ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 6-7, 2012 Waterfront Hotel - Morgantown, WV Federal Programs Spring Directors Conference Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Advertisements

Newport News Public Schools Information on Title I Funding
Title I A Requirements under NCLB Public Law Office of Federal Programs September 2014 Oklahoma State Department of Education.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 1 INTRODUCTION STATES LEADING REFORM States and districts have initiated groundbreaking reforms and innovations.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
State and Federal Accountability Directors of Special Education October 10, 2013 Region One Education Service Center Office of School Improvement, Accountability,
Ross Santy Director, Performance Information Management Service U.S. Department of Education Incorporating new programs into EDFacts 25 th Annual MIS Conference.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Monthly Conference Call With Superintendents and Charter School Administrators.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Request Frequently Asked Questions April 30, 2012 April 27,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS Gayle Pauley Assistant Superintendent Special Programs and Federal Accountability
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS December 18, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: RENEWAL PROCESS November 20, 2014.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
FIELD-TEST FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW October 31, 2013.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
Education in Delaware: ESEA Flexibility Renewal Community Town Hall Ryan Reyna, Office of Accountability.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
STATE CONSORTIUM ON EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS September 10, 2013.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY Virginia Federal Programs Statewide Conference.
Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING OVERVIEW IU 5. CHAPTER 4 - STANDARDS Effective March 1, 2014 PA Core Standards English Language Arts (ELA) Mathematics Reading.
ESEA Flexibility: Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 1 of 8.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
ESEA FLEXIBILITY: AN OVERVIEW September 26, 2011.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
NCLB / Education YES! What’s New for Students With Disabilities? Michigan Department of Education.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Federal Accountability Accountability Policy Advisory Committee (APAC) and Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) Meeting | March 5, 2012 Texas.
March 30, 2012 Marriott Hotel- Charleston, WV Committee of Practitioners Developing Federal Programs of Excellence.
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student. Brad Neuenswander, Deputy Commissioner KSDE.
MDE Accountability Update SLIP Conference, January 2016.
North Carolina ESEA Flexibility Focus Schools 1. How are Focus Schools identified?  Title I schools with in-school gaps between the highest- achieving.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Overview: Every Student Succeeds Act April ESEA in Ohio In 2012, our state applied for and received a waiver from provisions of No Child Left Behind.
The Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA): A Briefing for Alaska Lee Posey State-Federal Relations Division National Conference of State Legislatures.
ESEA Flexibility Waiver Renewal What to Expect for the Upcoming School Year June 17, 2015.
What just happened and what’s next? Presenters: Steve Dibb, MDE Debra Landvik, MDE AYP 2011.
OVERVIEW OF THE EVERY STUDENT SUCCEEDS ACT: TITLES I & III RIVERSIDE COUNTY PELD MEETING JANUARY 29, 2016 Presented by Patti F. Herrera, School Services.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Stakeholder Input Title I Administrative Meeting: May 19, 2016.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVERS December 2, 2011 House Education Committee Bob Harmon, Assistant Superintendent
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN Central Susquehanna Intermediate Unit.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Transition to ESSA WVDE Office of Federal Programs March 8, 2016 Alternate Audio Access: #
Determining AYP What’s New Step-by-Step Guide September 29, 2004.
New Jersey DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Title I, Part A & Title III, Part A Changes Under ESSA New Jersey Department of Education The Office of Supplemental.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Accountability
The Every Student Succeeds Act
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Where Are We Now? ESSA signed into law December 10, 2015
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
Build Your Own ESSA Explainer
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Field-test FLEXIBILITy: an overview
Every Student Succeeds Act Update
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
ESEA Flexibility: An overview
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA):
Presentation transcript:

ESEA FLEXIBILITY: QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS October 5, 2011

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 2

3 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND AYP Q.Is an SEA that receives ESEA flexibility still required to make AYP determinations as it does under NCLB?  Yes (see FAQ B-11)  All rules for AYP determinations remain the same except: 1.New flexibility for setting AMOs 2.Use of AYP determinations

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 4 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND AYP, CONT’D. Q.What is different about how an SEA that receives ESEA flexibility uses AYP determinations?  Reporting as primary use  AYP determinations to inform, but not dictate, accountability  Other factors that might inform accountability include: o Change in school or subgroup performance over time o Other indicators of student achievement, such as enrollment in AP or IB courses or student portfolios o Indicators of school climate o Other factors that are part of an existing State system  See FAQ C-18

