8th RESS IG IMMA contribution RESS-8-9. IMMA L6/L7 contribution IMMA has decided to provide the global expertise on L6/L7-vehicles at WP29 to address.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gateway Training Workshop Module Two
Advertisements

SAE J1772™ Gery J. Kissel Engineering Specialist General Motors
An illustration of EVS-GTR Battery System Test Project and Test Methods’ Adaption to Commercial Vehicles Peter Wu, BYD.
The necessity of New Regulations for New Technologies regarding R79 Japan September / 2012 Informal document GRRF (73rd GRRF, September 2012,
TF8 – OICA considerations for the draft annex for heavy vehicles.
Working group L-EPPR 03 June 2014 International environmental and propulsion performance requirements for L-category vehicles – OBD expert group On-board.
Informal document GRPE-70-14
TF8: Research IF EVS-GTR Battery System Test Project and Test Methods’ Adaption to heavy /commercial Vehicles.
PHSAUTOMOTIVESALSPHSAUTOMOTIVESALS Charging System tests & Voltage information Checking the charging system with just a volt meter.
Chapter 8Basic Computer Maintenance  8.1Preventive Maintenance 8.1Preventive Maintenance 8.1Preventive Maintenance  8.2Monitoring System Performance.
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Electrical Safety William Joel Sánchez.
ELECTRIC VEHICLE REGULATION IN JAPAN
Transposition of GTR No.13 “Hydrogen and fuel cell vehicles” into UN Regulation - Explanatory material - 20/September/2013 The European Commission and.
FRANCE1 Informal adhoc ELSA Working Group Geneva, December 9th, 2009 Proposal from France based on - Informal document GRSP n° ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSP/2009/16.
Smitty’s Speed Drills 2008 Code Drills Health Care Facilities (C) Copyright 2008 Ted "Smitty" Smith1.
Volker Rothe, OICA October 23, 2012 Draft Global Technical Regulation Electric Vehicle Safety Outline of the OICA proposal.
Draft Proposal ECE-R 100 protection against electric shock
Background information on GRE/2012/44 (EMC) Proposal for the 05 series of amendments of Regulation No. 10 October 2012 Informal document GRE (68th.
Student Book © 2004 Propane Education & Research CouncilPage Performing Gas Distribution System Leak Checks Requirements for vapor distribution.
Ministry of Industry and Trade of Russian Federation June 2013 Deputy director of the Department of transport and special engineering industry V. Kaganov.
1 ACSF Test Procedure Draft proposal – For discussion OICA and CLEPA proposal for the IG Group ACSF Tokyo, 2015, June Informal Document ACSF
TF8 work report for 9 th EVS-GTR conference Changchun.
EVPC1 Informal adhoc EVPC Working Group Geneva, may 18 th, 2010 Proposal from FRANCE based on EVPC informal group work Informal document No. GRSP
IMMA contribution 9/RESS meeting, Tue 21 May Thu 23 May 2013 CCFA, 2, rue de Presbourg PARIS 1 RESS-9-10.
Progress report about RESS activities Gerd Kellermann, Germany Informal document GRSP (50th GRSP, 6–9 December 2011, agenda item 15)
Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation system – EuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN Training on standardisation Support to the Modernisation.
RDE testing: how to define NTE emission limits?
Rechargeable Energy Storage systems (REESS) requirements Gerd Kellermann, Germany Informal document GRSP (51 st GRSP, May 2012,
GTR-EVS TF-6 SOC – OICA Discussion Paper Jan 21 st, OICA Discussion Paper for TF-Mtg1 EVSTF-06-32e.
Electric safety requirements in European Community vehicle type-approval legislation GRSP ELSA sub-group – 6 th meeting Brussels, Belgium, April.
EU Regulation on type-approval of hydrogen vehicles HFCV GTR – 4th SGS meeting Tokyo, Japan, September 2008 Ferenc PEKÁR Automotive Industry Unit.
Auto turn off battery charger Auto turn off battery charger.
Task Force on Electro-magnetic Compatibility (TF EMC) Status report of TF to GRE-75 Friday, 8 April 2016 Informal document GRE (75 th GRE, 5-8 April.
Japan’s proposal for EPPR (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) (India comment for EPPR-14-06e) 3/Mar/ 2016 JAPAN AUTOMOBILE STANDARDS INTERNATIONALIZATION.
1  Position of China and Japan Test exemption for vehicles with isolation monitoring system should be approved. The water test should be included in EVS-GTR.
Comparison among China, OICA draft for HD and R100 OICA TF8 June 7, EVSTF-08-42e.
OICA TF8 drafting annex Mar. **, 2016 TF8 OICA pilot 1 EVSTF-08-25e.
Dual-axis dyno Taskforce Status Report WLTP-IWG meeting April 2016 Iddo Riemersma (T&E) Christoph Lueginger (BMW) WLTP-14-04e.
Review of EVS 9 th Meeting 1> TF8 catch an agreement on the definition of heavy duty electric vehicles as below: heavy vehicles cover the vehicles belong.
1  Position of China and Japan  The water test should be included in EVS-GTR Phase 1.  Test exemption for vehicles with isolation monitoring system.
GRRF Ad-Hoc Working Group
(After the EPPR telephone conference on 11/May/2016)
GC0104 – Demand Connection Code (DCC)
Batteries as Integral Part of Equipment
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Task Force 3: Electrolyte leakage
Guide for the application of CSM design targets (CSM DT)
India’s Comments on EPPR (Part-B2)
Electric Vehicles Safety Global Technical Regulation
Informal adhoc ELSA Working Group
Informal document GRPE-73-21
Suggestion on software update
Informal document GRE Rev.1
Heavy Duty Vehicle Requirements in EVS-GTR for HFCV-GTR Discussions
Informal document GRE-79-04
New UN Regulation on electric vehicles of category L
Questions/Comments on ECE/TRANS/WP.29/GRSG/2019/10
Progress report of GRSG informal group
Informal document GRE Rev.1
Informal document GRSG Rev.1
Informal document GRE-80-0X
Informal document GRE-78-10
Informal document GRRF-78-41
Adolfo Perujo (IWG chairman)
Proposed Definition of the Pause Function
CLEPA comments on OBD II GTR 18 Draft
Informal document GRE-79-xx
Japan’s proposal for EPPR-16-05
Access to data requirementS
6th ACSF meeting Tokyo, April 2016
Presentation transcript:

