OCLC Online Computer Library Center Cooperative Collection Management Survey ARL Membership Meeting October 19, 2006 Chip Nilges Vice President, New Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Collaborative Collection Management Revived? Michael Jubb RIN Strategic Management of Monographs Discussion Forum 17 March 2011.
Advertisements

KAT HAGEDORN HATHITRUST SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES OCTOBER 9, 2009 Seamless Sharing: NYU, HathiTrust, ReCAP and the.
KAT HAGEDORN HATHITRUST SPECIAL PROJECTS COORDINATOR UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LIBRARIES OCTOBER 9, 2009 Seamless Sharing: NYU, HathiTrust, ReCAP and the.
Research Collaborative Management of Shared Print Collections Jim Michalko Vice President OCLC Research Association of Research Libraries Membership Meeting.
Mimi Calter Assistant University Librarian & Chief of Staff Stanford University Libraries & Academic Information Resources 13 April 2012 Western Regional.
ICOLC October 4, 2001 OCLC Services. Purpose Libraries’ web-based information portal needs –Maximize consortia’s role in their members’ use of database.
A Fine Balance: Tangible or Electronic? Gretchen Gould Reference Librarian & Bibliographer University of Northern Iowa
Common Statistics Programs and Projects in Canadian Academic Libraries Sylvie Belzile Université de Sherbrooke Statistiques de bibliothèques au 21 e siècle:
Please Limit your book requests I only have access to 100 million volumes today 1.
The JSTOR Project Print Retention and Withdrawal.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center WorldCat Discovery to Delivery Jennifer Pearson Global Market Solutions OCLC
Moving Shared Print to the Network Level Emily Stambaugh ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV June 27, 2014 “Looking to the Future of Shared Print” Shared.
Waking up from the Dream: Can Resource in Common Work? Presented: June 26, 2011 Wyoma vanDuinkerken and Crystal Vinal.
Anne R. Kenney SCLD Annual Conference April 24-26, 2006 The Sum of its Parts: Consolidated Storage, Management, and Delivery Services.
Contexts for International Issues & Comparative Research in Library & Archive Robert M. Hayes.
A Tale of Two Mega-regions and Many Systems: The Californias and Shared Print Projects Print Archive Network Forum ALA Midwinter Philadelphia, PA January.
Automatic Storage and Retrieval System for ILL Helen Sakrihei, The National Library of Norway Document Delivery Satellite Meeting, Nancy 2014.
Collection Development
B OARD of G OVERNORS State University System of Florida 1 B OARD of G OVERNORS State University System of Florida Facilities Renovation/Upgrade.
WESTERN REGIONAL STORAGE TRUST (WEST) BUSINESS MODEL Print Archive Network meeting ALA Annual June 22, 2012.
Collection Management Initiative A two year grant awarded to the University of California and funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation Mellon grant project.
Resource Sharing Development and Challenge in Academic Libraries: the Case Study of CALIS Yao XiaoXia CALIS Administrative Center , PUL , shanghai.
OCLC Research Libraries Partners 10 June 2011 Robin Murray Vice President, Global Product Management OCLC Collaboratively Building Web-Scale with Libraries.
23-24 February 2006 Sharing Best Practices among Universities - Thessaloniki, Greece 1 UOM Library Sharing Best Practices Anna Fragkou UNIVERSITY OF MACEDONIA.
Library Assessment in North America Stephanie Wright, University of Washington Lynda S. White, University of Virginia American Library Association Mid-Winter.
FAEIS Project User Opinion Survey 2005 Thursday, June 23, 2005 Washington, D.C. H. Dean SutphinYasamin Miller ProfessorDirector, SRI Agriculture & Extension.
VIVA Resource Sharing 2010 Originally presented at 12th Annual VIVA ILL Forum Sweet Briar College July 16, 2010 Updated for VIVA Steering Committee, September.
Megan Drake Pacific University Al Cornish Orbis Cascade Alliance Migrating to a Shared ILS Using Alma and Primo May 1, 2014.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center OCLC Resource Sharing Update Sam Sayre OCLC Western Service Center Cassie Maringer WCCLS.
A Feasibility Study of a Unified Library Management System for NHS Scotland - A Progress Report Laura McCaig, Information Manager, E-Library Communicators.
Internet2 – InCommon and Box Marla Meehl Colorado CIO 11/1/11.
GROUP BENEFITS October 11, 2011 Marilee Mark, Vice President Marketing Higher Cost Drugs for Chronic Conditions plan member perspective – 2012 sanofi healthcare.
