Clinical Operations Workgroup.  Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dedicated to Hope, Healing and Recovery 0 Dec 2009 Interim/Proposed Rules Meaningful Use, Quality Reporting & Interoperability Standards January 10, 2010.
Advertisements

Meaningful Use Stage I Class III Menu Objectives
Meaningful Use Stage I Core Objectives
E-prescribing gives providers an important tool to safely and efficiently manage patients' medications. Compared to paper or fax prescriptions, e-prescribing.
E-Prescribing in Medicaid/CHIP Agencies: Implementation Approaches, Challenges, and Opportunities - 29 September 2009 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration.
Standard 3 Plan and Manage Care NCQA Recognition for Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Standards © Qualidigm.
1 Operating Rules Status NCVHS Subcommittee on Standards December 3, 2010 Updated on enhancements to Operating Rules for Eligibility and Claim Status.
Meaningful Use Performance Measures Report Carmen Land Meaningful Use National Team Business Analyst Data Networks Corporation contractor for US Indian.
Meeting Stage 1 Meaningful Use Criterion Carlos A. Leyva, Esq. Digital Business Law Group, P.A.
TWS July2011 Stimulation Part 2. TWS July 2011 Objective: Implement drug formulary checks. Measure: The EP has enabled this functionality and has access.
GOVERNMENT EHR FUNDING: MEANINGFUL USE STAGE 2 UPDATE October 25, 2012 Jonathan Krasner Healthcare IT Consultant BEI
This document and all other documents, materials, or other information of any kind transmitted or orally communicated by RxHub (or its members) in the.
Data Update Health IT Standards Committee Meeting March 18, 2015.
Proposed Meaningful Use Criteria for Stage 2 and 3 John D. Halamka.
A Primer on Healthcare Information Exchange John D. Halamka MD CIO, Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 3 Introduction and Setup.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
MEANINGFUL USE UPDATE 2014 Mark Huang, M.D. Chief Medical Information Officer Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago Associate Professor Department of PM.
Medicare & Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs
Understanding and Leveraging MU2 Optional Transports Paul M. Tuten, PhD Senior Consultant, ONC Leader, Implementation Geographies Workgroup, Direct Project.
August 12, Meaningful Use *** UDOH Informatics Brown Bag Robert T Rolfs, MD, MPH.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
Meaningful Use Stage 2 Esthee Van Staden September 2014.
Clinical Operations Workgroup.  Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core:
Meaningful Use Measures. Reporting Time Periods Reporting Period for 1 st year of MU (Stage 1) 90 consecutive days within the calendar year Reporting.
EHRS as a Tool to Improve BP Control 1.Brief history of OQIUN, CCI. Began 1999 using data cards. Started working with multiple practice sites using different.
E-Referral enabled collaborative health care Opportunities and considerations Presented by: Sasha Bojicic Emerging Technology Group Canada Health Infoway.
Series 1: Meaningful Use for Behavioral Health Providers From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 2: The Role of the Certified Complete.
A First Look at Meaningful Use Stage 2 John D. Halamka MD.
TWS July 2011 New Crop eRx Comprehensive Electronic Prescribing System.
Medicaid EHR Incentive Program For Eligible Professionals Overview of the Proposed 2015 Modification Rule Kim Davis-Allen Outreach Coordinator
Affordable Healthcare IT Solutions. MU RX Compliance with Meaningful Use Stage 2.
Implementation days 10 Days Onsite Training Additional Hardware Automated Workflow Paperless Environment MD with PC Tablet / iPad Workflow Analysis.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 9/2013 From the CIHS Video Series “Ten Minutes at a Time” Module 7: Meeting the PBHCI Grant.
Query Health Operations Workgroup HQMF & QRDA Query Format - Results Format February 9, :00am – 12:00am ET.
GloStream and Meaningful Use August, Table of Contents Final rule from the ONC and CMS The gloStream path to truly meaningful use Medicare payment.
Page 0 10/19/201510/19/2015 Meaningful Use of Health IT: Laboratory Data Capturing and Reporting Nikolay Lipskiy, MD, DrPH, MBA CDC, PHITPO.
Component 11: Configuring EHRs Unit 2: Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science.
ePrescribing Functional Requirements
Stage 2 Meaningful Use Improve Population and Public Health 1.
1 Meaningful Use Stage 2 The Value of Performance Benchmarking.
©2011 Falcon, LLC. All rights reserved. Proprietary. May not be copied or distributed without the express written permission of Falcon, LLC. Falcon EHR.
June 18, 2010 Marty Larson.  Health Information Exchange  Meaningful Use Objectives  Conclusion.
Series 1: “Meaningful Use” for Behavioral Health Providers 1/2014 Changes to Stage 1: Core Objectives 1 through 7 (updates generally required for Stage.
Christopher H. Tashjian, MD, FAAFP July 23, 2013, Washington D.C.
HIT Policy Committee Stage 2 Recommendations Presentation to HIT Standards Committee June 22, 2011.
Clinical Operations Workgroup Update Health Information Technology Standards Committee June 19 th 2013.
Component 11/Unit 2a Meaningful Use of the Electronic Health Record (EHR)
Meaningful Use Made Easy Step by Step Approach to Stage 1 Compliance and 2013 Changes My Vision Express Practice Management and EMR Software Presented.
Meaningful Use: Stage 2 Changes An overall simplification of the program aligned to the overarching goals of sustainability as discussed in the Stage.
CMS Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs Final Rule Overview 1 Robert Anthony.
Drug Formulary Checks Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
E-Prescribe: Adopting Health Care Information Technology ADG associates presenting: Barbara Antuna Jessica Carpenter Patrick Esparza Brian Frazior.
Configuring axiUm for Meaningful Use
Meaningful Use and E-Prescribing Workflow Douglas S. Bell, MD, PhD Associate Professor, Dept. of Medicine, UCLA Research Scientist, RAND Corporation.
Electronic Exchange of Clinical Information Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Procurement Sensitive Medicare’s 2009 ePrescribing Program Daniel Green, MD, FACOG Medical Officer, Quality Measurement Health Assessment Group Office.
EPrescribing Configuring RPMS-EHR for Meaningful Use Resource Patient Management System.
Technology, Information Systems and Reporting in Pharmacy Benefit Management Presentation Developed for the Academy of Managed Care Pharmacy Updated: February.
E-Prescriptions Krishi. E-Prescriptions Overview One major contributor to PAEs is patient medication errors, and the implementation of e-prescription.
Meaningful Use Update 2015: How Does It Impact Family Medicine? Ryan Mullins, MD, CPE, CPHQ, CPHIT.
History of Health Information Technology in the U.S. The HITECH Act Lecture b – Meaningful Use, Health Information Exchange and Research This material.
1 The information contained in this presentation is based on proposed and working documents. Health Information Exchange Interoperability Minnesota Department.
The Value of Performance Benchmarking
Functional EHR Systems
Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use: Objective #4 – ePrescribing (eRx) Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Payment Program July 12, 2016 Today’s presenter:
2017 Modified Stage 2 Meaningful Use Objectives Overview Massachusetts Medicaid EHR Incentive Program September 19 & 20, 2017 September 19,
Functional EHR Systems
Health Information Exchange Interoperability
Presentation transcript:

