Application of Quantitative Method for Prospectively Identifying Risk for Ectasia After LASIK in Normal, Suspect, and Ectatic Eyes Mujtaba A. Qazi, MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Asymmetric Keratoconus Study: Novel Tomographic Parameters to enhance sensitivity to detect abnormalities in eyes with normal axial curvature maps from.
Advertisements

Intracorneal Ring Segments (ICRS)
Financial Disclosure Calhoun Vision consultant, equity Clarity Massey Labs consultant, equity.
TOPOGRAPHY ORBSCAN S.A.A. Mortazavi MD.
Juan Carlos Abad, MD Jaime Arango, MD; Camilo Tobón, MD ASCRS Poster P-225 Abad et al. Drs. Abad and Arango are consultants to Addition Technology Dr.
Familial corneal patterns in pellucid marginal degeneration: uncovering a possible etiology Hajirah N. Saeed, MD.
Statement of Commercial Interest: RDJ: None DRH: honoraria from Reichert for educational lectures on corneal biomechanics Multiple studies have shown ex.
Corneal topography orbscan
Swept Source Optical Coherence Tomography for Evaluation of Posterior Corneal Changes after Refractive Surgery Dr. Tommy Chung Yan Chan Dr. Vishal Jhanji.
Long-Term Follow-Up of Toric Intraocular Lens Implantation for Keratoconus Alejandro Navas, MD, MSc, Martha Jaimes, MD, Jesús Cabral, MD, Arturo Ramirez.
Corneal Biomechanics, Pachymetric Progression Profile and Corneal Volume: Indices for Detecting Ectasia and Screening Refractive Candidates Renato Ambrósio.
Purpose We studied the interdevice agreement of three systems in the different measurements of the corneal and anterior segment biometric parameters. The.
CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHY Wide acceptance as a clinical examination procedure with the advent of modern laser refractive surgery Measure a greater area of the.
Corneal Iron Ring After Hyperopic LASIK
Advances for Characterizing and Understanding the Irregular Cornea
LASIK What are the Limits ?
Outcome of refractive surgery in keratoconus suspect eyes
University of Verona Eye Clinic Department of Neurological and Motor Science Head: Prof. Giorgio Marchini Prevalence of Corneal Ectasia in Patients With.
Nizar S Abdelfattah, M.D.1, Marina Israel2, Nermin Osman, M.D.3,
Financial Disclosure: Authors do not have financial or commercial interest in mentioned equipments Dr Arce is Consultant & Territory Manager for Latin.
Medical Director - R & D Consultant, Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland Speaker, Bausch & Lomb do Brasil Territory Manager.
Comparison of Orbscan and Ultrasound Pachymetry Measurements Faik Orucov, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD,Ziv Caspi, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, and.
Correction of presbyopia by central biaspheric multifocal LASIK (PRESBYMAX ® ) in myopic patients. Jorge L. Alió MD, PhD, Dolores Ortiz PhD, Esperanza.
Elias F. Jarade, MD, FICS. Corneal and Refractive Surgery Service, The Dubai Mall Medical Center, Dubai- U.A.E. Tel: ; Mob
Prospective Study of Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus Scott X. Stevens, MD Bend Ophthalmology, LLC Author has no financial interest.
Corneal Topography using Orbscan : Basics and interpretation
World Cornea Congress VI Michael K. Smolek & Panagiotis Kompotiatis Department of Ophthalmology LSU Eye Center of Excellence, New Orleans The authors.
ROTATING SCHEIMPFLUG TOPOGRAPHIC PARAMETERS IMPORTANT IN DISTINGUISHING NORMAL FROM KERATOCONIC CORNEAL MORPHOLOGICAL FEATURES Clayton Falknor, MD, Orkun.
Evaluation of Long-Term Keratoconus Progression Using Scanning-Slit Topography First Author: David Galarreta, MD Contributing Authors: Nestor Cortes, MD,
Clinical outcomes of Epi-LASIK : 1-Year-Long Results of Flap ON/OFF with Mitomycin-C ON/OFF Gil-Joong Yoon (MD/PhD) 1 Seong-Taeck Kim (MD) 2 Jae-Woong.
“Development of Unilateral Corneal Ectasia After PRK with Ipsilateral Preoperative Forme Fruste Keratoconus” Jacob Reznik, MD¹; James J. Salz, MD²; Alena.
Young Joo Shin, 1 Sang Mok Lee, 2 Jin Choi, 3 Eun Ryung Han, 4 Dong Hae Kim 4 1 H ally m University Gangnam Sacred Heart Hospital 2 3The Armed Forces Medical.
Preetam Kumar, Shreyas Ramamurthy, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group Dr. Ambrósio is consultant for Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH (Wetzlar, Germany) Agreement of Artificial.
ELEVATION AND PACHYMETRY VALUES IN NORMAL CORNEAS OBTAINED BY GALILEI ASCRS Boston April Vision Sana Research Group Vision Sana Research Group.
