Lebanon 2013 1. Introduction Based on studies of its past disasters, Lebanon can be considered as a country vulnerable to earthquakes because of some.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Workshop on National Platforms 23 – 29 August 2008, Davos Switzerland Federal Department of Foreign Affairs FDFA Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation.
Advertisements

Governance of Disaster Reduction Priorities and Organizational Arrangement for the Implementation of HFA Martin Owor Assistant Commissioner Head of Disaster.
1 Bishkek November 17, Goulsara Pulatova RegionalCoordinator UNISDR Secretariat Office in Central Asia 2nd Regional Consultative.
Disaster Risk Reduction and the use of the Hyogo Framework
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
Mohammad Abu Sadeque PEng Director Cell Ph Disaster Management.
Background to the WCDRR
Mainstreaming Disaster Risk Management in Iraq
National Disaster Risk Management Program NDRMP Belgrade, March
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
Global Platform For Disaster Risk Reduction May 2011 Geneva, Switzerland Lebanon’s National Risk Assessment Nathalie Zaarour.
Roles of National/Global Platforms
United Nations Development Programme
The Italian Institutional Design for Administrative Simplification HIGH LEVEL REGIONAL SEMINAR ON “STRATEGIES, TOOLS AND CAPACITIES FOR ADMINISTRATIVE.
Progress, Processes and Perspectives for the post-2015 Development Framework: Rio+20 follow-up Consultative Workshop on Measuring Progress in the post-2015.
Risk and Emergency Management Division Southside Hampton Roads Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Background Based on Global Framework agreed in Kobe. Developed through regional and national consultations over two years. Includes lessons learned since.
23 rd September 2008 HFA Progress Report Disaster Risk Reduction in South Asia P.G.Dhar Chakrabarti Director SAARC Disaster Management Centre New Delhi.
0 Kestutis Rekerta Strategic Planning Division, Government Office of Lithuania World Bank Workshop, Bratislava, September 6, 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IN.
Europe & CIS Subregional Workshop: 7-8 March 2007, Istanbul, Turkey Enhancing National GEF Coordination, Communications and Outreach (Session 6): The Bulgarian.
Disaster risk reduction – How did we get here?
INITIAL PLANNING CONFERENCE FOR ARF DiREx 2015
Views from the Frontline A local perspective of progress towards implementation of the Hyogo Framework for Action
Natural Disaster Management in Nepal - An update OCHA Contact Group Meeting 11 July 2007.
GRIP - Global Risk Identification Programme, UNDP Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, , Local Risk.
DISASTER RISK REDUCTION COORDINATION MECHANISMS AND EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS National Legislation and Coordination Mechanisms The Case of Brazil Lauro T.
Community Coping Skills PAHO Leaders Course November 2006 Jamaica Lois Hue Lois Hue.
2010 and 2011 Work Plan Achievements UNISDR Asia Pacific secretariat.
Pakistan Urban Forum -South Asian Cities Conference Session on “Disaster and Mass Causality Response in Urban Crisis” Emergency Response through Community.
1 Mid-Term Review of the Hyogo Framework for Action Roadmap to Disaster Risk Reduction in the Americas & HFA Mid-Term Review.
THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT SELF ASSESSMENT TOOL (LG-SAT)
ANTIGUA AND BARBUDA Update on Work Plan, Biodiversity in Antigua and Barbuda and Inter-Agency Meetings Antigua and Barbuda and Inter-Agency Meetings for.
Preparations for First Asian Ministerial Conference On Sendai Framework for DRR Presented in 1st IAP Meeting 3-5 June, 2015, Bangkok K.K.Pathak Joint Secretary.
