Vilnius Lithuania 2014. BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Federal Technology Transfer Process: Licenses and Cooperative Research and Development Agreements ADVANCED LICENSING INSTITUTE AT.
Advertisements

- Generator of Policies for Small and Medium-Sized Companies.
Final Report Presentation By Mohammad Saber Sakhizada March,26 – 2009.
Development of Intellectual Property Policies at Universities and Research Centers Mr. Ryszard Frelek, Division for Certain Countries in Europe and Asia,
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
National Intellectual Property Strategies, Some Examples and Their Significance June, 2005 Maputo, Mozambique WIPO Intellectual Property and New Technologies.
RECOMMENDATIONS BY INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWYERS ON LEGAL REFORM MOSES NKOMO LL.B, MIP.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS A STRATEGIC TOOL Alison Campbell OBE PhD RTTP Belgrade 30 October 2012.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
1 Copyright © 2013 M. E. Kabay, D. Blythe, J. Tower-Pierce & P. R. Stephenson. All rights reserved. Introduction to Intellectual Property Law CJ341 – Cyberlaw.
Universities and Patents From Open Science to Open Innovation Gilles Capart Chairman of ProTon Europe.
Welcome and Introduction: Market Timing and Licensing Options
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Intellectual Property Patent Primer Michael Pratt Executive Director, Business Development November 1, 2011.
Intellectual Property Management in Universities and Successful Technology Licensing Organized by The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in.
5 November 2012 PERMANENT MISSION OF THAILAND TO THE WTO 1 Intellectual Property and Development: Thailand’s Experience.
Commercialization of University Technology Innovation, Technology Transfer and Licensing Jack Turner, Associate Director M.I.T. Technology Licensing Office.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
Bringing Knowledge to the Market: IPR, Licensing and Collaborative Research Regions for economic change : innovating through EU regional policy Brussels.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
The use of patents by a university spin-off. Sub-module BThe use of patents by a university spin-off 2/21 Structure of the case study University technology.
Technology Transfer at Rice
Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015. Exponential Inventor Intro to Intellectual Property 05/13/2015 Why is IP Important? Everyone makes a big deal.
Intellectual Property in the Context of Growth and Development of the World Economy Luciano Daffarra, Attorney at Law Daffarra, d’Addio & Partners China-Italy.
Constructing the “Price” of the Technology in IP Licensing Negotiations Sub Regional Training Program on IP Valuation Maribor November 5 to 7, 2012.
IP Policy and its linkages with Economic, Science & Technology Policies Muhammad Ismail Deputy Director IPO-Pakistan October 09, 2013 IN THE NAME OF ALLAH,
A Dual Role Principal (Rector) of Heriot-Watt University Chair of the regional economic development company.
What is Intellectual Property ? Patents- protection of technology Trademarks- protection of domain names and product identity Copyrights- protection of.
Intellectual Property and S&T Policy. Outline Economic perspective on S&T policy –Science, technology, information as economic resources –Market failure.
Investing in research, making a difference. Patent Basics for UW Researchers Leah Haman Intellectual Property Associate WARF 1.
Overview of the Indian Eqvt. to Bayh-Dole Act (USA) [Protection and Utilization of Public Funded Intellectual property (Bill 2008)]. By Dr. Gopakumar G.
International exchange of scientific - technical knowledge 1.
Government Funded Inventions Mark L. Rohrbaugh, Ph.D., J.D. Acting Director Office of Technology Transfer National Institutes of Health.
University Technology Transfer: Issues and Opportunities Mark Crowell Research Administration for Scientists (T. Quigg) 7 December 2001.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
NIH Funding Recipient Responsibilities February, 2004 Office of Technology Transfer Office of the Director National Institutes of Health.
Technology Transfer and IP framework initiatives May 2011.
Policies Promoting IP Development in Universities and Higher Institutions of Learning In Africa OGADA Tom WIPO National Workshop on Intellectual Property.
MARK BARNES SENIOR ASSOCIATE PROVOST AND UNIVERSITY CHIEF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE OFFICER September 14, 2012 Responsible Conduct of.
The Basics of Intellectual Property Law Understanding IP by A. David Spevack, Office of Naval Research.
Office of Technology Commercialization Chuck Rancourt Director.
WP1: IP charter Geneva – 23rd June 2009 Contribution from CERN.
THE IMPORTANCE OF IPR ACROSS THE LIFECYCLE OF INNOVATION Bob Stembridge Principal Patent Analyst, IP & Science.
“IP Universities” Istanbul, April 14 to 15, 2011 Albert Long Hall, BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY The U.S. Bayh- Dole Act Av. Uğur Aktekin The U.S. Bayh-
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
1 28 June 2006 © ip21 Limited 2006 Intellectual Property Issues for the Consultant Matthew Dixon, Chartered Patent Attorney, ip21 Limited
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Intellectual Property Valorization
Intellectual Property at USC October 27, 2003 Dr. Michael Muthig.
WIPO E-SPEED DB (tentative) Shintaro TAKAHARA Director Multilateral Policy Office JAPAN PATENT OFFICE Open-ended Forum on Proposed Development Agenda Projects,
IP Basics. What is IP? Right to EXCLUDE others from using IP Intangible assets; right to monetize them Agreement between society and creators; knowledges.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
Intellectual Property Guide WP4 delivrables Tristan Rouillé, Ifremer 19 / 20 April 2011.
Intellectual Property And Data Rights Issues Domestic & Global Perspectives Bayh-Dole act -- rights in data Henry N. Wixon Chief Counsel National Institute.
OTC FELLOWS PROGRAM INFORMATION SESSION Fall 2016.
Technology Transfer Office
Fostering Valorisation of Publicly Funded Research Dr Pat Frain
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
Intellectual Property 101
Technology Management Activities and Tools
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Universities and the Commercial World
Technology Transfer 101 An Overview of the Process
Intellectual Property 101
Partnering with Business and Industry
Capturing Creativity: Intellectual Asset Management and IP Strategy.
Jakob Wested and Helen Yu and Timo Minssen
Intellectual Property &Technology Transfer
Presentation transcript:

