Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Modeling Source Apportionment Gail Tonnesen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Sulfur & Nitrogen Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference.
Advertisements

UC Riverside Attribution of Haze Meeting, June 22, 2005, Seattle, WA UNC/CEPENVIRON Corp. Spatial Processing and Display of WRAP Emissions Data, and Source.
3SDW test case at NPS/CIRA Mike Barna NPS-ARD 5/29/13 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results: Base B and Emissions Sensitivities Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly.
CENRAP Modeling Workgroup Mational RPO Modeling Meeting May 25-26, Denver CO Calvin Ku Missouri DNR May 25, 2004.
Spatial Reduction Algorithm for Numerical Modeling of Atmospheric Pollutant Transport Yevgenii Rastigejev, Philippe LeSager Harvard University Michael.
Technical Support System Review / / RPO Monitoring/Data Analysis Workgroup Conference.
Jenny Stocker, Christina Hood, David Carruthers, Martin Seaton, Kate Johnson, Jimmy Fung The Development and Evaluation of an Automated System for Nesting.
Session 9, Unit 17 UAM and CAMx. UAM and CAMx UAM - Urban Airshed Model Currently available versions:  UAM-V 1.24  UAM-V 1.30  Available from Systems.
Beta Testing of the SCICHEM-2012 Reactive Plume Model James T. Kelly and Kirk R. Baker Office of Air Quality Planning & Standards US Environmental Protection.
AoH Report Update Joint DEJF & AoH Meeting, Las Vegas November , 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering A Process Analysis for Analyzing and.
TSS Data Preparation Update WRAP TSS Project Team Meeting Ft. Collins, CO March 28-31, 2006.
WRAP 2004 Technical Work Elements Tom Moore March 24, 2004 Air Managers’ Committee §308/§309(g) Implementation Workgroup.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
2004 Workplan WRAP Regional Modeling Center Prepared by: Gail Tonnesen, University of California Riverside Ralph Morris, ENVIRON Corporation Zac Adelman,
Center for Environmental Research and Technology University of California, Riverside Bourns College of Engineering Evaluation and Intercomparison of N.
PM2.5 Model Performance Evaluation- Purpose and Goals PM Model Evaluation Workshop February 10, 2004 Chapel Hill, NC Brian Timin EPA/OAQPS.
WRAP Update. Projects Updated 1996 emissions QA procedures New evaluation tools Model updates CB-IV km MM5 Fugitive dust NH 3 emissions Model.
Implementation of the Particle & Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) for the CMAQ Modeling System: Mercury Tagging 5 th Annual CMAS Conference Research.
COHA Update Jin Xu. Update 2003 and 2004 back-trajectories – done PMF modeling by groups using 2000 to 2004 IMPROVE data – done Analysis of PMF results.
Further Development and Application of the CMAQ Ozone and Particle Precursor Tagging Methodologies (OPTM & PPTM) 7 th Annual CMAS Conference Chapel Hill,
WRAP CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results Implementation Workgroup Meeting August 29, 2006.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 Source Apportionment Modeling Results and RMC Status report Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
1 Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ PM2.5 Source Apportionment Estimates Kirk Baker and Brian Timin U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park,
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Tagged Species Source Apportionment (TSSA)
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
TSS Project Update and Demo of Selected Tools WRAP IWG Meeting Santa Fe, NM December 7, 2006.
Regional Haze SIP Development Overview AQCC Presentation July 2005.
Regional Modeling Center Workplan Fire/Carbon/Dust Workshop May 24, 2006.
WRAP Experience: Investigation of Model Biases Uma Shankar, Rohit Mathur and Francis Binkowski MCNC–Environmental Modeling Center Research Triangle Park,
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Implementing PM Source Apportionment (PSAT) in CAMx Greg Yarwood, Ralph Morris and Gary Wilson ENVIRON International.
4. Atmospheric chemical transport models 4.1 Introduction 4.2 Box model 4.3 Three dimensional atmospheric chemical transport model.
Causes of Haze Assessment (COHA) Update. Current and near-future Major Tasks Visibility trends analysis Assess meteorological representativeness of 2002.
California Air Resources Board1 Integration of Modeling Results - the problem of double counting and possible solutions Shuming Du August 27, 2003.
Application of the CMAQ Particle and Precursor Tagging Methodology (PPTM) to Support Water Quality Planning for the Virginia Mercury Study 6 th Annual.
Source Attribution Modeling to Identify Sources of Regional Haze in Western U.S. Class I Areas Gail Tonnesen, EPA Region 8 Pat Brewer, National Park Service.
Evaluation of the VISTAS 2002 CMAQ/CAMx Annual Simulations T. W. Tesche & Dennis McNally -- Alpine Geophysics, LLC Ralph Morris -- ENVIRON Gail Tonnesen.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CMAQ Model Performance Evaluation with the.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Introduction to the the RMC Source Apportionment Modeling Effort Gail Tonnesen,
WRAP SCC Temporal and Speciation Profile Improvement Project Status WRAP Regional Modeling Center Carolina Environmental Program November 4, 2003.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 CMAQ tools: PROCAN Andrea Fraser PhD student Supervised byProf. H ApSimon Prof. R Derwent.
Georgia Institute of Technology SUPPORTING INTEX THROUGH INTEGRATED ANALYSIS OF SATELLITE AND SUB-ORBITAL MEASUREMENTS WITH GLOBAL AND REGIONAL 3-D MODELS:
Photochemical grid model estimates of lateral boundary contributions to ozone and particulate matter across the continental United States Kirk Baker U.S.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 Results from January/July CMAQ Source Apportionment Modeling Gail Tonnesen,
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Environmental Modeling University of California at Riverside Data Needs for Evaluation of Radical and.
V:\corporate\marketing\overview.ppt CRGAQS: CAMx 2004 PSAT Results Presentation to the Gorge Study Technical Team By ENVIRON International Corporation.
Impact assessment of anthropogenic emission control upon aerosol mass burden during heavy pollution episodes over North China Plain Meigen Zhang, Xiao.
NPS Source Attribution Modeling Deterministic Models Dispersion or deterministic models Receptor Models Analysis of Spatial & Temporal Patterns Back Trajectory.
Template Comparison of PM Source Apportionment and Sensitivity Analysis in CAMx Bonyoung Koo, Gary Wilson, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood ENVIRON Alan Dunker.
Attribution of Haze Report Update and Web Site Tutorial Implementation Work Group Meeting March 8, 2005 Joe Adlhoch Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
1 DRAFT Report for Air Quality Analysis on Cumulative Emissions, Barrio Logan Tony Servin, P.E. Modeling Support Section Planning and Technical Support.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
WRAP Regional Modeling Center, Attribution of Haze Meeting, Denver CO 7/22/04 December WRAP Modeling Forum Conf Call Call Information: December 20, 1pm.
Presents:/slides/greg/PSAT_ ppt Modeling Options for Proposed BART Rule Two roles for modeling in proposed BART rule > Does a potential BART-eligible.
WRAP Technical Work Overview
CENRAP Modeling and Weight of Evidence Approaches
Phase I Attribution of Haze Overview (Geographic Attribution for the Implementation of the Regional Haze Rule) or (an experiment in weight-of evidence)
CMAQ Programs and Options
M. Samaali, M. Sassi, V. Bouchet
Scorecards.
Results from 2018 Preliminary Reasonable Progress Modeling
CAMx-PSAT Source Apportionment Modeling Results
Attribution of Haze Project Update
CRGAQS: CAMx PSAT Results
Presentation transcript:

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Modeling Source Apportionment Gail Tonnesen, University of California, Riverside RPO Meeting, Denver, CO, May 25, 2004

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Motivation Need to understand which emissions sources contribute to haze and other pollutants. Use this information to assist in developing control strategies.

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Modeling Approaches Sensitivity Studies: –Brute Force: Zero-in or Zero-out a single source. –DDM Sensitivity – efficient but non-linear. Use tracers or “tagged species” to track mass from a single source: –UCR and ENVIRON are implementing similar tracer algorithms in CMAQ and CAMx.

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Other Modeling Approaches Modeling back-trajectories. Chemical Mass Balance (CMB).

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Tagged Species Approach Use “Tagged Species” tracers to track chemical transformations and the movement and chemical conversion of mass across domain. Add tracers for key species and for defined regions & source categories. Outputs 3-D fields showing transport of secondary species. Also outputs bar plots showing contributions at each receptor site.

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Tagged Species for Nitrates NOX = reactive N family. = { NO, NO2, NO3, 2*N2O5, HONO, PNA} HNO3 PAN RNO3 ANO3J ANO3I

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Chemical Transformations Emissions are as NOx = NO + NO2 Use integrated reaction rates at each time step to update the tagged species: –NOX  PAN –NOX  RNO3 –NOx  HNO3 –HNO3  ANO3

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Transport & Loss Terms Use CMAQ transport solvers for advection and dispersion of each tracer. Also update for mass export in CLOUD and aqueous chemistry algorithms. Update tagged species for emissions and deposition terms. Check for mass conservation at each step and adjust mass if needed. Halt if large errors.

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Traced Area: WRAP Modeling Domain Source Area Mapping File: Each state is distinguished by a unique number

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Traced Source Tags TypesSource CategoryNotes ICON Initial Concentration BCON Boundary Concentration EmissionsMV_*Mobile sources of any state BG_*Biogenic sources of any state RD_*Road dust of any state NR_*Non- Road dust of any state PN_*Point sources without SO2 of any state PS_*Point sources with SO2 of any state AR_*Area sources of any state WF_*WF Fire of any state AG_*AG Fire of any state RX_*RX Fire of any state MX_*Mexico Fire ET_*Total Emission of any state *_WRAPAny type of emission of WRAP domain OthersOTHERSAny sources other than all of the above

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CA Mobile Source Sensitivity – Zero-out

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CA Mobile Source contribution using tracers

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Contributions to NO3 at Yosemite

Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside Future Work Test alternate treatments of HNO3  NO3 and H2SO4  SO4 equilibrium. Improve Graphics/Statistics Program to automate Tracer Result Evaluation. More testing- comparisons with zero out sensitivity runs. Scalability in supporting other modeling domains –Create corresponding source area mapping files – county domains.