قَالُواْ سُبْحَانَكَ لاَ عِلْمَ لَنَا إِلاَّ مَا عَلَّمْتَنَا

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hernias Dr. Saleh M. Aldaqal MBBS, FRCSI,SBGS
Advertisements

LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA SURGERY TECHNICAL ASPECTS, CASE SELECTION
INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR: OPEN vs TEP APPROACHES
Minimally Invasive Hip Surgery. Introduction Many people suffering from arthritis alter their lives to deal with pain. Many people suffering from arthritis.
The third way to treat groin hernia, “the Minimal Open Pre Peritoneal approach”“MOPP” M. Soler J. H Alexandre, described in 1984 a trans inguinal preperitoneal.
Thoracoscopic treatment of primary spontaneous pneumothorax in children Maria Marciniak Students' Scientific Society at the Department of Surgery and Oncology.
Herniorrhaphy SUR 111.
Open vs Lap Hernia Repair: Which is Better? R. Matthew Walsh, M.D., F.A.C.S. Vice Chairman, Department of General Surgery.
What inguinal hernia operation and why?
LAP TOTAL EXTRAPERITONEAL HERNIOPLASTY
MODIFIED GRID IRON, (F. UGAHARY), HERNIOPLASTIE, USING A NEW SELF EXPANDABLE PROSTHESIS. THE REALLY MINIMAL INVASIVE PREPERITONEAL APPROACH: REVIEW, RESULTS.
Laparoscopic Colon Surgery
Dr. Ibrahim Bashayreh RN, PhD
LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA SURGERY IS IT NECESSARY, IS IT ADVANTAGEOUS? Asoc. Prof.Dr. Orhan Yalçın Ministry of Health Okmeydanı Education and Research.
Repair of Inguinal Hernia: Open or Laparoscopic
Preoperative Anxiety Ilan Keidan MD Pediatric Anesthesia Anesthesia and Intensive Care Sheba Medical Center.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم IN THE NAME OF ALLAH
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Audit of the Enhanced Recovery Programme for Hysterectomy at West Middlesex University Hospital Background.
k Consultant General Surgeon  Poona Hospital & Research Centre ä Kamla Nehru Corporation Hospital k Associate Professor of surgery  Bharati Vidyapeeth.
Parastomal Hernia Repair
Hernias Dr. Gold-Deutch Ruthie.
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
Prospective Multicenter Study Preliminary Report P. Witkowski- Coordination Center Dept of Surgery, Columbia University, USA F. Abbonante- Dept of Surgery,
LAPAROSCOPIC INGUINAL HERNIA REPAIR
In the name of God. Celecoxib as a pre-emptive analgesia in arthroscopic knee surgery; a triple blinded randomized controlled trial Mohsen Mardani-Kivi,
Dr.Mohammad foudazi Research center of endoscopic surgery, Iran medical university.
Minimally Invasive Hip Surgery. What is Minimally Invasive Hip Surgery? A new surgical technique A new surgical technique Uses traditional hip implants.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Major surgery in a minor way Sin WT, Woldman S, Attilia B, Gauthaman N, Karpouzis H, Patwardhan M South.
A Comparative Audit of Total Abdominal Hysterectomy, Subtotal Hysterectomy, Vaginal hysterectomy and Laparoscopically Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy in.
SILS Complications Dan Geisler, MD, FACS, FASCRS.
Randomized Clinical Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of the Perforated Peptic Ulcer: The LAMA Trial Marietta J. O. E. Bertleff, Jens A. Halm, Willem.
Hernias Dr. Sajad Ali (MBBS., MS.)
Objective In Japan, laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy(LH) is not popular. We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the results of LH in our hospital.
Ankara Numune Teaching and Research Hospital
HERNIA. DEFINITION HERNIA TYPES Primary Incisional.
Single Incision Bariatric Surgery Ninh T. Nguyen, MD, FACS University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA.
Laparoscopic versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Minimally Invasive Advances in AWR
Chapter 28 and 29 Post Surgical Rehabilitation. Overview Although many musculoskeletal conditions can be treated conservatively, surgical intervention.
A Randomised, Controlled Trial of Acetaminophen, Ibuprofen, and Codeine for Acute Pain relief in Children with Musculoskeletal Trauma Clark et al, Paediatrics.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم جامعة أم درمان الإسلامية كلية الطب و العلوم الصحية - قسم طب المجتمع مساق البحث العلمي / الدفعة 21 Basics of Clinical Trials.
Why/When/How to do TEP and TAPP
Pre-Operative and Post-Operative Care
COMPARING LONG TERM RESULTS OF COŞKUN HERNIORRAPHY AND LICHTENSTEIN MD. Faruk COŞKUN ANKARA NUMUNE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL 3.GENERAL SURGERY CLINIC.
Preperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty with ULTRAPRO versus PROLENE mesh Chei Mei medical center Uen Yih-huei.
Mamoun A. Rahman Mr Osborne’s team January 2009 Paper of the Week.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy in a District General Hospital- Audit of clinical practice.
The effect of numbers and duration between osteopathic treatments on Patients suffering from foot related pain; a dose-response study Joachim Kaufmann.
Groin swellingg.
Important questions As good or better ? Cost effective ? Overall, safer? Is it safe as a cancer operation? Can all surgeons do it? Compare to open surgery.
JIs Guzman, Montefalcon, Sulit
Most Effective Way to Overcome the Nagging Shoulder Pain: Arthroscopy.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم Community Medicine Lec -11-
INTRODUCTION METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION Sam Simmonds prize 17 th May,2013 Sohail Yousaf Will Kieffer Benedict Rogers Iain McFadyen David Ricketts Management.
PATIENTS AND METHOD 5 cases were reported from 1998 to girls and 3 boys. Average age 11 years (3-17y). All of them where taken care of surgically.
Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy and total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A comparison of peri- operative outcomes Dr Kate Maclaran, Mr Nilesh Agarwal,
Dr Prakash Agarwal Dr R.K.Bagdi Apollo Children’s Hospital, Chennai.
Laparoscopic Hernia Repair
Ashraf I. Obaid, MD, PBGS, Karam M. Alslaibi, MD Presented By
Advantages of laparoscopic surgery
Marina Yiasemidou, MBBS, MSc CT1 General Surgery
TAPP REPAIR FOR INGUINAL HERNIA -
Under the supervision of: J. P Slavin
Role of Laparoscopy in Management of Hernias
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Dr. Prasad Bansod* Dr. B. S. Gedam** Dr. V. B. Kale***
Incisional hernia prevention
Jose D Roman M.D. Braemar Hospital, Hamilton, NEW ZEALAND
Rhematoid Rthritis Respiratory disorders
SPIGELIAN HERNIA : A CASE REPORT
Presentation transcript:

