Triennial Plan 2: Legal Framework. About Us  Efficiency Maine is an independent trust – Accounts and administrative responsibilities transferred from.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
Advertisements

1 Conservation Program Cost-Effectiveness Tests Presentation to the: Florida Public Service Commission Workshop on Energy Efficiency Initiatives November.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
1 Energy Conservation Board Meeting Tuesday April 15, 2008.
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Overview of Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) Program San Antonio Office of Environmental Policy December 16, 2009.
Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
Integrated Municipal Energy Services Committee EESE Board Statute: Encourage Municipalities to increase investments in energy efficiency and sustainable.
1 Total Resource Cost Effectiveness Test Utility Brown Bag Series by Tom Eckman, NWPCC Ken Keating, BPA October 4, 2006.
Energy Efficiency and Arizona’s Energy Future Jeff Schlegel Southwest Energy Efficiency Project (SWEEP) April
Connecticut’s Energy Future Removing Barriers to Promote Energy Sustainability: Public Policy and Financing December 2, 2004 Legislative Office Building.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
DRA Advocacy Joe Como, Acting Director. 2 DRA Facts The Voice of Consumers, Making a Difference! 3  History: CPUC created DRA (formerly known as the.
Errol Close Decarbonisation Policy and Co-ordination IWFA May Conference.
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
Energy Policy Levers. 2 State as a Taxing Authority Income tax credits or deductions Income tax credits or deductions Residential Alternative Energy Tax.
Food Stamp Employment and Training – Community Organizations CREATING A POSSIBLE REVENUE STREAM OPTION FOR WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNITY ORGANIZATIONS.
CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE EFFICIENCY MAINE’S RECENT SUCCESSES AND MAJOR OPPORTUNITIES AHEAD Michael D. Stoddard Executive Director.
INSTALLATION OF CAPACITOR BANKS IN COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRY BUILDINGS African Regional NAMA Workshop Kigali, Rwanda, 2015 By: Kennedy Amankwa, Energy Commission,
Presented By: Matt Bell Partner, Viridian. Buildings and the Environment Buildings account for 36% of greenhouse gas emissions Buildings account for 72%
Highlights of Commission Activities Little Rock ASHRAE Monthly Meeting October 12, 2011 Presented By: John P. Bethel.
Effective Management and Compliance 1 ANA GRANTEE MEETING  FEBRUARY 5, 2015.
Oregon Renewable Energy Action Plan April 2005 with Geothermal Energy highlights by Carel DeWinkel Senior Policy Analyst.
Center for Renewable Energy Research and Environmental Stewardship CRERES November 6, 2009.
NW Regional -- Washington n n Washington’s residents, businesses and industries spend $10 billion on their energy costs each year. n n Washington’s long-term.
Chapter 19 Governmental Entities: Proprietary Funds, Fiduciary Funds,& Comprehensive Annual Financial Report.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
FERC’s Role in Demand Response David Kathan ABA Teleconference December 14, 2005.
Distributed Energy Resources The Energy Challenge of the 21 st Century.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Carbon Finance North America Workshop NYC Catherine A. Lee, Esq. Consultant to Maine DEP June 15, 2007 The Nation’s First GHG Cap and Trade Program
Michael R. Walker Research Director IGCC Financing Project Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University PH: , FX:
Energy Efficiency Program Performance Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission NARUC Winter Meeting - February 16, 2008 
Designing Utility Regulation to Promote Investment in Cost-Effective Energy Efficiency Dale S. Bryk Natural Resources Defense Council Pennsylvania.
Presentation to WIEG Act 141 Carol Stemrich Assistant Administrator Gas and Energy Division.
Strategic Planning for DSM in a Community-owned Utility Presented by Shu-Sun Kwan & Ed Arguello Colorado Springs Utilities 2005 APPA Engineering & Operations.
Developing a Framework for Offset Use in RGGI Opportunities and Risks Dale Bryk, NRDC and Brian Jones, MJB&A – Northeast Regional GHG Coalition RGGI Stakeholder.
Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative RGGI John Marschilok, P.E. Environmental Engineer Department New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
M ICHIGAN P UBLIC S ERVICE C OMMISSION Energy Optimization Plans 2011 Biennial Review Pre-Filing Update Rob Ozar, Manager Energy Optimization Section March.
Ukraine In-Depth Energy Efficiency Review VI International Specialized Trade Fair “ENERGY EFFICIENCY RENEWABLE ENERGY – 2013”, Kiev, 8 November 2013 Steivan.
1 Review of CPUC Role with the Public Interest Energy Research (PIER) Program on Natural Gas Briefing for California Senate Energy, Utilities and Communications.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
1. Sustainable Development. International commitment. COORDINATION. A LONG-TERM VISSION. Policies Enhance the economic growth. Certainty and Economic.
Investing Our Energy In You Traverse City Light & Power Electric Generation TCL&P Study Session December 1, 2009.
California Public Utilities Commission Why a Load-Based Emissions Cap for California? Julie Fitch CPUC Director of Strategic Planning April 19, 2007 Presentation.
1 Louisiana: Our Energy Future 2009 American Recovery & Reinvestment Act.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
Philippine Feed-In Tariff System Implementation 1.
Triennial Plan 2: Purpose and Process. Purpose of Triennial Plan – General Objectives  Structuring the planning process – Enable planners to present.
1 Proposed Final Opinion on GHG Strategies in the Energy Sectors Key Findings and Recommendations October 16, 2008.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Institutional Support Vladimir Koritarov Argonne National Laboratory April 2016.
1 Hearing to Discuss the Potential Interplay and Effect of the Money Available to States’ Low- Income Weatherization Programs under the American Recovery.
Community Choice Aggregation Demonstration Project Marin County Base Case Feasibility Analyses Overview April 5, 2005.
Los Angeles County Community Choice Aggregation Regional CCA Task Force Meeting October 28, 2015.
EFFICIENCY FIRST FOR MISSOURI’S ENERGY FUTURE Becky Stanfield, NRDC October 21, 2014 MPSC Statewide Collaborative Meeting.
Overview of SB 350 California Public Utilities Commission Melicia Charles, Energy Division February 23,
Draft 2013 Energy-Efficiency Forecast
Efficiency maine’s recent successes and major opportunities ahead Michael D. Stoddard Executive Director.
Energy Efficiency in New England: Resource Opportunities
INGONYAMA TRUST BOARD’S ANNUAL PERFORMANCE PLAN
Developing the power sector in Federal Nepal Main lessons from international experience Kathmandu, November 06, 2018.
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Photovoltaic Systems Engineering Application to PV Systems
Janine Migden-Ostrander Principal Regulatory Assistance Project
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
Presentation transcript:

