EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Kevin A Cavender EPA-Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards Precursor Gas Monitoring NO y Monitoring Training.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPA Methods 3A, 6C, 7E, 10 & 20 Corrections to May 15, 2006 Final Rule That Updated the Methods That Updated the Methods Foston Curtis US EPA.
Advertisements

Teledyne Analytical Instruments
Production of Nitric Acid
Use of the Spectronic 20 Spectrophotometer
SO2 Precursor Gas Monitoring Training Overview
THE NITROGEN CYCLE. TOPICS FOR TODAY 1.The Nitrogen Cycle 2.Fixed Nitrogen in the Atmosphere 3.Sources of NOx 4.What about N 2 O? 5.Nitrogen Cycle: on.
Modification of Network Sampling Systems for Measurement of NH 3 Derek Day, Misha Schurman, Katie Beam, Jeff Collett, William Malm MOTIVATION Ammonia (NH.
Measurement of NO y During SCOS97-NARSTO Dennis R. Fitz University of California, Riverside College of Engineering Center for Environmental Research and.
EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NCore Calibration Issues Meeting the new QC Requirements Lewis Weinstock and Dennis Mikel EPA Office of Air Quality,
Lesson17. Heterogeneous and cloud processes Wide range of physical and chemical of substrate surfaces for heterogeneous reactions to take place. Clouds.
Phosphorus Measurements ä The Technique ä Detection Limits ä Wallastonite ä The Technique ä Detection Limits ä Wallastonite 
44 th Annual Conference & Technical Exhibition By Thomas Hartman, P.E. The Hartman Company Georgetown, Texas Sustainable Chilled Water.
Teledyne Analytical Instruments TELEDYNE AAQMS Systems.
Gas Analyzer Theory of Operation
National Air Monitoring Conference EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Dennis K. Mikel EPA - Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards Technical.
Ozone and Ozone Monitoring 2015 National Tribal Forum Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist III Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center Institute for.
Teledyne Analytical Instruments
Antek 6200 ® Meet Sulfur Regulations and Control Your Process with Continuous Measurements Product Presentation.
Tel: +44 (0) Turbidity Application and Product Data.
Update on in-situ tower-based measurements INFLUX workshop Purdue University 8 August 2011.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Colorado May 2013.
Gaseous Pollutants mini-course TAMS Center February 2009 Creating a Test Atmosphere.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Nevada May 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Jersey May 2013.
Did the recession impact recent decreases in observed sulfate concentrations? Shao-Hang Chu, US EPA/OAQPS/AQAD October, 2011.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
Update on Proposed Ozone FRM Ozone Transport Commission Spring Committee Meeting April 10, 2014 Washington, DC Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington,
AOSC 634 Air Sampling and Analysis
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of.
Field Methods of Monitoring Atmospheric Systems Measurement of Air Pollution Copyright © 2009 by DBS.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Utah May 2013.
1 Dec. 11, 1997 LEADS Quality Control Systems Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
1 Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument Lok Lamsal and Randall Martin with contributions.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Central States May 2013.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Alabama May 2013.
8–1 John A. Schreifels Chemistry 212 Chapter 15-1 Chapter 15 Chemical Equilibrium.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Maryland May 2013.
Sampling and Measurement for Inorganic Gaseous Pollutants.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
Chebatoris, A.W., Harvey, J.W., Hess, B.T., Krepps, J.P., O’Brien, K.A., Short, D.B., and Spaulding, R.E. Abstract Nitrogen dioxide is a criteria air pollutant.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
1 Relationship between ground-level NO 2 concentrations and OMI tropospheric NO 2 columns Martin Steinbacher, Empa; Edward Celarier, SGT Inc.
Fresno NCore Monitoring Deployment Status Presentation April 12, 2011 by: Joe Cruz Air Pollution Specialist, CARB.
Module 11 Module I: Terminology— Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP Catherine Brown U.S. EPA.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Iowa May 2013.
Update on CASTNET Modernization Air Monitoring Steering Committee Meeting May 4, 2006 Larry Kertcher Office of Atmospheric Programs (OAP)
Chapter 1: The Nature of Analytical Chemistry
Motivation Chemiluminescence Method Heteropoly Blue Results Due to the harmful health effects of respirable crystaline silica, the National Institute of.
AIR CLIMATE & ENERGY RESEARCH PROGRAM B U I L D I N G A S C I E N T I F I C F O U N D A T I O N F O R S O U N D E N V I R O N M.
Garfield County Air Quality Monitoring Network Cassie Archuleta Project Scientist Board of County Commissioners – Regular Meeting.
Fundamentals of Analytical Chemistry Eighth Edition.
Determination of TKN by Subtraction using ASTM D and ASTM D
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Workshop on Air Quality Data Analysis and Interpretation
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
EAS 4/8803: Experimental Methods in AQ
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
Continuous measurement of airborne particles and gases
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Kevin A Cavender EPA-Office of Air Quality, Planning and Standards Precursor Gas Monitoring NO y Monitoring Training Overview