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 5 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND AYP, CONT’D. All flexibility for making AYP determinations remains the same, including:  Counting proficient scores on alternate assessment based on alternate academic achievement standards (up to 1% limit)  Including scores of former English Learners and former students with disabilities in those subgroups for up to two years  Excluding scores of recently arrived English Learners

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 6 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND AYP, CONT’D. All requirements for making AYP determinations remain the same, including:  Disaggregated results in at least reading/language arts and mathematics  Other academic indicator  Graduation rate regulations not waived  Participation rate  AYP determinations included on State and district report cards

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 7 PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS Q.How must an SEA identify its priority and focus schools?  An SEA must identify a number of schools equal to at least 5 percent of its Title I schools as priority schools, and at least an additional 10 percent of Title I schools as focus schools  An SEA must include its lists of priority and focus schools in its request and include them on report cards  An SEA may update its lists of priority and focus schools based on more recent data, but must ensure implementation of interventions in accordance with the SEA’s approved timeline  See FAQs C-22 through C-30

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 8 PRIORITY AND FOCUS SCHOOLS, CONT’D. Q.How may an SEA identify high schools with graduation rate less than 60 percent over a number of years as priority and focus schools?  Title I-participating high schools with graduation rates less than 60 percent over a number of years must be identified as either priority or focus schools  In addition, Title I-eligible high schools with graduation rates less than 60 percent over a number of years may be identified as priority schools, but not as focus schools

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 9 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS Q.How does implementation of ESEA flexibility interact with an SEA's or LEA's implementation of the SIG program?  Under the ESEA flexibility, an SEA may: o Count a PLA school receiving SIG funds to implement one of the four SIG models as a priority school o Competitively award new subgrants to LEAs implementing a SIG model in a PLA school or a priority school  SIG funds must be used in accordance with the requirements of the SIG program

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 10 SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES (SES) AND SCHOOL CHOICE Q.What are an LEA’s requirements related to SES and school choice under ESEA flexibility?  An LEA would no longer be required provide SES or school choice or reserve the funds to do so  An LEA could still use the funds on SES or choice-related transportation if it chooses to do so  See FAQs B-9 and B-10

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 11 SUPPLEMENTAL EDUCATIONAL SERVICES (SES) AND SCHOOL CHOICE, CONT’D Q.Does an SEA that requests ESEA flexibility need to conduct a process for selecting SES providers?  Until an SEA is approved to implement the flexibility, it must comply with the current requirements related to approving SES providers

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 12 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND SECTION 1117 OF THE ESEA Q.Is ESEA flexibility waiving the provision that States have a statewide system of support?  SEAs will still be required to implement a statewide system of support  How this statewide system of support operates may change from past practices based on the proposed differentiated accountability system plan presented in the SEA’s request

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 13 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND HIGHLY QUALIFIED TEACHER REQUIREMENTS Q. Do LEAs that did not previously meet the State’s HQT targets still have to develop improvement plans?  Under ESEA flexibility, an LEA is not required to develop an improvement plan, regardless of the years for which it did not meet HQT targets  These waivers will be in effect once the SEA’s request for flexibility has been approved  Until the date that the request is approved, SEAs and LEAs must comply with all current laws

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 14 ESEA FLEXIBILITY AND AN SEA’S ACCOUNTABILITY WORKBOOK Q.Does an SEA that receives ESEA flexibility need to update its accountability workbook?  Yes  The Department will work with SEAs to enable them to expeditiously update their accountability workbooks prior to the school year  An SEA with an approved request may begin implementing the flexibility before its accountability workbook amendments are approved

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 15 ESEA FLEXIBILITY: INTENT TO REQUEST FLEXIBILITY Q.What should be included in an SEA’s intent to request ESEA flexibility on October 12?  The SEA should note whether it expects to submit a request in November or February  The “intent to request” is not binding, but is an important tool to help ED plan for the review  An SEA is always free select another window at a later point

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 16 ESEA FLEXIBILITY: SUBMITTING ON NOVEMBER 14, 2011 Q.Is there a time certain by which an SEA must submit its request on November 14?  An SEA may submit a request any time on November 14 in order to be considered in the first review window  Requests are to be submitted to our designated mailbox  If you have any technical problems with your submission, please Sharon Hall at

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 17 ESEA FLEXIBILITY: ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS  You may ask questions over the phone or through the webinar’s chat function

ESEA Flexibility U.S. Department of Education 18 CLOSING State Questions and Office Hours  To submit questions or schedule a time for SEA teams to speak with Department staff, contact