices, and instruments. We also had land subsidence at many places around buildings, water leaks, and misalignment of electromagnets and shielding blocks. added concrete basis

NaI -survey meter GM-survey meter Dose rate in KEK Tsukuba campus

–Accelerated particles: H - (negative hydrogen) –Energy:181 MeV, The last two SDTLs are debunchers (400 MeV for ACS, 600 MeV for SCL) –Peak current:30 mA(50 mA for 1MW at 3GeV) –Repetition:25 Hz (additional 25 Hz for ADS application) –Pulse width:0.5 ms (Beam), 0.6 ms (RF) Linac major parameters

Observation of the shadow of the DT by an alignment telescope Displacement ? Normal Inside view of the DTL before installation Drift Tubes in DTL

Alignment result of the linac Horizontal Vertical Position Z DTL SDTL MEBT2A0BTL3BT Bending angle at DTL end : 0.91-mrad horizontaly, 0.28-mrad vertically. In the SDTL & A0BT section, the displacement is 1.5-mm in maximum for horizontal direction.

Beam loss in RCS with the beam > 400 kW P- BLM signals Before the earthquake P-BLM signal (V) 300 kW 420 kW CollimatorArc Extr.Arc RF Arc Inj. No large difference in beam loss After the earthquake Beam loss increased after the earthquake for 420 kW Particle loss before the earthquake : ~ 0.4% Particle loss after the earthquake : ~ 0.8% Significant difference in beam loss In the summer of 2013, the entire adjustment of the RCS will be done BLM ID#

Linac: * HV terminals of Ion pump have the discharge problem. * Almost temperature sensors were corroded. * A HV rectifier in the oil tank for the Klystron was broken. * Humidity in the tunnel is still high by the leakage of ground water. * Cranes are still not usable. * Floor is broken and tilted. RCS: MR: * New leakage of the ground water found in the tunnel. *Twisted expansion joints of the tunnel are not fixed. Exp: * Power supply of the magnetic horn for T2K was broken. Problems after the beam resumption

Neutrino Oscillation (T2K) Experiment  e     T2K Atmospheric Neutrino Accelerator Neutrino Solar Neutrino Reactor Neutrino KamLAND, SNO Kamioka, K2K, MINOS, etc. Goal is to measure sin 2 2  13 down to 0.01 Electron neutrinos Mu neutrinos  13 Mixing between the 1st and 3rd generation Competition with Double Chooz, Daya Bay, FNAL, etc.

T2K electron neutrino candidates