Triennial Plan 2: Legal Framework

About Us  Efficiency Maine is an independent trust – Accounts and administrative responsibilities transferred from the Maine PUC to the Trust on 7/1/2010 – Directed by a 9-member Board of Trustees representing business and residential energy customers, engineers, energy experts, economists – Funds held in trust for the benefit of the energy consumers who pay in to the funds through the SBC and RGGI – Funds are expended consistent with statute, rules, and 3-Year Strategic Plan to be approved by Trust Board and Maine PUC 2

Maine Statutes  35-A MRSA et seq. (Efficiency Maine Trust Act) – Establishment of Trust (10103) – Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) Trust Fund (10109) – Electric Efficiency and Conservation Program (10110) – Natural Gas Conservation Program (10111) – Heating Fuels Efficiency Fund (10119) – Federal Energy Programs (State Energy Program) (10115) – Renewable Resource Fund (10121)  35-A MRSA et seq. (PACE Loan Act)  35-A MRSA 3210-C (Long-term Contracting for Capacity Resources) 3

Maine Rules Code of Maine Rules -- Efficiency Maine Trust  Ch. 1 Contracting Process for Service Providers and Grant Recipients Ch. 1  Ch. 2 Administration of (RGGI) Trust, Budgeting, Project Selection Criteria and Procedures, Monitoring, and Evaluation Requirements Ch. 2  Ch. 103 Renewable Resource Fund Regulations: Selection Criteria for Demonstration Projects, Cost-effectiveness Requirements for Renewable Energy Rebates and Quality Assurance System Ch. 103  Ch. 110 PACE Program Regulations: Loan Underwriting Standards, Consumer Disclosure Requirements, Terms and Conditions of Participation and Quality Assurance System (in Adobe.pdf format) Ch. 110  Ch. 380 Electric Energy Conservation Programs Ch. 380  Ch. 480 Natural Gas Conservation Program Ch

Purpose  The Trust’s purpose is to: – Provide uniform, integrated planning, program design and administration of programs – Reduce energy costs and improve security of the state and local economies. – Administer cost-effective energy efficiency programs to help individuals and businesses meet their energy needs at the lowest cost and generally to improve the economic security of the State – Ensure that all expenditures of the trust are cost-effective in terms of avoided energy costs; and – Actively promote investment in cost-effective energy efficiency measures and systems that use alternative energy resources that reduce overall energy costs for consumers in the State. 35-A-MRSA Chapter 97, § 10103(1) 5

Duties  Program Administration and Coordination – The Trust administers and disburses funds and coordinates programs to promote energy efficiency and increased use of alternative energy resources in the State  Metrics – The Trust shall develop quantifiable measures of performance for all programs it administers.  Plan – The Trust will develop and adopt a triennial plan that “must provide integrated planning, program design and implementation strategies for all energy efficiency, alternative energy resources” administered by the Trust  Report – The Trust shall report by December 1 st to the legislative committee of jurisdiction 35-A MRSA Sec (4) 6