Clinical Operations Workgroup

 Core Measure  Generate and transmit permissible prescriptions electronically (eRx)  Meaningful Use Stage 1:  Core: More than 40% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are transmitted electronically using certified EHR technology  Menu: Implement drug formulary checks  Core Measure MU Stage 2:  Core: More than 50% of all permissible prescriptions written by the EP are compared to at least one drug formulary and transmitted electronically using Certified EHR Technology

 NCPDP Formulary & Benefit Standard ◦ Current Version 4.0 approved by membership F&B Standard is not used from Pharmacy to Payer

 At a high-level, the Sender is responsible for: Maintaining updated formulary and benefits information. Publishing the information regularly to keep recipients up-to-date. Providing a means for linking a patient to a formulary, either through a Cross-Reference List or through an Eligibility transaction.

At a high-level, the Intermediary is responsible for:  Facilitating the distribution of formulary and benefits information between the Formulary Publishers and Retrievers.  Documenting and communicating the data load specifications, processing, and usage guidelines particular to their service.  Validating transmitted files against the standard specification (optional).

At a high-level, the Receiver is responsible for:  Accepting or retrieving the formulary information from the Sender (directly or via an Intermediary) and integrate it into their point-of-care application.  Associating formulary and benefits information to the patient or group, as appropriate, using the Cross- Reference List or an Eligibility transaction.  In the context of a prescribing system, present the formulary and benefits information to the physician during the prescribing process, enabling him/her to make the most appropriate drug choice for the patient

 Large files needed to provide the F&B Data – might be minimized using RxNorm instead of NDC’s. This will also help when medication are not match due to differences in representative NDC via compendia’s or other sources  Submitted in batch form, not in real-time  Group level variations in coverage are not represented leading to the provider not seeing an accurate representation of the patients drug-specific benefit since member-specific exceptions and other variances are not accurately reflected  Assumes that the patient’s current drug insurance plan is identified through a successful eligibility check based on 5 point identifier and not the patients actual pharmacy benefit data (PCN/BIN)  Differences in coverage among different employer level groups within individual health plans is a major source of inaccuracies in the F&B data presented to clinicians  Use of symbols used in formulary interpretation that do not reflect actual drug- specific benefits at the point of care  Cannot detect differences in primary & secondary prescription benefit coverage

 Automatic (push) ◦ formulary data information is automatically pushed into the provider’s system in real time without any provider intervention  Pull (manual) ◦ the provider must take the initiative and manually download the updated data (or called ‘practice triggered’).

 Current F&B Standard should use a standardize vocabulary, RxNorm, to facilitate accurate exchange of data  Certified EHRs should have the functionality to run real-time, patient level formulary checks in a timely manner  All Certified EHRs technology should support automatic/ push functionality to update F&B data to minimize latency in information at the Point of Care  Certification criteria should be set to minimize variations of presentation of data at the point of care  Certified EHR technology should be able to match the patient not only to the medical benefits but to their pharmacy benefits utilizing PCN/BIN/Issuer  F&B Data presented at the point of care should at minimum represent the patients group pharmacy benefit, but a specific patients coverage for a specific drug & dose is ideal