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness and Peripheral Corneal Thickness using Sheimpflug system, Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Pachymetry.
The Effect of Corneal Anterior Surface Eccentricity on Astigmatism after Cataract Surgery Choul Yong Park MD 1 Sung Jun Lee MD 1 Prabjot Channa MD 2 Roy.
1 P.O. dei Pellegrini; A.S.L. Napoli 1Centro 2 Dipartimento di Oftalmologia, Seconda Università degli Studi Napoli Scheimpflug topography, Scanning-Slit.
E-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group e-Poster Rio de Janeiro Corneal Tomography and Biomechanics Study Group Clinical.
Evaluation of Corneal Tomography in Primary Pterygium Sahil Goel, MD (Presenting Author), Murugesan Vanathi MD *The authors have no financial interests.
10 year follow up of LASIK surgery for low to high levels of myopia Qasim Qasem FRCS, Caitriona Kirwan MRCOpth, Michael O’Keefe FRCS. Institutional Affiliations:
Ocular functional optical zone following hyperopic LASIK/PRK: Analysis based on polychromatic retinal image quality Mitchell P. Weikert, MD Li Wang, MD,
M. Escaf, J. Mendoza, L. Izquierdo jr., M. Henriquez Instituto de Ojos Oftalmo Salud Lima, Peru There is no financial interest in this poster.
Strike Point System to Determine Candidacy for LASIK or PRK Lewis R. Groden, MD Monte Sichelman, MD The authors have no financial interests in any of the.
Ocular Response Analyzer Waveform Analysis in the Ectatic Corneas: Correlation of the New Corneal Biomechanics Parameters and Severity of Keratoconus Kristin.
Financial Disclosure: Medical Director–Galilei R&D Consultant, Ziemer Group AG, Port, Switzerland Consultant & Territory Manager for.
Familial corneal patterns in pellucid marginal degeneration: uncovering a possible etiology Hajirah N. Saeed, M.D., Amy B. Rosenfeld Ph.D., Xiaowu Gai,
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness, Anterior Chamber Depth, and Central Corneal Power Measurements between Two Scheimpflug Imaging Systems Yuichi.
Authors: Leonidas Traipe Magdalena Rios Edison Villagra Allister Gibbons Marcelo Hidalgo Claudia Goya Authors have no financial interest.
Faik Orucov*, MD, Joseph Frucht-Pery, MD, David Landau, MD, Eyal Strassman, MD, Abraham Solomon, MD Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ.
Risk Factor Analysis of Topographic Progression in Keratoconus Seong Joon Ahn, MD 1,2, Mee Kum Kim MD, PhD 1,2, Won Ryang Wee, MD, PhD 1,2 1 Department.
Long Term Results of Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty “FALK” Mohamed Abou Shousha, MD, Sonia H. Yoo, MD, William Feuer,
US Trends in Refractive Surgery: 2011 ASCRS Survey Richard J. Duffey, MD David Leaming, MD Chicago: April 21, 2012.
Mathematical Description of the Ocular Response Analyzer Applanation Signal in Post-LASIK Ectasia Mujtaba A. Qazi, M.D. 1,2 David A. Luce, Ph.D. 3 Jay.
Poster produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support (FACS), Georgetown University School of Medicine LASIK Combined with Corneal Cross-linking in Eyes with.
Corneal Biomechanical Changes Following Surface Keratorefractive Surgery Teeravee Hongyok, MD, Christopher J. Rapuano, MD, Ajoy Virdi, MBBS, Elisabeth.
Evaluating Post Laser Refractive Surgery Corneal Thickness Using Artemis-2 Very High Frequency Arc-Scanning Ultrasonography Versus Pentacam * † Sharon.
Postoperative Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) versus Preoperative Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) with the WaveLight Refractive Suite (Excimer EX500.
CORNEAL ENDOTHELIAL PROFILE AFTER FERRARA RING IMPLANTATION Leonardo Torquetti, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara, MD, PhD Paulo Ferrara Eye Clinic Belo Horizonte.
17100 Contact lens fitting after corneal CXL
LSU Eye Center, New Orleans, LA
LASIK vs ASA Case Studies
Comparison of Central Corneal Thickness measured by
Mehdi Ghajarnia, MD Mark Mifflin, MD John A. Moran Eye Center
post-lasik corneal ectasia
Clinical outcome of thin corneas after laser in situ keratomileusis
Carlos G. Arce, MD Associate Researcher and Ophthalmologist
Is Photorefractive Keratectomy the Laser Vision Correction of Choice?
Sun Woong Kim, M.D.1, Hae Jung Sun, M.D.1,
Retrospective Study of 4 Cases That Developed Ectasia After LASIK (Intralase flaps) with Low-Risk Based on Ectasia Risk Score System Allan Luz, MD Colin.
Presentation transcript:

Application of Quantitative Method for Prospectively Identifying Risk for Ectasia After LASIK in Normal, Suspect, and Ectatic Eyes Mujtaba A. Qazi, MD Pepose Vision Institute and Department of Ophthalmology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, Missouri

Co-INVESTIGATORS: Pete Kollbaum, OD, PhD,1 Ashraf M Co-INVESTIGATORS: Pete Kollbaum, OD, PhD,1 Ashraf M. Mahmoud,2 Michael Twa, OD, PhD,3 & Cynthia J. Roberts, PhD,2,5 Mohinder M. Merchea, OD, PhD,6 Jay S. Pepose, MD, PhD7,8 1. Indiana University, School of Optometry 2. The Ohio State University, Department of Ophthalmology 3. University of Houston, College of Optometry 4. The Ohio State University, Department of Biomedical Engineering 5. Bausch & Lomb 6. Pepose Vision Institute 7. Washington University School of Medicine, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Financial disclosures: Qazi: Alcon B; Allergan B Roberts: Reichert D,E; Ziemer A, D, E, P Merchea: Bausch & Lomb Y Pepose: Bausch & Lomb A, D; Visiogen A

Purpose: To compare the Randleman Ectasia Risk Factor (ERF) Score in populations with a clinical diagnosis of normal, suspect keratoconus, and kerectasia, including keratoconus and post-LASIK ectasia.

Design: Retrospective: chart review Keratoconus (KCN, n=36) CLEK Study Criteria: Irregular Mires or Reflex; Vogt’s Striae or Fleisher ring or Apical scar Fellow eye of Keratoconus (KCF, n=10) No definite slit-lamp findings in study eye, with (+) CLEK criteria in contralateral eye Keratoconus Suspect (KCS, n=44) Topographic irregularity but no slit-lamp findings in either eye Normal (n=32) Post-LASIK Ectasia (n=9)

Design: Ectasia Risk Score Parameters Age Central Pachymetry (CCT) Spherical Equivalent (SE) Calculated Residual Stromal Bed (RSB) 120 micron flap for all eyes 14 microns/D of SE calculated for ablation (AD) RSB = CCT - (120 + AD) Topography

Methods: Randleman Ectasia Risk Factor (ERF) Scoring System Age Anterior & Posterior Elevation Curvature (Axial, Mean, Tangential) Pachymetry Topography Grading System 1. Normal/symmetrical; includes round, oval, or symmetric bowtie patterns. 2. Suspicious; includes the following asymmetric patterns: a. Asymmetric bowtie i. Asymmetric steepening in any direction less than 1.0 D ii. No skewed radial axis b. Inferior steep/skewed radial axis i. Significant skewed radial axis with or without inferior steepening, or ii. One diopter or more of inferior steepening in some areas but an I-S value of less than 1.4. 3. Abnormal; includes keratoconus, pellucid marginal corneal degeneration, or forme fruste keratoconus with an I-S value of 1.4 or more. Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery.. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):37-50.

Randleman ERF Score Randleman JB, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Stulting RD. Risk assessment for ectasia after corneal refractive surgery.. Ophthalmology. 2008 Jan;115(1):37-50.

ERF Scores MEAN SD RANGE MEDIAN P VALUE comparing study group to NORMAL NORMAL 1.67 1.76 0 - 6 1 Keratoconus Sustpect (no slit lamp lsigns in either eye but) 3.91 2.25 1 -9 4.0 <0.01 Keratoconus Fellow (slit lamp signs in comtralateral eye only) 4.50 2.51 1 – 8 4.5 Keratoconus (slit lamp signs in study eye) 9.08 4.29 3 – 16 8 Preop parameters of Post-LASIK Ectasia 2.33 1.00 1 - 3 0.23

RESULTS In the KCNfellow (mean 2.60±1.43, range 1-4, median 3) and PLE (2.33±1.00, 1-3, 3) groups, only the topography score was statistically significantly higher (p<0.001) than in NRM (0.39±0.50, 0-1, 0). In PLE, 66% of eyes had skewed asymmetry and 33% had an asymmetric bowtie. Irregular topography (1.82±1.87, 0-4, 1, p<0.001) and younger age (p=0.01) scores were statistically higher in the KCS group compared to NRM.

SUMMARY Application of the Randleman Ectasia after LASIK Risk Score in ectatic and suspicious eyes highlights the importance of topographic analysis in the preoperative assessment of the keratorefractive surgery candidate. Differential weighting of the topography score may enhance the efficacy of ectasia risk analysis. The relative risk of specific topographic features should be further quantified.