قَالُواْ سُبْحَانَكَ لاَ عِلْمَ لَنَا إِلاَّ مَا عَلَّمْتَنَا بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم قَالُواْ سُبْحَانَكَ لاَ عِلْمَ لَنَا إِلاَّ مَا عَلَّمْتَنَا إِنَّكَ أَنتَ الْعَلِيمُ الْحَكِيمُ صدق الله العظيم

Mohammed Saleh Al-dawbali Ass. Prof Of Surgery (Sana'a University) The Role Of Narrowing Of The Internal Ring In The Outcome Of Laparoscopic Treatment Of Indirect Inguinal Hernia. By Mohammed Saleh Al-dawbali MD (Egy.), MRCS (Eng.) Ass. Prof Of Surgery (Sana'a University)

Introduction -- Hernia is a frequent disease in the community so that it produce a sizable part of many general surgeons practice. -- The success of laparoscopic cholecystectomy has resulted in the enthusiasm to modify other abdominal procedures so that they can be performed laparoscopically. -- laparoscopic Inguinal hernioplasty is one of such procedure.

Introduction (cont.) Over the past 20 years, several hernia repair techniques have been introduced .The main cause for the development of these new techniques was to reduce the recurrence rate. The introduction of the Lichtenstein tension-free hernioplasty, which uses a mesh to reinforce the abdominal wall, has decreased recurrence rates greatly. However, certain types such as recurrent, bilateral hernias are particularly suited for a laparoscopic approach . Laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty is associated with shorter recovery periods, earlier return to daily activities and work, and decreased postoperative pain.

Indications Certain types of hernia such as - Recurrent, - Bilateral, are particularly suited for a laparoscopic approach . BUT also it can be done for primary unilateral hernias as first patient preference

Approach Laparoscopic hernia repair can be done either through: 1. Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approach (TAPP )or 2. Total Extra-peritoneal Approach (TEP).

Aim Of The Work Our study aim to assess whether the addition of the closure of internal ring to the classical TAPP has a better short outcome on regard to post operative pain, bulging, seroma or haematoma formation and on the long term outcome in regard to recurrence .

Patients And Methods - A total of 40 patients were selected from those presented to the Outpatient Clinic with indirect inguinal hernia from the period May 2009 to April 2011

Patients And Methods Exclusion criteria for patient selection were as follows:- - younger than 12 years of age - severe obesity (BMI >35). - associated medical problems that contraindicate safe induction of general anesthesia or elective surgery

Patients And Methods The forty Patients were randomly divided into two groups , group A contain 20 patients and were treated by closure of the ring and classical TAPP ,while group B contain 20 patients and was treated by Classical TAPP Only.

Operation In the theater, neither nasogastric tube nor urinary catheter were needed (patient were instructed to evacuate their bladder before coming to the theater).

Op. Technique (cont.) Insertion Of The Trocar (open tech.) Induction Of Pneumoperitoneum (14mmHg) abdominal cavity and viscera are inspected in a systematic order

Two working ports were further introduced at a level just caudal to the umbilicus and lateral to the rectus muscle of both right and left lower quadrants. N.B This array of trocars was used in either unilateral or bilateral cases.

