Summary of Fuse Testing for Barrel Module Fuse Boxes Duke University Jack Fowler.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HIV Drug Resistance Training
Advertisements

FCMAT Response & Preparation: Process Outline October 25, 2006.
Circuits Computer Lab Today.
Seog Oh/ Duke University/June, 2003 TRT/ ATLAS week at CERN Duke Production Status.
1 LHC-DFBX Procurement Strategy Joseph Rasson LBNL Presented at the DFBX Production Readiness Review October 2002, LBNL Brookhaven - Fermilab - Berkeley.
Solar Cell Efficiency Flight Readiness Review Teddy Bounds Angela Dunn Joel Sasser.
Click on PI Name. EHSA dashboard Radiation Module – Waste Pick up Please follow the instructions to arrange for radiation waste pick up from lab. No.
1 Operating Experience and Reliability Update on the 5 kW CW Klystrons at Jefferson Lab Richard Walker & Richard Nelson Jefferson Lab, Newport News VA.
This presentation contains the following: -the availability and need menu options -the add option Mark Smith.
TDR2 FM board tests D. Haas Test Setup Test Procedure Functional tests Results Test Schedule.
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download, adapt, and distribute this.
BaBar/LST Meeting Dec 8, 2003K. Honscheid, Ohio State University Module Assembly Quality Control High Voltage Ohio State Status Report.
Ian Frank Matt Walter Jesse Steiner Luke Spencer Mike Celentano Nick Balducci Team Lead Chief Engineer Electrical Engineer Industrial Engineer Electrical.
ECAL status Outline: Signal cable connectors quality check results: –ADC side –PM side ECAL PM/C-W channels commissioning status Access activities Further.
1 Computer Power Supply Amateur Radio Conversion For Cheap +12 vdc Power March 17, 2003.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University Dubna, May Fuse Box Production Chiho Wang/Jack Fowler.
LARG week 07/01 Paul Poffenberger University of Victoria Endcap Feedthrough Production at Victoria Status Summary.
Seog Oh/ Duke University/September, 2003 TRT Workshop/ Peniscola, Spain Duke TRT Progress.
Our concept was that we could effectively make a solar powered light that attaches to a hard hat and will provide a worker with adequate light when working.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Feb TRT Barrel assembly status & schedule Feb. 9, 2005.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Feb Fuse Box Status Chiho Wang Duke University.
Create a New Layaway in the LayThisAway System A step-by-step guide to creating a new Layaway in the LayThisAway System.
M. Gilchriese Sector Status Module Loading Task Force Meeting November 18, 2004.
Silicon Meeting July 10, 2003 Module and Stave Production Status James Fast Fermilab.
May 2001, Istanbul Workshop High Voltage Plates and Capacitor Status Jack Fowler.
1 Flux concentrator for SuperKEKB Kamitani Takuya IWLC October.20.
Straw Working Group Status assembly at CERN Plans 10/2/14Straw WG.
Chiho Wang Duke University 1 TRT Barrel integration Status / Schedule Chiho Wang.
4-Jan-16S.Movchan Straw manufacturing and QC1 Straw tracker manufacturing procedure Dubna: assembly halls procedure conclusion Presented by S.Movchan.
1 FVTX Detector Assembly Stephen Pate New Mexico State University (FVTX Assembly Management WBS 1.7) Stephen Pate, NMSU – FVTX Review – 16-Nov-2009.
Single Module Tests (electrical) Inspect connectors and cables for visible damage C-measurement: make sure all pads are correctly connected HV test (1.5.
1 Sasha Milov DC meeting Sept 12, 2007 HBD status Sasha Milov Sept 12, 2007.
Summary Plans Content Module assembly at CERN and Dubna Readout DAQ Procurement Stacking Summary.
Status Report for E391a (Continuation of the previous PAC on April) G.Y.Lim IPNS, KEK Group Meeting at the JINR 26 th – 29 th July 2003 Dzhelepov Laboratory.
This is an example text TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING DecOctSepAugJulyJuneAprilMarchFebJanMayNov 12 Months Example text Go ahead and replace it with your own.
Chronology - I  Year Jan. 2008: from time to time short circuits failures in chains supplying low voltage to C-W bases (either +6V or -6V, ~5 lines.
9/12/2003Ivan Hruska1 First box prototype –Box design in July ‘03 –Box produced during August ’03 Tested last week in few fingers Small changes necessary.
Executive Committee, Toronto August 3, 2005 TRT Barrel WBS 1.2/3.2 Harold Ogren Indiana University.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Istanbul Workshop Duke University May, Fuse Boxes Chiho Wang Duke University.
Personal Planning System The Adding a Program to the Library Enterprise Edition.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Feb Fuse Box & Capacitor Status Chiho Wang Duke University.
Quality Assurance for LHC Gas Systems Stefan Haider / EP-TA1.
 94 LVPS Packages mounted 4’-25’ from the front-end electronics.  4 modules per package. u +5V& -5V “Digital”, +5V & -5V “Analog” 18 A 1A 18A 18Amps.
 Mechanical Components have been ordered and should arrive by Week 1 of winter quarter  Outstanding electrical components dependent on varying mechanical.
Soarian Orders Update: ► Type and Screen ► Crossmatch ► Transfusions Implementation Date: Nov 6, 2012 Oct 2012.
RFQ Installation Status 10/27/2015 October 27, 2015 Jim Steimel & Curtis Baffes.
ATLAS TRT Duke University CERN, Feb Fuse Box Status Duke University.
ELENA installation progress F. Butin / ELENA collaboration.
Chiho Wang ATLAS TRT Duke University Dubna, May Barrel integration status May 24, 2005.
IT Strategy Roadmap Template
BSS Prep work at CERN and Acceptance of Parts
Jack Fowler Duke University Spain Workshop
Outline Introduction to LHC Power Converters Remaining Inventory Observed Availability New inventory – FGClite Cumulative & SEE Effects Maintenance.
Summary of Fuse Testing for Barrel Module Fuse Boxes
Summary of Fuse Testing for Barrel Module Fuse Boxes
Module Production and Testing at Duke
LPI Moscow, K. Zhukov, MEPhI-LPI Moscow, V. Kantserov

