Distortions of Social Research Ethics Anna Traianou Martyn Hammersley Oxford Learning Institute, University of Oxford, January 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Business Ethics for Real Estate: A. Glean
Advertisements

4th Module: Information Systems Development and Implementation:
Ethical Considerations in Home Visiting
Ethical Considerations
Integrity and impartiality
Authority and Democracy
Bledsoe et al., Paramedic Care Principles & Practice Volume 1: Introduction © 2006 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Chapter 7 Ethics in.
Moral Reasoning Making appropriate use of facts and opinions to decide the right thing to do Quotations from Jacob Needleman’s The American Soul A Crucial.
ETHICAL THEORY AND ETHICAL RESEARCH David Archard Professor of Philosophy, Lancaster University Member of the Lancaster University Research Ethics Committee.
Medical Ethics Lecturer :Noha Alaggad
Ethics in Action HST II Class. Objectives / Rationale Health care workers must understand ethical and legal responsibilities, limitations, and the implications.
Moral and Ethical Issues. Definitions Morals - concerned with principles of right and wrong or conforming to standards of behavior and character based.
ICS 417: The ethics of ICT 4.2 The Ethics of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Business by Simon Rogerson IMIS Journal May 1998.
Ethics in Social Science Research and Experiments.
Philosophy in Practice Week 7: Philosophy in Practice Week 7: National identity and special bonds of solidarity: what is it and why does it matter to political.
Ethical and Legal Implications of Practice Chapter 5.
Ethical Issues.
Ethics Defined ethics (used with a sing. verb): The study of the general nature of morals and of the specific moral choices to be made by a person; moral.
Ethics in Life Sciences: From theory to the real world Lecture No. 11.
D: Chapter 5 Ethics and Social Responsibility. Ethics The code of moral principles and values that govern the behaviors of a person or group with respect.
Ethics in Life Sciences: From theory to the real world Lecture No. 11 Video Link Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the.
What Would You Do? A Case Study in Ethics
Business Ethics/Corporate Social Responsibility Overview.
Chapter 3 Ethics in research.
The principles used by AUTEC in granting ethical approval for research.
On Ethical Principles for Social Research Martyn Hammersley The Open University Annual Conference, Research Institute for Health and Social Change, Manchester.
EFFECTING CULTURAL CHANGE IN RESEARCH ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Encouraging a culture of research integrity Andrew C. Rawnsley.
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Professional Ethics: Should Software Engineers Adhere to a Professional Code of Conduct? Jonathan Schiff CS 301.
Corporate Responsibility and Compliance A Resource for Health Care Boards of Directors By Debbie Troklus, CHC and Michael C. Hemsley, Esq.
Learning Goal: I can define and correctly use Anthropology, Psychology and Sociology terms and concepts. I can use ethical guidelines to develop a position.
PAB/ICAJ Seminar1 The Public Accountancy Board & The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Jamaica Sustaining the Knowledge of Public Accountants - Seminar.
MEM 604: Social, Legal and Ethical Considerations for Engineering Engineers and the Environmental Challenge.
Responsible Engineers Framing the Problem. How do we address a problem? When addressing an ethical dilemma, we usually experience moral disagreement and.
Ethics in Research: APA code & Review Boards. Definition the study of proper action Morality right versus wrong it is the shared responsibility of the.
Copyright © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Business Ethics Concepts & Cases Manuel G. Velasquez.
 the study of the rightness or wrongness of human conduct.  In any situation involving two or more individuals, values may come into conflict and ethical.
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Jen Maguire SW 582 Fall  Institutional Review Boards  Weighing Benefits and Costs  Bias and Insensitivity Regarding Culture and Gender  The.
ENGM 604: Social, Legal and Ethical Considerations for Engineering Responding to the Call of Morality: Identifying Relevant Facts, Principles and Solutions.
ETHICS in the WORKPLACE © 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 2 Ethical Principles.
Introduction to Political Philosophy What is politics, what is philosophy, what is political philosophy and intro to the state of nature.
Technological advances offer great promise for both teachers and learners, but there are numerous challenges to the implementation of technology in classroom.
ETHICALETHICALETHICALETHICAL PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES.
Professional Ethics: When are Software Engineers Required to “Blow the Whistle?” Jonathan Schiff CS301.
Engineering Ethics ELEC 422, Spring 2006 (kudos to Drs. Peeples and Jerse for portions of this presentation)
Karlene Barrett, PhD, CASAC. Seminar Overview Meet and Greet Check In – Questions, Concerns, etc… Feedback on Week 1 Standards (Chapters 4 and 5) Case.
© C. Gray & Associates, 2011 Definition of Ethics  The science of moral; the branch of knowledge that deals with human duty or the logic of moral.
Dual Relationships
Philosophy 223 Normative Ethical Theory: Challenges to the Dominant Theories.
Basic Principles: Ethics and Business
Ethics in Sports and Physical Education: A Source of Role Conflict.
Business Ethics Concepts & Cases 商业伦理 国贸学院 张小俊
Normative Approaches to Values in Science Kristina Rolin June 27 th, 2010 Feminism, Science, and Values IAPH 2010:
Bledsoe et al., Essentials of Paramedic Care: Division 1 © 2007 by Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, NJ Division 1 Introduction to Advanced Prehospital.
Ethical Perspectives October 18, Moral Objectivism Moral principles have objective validity, independent of cultural acceptance Moral principles.
The Ethics of Care According to this method, we have an obligation to exercise special care toward the people with whom we have valuable, close relationships.
The ethics of social research MA SBE. The ethics of Social Research The ethics of social (and educational) research has become even more prominent in.
Chapter 4 Ethical Standards. Introduction Limits to what law, regulations, and accrediting standards and requirements can govern In the absence of law,
Ethics and Moral reasoning
Ethical Issues in Psychological Research
CAN RESEARCH BE TOO ETHICAL?
Introduction to Moral Theory
Ethical Foundations.
Ethical Foundations.
Codes of Conduct Usefulness
Ethical Foundations.
Ethical Foundations.
Moralism and the Situated Character of Qualitative Research Practice
Chapter 4 Dental Ethics.
Presentation transcript:

Distortions of Social Research Ethics Anna Traianou Martyn Hammersley Oxford Learning Institute, University of Oxford, January 2013

A consensus about research ethics? ‘Professional ethics are generally a deceit and a snare’ (Douglas 1979:13) ‘Ethics is foundational to the telos of the research enterprise’ (Mertens and Ginsberg 2009:2) ‘The only safe way to avoid violating principles of professional ethics is to refrain from doing social research altogether’ (Bronfenbrenner 1952:452)

What is research ethics? Typically, ‘ethics’ is taken to mean: how researchers should deal with the people they study, or those from whom they obtain data. Commonly discussed principles include: minimising harm, respecting autonomy, and preserving privacy (Hammersley and Traianou 2012). But epistemic values and virtues are also relevant to research: a commitment to evaluate knowledge claims solely in terms of their likely truth, honesty about methods and findings, responsiveness to criticism, etc.

The relationship between epistemic and practical values Epistemic values are intrinsic to the research process, whereas practical ones concerning how people should be treated are extrinsic to it (though this does not mean that they are always less important). Yet very little attention is given to epistemic values in most discussions of research ethics.

In the past At one time, ethical issues were treated by social researchers in much the same way that we deal with them in most areas of everyday life: as they arise, and in a situation-specific way. They were only given sustained attention when cases were judged very serious, or when there were disputes. Such problems stimulated occasional articles that often led to discussion of principles that fed into subsequent practical decision- making by researchers.

The rise and rise of ‘research ethics’ Two key developments in the late 20 th century and early 21 st century: The growth of ethical regulation: from professional codes to control by ethics committees. The emergence of what we will refer to as ethicism on the part of many qualitative researchers.

Insistence on ‘high standards’ or even on ‘the highest standards’ This is found both in professional codes (see, for example, the President’s preface to the current British Educational Research Association ethical guidelines, 2011), and in the rationales provided for ethics committees (see Universities UK’s Concordat to Support Integrity in Research, 2012; and the sections on research ethics of many UK university websites). We might ask: What’s wrong with ‘acceptable’ or ‘satisfactory’ standards?

Why commitment to ‘high standards’ is problematic Conflicts amongst ethical principles Conflicts between these principles and epistemic or methodological requirements As a result, compromises are inevitable. Furthermore, both ethical principles and methodological requirements must be interpreted to determine how they apply to particular situations, and there is scope for reasonable disagreement about this.