8th RESS IG IMMA contribution RESS-8-9

IMMA L6/L7 contribution IMMA has decided to provide the global expertise on L6/L7-vehicles at WP29 to address the immediate need IMMA has already started with preparing a contribution for the RESS IG – Todays contribution is based on L1-L5 as the L6/L7 assessment is not completed yet. IMMA will contribute with the L6/L7 perspective at the 9 RESS meeting. – IMMA expects no delays in the RESS programme as a result of the later arrival of the perspective on L6/L7

Separate regulation or amendment for R100 At this moment IMMA prefers to integrate L-category requirements into R100. It is currently too early to make a complete and adequate assessment on the pro’s and con’s of separating an L-cat regulation from R100. IMMA advises to review this aspect in a later stage, and continue first with the creation of the requirements for L-cat on the basis of the R100. A dedicated regulation for L category vehicles would take more time. –More time is not compatible with the European time table of the new type-approval regulation and may lead the EU to adopt its own regulation independently, and provisionally. –As a result manufacturers may be confronted during a certain period with a non-harmonized situation between the EU and the rest of the world, and with a succession of regulatory changes once the UN regulation will be finally adopted.

R100 part 1 contribution 2.21 – No need to introduce a definition of isolation resistance – BUT add in paragraph this sentence: If AC high voltage buses and DC not high voltage buses are galvanically isolated from each other, isolation resistance between the high voltage bus and the electrical chassis shall have a minimum value of 500 Ω/volt of the working voltage for AC buses. – To take into account the technical solution in which a low voltage battery is used to provide power to a high voltage AC inverter with galvanical insulated circuit in between.

R100 part 1 contribution 3.1 – PART I: APPROVAL OF A VEHICLE TYPE WITH REGARD TO THE HIGH VOLTAGE SYSTEM ITS ELECTRICAL SAFETY Reasons: – to be in line with the title of chapter 5. REQUIREMENTS OF A VEHICLE WITH REGARD TO ITS ELECTRICAL SAFETY – the functional requirement is applicable also to a vehicle with only low voltage components.