STAR TOF MRPC Mass Production & Q.C. (USTC)

Diagnostics Analytical 920 LC Semi-Prep 940 LC
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
You must log in using both you address and your Full name before proceeding

Production process- your product processing cards, technology
Limited Streamer Tube Project Summary
Creating Reports.
Hybrid & Module Testing Status
2009 TIMELINE PROJECT PLANNING 12 Months Example text Jan Feb March
All Right Reserved © JiJi Technologies Pvt Ltd
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Fuse Testing for Barrel Module Fuse Boxes Duke University Jack Fowler

Fuse Box Production Summary Fuse Boxes have been in production for ~ 12 months 35 sets of each type are being produced This involves > 7500 fuses Fuses were delivered from Oct 03 until Aug 04

Fuse Box Production Steps Assemble Fuse Box components and solder Test Fuses Clean Fuse boxes and dry Test Fuses Dry fuse boxes for minimum 3 hrs at < 55° C Conformal coat fuse box components Final Test Boxes - continuity at < 100 V and check for breakdown at 2 kV Final assembly – add hardware and heat shrink and label cables

Fuse Boxes

Post Production Tests Once fuse boxes are through the final test, we perform simple resistance test on each of the fuses. In the period of time between tests, the fuse boxes are stored on a shelf in the lab.

Type 1 Fuse Failure Rates Nov 17 – 33 / 1518 or (2.17 %) Nov 23 – 7 / 1485 or (0.47 %) Nov 28 – 6 / 1478 or (0.41 %) Dec 7 – 1 / 1472 or (0.07 %) Cumulative Totals 47 / 1518 or (3.10 %)

Type 2 Fuse Failure Rates Nov 17 – 49 / 2346 or (2.09 %) Nov 23 – 4 / 2297 or (0.17 %) Nov 28 – 4 / 2293 or (0.17 %) Dec 7 – 6 / 2289 or (0.26 %) Cumulative Totals 63 / 2346 or (2.69 %)

Type 3 Fuse Failure Rates Nov 17 – 14 / 1872 or (0.75 %) Nov 23 – 5 / 1858 or (0.27 %) Nov 28 – 1 / 1853 or (0.05 %) 5 / 884 or (0.57 %)* Total 6 /2737 or (0.22 %) Dec 7 – 3 / 1852 or (0.16 %) 3 / 879 or (0.34 %)* Total 6 / 2731 or (0.22 %) Cumulative total 31 / 2756 or (1.12 %) * New type 3 boxes were added to the tests

Total Fuse Failure Rates

Cumulative Test Results Total Cumulative of all fused tested –Nov 17 ’04 – 97 / 5736 or (1.69 %) –Nov 23 ’04 – 112 / 5736 or (1.95 %) –Nov 28 ’04 – 128 / 6620 or (1.93 %)* –Dec 7 “04 – 141 / 6620 or (2.13 %)* 141 fuses corresponds to 1128 straws * New type 3 boxes were added to the tests

Comments and Summary The failure rates from the Nov 17 test were higher because time between tests varied up to 6 weeks. The remaining tests have been done at ~ 1 week intervals. Many fuses were replaced during the production process. These were not documented well as they were attributed to handling of the boxes during the process without the fuses being potted. Approximately 6 of the fuses that failed the test were found to be good in the next test. These remain marked as failed and will be monitored. The tests will continue into next year to determine if these are infant mortalities or if the failure rate remains constant. If the rate drops and begins to appear more acceptable, then tests with HV applied will be performed to see if it has any effect.

Future task??? Begin to redesign the fuse box without the use of fuses. IF the HV connection boxes are to be made, this will take a minimum of 4 months.