Program Funding (Generally)  The Trust may: – Apply for and receive grants from state, federal or private sources – Deposit the proceeds of any bonds into program funds – Receive and spend revenue from the Forward Capacity Market (FCM) or other capacity payments Revenues transferred to the Trust from the energy infrastructure benefits fund any “other funds received by or from any entity with which the trust has an agreement or contract” 35-A MRSA 10103(4) 7

Electric Efficiency and Conservation Program  Uses (1) – “Conservation Programs” means programs developed by the Trust designed to reduce inefficient electric use. – Goal: Help reduce energy costs for electricity consumers by the maximum amount possible – Implement programs that are cost-effective and consistent with objectives and a strategy established by the trust and approved by the PUC – Objectives Increase consumer awareness of cost-effective options Create favorable market conditions for increased use of EE Promote sustainable economic development and reduce environmental damage Reduce the price of electricity over time for all consumers by reducing demand during peak use periods Reduce total energy costs for electricity consumers 8

Electric Efficiency and Conservation Program  Uses (2) – Seek to implement delivery of programs in all regions of the state on an equitable basis and to citizens at all income levels. Target at least 20% of Base Assessment to Low Income residential customers Target at least 20% of the Base Assessment to Small Business customers Apportion the remaining Base Assessment among customer groups and geographic areas in a manner that allows all other customers to have a reasonable opportunity to participate in programs 9

Electric Efficiency and Conservation Program  Funding Level – Base Assessment Fixed rate of cents/kWh (except on T & ST customers) = $13.1M/Yr – Other Assessments In accordance with the Triennial Plan, the commission shall assess each transmission and distribution utility … as necessary to realize all available energy efficiency and demand reduction resources … that are cost-effective, reliable and feasible” net of: – Base Assessment – RGGI funding for electric conservation – FCM payments – Any other predictable sources of funding for conservation programs 35-A MRSA Sec (4) and (5) 10

Natural Gas Conservation Program  Uses – Establish a cost-effective conservation program to promote the efficient use of natural gas that: Increases consumer awareness of cost-effective options for conserving energy; Creates more favorable market conditions for the increased use of efficient products and services; Promotes sustainable economic development and reduces environmental damage – Apportions funds such that: Reasonable percentage to low income residential customers Reasonable percentage to small business customers Remaining funds “allow all other consumers to have a reasonable opportunity to participate” in programs 35-A MRSA Sec (1) 11

Natural Gas Conservation Program  Funding – An assessment of not less than 3% of the gas utility’s delivery revenues – Only for utilities having > 5,000 residential customers (Unitil) – “In accordance with the Triennial Plan, the Commission may assess a higher amount.” – Assessments charged to gas utilities under this section are just and reasonable costs for rate-making purposes and must be reflected in the rates of gas utilities 35-A MRSA Sec (2) 12

RGGI Trust Fund  Uses – To support the goals of the carbon cap-and-trade program – Trustees have a fiduciary duty to the customers of the T&D utilities Funds are held in trust for the purposes of benefiting consumers – Fund conservation programs that give priority to measures with the highest benefit-to-cost ratio, as long as cost-effective collateral opportunities are not lost, to reliably reduce kWh and/or GHG. – Size of a project not limited by statute  Funding – Revenue resulting from the sale of carbon dioxide allowances under RGGI auctions – If price/ton reaches $5, additional revenues go to customer rebates 35-A MRSA Sec

Federal Funds  Uses – The Trust shall oversee and administer: The US DOE State Energy Program Other federally funded programs and projects related to Trust programs. – Must be used consistent with Triennial Plan 35-A MRSA Sec

Heating Fuels Efficiency and Weatherization Fund  Uses – To reduce heating fuel consumption consistent with the purpose and targets of the Trust and the Triennial Plan to achieve the following goal By 2030, provide cost-effective energy efficiency measures to substantially all homes and businesses whose owners wish to participate – Only for programs that provide cost-effective energy efficiency and weatherization measures for the benefit of heating fuel customers or to efficiency service providers serving those customers. Cost-effective measures includes those that improve the efficiency of energy-using systems through system upgrades or conversions, including conversions to systems that rely on renewable energy sources or that rely on effective energy efficiency technologies 35-A MRSA Sec

Heating Fuels Efficiency and Weatherization Fund  Funding – No funding stream is established in statute – Fund may receive Funds collected from an assessment on heating fuels Federal funds targeted for the purposes of this Fund Proceeds of any bonds issued for the purposes of the Fund Any other funds from public or private sources 35-A MRSA Sec

Renewable Resource Fund  Uses – Renewable resource R&D – Renewable energy demonstration projects To non-profits, CAPs, COUs, municipalities, – Renewable Rebates  Funding – Voluntary (check off) contributions from utility bills – Alternative Compliance Payments from load serving entities that do not comply with the Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) 35-A MRSA Sec