EXPLORATION

Peritoneal incision (Right)

Left peritoneal incision

Right side dissection

Left side dissection

Ring closure

Mesh fixation

Peritoneal closure

Results Patients characteristics: The patient’s ages ranged from 25→55 years old The mean age was 33 years in Group A and 30 years in Group B All of our pt were male (no female)

Distribution of Hernia site 24 cases (60%) were right side , 6 cases ( 15%) were left side and 10 cases (25 %) were bilateral .

Average Operative Time

Intra-Operative Complications Intra-operative complication occur in a single case (2.5 %) in the form of urinary bladder injury during reduction of the structure from a left hernia defect in a patient with bilateral hernia. The injury was recognized at the time of operation and dealing with it was done in the form of repair in two layer after putting of urinary catheter. The hernia repair was completed then as usual .The patient recover post operatively without further complication

Post Operative Care. The patients were shifted from the operating theater to the surgical ward and were discharged in the next day (except when complications were suspected). In the surgical ward recording of the postoperative pain using the Visual analogue scale (VAS) was used . Patients were seen after 1 week , then after 1 month and then after 6th months postoperatively and they were told to contact us if they face any problem regarding their hernia. During the follow up of these patients they were examined clinically to assess the post operative pain and to look for the presence of odema, seroma , hematoma , wound infection ,post operative bulge, recurrence or any other complications.

Hospital Stay -All patient of both group were ambulated in the same day of operation and discharged in the next day of the operation. -Only 1 case (2.5 %) who discharged in the 3rd POD.

Follow up Postoperative pain . there was no significant difference between patients of both groups (P value < 0.01) and the pain score was ranged from VAS 1 to VAS 3 (mild ) and in more than 90% of cases pain was overcomed with simple analgesics . The causes of pain seems to be multifactorial (dissection , fixation of the mesh, foreign body reaction……etc)

Visual analogue scale (VAS)

- Seroma occur in two cases (10 %) of the second group and was treated conservatively . No seroma occur in pts of the first group

Post operative bulging was noted in 16 case (80 %) of the second group and it last for a period of around two months postoperatively , while in the first group there were No bulging neither in the early nor in the late postoperative period. This make the patients of the first group more satisfy .

The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 1 The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 1.5 year postoperatively ( average 1 year) The results of follow up show: On clinical basis all patients of both groups were relived of the symptoms of hernia No recurrence have been reported in all cases of both group.

Conclusion Laparoscopic surgery is becoming widely accepted as an alternative to conventional procedures. With-miniaturization of instrument it is becoming more and more evident that laparoscopic techniques can be applied safely and successfully to hernia patients. The selection criteria for patients who are eligible for laparoscopic procedures is dynamic and as skills and technologies improve fewer patients are found to have absolute exclusion criteria

Result show that Laparoscopic narrowing of the internal inguinal ring was found to be safe , effective and low cost procedure for treatment of oblique inguinal hernia with better outcome regarding post operative serohematoma and postoperative bulging which are annoying problem to hernia patients .

However, the important Question is Whether the closure of the internal ring will be an auxiliary step in the classical TAPP procedures in the light of these substantial benefits as regard to less postoperative complications. More studies needed to answer this question but in our study narrowing of the internal ring with hernioplasty was simple, sufficient and effective .

Thank you !

Numerical rating scale (NRS)

Faces rating scale (FRS)

Pain rating scales instructions Subjective pain score All patients are to have a functional activity score recorded in addition to the chosen subjective score. Visual analogue scale (VAS) Instruct the patient to point to the position on the line between the faces to indicate how much pain they are currently feeling. The far left end indicates ‘No pain’ and the far right end indicates ‘Worst pain ever’. Numerical rating scale (NRS) Instruct the patient to choose a number from 0 to 10 that best describes their current pain. 0 would mean ‘No pain’ and 10 would mean ‘Worst possible pain’. Faces rating scale (FRS) Adults who have difficulty using the numbers on the visual/numerical rating scales can be assisted with the use of the six facial expressions suggesting various pain intensities. Ask the patient to choose the face that best describes how they feel. The far left face indicates ‘No hurt’ and the far right face indicates ‘Hurts worst’. Document number below the face chosen. Behavioural rating scale The behavioural pain assessment scale is designed for use with non-verbal patients unable to provide self-reports of pain. Rate each of the five measurement categories (0,1 or 2). Add these together. Document the total pain score out of 10. Functional activity score This is an activity-related score. Ask your patient to perform an activity related to their painful area (for example, deep breathe and cough for thoracic injury or move affected leg for lower limb pain). Observe your patient during the chosen activity and score A, B or C. A – No limitation meaning the patient’s activity is unrestricted by pain B – Mild limitation means the patient’s activity is mild to moderately restricted by pain C - Severe limitation means the patient ability to perform the activity is severely limited by pain *Relative to baseline refers to any restriction above any pre–existing condition the patient may already have.