R100 part 1 contribution – : – IMMA agrees that the requirements are also applicable for L-category – To consider a further point e) for detachable battery connector. To be discussed in part 2 discussion. – IMMA question: If the battery voltage is higher than 60V DC, what should be the protection degree for the connector of the detachable battery? IMMA suggests IPXXB in this case – Or rider

R100 part 1 contribution Isolation resistance requirement for the coupling system for charging the REESS – Probably more clear: – For the vehicle inlet and for a recharge cable if permanently connected to the vehicle of cat L, intended to be conductively connected to the grounded external AC power supply and the electrical circuit that is galvanically connected to the vehicle inlet or to the recharge cable during charging of the REESS, the isolation resistance between the high voltage bus and the electrical chassis shall be at least 1 MΩ when the charger coupler is disconnected. During the measurement, the traction battery may be disconnected.

R100 Part 1 contribution 5.3 IMMA interpretation is that : 1.if other alternative means are provided that ensure active driving possible mode is disabled when alighting the vehicle, this section should not apply. 2.If an indicator for the active driving mode is present before the rider leaves the vehicle the requirement is satisfied. 3.If the vehicle is on the central parking stand the wheel cannot touch the ground so is not in active possible driving mode, IG RESS may consider additional language to confirm the above applicable for L-category vehicles.

R100 part 1 contribution 5.3 If the on-board REESS can be externally charged by the user, vehicle movement by its own propulsion system shall be impossible as long as the connector of the external electric power supply is physically connected to the vehicle inlet. This requirement shall be demonstrated by using the connector specified by the car vehicle manufacturer. For an l-cat vehicle, with a permanently connected charge cable, the requirement above is not applicable if using the cable to charge the vehicle prevents the use of the vehicle. If a vehicle is equipped with a driver direction control unit the state of this unit shall be identified to the driver.

STATE 0 (POWER-OFF) STATE 1 STATE 2 (ACTIVE DRIVE POSSIBLE MODE)  REPLACE ALL PARAGRAPH WITH START-UP PROCEDURE 1° Action 2° Action At the start-up For the power- on procedure of the vehicle propulsion system in order to select the active driving possible mode at least two deliberate and distinctive actions shall be performed by the driver in order to go from the power-off mode to the active driving possible mode.

STATE 1 STATE 2 (ACTIVE DRIVE POSSIBLE MODE) (ctd) DEACTIVATION PROCEDURE OF THE STATE DEFINED "ACTIVE DRIVE POSSIBLE MODE STATE" 1° Action One action is required to deactivate the active driving possible mode. A main-switch (a switch intended to start up the vehicle) function shall be an integral part of the power-on/power-off procedure. If the power- on/power-off procedure of the propulsion system is activated by the vehicle key system, it shall be designed according to the operational safety design. It shall be indicated, continuously or temporarily, to the driver rider, that the propulsion system of the vehicle is ready for driving. After an intentional power-off of the vehicle, it shall only be possible to reactivate it by the power-on procedure, as described.

Automatic turn-off mode An automatic turn-off mode shall be an integral part of the power- on/power-off procedure. If the automatic turn-off mode is activated, the power-off procedure of the propulsion system is activated even without any action on the main switch. Automatic turn-off mode shall be activated when the vehicle is left alone without the driver rider for the period of time specified by the manufacturer, even if the main switch is being kept as turned on. To go from the automatic turn-off mode to the active driving possible mode, one deliberate action shall be required Justification: Already covered in the R100 by this prescription in 5.3: When leaving the vehicle, the driver shall be informed by a signal (e.g. optical or audible signal) if the vehicle is still in the active driving possible mode.

Indication of reduced power If the electric propulsion system is equipped with a means to automatically reduce the vehicle propulsion power, significant reductions should shall be indicated to the rider driver. Explanation: The intention was to ensure if the means is present, the presence of this function is indicated to the driver and not to verify the level of power at which the system must inform the driver about the reduction. This level must be decided by the manufacturer and need not be verified by the technical service.

R100 part 1 contribution Annexes – Annex 3: supported by IMMA – Annex 4A: IMMA will comment at 9/RESS – Annex 5:IMMA will comment at 9/RESS – Annex 7: IMMA will comment at 9/RESS