Vilnius Lithuania 2014

BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory University of Oregon Technology Transfer Office

OVERVIEW: Background: Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Innovation v. Invention Knowledge Economy to the Innovation Economy National IP Strategy: law and policy Introduction to the United States’ innovation policy and law Technology Transfer Offices Licensing IP 3

U.S. Constitution: Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 The Congress shall have Power To...promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries.... 8

Innovation Economy Starts with Knowledge Generation The “Culture of Innovation” Innovation Systems 9

National IP Strategy An effective National IP Strategy is typically formulated to complement the nation’s existing strategic development plan. The plan should be integrated and aligned with Lithuania's development plan. -Identifying the need Having a well-integrated strategic plan ensures that resources are aligned and de-conflicted. -Are the strategies of the Science Ministry aligned with the health ministry, and how does that work with funding decisions?

Goals of a National IP Strategy Develop a innovation economy Strengthen linkages between industry and research institutions. Strengthens the country’s ability to generate economically valuable IP assets. Builds natural bridges between researchers, universities, laboratories, investors and entrepreneurs.

Patents & Copyright Understanding the tools used to transfer technology. Patents Copyrights Don’t worry about trademarks and trade secrets, but don’t forget about them either. 12

Innovation v. Invention So many inventions and so few innovations, and how to tell the difference. The “Useful Arts.” What do you have? Identifying what is useful. Get the best people in the room. 13

Innovation Economy Financing Research – who? Scientific management What research gets funded? Technology protection and knowledge transfer is essential to making it work Licensing 14

University Research Where does the funding come from? Who owns what? Now what? 15

Bayh-Dole Act Impacts the ownership of inventions made with federal funding. Before the Bayh–Dole Act, federal research funding contracts and grants obligated inventors (wherever they worked) to assign inventions they made using federal funding to the federal government. Bayh-Dole permits a university, small business, or non-profit institution to elect to pursue ownership of an invention in preference to the government. Key Concepts: Encourage: creation, research & development. Facilitate: management of IP assets and encourage licensing and technology transfer. Protection: enforcement with well-trained customs agents, police, and competent judges who understand the value of IP. ownership of inventions made with federal funding. Before the Bayh–Dole Act, federal research funding contracts and grants obligated inventors (where ever they worked) to assign inventions they made using federal funding to the federal government. [3] Bayh-Dole permits a university, small business, or non- profit institution to elect to pursue ownership of an invention in preference to the government [3]

Bayh-Dole Act Major Provisions: Non-profits and universities may retain the title to the intellectual property developed under federally-funded research programs. Universities are encouraged to collaborate with commercial firms. Universities are expected to file for intellectual property protection (patents/copyrights) on inventions they elect to own.

Bayh-Dole Act Major Provisions: The Federal Government retains a non-exclusive license to practice the patent throughout the world. March-in rights Termination of licence The Bayh-Dole Act encourages universities to participate in technology transfer activities.

University Innovation Cycle Research and Development (R&D) Invention IP protection University IP management Licensing Private commercial technology development Royalty development? 19

Innovation Cycle Research and Development (R&D) Inventions 20 R&D can be cost intensive – but it is often not the case for universities to conduct R&D. Strong links between universities and the private sector are essential.

Innovation Cycle IP protection University IP management 21 What is the appropriate IP: Patent or Copyright Inovation Office Staff Structure

Technology Transfer Office Structure Internal or external Professionals Measuring Success 22

Innovation Cycle Licensing Private commercial technology development Royalty development 23

Licensing Granting the appropriate scope of rights Permit research uses Preference for non or partial exclusivity Specified field of use Enforceable milestones and benchmarks Maximize development of products for the public good Ensure appropriate return on the public investment 24

Factors Considered in Licensing Stage of development Type of product Market value of product Uniqueness of material Scope of patent coverage Market timing 25

Private commercial technology development Strong links to the private sector – relationships Cooperative research with a private company Mutual trust 26

Royalty development? “Public good” The problem with Google Every research university began to want to create a Google Be realistic 27