OPAC Review Catalog functions Inventory and control Locating known items Discovery tool.
June 2004 IAMSLIC Resource Sharing Committee, Requesting Copies and Interlibrary Loans in the IAMSLIC Z Catalogue.
Report on the Benchmarking Study Evaluation 2006 Margarita Moreno, Manager Document Supply Service National Library of Australia.
Single Copy Task Group TRLN Zari Kamarei University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill June 4, :30 PAM-Wide RT.
International Interlibrary Loan SWEM Library The College of William & Mary (VWM)
OCLC Online Computer Library Center NAST Report Attributes ALA Midwinter 2007 Meeting January 21, 2007 David Millikin Product Manager, Library Logistics.
Radical Change by Traditional Means: Deep Resource Sharing by the University of California Libraries Presentation to the UK Serials Group Conference 2004.
State of the Cooperative Kate Nevins April 22, 2010 ASERL Update.
Florida’s Outcome-Based Evaluation Program Finding the Fit with Multitype Library Cooperatives Sondra Taylor-Furbee June 15, 2002.
Zoran Bohaček Croatian Quants Day 22. II Business reasons to analyse a credit registry database.
Extending Access To Information Resource Discovery Service William E. Moen, Ph.D. Kathleen R. Murray, Ph.D. School of Library and Information Sciences.
WorldCat Delivery Pilot WorldCat Delivery Pilot Sarah McHugh Statewide Projects Librarian Montana State Library Jennifer Pearson Global.
The OhioLINK Library System Ohio Library and Information Network.
Digital Preservation: Needs in the RLG Community eLib Conference Information Ecologies: The Impact of New Information 'Species' York, 2-4 December 1998.
WML Print Collection. Status of Print Collection Shelving is at capacity Insufficient air circulation around volumes encourages the growth of mold Previous.
Overviews of the Library of Texas & ZLOT Project Dr. William E. Moen Principal Investigator.
International Resource Sharing - As Seen from a European Perspective Poul Erlandsen National Library of Education Copenhagen, Denmark.
ZLOT The Z Texas Implementation Component of the Library of Texas Dr. William E. Moen Principal Investigator.
Interlibrary Loan and Document Delivery from Japan What You Really Need to Know By Sharon Domier.
ULMS Feasibility Study Overview Laura McCaig. Basis of Feasibility Study  To determine the current picture in NHS Scotland Libraries  Identify associated.
1 JRNL: Journal Retention and Needs Listing A Software Tool for Print Journal Archives Judith C. Russell Dean of University Libraries Benjamin Walker Assistant.
NC Shared ILS (Integrated Library System) Library Cooperation Summit Boone, NC August 12, 2009.
1 Serials Collections Analysis for Libraries and Consortia Presentation to ICOLC Jim McGinty CEO.
Matt Goldner Product & Technology Advocate Mela Kircher Product Manager WorldCat Local Metasearch 13 November 2009.
Retailing Methods and Techniques in Libraries. The Product One main problem that libraries face is recognizing that they provide a product. Successful.
Shared Print Monographs: Making it Work Clem Guthro, Director of Libraries, Colby College Maine Shared Collections Strategy: Why Now in Maine?
Delivers local and global resources and OCLC e-Content in a single search Paul Cappuzzello Senior Library Services Consultant
CLA 2013 LORRAINE BUSBY MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND.
OCLC Online Computer Library Center 1 Building & Sustaining Library Partnerships.
Data Grids, Digital Libraries and Persistent Archives: An Integrated Approach to Publishing, Sharing and Archiving Data. Written By: R. Moore, A. Rajasekar,
Western Regional Storage Trust (WEST) Business Model
International Resource Sharing Where are we today?
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
Old Serials, Dirty Data: Print Retention as an Opportunity
PAN Forum June 27, 2014 ALA Annual Conference Las Vegas, NV
When to Hold On and When to Let Go: A Distributed Retrospective Library Assessment Conference, December 6, 2018 Jean Blackburn, Collections Librarian,
Empire Shared collection program update
Mary Miller Director of Collection Management & Preservation
Presentation transcript:

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Cooperative Collection Management Survey ARL Membership Meeting October 19, 2006 Chip Nilges Vice President, New Services OCLC

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Survey Objectives  Understand current practice  Collection management  Remote storage  Digitization  Evaluate 3 service concepts  Registry & reports  Resource sharing  Shared storage & digitization

