ANNETTE ENEMARK Director of Tetraplan (DK)

You are… …familiar with the S.U.M.P planning process Stand up …an experienced S.U.M.P’er Keep standing Otherwise: Sit right back

Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013 Will mobility conditions change? 24% belive it will improve 37% belive it will be worse 35% belive it will be the same One-third of the memberstates feel their access in cities are beeing limited In more than half the memberstates congestion is an important urban problem 38% of citizens encounter problems when traveling within cities

Special European Barometer: Attitudes of European towards Urban Mobility, 2013 Who should fix the problems.. 56% City authorities 52% Citizens themselves 28% Regional authorities 27% National Government 3% Private companies

The story of S.U.M.P. Action Plan on Urban Mobility (2009) White Paper (2011) Urban Mobility Package (2013) Funding options Horizon 2020 INTEREG Civitas Activity Fund...

SUMP vs. traditional planning The Transport planner The SUMP WayThe Urban planner Approach Access to roads, busses, bike lanes… The need of the traveller All things at the right place Aim Optimize capacityOptimize mobilityOptimize land use Focus Reduction of risks, as accidents, noise, pollution Accessibility Reduction of negative impacts from other functions Solution Hardware solutions Software and hardware solution Strict land use laws Understanding of mobility Movement from A to B in time and space More than from A to B A side-effect to be managed Adapted with pride from: Mobility researchers from Aalborg University, The SUMP manual, Can Less sometimes be more? Integrating land use and transport, 2013,

Scenario Based on the Urban Planner Model, VEMA. Formelm.dk Scenario of 100 families Changes in modal split if... Modalsplit 100 single Family Houses

The many devils … The siloes The outreach to internal and external partners The active engagement with the public Setting targets and evaluating effects Finding the funding Securing political backing Time consuming

Interactions in the mobility management sector: new coopera- tions, techniques, solutions, ECOMM Regional aspects of MM, ECOMM 2000.Responsible mobility - active partnerships, ECOMM 2002.Managing transport demand to attain sustainable development and economic effectiveness, ECOMM 2003.Transition toward a sustainable urban mobility: demonstrate to convince, ECOMM Delivering attractive options for sustainable travel in different stages of life – current demands shaping the future of travel, ECOMM Accessibility and attractiveness of cities, ECOMM 2006.The future and MM, ECOMM 2007.TDM - Tackling Climate Change, ECOMM Cost/benefit and evaluation of MM, ECOMM Moving people - bridging spaces, ECOMM Economic Recession: A new dawn for MM, ECOMM MM - Key Factor for European development, ECOMM Smart choices require easy access – the challenge of making MM a part of every day life, ECOMM Creating the bridge to a green, fair and prosperous mobility future, ECOMM 2014.

GOOD PRACTICE S.U.M.P. Copenhagen – vision and goal setting Borrowed - with thanks - from Dr. Susanne Böhler-Baedeker, Rupprecht Consult West of England partnership – institutional cooperation Birmingham – integrating energy and mobility planning Gent – consequent sustainable urban mobility planning Vienna – quality-controlled urban mobility strategy Dresden – stakeholder and citizen involvement

Is S.U.M.P. the new black?