APEC EWG 23 Bangkok, Thailand Earthquake Response Cooperation Program for Energy Supply Systems Phase 2 Progress Report By Chinese Taipei May 16, 2002.
NATIONAL PROGRAM ON COMMUNITY-BASED DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT Progress during 2011 Disaster Management Center General Directorate of Water Resources Ministry.
1 Briefing on the 3 rd session of the Global Platform for Disaster Risk Reduction “Invest Today for a Safer Tomorrow – Increased Investment in Local Action,”
Capital Markets Authority September 20, 2013 Turkish-Arab Capital Markets Forum 1.
EFDRR Our Goal… Good HFA Exchanges 1.Describe some exchanges that have taken place and any results. 2.Analyse the results of the questionnaire. 3.Make.
National CEP strategies, priorities and related policies in Ukraine 4 june 2009, Brussels, NATO HQ Valeriy Tretyakov, Deputy Minister of Ukraine of Emergencies.
1 Stefanie Dannenmann-Di Palma, Programme Officer UNISDR Europe Climate Change Adaptation and Disaster Risk Reduction: A.
HFA Progress and Updates Consultative Meeting of National Disaster Platform on Feb 17, 2013 Jishnu Subedi Institute of Engineering Tribhuvan University.
HFA Review Sri Lanka. Consultations 42 members of National Platform were consulted. Five groups appointed by members to evaluate the progress.
What APEC Task Force for Emergency Preparedness (TFEP) has progressed in the implementation of HFA Presented by Vincent Liu Program Director APEC Secretariat.
Yuki Matsuoka The United Nations International Strategy for Disaster Risk Reduction th CEOS Plenary 5 November 2015.
NATIONAL SOCIETY FOR EARTHQUAKE TECHNOLOGY-NEPAL (NSET) ISDR Asia Partnership Meeting March 2011 Jakarta Indonesia Local Level Pilot HFA Workshop.
1 UNDAF PRIORITY WORKING GROUP 3 ENVIRONMENT 4 December 2011.
Strategy for Sustainable Development of the Czech Republic - from individual to participatory approach Jiří HLAVÁČEK Director Department of Strategies.
1 UN Strategic Support for Disaster Risk Reduction in Thailand: Optimising the 6 th Asian Ministerial Conference in 2014 UNCT Thailand Meeting.
1 HFA New Paradigm in Disaster Risk Reduction Expert Meeting on NMHss Participation in Disaster Risk Reduction Coordination Mechanisms and.
UNDP HAITI Strengthening capacity, coordination & M&E for preparedness & response (and DRR)
Planning and Coordination in Environmental Governance: Indonesian Way of Undoing Thing Laode M. Syarif, Ph.D Hasanuddin University Makassar - Indonesia.
MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT REPUBLIC OF ALBANIA Assoc. Prof. Dr. Kledi Xhaxhiu CLIMATE CHANGE POLICIES IN ALBANIA Deputy Minister
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 31 – Common Foreign and Security Policy.
Prof. Lalko DULEVSKI President of the ESC of Bulgaria Ad hoc group Europe 2020 Steering Committee, , Brussels.
1 Earthquake Response Cooperation Program for Energy Supply Systems (Phase 2) Proposed by Chinese Taipei May 18, 2001 APEC EWG 21 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
A Presentation to the 2017 GEO Work Programme Symposium,
MINISTRY OF THE INTERIOR OF MONTENEGRO
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction
Western Balkans Climate Resilience Workshop
Water resources and management working group
District Disaster Risk Reduction Managment Plan
Forestry, protected areas, and biodiversity working group
The Hyogo Framework for Action and ISDR system- and WMO
Hazards Planning and Risk Management
NATIONAL POLICY FOR DISASTER PREPAREDNESS AND MANAGEMENT. UGANDA
Hazards Planning and Risk Management
PARIS21 - League of Arab States
Strengthening Early Warning Systems in Europe
MARITIME POLICY OF POLAND UP TO 2020 (WITH A PERSPECTIVE UP TO 2030)
Resilience and disaster risk reduction working group
Presentation transcript:

