Representing interests in the European decision- making process The recognised opportunity as the greatest competitive advantage Pricomm Conference Budapest,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 European Commission The role of regional networks in the EU policy making process Disclaimer: This contains the personal opinions of the author.
Advertisements

Czech approach to Regulatory Impact Assessment Prof. Michal Mejstřík Chairman of Regulatory Impact Assessment Board (RIAB) of the Czech Government Legislative.
Role of National Parliaments
Smart regulation communication HLG AB, 7 December 2010
Health and Safety Executive HSE's engagement with the EU Information for SBTAF Stuart Bristow International Unit.
European Commission Enterprise and Industry # European Standardisation: Proposal for a Regulation Presentation to IMCO – 5 October 2011 European Commission.
1 The interconnection of business registers Judit Fischer – DG Internal Market and Services Budapest, 14 June 2010.
Batteries Recycling © Crown Copyright 2008 Working with the EP.
Advocacy in Brussels. What not to do…… What do we want?
NGO Seminar on the Slovenian Presidency to the EU – ENVIRONMENT L jubljana, 7. – 8. June 2007 Decision-making process in the EU and the role of NGOs in.
Ellen Bruno Lobby the EU. What is the Swedish Society for Nature Conservation Democratic movement members, 100 years old 3 working methods love.
lecturer: Sebastian Aki Abredadt Mart.No.: Course: MPE1
How to work with EU institutions ? Key Note Speech by Pascal Goergen Representative of the Brussels-Capital Region to the EU «Practical Skills for Regional.
Learning and development - consultancy - research EIPA 2010 © European Institute of Public Administration - Institut européen d’administration publique.
An introduction to the EU and its legislation. Member States currently 15 –Austria- Ireland –Belgium- Luxembourg –Denmark- Netherlands –Finland- Portugal.
David Halldearn, ERGEG Conference on Implementing the 3 rd Package 11 th December 2008 Implementating the 3rd Package: An ERGEG Consultation paper.
The Law of the European Union Information and Communication.
Advocacy The practice of the European and the Hungarian Anti-Poverty Networks Kunbábony, 21 June 2011.
Plenary 3 Chair: Stephen Palmer Health Impact Assessment: Making the Difference.
EBC in the development of the EU Health and Safety legislation Rome twinning seminar “Under Construction II” 20th March 2009.
Croatian Report on new Environmental Protection Law Josipa Blažević-Perušić, B.Sc. Arch. State Secretary Anita Pokrovac-Patekar, B.Sc. Pharm. Senior Environmental.
CEBS in Brief. The Lamfalussy approach The Lamfalussy approach was first implemented in the securities field following the recommendations of the Committee.
Attila Kovács PhD candidate Corvinus University of Budapest Political networks in the European Parliament Network analysis of the 2013 CAP reform ‚MAKE’
EMTA European issues: PSO and Green Paper Progress report – April 2007 EMTA General meeting.
Luc Hendrickx Sofia 20 February 2006 Successful representation of SMEs at EU level - best practices - TAIEX Workshop on Competitive Power © ueapme2006.
Influencing EU policy development: points of entry for carers Christine Marking Advisor to the Eurocarers Executive.
Communication Paper on Smart Regulation COM(2010) 543, 8 October 2010 Presentation by Savia Orphanidou 3 rd November 2010.
CAP Reform: early observations from the negotiations Martin Nesbit Director, EU and International Agriculture Edinburgh stakeholder meeting 25 January.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
Experience of Trade in Services: EU Member‘s perspective Brigitte Lüth Attachée, Permanent Delegation of Austria to the WTO.
Capacity building workshop on environment and health Public participation and the right to know: Aarhus Convention and PRTR Protocol Monica Guarinoni Sofia,
Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr. Philipp Birkenmaier Secretariat of Nationaler Normenkontrollrat Nicosia, 2 April 2012.
The Commission's Impact Assessment system 18 September 2014 María Dolores Montesinos Impact Assessment unit Secretariat General 1.
Eurostat ESTP course on International Trade in Goods Statistics April 2013 Point 2 of the agenda Legal framework for EU trade statistics.
The Codecision Procedure Katrin Huber & Nikolaos Tziorkas, Conciliation and Codecision Secretariat, European Parliament Budapest, 2 & 8 April, 2009.
European Public Health Alliance Lobbying, the role of NGOs and communication strategies Tamsin Rose Sofia, 29 October 2005.
EU VAT Recent developments - Update - Maryse VOLVERT European Commission.
The Presidency’s relations with the other institutions The European Parliament (1) ● The presidency presents its programme to the EP at the beginning of.
Policy Plan on Asylum An integrated approach to the protection of refugees across the European Union June 2008.
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT Gema Tarin. HOW WAS THE EP CREATED? It was 19 March, 1958, when delegates first assembled as the European Parliamentary Assembly.
EU Law-making The EU has no general law-making power. There are specific Treaty provisions, which authorise it to make laws in particular fields.
Corfu, 10 December 2003 Public sector information: a key resource for Europe Yvo Volman European Commission.
WORKING TIME DIRECTIVE Pearle conference Stockholm – December 2009 Agenda point 10.
EC Bathing Water Directive Jon Worth Jon Worth Photo © Teignbridge District Council.
Impact Assessment and Evaluation: Interaction between EU and MS level Andrew Farmer, Institute for European Environmental Policy Make it Work Conference.
European Union Legal Research
Codecision in practice Bucharest, 26 January 2006 CODECISION IN PRACTICE Presented by Nikos TZIORKAS European Parliament - Conciliations and Codecision.
Multi-level governance – fostering participation in practice Gracia Vara Arribas Budapest, 23 March 2011 EIPA, 2011 ©
EAI Board The EU 2030 Climate and Energy Framework 11 th March 2014.
The EU Law Making Process & The Role of Trilogues Malcolm Harbour CBE CEng MIMechE Senior adviser, European Policy Centre EUDUG Meeting Friday 13 th November.
SEVESO II transposition and implementation: Possible approaches and lessons learned from member states and new member states SEVESO II transposition and.
June 2009 Regulation on pesticide statistics Pierre NADIN ESTAT E1- Farms, agro-environment and rural development
European Public Health Alliance Advocating for Better Health in the EU Lara Garrido-Herrero (ANME General Assembly) Frankfurt, 11 November 2006.
Legislative implementation of EU Criminal Law in Sweden Seminar EU Criminal Law Spring 2013 Department of Law UPPSALA UNIVERSITY Mari-Ann.
Towards a European Shared Environmental Information System in Support of Environmental Policies: INSPIRE: an Inspired revolution for a knowledge-based.
UEAPME: Lobbying and Advocacy at EU level.
EU Update/CIS England WFD Stakeholder Forum 4 April 2008.
EU Law Law 326.
Public Participation in Biofuels Voluntary
EU information review of the year 2011
Position Paper of the 4 independent watchdogs Dr
Spanish Presidency: Priorities in the field of Cohesion Policy
SSG on Climate Change and Water SCG meeting May 2008 Marieke van Nood, Unit D.2, DG Environment, European Commission.
Italian Presidency of the Council of the EU
Post-2020 discussions 1. State of play of discussions 2. On-going work 3. Questions for debate.
EU Legislative Procedures and the European Parliament
Regulatory procedure with scrutiny
Structural Funds: Investing in Roma
Item 6 of the Agenda Balance of Payments Working Group 2-3 April 2012
Presentation transcript:

Representing interests in the European decision- making process The recognised opportunity as the greatest competitive advantage Pricomm Conference Budapest, Edit Herczog, MEP

Summary Introduction Introduction –Opportunities and risks I. The codecision procedure I. The codecision procedure –A. The principle –B. The process II. What message can be conveyed? II. What message can be conveyed? –A. How to prepare your message –B. How to communicate your interests –C. Who wins? –D. What convinces the decision maker? Conclusion Conclusion –Maximise your chances

Introduction

Insufficient Ambition Low investment High costs Excessive optimism Risky investment Under-estimated costs Opportunities and risks Recognition of opportunities Calculation of risks Dramatic disadvantage Investment: 0 Maximal costs Optimal competitive edge Well planned investment Well calculated costs: High RONI

I. The codecision procedure

I.A. The principle Parliament Council Commission Parliament Council Administration Commission

I.B. The process White/Green Paper Consultation Lobbying the Commission Lobbying Council + EP Lobbying Council + EP Thorough knowledge Transposition Legislative Proposal I. ReadingII. Reading European Institutions: Preparation Member States: Implementation / Enforcement Timescale When to enter the process? Opportunities Risks

I.C. The details: Preparation phase Draft legislation White Paper Parliament debate Green Paper / public consultation Realising the Need for legislation Stakeholder Government MEP Council EP Stakeholder Direct participation !!! Stakeholder Follow the news from the Commission !!! MEP EP Stakeholder Direct lobbying, where expectations and interests of the stakeholders are taken into account Stakeholder Impact assessment

I.D. The details: Legislative phase CouncilParliament 1st reading 2nd reading 3rd reading Committee Plenary Amendment tabled by 1 MEP Adopted by simple majority Amendment tabled by 37 MEPs Adopted by simple majority Committee Plenary Amendment tabled by 1 MEP of the lead committee, adoption by simple majority Amendment tabled by 37 MEPs Adopted by absolute majority From here on, the EP can’t put Forward anything new. Expert level preparation Common Position: Qualified majority (min. 13 govts) Conciliation – smallest common denominator The opportunites for stakeholders to influence the debate gradually decrease

II. What message can be conveyed?

II.A. How to prepare your message Stocks: Gathering spare parts ~ 100 pcs Research: Identifying indi- vidual stakes and interests I. Working phase: Building up components 10 pcs Analysis: Ponderation, coordination II. Working phase: Assembling the whole 1 pcs Synthesis: United, concise and targetted position Delivery: Ready-to-use product Drafting: Ready-to-lobby position paper HERE COMES THE MEP

II.B. How to communicate your interest The European playing field Situation Individual interests Occasional agreements Coordination Converging lines Common vector IN THE EU, INTERESTS HAVE TO BE COMMUNICATED THIS WAY. You have to know: Where you start from Where you want to get How much you can get

II.C. Who wins? Start Finish Who is RIGHT and CONVINCING Who is RIGHT CONVINCING and has the MAJORITY

II.D. What convinces the decision maker? Like this? After the decision, how does the politician want to be perceived? Like this?Or like that?

Conclusion

Instead of individual requests, use all channels: YouMEP Your mayor Your chamber of commerce Your national MP Your national federation Your European federation Increase your politicall weight Maximise your chances The press S

To sum up: What’s a lobbyist? Cambridge Dictionary definition: Cambridge Dictionary definition: –someone who tries to persuade a politician or official group to do something Oxford Dictionary definition: Oxford Dictionary definition: –someone who tries to influence politicians on a particular issue Herczog definition: Herczog definition: –someone who is – and is recognised as – the best source of information and solution during the decision making process, with the aim of achieving their own targets as well as the long term [European] strategies

Thank you for your attention. Edit Herczog Edit MEP Tel.: