Translation of Anti-CD22 Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Lymphoma Joseph M. Tuscano, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Department of Internal.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
VCOM Conflict of Interest Policy Overview of Financial Conflict of Interest Related to Research December 4, 2013.
Advertisements

University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
1 RIT: Support Infrastructure, Policies and Procedures – Perceptions, Myths and Reality Varda Main Director Technology Licensing Office.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Contracting & Research Services (CRS)
Personal financial benefit or economic interest from one’s position that may inappropriately: influence the employee’s judgment compromise the employee’s.
Technology and Economic Development Intellectual Property Issues in Research Jim Baker Director Office of Technology and Economic Development
Office of Research Administration Grant and Contract Services (GCS)
IP Issues in Research Jim Baker, Executive Director Innovation, and Industry Engagement.
University Technology Transfer Presentation to Legislative Biotechnology Task Force 29 September 2005 Gene A. Merrell Assistant Vice President - Research.
Air Force Materiel Command I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Developing, Fielding, and Sustaining America’s Aerospace Force INTELLECTUAL.
Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer Ron Huss, Ph.D., Associate Vice President of Research and Technology Transfer Michael Brignati, Ph.D., J.D.,
Technology Transfer University of Colorado Denver Rick Silva, Ph.D., M.B.A. -- Director Senior Licensing Managers David Poticha, M.S., J.D. Paul Tabor,
Intellectual Property and CRDs February 19, 2015.
Introduction to Intellectual Property using the Federal Acquisitions Regulations (FAR) To talk about intellectual property in government contracting, we.
Technology Transfer Commercial Opportunities in Research J. Heidjer Staecker Partner.
ICARE Member Reports ETP seeks to improve incentives and encourage commercial investment in new therapies. (Treatments reach patients only by commercial.
Vilnius Lithuania BSc.: Biochemistry Neuropsychology J.D.: University of Oregon LL.M.:University College London Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.
Intellectual Property: Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State University Research Foundation (ISURF) Director, Office of Intellectual Property.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH Working with FDA: Biological Products and Clinical Development U.S. DEPARTMENT.
The Issue of Technology Readiness Level One of the current issues being discussed by the Department of Energy’s Technology Transfer Working Group is the.
Management of Intellectual Property at Iowa State University Contributing to Economic Development Kenneth Kirkland, Ph.D. Executive Director, Iowa State.
Technology Transfer at Rice
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES National Institutes of Health National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH.
Tech Launch Arizona Tech Transfer Arizona Rakhi Gibbons, Asst. Director for Biomedical and Life Sciences Licensing.
Johns Hopkins Technology Transfer 1 Translational Biomedical Research: Moving Discovery from Academic Centers to the Community Translational Biomedical.
University Contracting The University of Arizona Office of Research and Contract Analysis (ORCA)
A Basic Primer on Intellectual Property Kathryn Atchison, DDS, MPH Vice Provost, Intellectual Property and Industry Relations Associate Vice Chancellor.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System Margaret Sampson Partner, Vinson & Elkins LLP U. T. System Board of Regents’ Meeting Technology.
The Patent Process. Protection of Ideas or Inventions An idea/know how Generally speaking, we would like to protect inventions that have significant commercial.
University of Louisville Faculty Discussion on Research Ho! Ho! Ho! Happy Holidays! 1 December 10,2009.
Partnering with Federal Labs: A Panel Discussion FLC Mid-Atlantic Region Annual Meeting October 24, 2007.
1 Knowledge | Innovation | Technology Overview of Risk Management in University Technology Transfer David N. Allen, Ph.D. Associate Vice President for.
Driving Innovation to Market. Partnering with the Office of Intellectual Property and Industry Sponsored Research December 10, 2013 Tara A. Kamin, Esq.
 Tracy L. LeGrow, Psy.D. Associate Professor Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine.
Organizing a Technology Licensing Office (TLO) Jon Sandelin Senior Associate Emeritus
How can we work together? Partnering with Industry: An Investigator’s Perspective Robert L. Coleman, MD M. D. Anderson Cancer Center.
Introduction to the Offices of Biotechnology & Business Development John L. Harb Director, Office of Biotechnology __________________________________ October.
03/10/2008 Terese Rakow, PhD. Postdoctoral Career Development Course March 10, 2008.
NIH Funding Recipient Responsibilities February, 2004 Office of Technology Transfer Office of the Director National Institutes of Health.
D.Zucker Draft-EB09 Ethics & Academic Technology Transfer: Patients, Products and Public Trust Deborah Zucker, MD, PhD, Tufts Medical Center.
MARK BARNES SENIOR ASSOCIATE PROVOST AND UNIVERSITY CHIEF RESEARCH COMPLIANCE OFFICER September 14, 2012 Responsible Conduct of.
Life of a Stanford Invention. Functional Antibodies FM Sound Synthesis Recombinant DNA Google Notable Stanford Inventions.
Office of Technology Commercialization Chuck Rancourt Director.
Copyright © Harvard Medical School. All Rights Reserved. Outside Activity Report: What Do I Need to Report?
Academic Technology Transfer Operations and Practice Knowledge Economy Forum IV Istanbul, Turkey March 22-25, 2005 Alistair Brett Oxford Innovation.
Policy on the Management of Intellectual Property in Technology Transfer Activities at CERN CERN/FC/5434/RA Technology Transfer Network Meeting – 10 th.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY 101 CHASE KASPER, DIRECTOR OFFICE OF TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
Commercializing USDA Innovations Via Public-Private Partnerships June Blalock Coordinator, Technology Licensing Program USDA, Agricultural Research Service.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
Technology Transfer in The United States Paul Zielinski Director, Technology Partnerships Office, National Institute of Standards and Technology Chair,
Privatizing the intellectual commons: Universities and the commercialization of biotechnology Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind Journal of.
Research Administration Forum May 2005 Tom Hagerty Office of Technology Management.
Review of Research-Related Agreements Between Academic Institutions and Other Entities. Manoja Ratnayake Lecamwasam, PhD Intellectual Property and Innovation.
Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis Presented By: Michael Difilippantonio, Ph.D. October 1, 2015.
FDA DRUG APPROVAL FDA’s Lengthy Drug Approval Process in Twelve Steps Overview of the FDA Drug Approval Process Drug Developed June 13, 2016 | Emilia Varrone.
Technology Transfer Office
COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT
Intellectual Property 101
Towards a roadmap for collaborative R&D
Nicholas S. Argyres and Julia Porter Liebeskind
Intellectual Property 101
Program Introduction. Monoclonal Antibodies and Immunogenicity: Relevance to Clinical Practice?
Pediatric Clinical investigator training workshop
Opening an IND: Investigator Perspective
The Bayh–Dole Act: Where Are We Today?
U.S. Army Technology Transfer Mechanisms
Pediatric Therapeutics Still working to get it right for kids
Review of Technology Transfer at The University of Texas System
Presentation transcript:

Translation of Anti-CD22 Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Lymphoma Joseph M. Tuscano, M.D. Associate Professor of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine Division of Hematology and Oncology The Good, The Bad, and the Ugly

Overview The GoodThe Good –The data and the RAID program The BadThe Bad –UC Policy and Patents The UglyThe Ugly –Licensing, industrial partners, and the ethics of it all of it all

Conclusions/Significance CD22 ligand blocking mAbs have unique physiologic properties CD22 ligand blocking mAbs are pro-apoptotic CD22 ligand blocking mAbs are pro-apoptotic They target lymphoma xenografts They target lymphoma xenografts They have independent lymphomacidal properties They have independent lymphomacidal properties Augment the efficacy of RIT Augment the efficacy of RIT Nontoxic alone and no additional toxicity with RIT Nontoxic alone and no additional toxicity with RIT mAb with therapeutic potential identified based on mAb with therapeutic potential identified based on targeting AND physiology targeting AND physiology

Future Studies Additional xenograft studies with mAb (HB22.7) alone (increased dose and schedule) dose and schedule) Xenograft studies with HB22.33 Xenograft studies with HB22.33 Additional signaling studies Additional signaling studies In vivo apoptotic studies In vivo apoptotic studies Humanization and human clinical trails with HB22.7 Humanization and human clinical trails with HB22.7 via the Rapid Access and Intervention Drug (RAID) program via the Rapid Access and Intervention Drug (RAID) program Licensing and support from Cellective Therapeutics Licensing and support from Cellective Therapeutics

Types of Monoclonal Antibodies Adapted from LoBuglio. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1992;13:273. Human Murine Chimeric Humanized Human Murine Chimeric Humanized

What is RAID ? RAID is a program designed to facilitate translation to the clinic of novel, scientifically meritorious therapeutic interventions originating in the academic community. It will do this by making available to the academic research community, on a competitive basis, NCI resources for the pre-clinical development of drugs and biologics. RAID is intended to remove the most common barriers between laboratory discoveries and clinical trials of new molecular entities. The goal of RAID is clinical "proof of principle" that a new molecule or approach is a viable candidate for expanded clinical evaluation.

HB22.7 Chimerization

UC Policy Tech Transfer Office Local vs. UCOP Local vs. UCOP Disclosure Disclosure When and Why When and Why Patents Patents Different Types

The Bayh-Dole Act What is the Bayh-Dole Act, what prompted it, and why is it important to university technology transfer? and why is it important to university technology transfer? Enactment of the Bayh-Dole Act (P.L ), the "Patent and Trademark Act Amendments of 1980" on December 12, 1980 created a uniform patent policy among the many federal agencies that fund research. Bayh-Dole enables small businesses and nonprofit organizations, including universities, to retain title materials and products they invent under federal funding.

The Bayh-Dole Act How has the Act influenced university technology transfer over the last decade and what are the results?How has the Act influenced university technology transfer over the last decade and what are the results? Bayh-Dole gave universities control of their inventions. By placing few restrictions on the universities' licensing activities, Congress left the success or failure of patent licensing up to the institutions themselves.

Tech Transfer Office The missionThe mission The mission of university technology transfer/licensing offices is to transfer research results to commercial application for public use and benefit. Decides on patentability Markets patents Markets patents Negotiates and administers licenses Negotiates and administers licenses Oversight of patent prosecution Oversight of patent prosecution Records income Records income

Tech Transfer Office Cont. InfluencesInfluences –a) the faculty--inventors, who often have expectations of research opportunities, income, public utilization and fame; –b) the private sector, expectations of securing commercially viable technology at a fair price; –c) the university administration, which expects the office to be self-supporting and wants to prevent conflicts of interest; –d) the governing board, which needs assurance that the university's name and reputation are protected in its industrial relationships; –e) the taxpayers, with expectations that the office will manage state and federal resources in an effective and nondiscriminatory manner; and –f) the sponsoring agency which insists on compliance with provisions of the Bayh-Dole Act.

Patents Three typesThree types –Utility –Design –Plant DesignDesign Utility patents are granted for any new process, method, machine, manufacture, or compositions of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof.

Licensing (1)What kind of licensing is most likely to lead to rapid commercialization; and (2) What kind of licensing is in the public interest. (3) $$$ Influences

The Reality of Getting to Human Clinical Trials Composition of Mater patent held by DFCI Methods Patent held by UCD and Duke Methods Patent held by UCD and Duke RAID subcontracted to Aires Biochemical company RAID subcontracted to Aires Biochemical company Who owns the “right” to the humans antibody Who owns the “right” to the humans antibody Production issues have complicated translation Production issues have complicated translation My role as a university researcher and royalty recipient, principle My role as a university researcher and royalty recipient, principle investigator of human clinical trials, licensing company advisor investigator of human clinical trials, licensing company advisor and shareholder. and shareholder. After ~ 15 years of development, so close yet so far from treating patients with cancer

JT Clinical Trials Grant support Academic success $$ UCOP Licensing Patent prosecution etc Industry $$$$$ Licensing Partner/advisor $$ + control $$ + control Duke Patent/partner Collaboration/academicsuccess $$$$$ ** LOST IN TRANSLATION Aeres/Manufacturing