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Outline Methodology Interferences and operational issues Commercially available NOy Monitors Calibration Current work in progress Summary

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Methodology What is NO y ? NO y consists of the sum of all reactive nitrogen oxides. including NO, and NO 2, and other nitrogen oxides referred to as NO z. NO + NO 2 + NO z = NO y The major components of NO z include nitrous acids [nitric acid (HNO 3 ), and nitrous acid (HONO)], organic nitrates [peroxyl acetyl nitrate (PAN), methyl peroxyl acetyl nitrate (MPAN), and peroxyl propionyl nitrate, (PPN)], and particulate nitrates.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Methodology Why Measure NO y ? NO y is a precursor to both ozone and PM 2.5 formation Conventional NOx boxes “accidentally” measure some NO z species, but not all.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Methodology Measurement Principles NO is measured based on its chemiluminescent reaction with O 3 NO > NO 2 + hv The amount of light generated is linearly proportional to the concentration of NO. NO y is measured by first passing the sample through a converter that converts NO 2 and NO z species to NO and then measuring for NO as above.

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Methodology Diagram of a High Sensitivity NO y instrument

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Methodology What makes a high sensitivity NO y monitor different than a conventional (low sensitivity) NO x monitor? A high sensitivity NO y monitor is very similar to conventional NO x monitors with the following exceptions: Remote converter is located at sample inlet, not inside monitor Pre-reactor to reduce non-NO y interferences Increased sample flow rate Reduced reaction chamber temperature and pressure

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Installation Remote Converter Remote Converter on 10 meter tower

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Interferences and Operational Issues Reaction of NO with ambient O 3 Ambient ozone will react with NO in sample lines creating negative NO interference Residence in sample line should be kept to less than 2 seconds Ammonia Converter may convert a small amount of ammonia to NO creating positive NO interference Avoid locating near ammonia sources (e.g., feed lots) Converter height above ground level and “fetch”

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Commercially Available NOy Monitors TAPI 200EU/501 NOy TEI 42CY EC9841A-NOy

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Testing Results Make/ModelThermo 42CY NO y (observed) API 200EU/501 (observed) Averaging Time120 seconds Conc. Range0-100 ppb Zero Drift (0.1 ppb/day)12 hr. (0.1 ppb) 24 hr. (0.1 ppb) 12 hr. (0.03 ppb) 24 hr. (0.05 ppb) Span Drift20% FS (0.3%) 80% FS (0.6%) 20% FS (0.5%) 80% FS (1.2%) Precision (Coefficient of Variance)1.49%2.67% Bias+/-1.19%+/-2.73% LDL (0.05 ppb)0.05 ppb Noise (0.025 ppb)0.013 ppb0.009 ppb Linearity (1% FS. M, B, and R 2 reported) x R 2 = x R 2 = MDL Observed0.050 ppb (0.03 – 0.13 ppb CL)0.058 ppb (0.04 – 0.11 ppb CL)

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NOy Span Response

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop NOy Precision Response

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Histogram of NOy Data Collected at Burden's Creek Site 5/1/05-1/29/06 Percent Concentration (ppb) NO NOy NO2 + NOz

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Histogram of NOy Data Collected at Burden's Creek Site 5/1/05-1/29/06 BinNONOyNO2+NOz Total4630

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Instrument Operation Initial Calibration Note: Supply sufficient calibration gas to ensure excess flow through converter inlet (supply > 5 liters per minute) Supply zero air until stable readings are obtained (approximately minutes) Adjust monitor to read zero response for NO and NO y. Supply NO calibration gas at approximately 90% of scale Adjust monitor after stable NO and NO y readings are obtained Add ozone to calibration gas to produce NO 2 at approximately 70% of scale Amount NO decreases equals the amount of NO 2 created Calculate conversion efficiency as (NO y -NO)/(NO 2 created) Conversion efficiency should be greater > 96%. Adjust NO 2 + NO z reading to amount of NO 2 created

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Instrument Operation Converter Efficiency Test Converter efficiency test designed to challenge converter with more difficult to convert NO y species N-propyl nitrate, isopropyl nitrate Supply sufficient calibration gas to ensure excess flow at converter inlet (> 5 liters per minute) Supply calibration gas at approximately 90% of scale Allow sufficient time for readings to stabilize Calculate converter efficiency as – (NOy reading/Concentration Suppliedx100%) If converter efficiency is less than 96% the converter should be repaired/replaced

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Current Work In Progress Evaluation of inlet materials for API –Testing HNO3 loss on stainless steel, silico steel, and FTP teflon. Evaluation of “proof of concept” NO/true NO 2 /NOy monitor –Two converters Moly for NOy High intensity LED for NO 2

EPA Precursor Gas Training Workshop Questions?