The consequences of ethical regulation 1.There is a tendency for thinking about both ethics and methodology to be reduced to the following of procedures. 2.The autonomy required for researchers to engage in ethical deliberation is infringed by ethics committees. 3.There is a displacement of responsibility for both methodology and ethics. (see Hammersley 2009)

Reduction to procedures This results from the fact that: Research committees consider a large number of research projects, and must try to deal with these in a consistent and economical fashion; Their members often do not have detailed knowledge regarding all the kinds of research about which they make judgments; In relation to any particular project, they must make decisions in abstraction from contextual knowledge about the people and places being researched.

Infringing the autonomy of researchers and its consequences To a large extent, ethics committees now decide what research can be done, and what methods can and cannot be employed in particular projects. Potentially, this damages the quality of research, and also partially removes ethical responsibility from researchers. Ethical regulation is characteristic of modern corporate organisational forms: accountability (in terms of the allocation of potential blame) is delegated independently of actual control.

Ethicism or Moralism This is ‘the vice of overdoing morality’ (Coady, 2005, p. 101) It is ‘a class of defects of thought and understanding’, not least ‘thinking about morality, including its place in our lives, in the wrong kind of way, specifically in ways that discount the importance of other (non-moral) values’ (Taylor 2012:1-2)

Ethicism in qualitative research 1.Demanding that the process of research should exemplify ethical ideals, such as equity or democracy. For example, insisting on equality in research relations, or the subordination of researchers to those being studied. 2.Redefining the goal of research to include non- epistemic values in addition to, or instead of, the pursuit of knowledge. These values include: improving education, health, or some other practice or service; challenging inequalities; emancipating the oppressed; serving indigenous communities (see Mertens and Ginsberg 2009).

Sources of ethicism Qualitative research demands appreciation of others’ perspectives, perhaps even empathy. This can easily turn into sympathy or a sense of solidarity, especially when the researcher has an affinity with those being studied, or pities them. This tendency is reinforced by the instrumentalism of the age, according to which knowledge is of no value in itself, only for its consequences. In these terms, the pursuit of knowledge, even of policy- or practice-relevant knowledge, is regarded by many as insufficient warrant for research.

Power treated as evil All research is seen as necessarily implicated in power relations; with power – or inequalities in power – typically condemned and resisted. Research findings are viewed as inevitably serving some interests and damaging others, and it is concluded that the researcher has an obligation to ensure that the right interests are served. The pursuit of research is itself believed to involve the exercise of power by the researcher, so it is argued that power relations need to be equalised within the research process, for both ethical and methodological reasons.

Consequences of ethicism Ethicism is the prioritising of non-epistemic values, both in relation to the intended product of research and to the processes through which it is pursued. Its result is that attention and effort are distracted away from the difficult task of producing sound knowledge about the social world. Given that social scientists have a long way to go before they can produce research findings that match the level of cogency frequently claimed for them, and which others expect, this is clearly undesirable.

Conclusion We have identified two developments over the past few decades that we believe have distorted thinking about social research ethics: 1.The rise of ethical regulation; and 2.The emergence of ethicism amongst qualitative researchers. We see these as leading to insufficient emphasis being given to epistemic values and virtues, and believe that this is resulting in serious damage to social inquiry.

References Bronfenbrenner, U. (1952) ‘Principles of professional ethics: Cornell studies in social growth’, The American Psychologist, 7, pp Coady, C.A.J. (2005) Preface, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 22, 2, pp101– 104. Douglas, J. D. (1979) ‘Living morality versus bureaucratic fiat’, in Klockars, C. and O’Connor, F. (eds.) Deviance and Decency: The ethics of research with human subjects, Beverly Hills CA, Sage. Hammersley, M. (2009) ‘Against the ethicists: on the evils of ethical regulation’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology 12, 3, pp Hammersley, M. and Traianou, A. (2011): ‘Moralism and research ethics: a Machiavellian perspective’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 14, 5, pp Hammersley, M. and Traianou, A. (2012) Ethics in Qualitative Research, London, Sage. Mertens, D. et al (2009) ‘Transformative research and ethics’, in Mertens and Ginsberg (eds) Mertens, D. and Ginsberg, P. (eds) (2009) Handbook of Social Research Ethics, Thousand Oaks CA, Sage. Taylor, C. (2012) Moralism: A study of a vice, Durham, Acumen.

An Advert Hammersley, M. and Traianou, A. (2012) Ethics in Qualitative Research: Controversies and Contexts, London, Sage. Traianou, A. and Hammersley, M. Ethics and educational research. Available at: ethics