Lebanon

Introduction Based on studies of its past disasters, Lebanon can be considered as a country vulnerable to earthquakes because of some earthquake-prone grooves going through its territories. Coastal cities such as Tyr, Sidon, Beirut and Tripoli have known a number of deadly earthquakes over past centuries. The current road network may be affected by landslides, which hampers access to a number of Lebanese areas. Based on the above, one can say that, should an earthquake occur, it will have a major negative impact on the country’s development efforts. Such a disaster will cause injuries and casualties, especially in the absence of a sound national risk reduction methodology. 2

 Lebanon is one of 168 countries that adopted Hyogo Framework for Action in 2005, in a ten-year plan to make the world safer from disasters.  In late 2009, the Disaster Risk Management Unit at the Presidency of the Council of Ministers started its work with the support of UNDP.  In March 2010, the unit represented Lebanon in a regional forum held in Egypt on progress achieved within Hyogo Framework for Action, upon UNISDR invitation.  Another workshop was then held in Beirut; and Lebanon initiated the preparation phase of the HFA progress report, through the following mechanism: 3

First Phase  Define the stakeholders Disaster reduction is everyone’s responsibility, hence the need to define all the parties, ministries, institutions and associations, which have a direct contribution to the framework: Presidency of the Council of Ministers Higher Relief Authority Ministry of Defense: Army command Ministry of Interior and Municipalities: ISF, Directorate General of Civil Defense, Beirut fire department Ministry of Public Health 4

Ministry of Social Affairs Ministry of Justice (Legislation and Opinions Bureau) Ministry of Energy and Water Ministry of Public Works and Transport: Directorate of Civil Aviation, Directorate of Roads and Buildings, Directorate of Land and Air Transport Ministry of Education and Higher Education Ministry of Information: National News Agency Ministry of Finance Ministry of Economy and Trade Ministry of Environment Council for Development and Reconstruction 5

Council for Scientific Research Lebanese Red Cross National Women Commission Association for Forest Development Swiss Agency for Development UNDP Between March and July 2010, the Presidency of the Council of Ministers sent letters to different administrations and ministries to appoint liaison officers to participate in workshops and draft the national report. 6

 Establish working groups with specific priorities In July 2010, a workshop was held under the auspices of the Prime Minister at the Grand Serail and in the presence of a UNISDR representative; participants were introduced to Hyogo Framework for Action and to how the progress report should be drafted. They were divided into working groups in line with the priorities defined by Hyogo Framework for Action, as follows: Working Group 1: Institutional Framework. It includes representatives from: National Women Commission, ministry of finance, directorate of civil aviation, ministry of public works and transport, ministry of national defense, Lebanese Red Cross, ministry of economy and trade, ministry of justice, UNDP. 7

Working group 2: Early Warning and Risk Assessment. It includes representatives from: ministry of environment, ministry of energy and water, council for scientific research, Association for Forest Development, UNDP, Ministry of Defense, Presidency of the Council of Ministers. Working group 3: Awareness raising. It includes representatives from: ministry of social affairs, ministry of interior and municipalities, ministry of national defense, Lebanese Red Cross, ministry of education and higher education, ministry of information, National Women Commission. Working group 4: Sectors. It includes representatives from: ministry of public health, CDR, Council for scientific research, ministry of energy and water, ministry of education and higher education, Swiss Agency for Development, ministry of public works and transport. Working group 5: Response and Reconstruction. It includes representatives from: Higher Relief Authority, ministry of interior and municipalities, Beirut Fire Department, ministry of social affairs, ministry of national defense. 8

 Hold meetings and workshops for stakeholders Four meetings were held at the Grand Serail for each working group, in view of exchanging opinions and answering the questionnaire. 9

 Gather all comments from the working groups After all the 5 working groups finished their work, a workshop was held to prepare the progress report. The report was done in September

 Incorporate all information in the HFA follow up mechanism: In September 2010, all checked information have been incorporated online in the HFA follow up mechanism within the Global Assessment Report. 11

 Final Report Two workshops were held in December 2010 and April 2011 to update the progress report and finalize the final report published online in April 2011: 12

The Second Phase  Continuing report update: In February 2012, the various teams were called upon to review and update the report and follow up on progress made in implementing HFA. 13

 In April 2012, Lebanon participated in HFA special session for Arab countries, upon an invitation by UNISDR, in Egypt.  In June 2012, the first post-HFA meeting was held and attended by UNISDR representative and liaison officers  In September 2012, the progress report was drafted for the period  In March 2013, the final report was issued by the liaison officers, to be later approved by the government prior to April 30,

After 2015 After 2015 HFA should not be a framework Reporting should not be an option DRR should be on the agenda of the UN Council in New York in September, where each head of delegation should mention in his speech what is the progress of their country on DRR Allocate more funds to DRR and support undeveloped countries, as in 2013 all funds are allocated for Syrian displaced only and no more for developments and DRR 15

THANK YOU… 16