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Methodology  Web-based survey with 500 OCLC governing member Academic, ARL, and Public libraries  204 libraries completed survey (response rate=41%)  Report focuses on the Academic library and ARL respondents results

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Collection Management  Half of the Academic library respondents use collection analysis tools.  Users tend to have more than 1 million items in collection (68%).  These users employ several tools.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Cooperative Collection Development Groups  More than one-third of Academic library respondents belong to a cooperative collection development group.  Here are a few of the groups:  CRL Cooperative Collection Development Group  CARLI  CARL

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Remote Storage  One-third of Academic library respondents move materials into remote storage.  Most move materials into storage due to:  Lack of space (91%)  Lack of circulation (81%)

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Storage Filling Up  More than half of Academic library respondents have more than two-thirds of their storage full.  Stored items are used:  Most respondents (81%) circulate stored items but facility is not open to patrons.  Most respondents (84%) make most stored items available for ILL

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Where are your library’s storage facilities located? (N=32)

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Digitization  Half of Academic library respondents digitize materials.  Most respondents who digitize process archival materials (84%).  During 2005, digitization activity increased for more than half of respondents (55%).

OCLC Online Computer Library Center 3 Service Concepts Concept A – Registry & Reports  Create a shared database of collections in storage  Offer tools and reports for comparing stored collections across institutions/groups  Libraries could use this information to inform their collection development decisions

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Investigate 3 Concepts Concept B – Resource Sharing In addition to all services associated with concept A, participating libraries would also be able to... indicate the following for the items that they register: preservation policies lending policies at item level  use this database to borrow items from other libraries

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Investigate 3 Concepts Concept C – Shared storage, preservation, digitization In addition to all services described in Concept B... Participating libraries could agree to send their selected items to an off-site, independent organization for storage, preservation & access.  The independent organization would identify candidate for central storage based on ILL and circulation data.  The independent organization would provide delivery service for all stored items.  Where it has the rights to do so, the independent organization would digitize heavily requested items.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Investigate 3 Concepts  Concepts are in the early stages of development and no pricing was available to test in the questionnaire.  Without pricing, respondents could not be asked to evaluate their likelihood to subscribe to each concept.  Respondents were asked to rate how desirable the concept would be to their library by using a scale that ranged from "0" (Not At All Desirable) to "10" (Very Desirable).

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Concept Evaluations Top Box Note: Top box score analyzes the percent of respondents who indicate a score of 8 or higher.

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Preferred Concept  Without knowing price, half of Academic library respondents prefer Concept C.  In open-ended question, respondents stated why prefer concepts:  Digitizes items for preservation  Provides document delivery  Provides remote storage

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Conclusions  Half of Academic library respondents are involved in collection management and digitization.  Two-fifths are using remote storage which is filling up.  Community seems ready for cooperative collection management service.  Additional market research is recommended on 3 concepts to determine feasibility of service.  OCLC next steps include supporting concepts A and B

OCLC Online Computer Library Center National Storage Trust Network Concept A: Ad Hoc Shared Information Registry Nonparticipating Library WIthdrawals ILL Participating Library Policies Retrieval WIthdrawals Participating libraries provide data on stored holdings and access policies Participating and nonparticipating libraries may analyze collections compared to registry Libraries make independent local decisions about acquisition, retention, digitization, storage Assume individual local risk Collection analysis reports Storage Facility Borrowing System Holdings Collection analysis reports ILL

OCLC Online Computer Library Center National Storage Trust Network Concept B: Cooperative Management Registry Nonparticipating Library WIthdrawals ILL Participating Library Policies Retrieval WIthdrawals In addition to providing data on holdings and access policies, participating libraries make preservation and access commitments to fellow participants Libraries make local decisions in the context of mutual collection management policies Collection analysis reports Storage Facility Borrowing System Holdings Collection analysis reports Priority loans Commitments Shared Virtual Collection

OCLC Online Computer Library Center Borrowing System National Storage Trust Network Concept C: Federated Collection Management Registry Nonparticipating Library WIthdrawals ILL Participating Library Retrieval WIthdrawals Independent entities administer collection analysis and preservation responsibilities to achieve system-wide benefits Libraries cede some control to the network in return for greater stability of the system Collection analysis reports Storage Facility Holdings Collection analysis reports Commitments and Policies Shared Preservation Collections Federation Coordinator(s) Priority loans