Sultan Agung Islamic University

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Olga Boltneva Marina Belousova
Advertisements

Alina Alvarez IEEE Uruguay Section
The teacher tells or shows directly what he/she wants to teach. This is also referred to as direct instruction.
Stephen Krashen’s L2 Acquisition Theory Compiled by Doris Shih.
Krashen’s “monitor model” The acquisition-learning hypothesis The monitor hypothesis The natural order hypothesis The input hypothesis The affective.
Second language learning
Hartono, S.S., M.Pd. COLASULA
Second Language Acquisition
Chapter 4 Key Concepts.
Accuracy and Fluency: Giving each its place JoAnn Miller, Editorial Macmillan
Chapter 3: The Direct Method
Topic: Learning and teaching activities
APPROACHES and METHODS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING
Second language acquisition
Education of English Conversation
1 Second Language Acquisition Preproduction Early Production Speech Emergence Intermediate Fluency Continued Language Development.
Sharonda Walker Texas Woman’s University. Acquisition-Learning Monitor Natural Order Input Affective Filter.
EFL Anthony’s model: Approach Method Technique
Teaching Grammar Prof. A.karim Benlaayouni Ibn Zohr Univ.
Grammar-Translation Approach Direct Approach
Grammar Translation Method
SMORGASBORD OF IDEAS FOR LANGUAGE TEACHERS Five hypotheses about second language acquisition.
ACRONYMS ACRONYM DEFINITION NOTES EFL English as a foreign language
Direct Method Dr. Chen Chinfen. Background  Founded by Francois Gouin, in 1860, he observed hundreds of French students learning a foreign language and.
The Grammar – Translation Method
Theme Six The Other Side of the Coin: Process Shen Chen School of Education The University of Newcastle.
Teaching Vocabulary.
Second Language acquisition
Explaining second language learning
Second Language Acquisition Yueh-chiu Helen Wang National Penghu University.
ELT 415 Material Assessment PART IV 1. THREE PIECES OF ADVICE Try to get as much information as possible by asking for it specifically or by trying to.
Stephen Krashen D. Fleming University of Ottawa. Stephen Krashen is one of the best known applied linguists today has been severely (and often justifiably)
Unit 3 The Direct Method.
10/20/2015Dr. Hanaa El-Baz 1 Methodology L7 Lecture Error Correction and feedback.
The Direct Method.
By Alice Omaggio Hadley
The Grammar-Translation Method Introduction. Objectives of GTM  To be able to read literature written in the target language  To be able to translate.
King Faisal University جامعة الملك فيصل Deanship of E-Learning and Distance Education عمادة التعلم الإلكتروني والتعليم عن بعد [ ] 1 جامعة الملك فيصل عمادة.
 There must be a coherent set of links between techniques and principles.  The actions are the techniques and the thoughts are the principles.
What is Communicative Language Teaching??. Communicative Language: Blends listening, speaking, reading, and writing. Is the expression, interpretation,
The Direct Method 1. Background It became popular since the Grammar Translation Method was not very effective in preparing students to use the target.
Consolidation time! Please don’t forget what you’ve learned so far.
Second Language Acquisition Theories (A brief description) Compiled by: Nicole Lefever.
2014 Fall Semester- Week 6. Introduction (1) 1. James Asher (1960) hypothesis: Language learning starts first with understanding and ends with production.
BACKGROUND ISSUES IN LANGUAGE LEARNING
Introduction to Language Teaching The Grammar-Translation Method.
Lesson 4 Grammar - Chapter 13.
Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner, Krashen, Chomsky
1 ACCURACY AND CORRECTING MISTAKES Penny Ur 2006.
Language Teaching Approaches on twenty century. Grammar-translation The approach was generalized to teaching modern languages. Classes are taught in the.
CLT with Grammar Instruction People learned languages before institutionalized education existed. Natural learning processes always assert themselves over.
Second Language Acquisition L2 learned or acquired? Language learning (behavioral psychology) –Explicit knowledge –Learners know grammar terms; metalanguage.
Stephen Krashen SECOND-LANGUAGE ACQUISITION THEORY.
Second language acquisition vs foreign language learnirg.
3. Nine-Twentieth-Century Approaches to Language Teaching
T H E D I R E C T M E T H O D DM. Background DM An outcome of a reaction against the Grammar- Translation Method. It was based on the assumption that.
Language learning Approaches & key theorists. Historical language approaches 1 Grammar/translation Formalised end 19 th C. Mind consisting of separate.
How Languages Are Learned
Using Technology to Teach Listening Skills
Vocabulary Acquisition in a Second Language: Do Learners Really Acquire Most Vocabulary by Reading? Some Empirical Evidence Batia Laufer.
Second-language learning
Krashen’s Monitor Model & the Teaching of Writing
Explaining Second Language Learning
Individual Variation in the Use of the Monitor Stephen D Krashen
Basic Principles of Second Language Acquisition
THE SILENT WAY.
STARTING OUT Chapter 2.
Chapter 4.
Second-language learning
The Grammar – Translation Method
Presentation transcript:

Sultan Agung Islamic University THE ROLE OF GRAMMAR TEACHING / FORMAL INSTRUCTION IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION Hartono, S.S., M.Pd. College of Languages Sultan Agung Islamic University

Objectives Ss can understand what formal instruction plays in acquisition. Ss can understand the effects of learning and conscious rules in acquisition. Ss can understand the way to present rules for learning. Ss can understand what to do with errors.

Definition of term Grammar teaching or formal instruction is defined as the teaching of languages with the emphasis on focusing the learners’ attention on forms in order that they become conscious of the rules of those forms and eventually acquire the language.

Similar terms referring to the same meaning are: instruction (Krashen, 1982), formal instruction (Lighbown and Spada, 1990), code-focused instruction (Doughty, 1991).

REMEMBER !! Acquisition vs. Learning

The Role of Conscious Learning (Krashen’ s Monitor Model) Conscious learning acts as an editor, as a Monitor, “correcting” the errors, or rather what the performer perceives to be errors, in the output of the required system. This can happen before the sentence is spoken or written.

Conscious knowledge is therefore, not responsible for fluency, it doesn’t initiate utterances.

According to Krashen, learning doesn’t “turn into” acquisition, based on the following reasons: We often see acquisition in cases where learning never occurred. We also see learning that never seems to become acquisition. The fact that even the best learners master only a small subset of the rules of a language.

THE PLACE OF GRAMMAR Krashen uses the term ‘grammar’ as a synonym for conscious learning. According to him, grammar has two possible roles: 1. As a monitor: 2. As a subject matter or for language appreciation.

ISSUES IN RELATION TO TEACHING GRAMMAR FOR MONITOR USE When the monitor is used: when the performer has time, as in writing and prepared speech, and he / she is thinking about correctness or focused on forms.

2. What can be monitored: all the rules that students can carry around in their heads as mental baggage and actually use in performance.

TYPES OF MONITOR USER Monitor Over-user: performers who do attempts to think about and utilize conscious rules during their production. Monitor under-user: the performer who does all self-correction by ‘feel’ and has no control of conscious grammar. Incompetent monitor user: the performer who thinks s/he knows the rules but has them ( or at least many of them) are wrong.

PRESENTATION OF RULES Deductive – inductive issue Deductive: the rules are given directly. This approach is supported by cognitive-code teaching as Grammar Translation Method.

Inductive: Learners are asked to figure out the rules themselves. The argument for this approach is “the best way to insure learning was for the student to work out the rule himself.

ACQUISITION AND INDUCTIVE LEARNING: SIMMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES Data first, rule follows Rule is subconscious Focus on meaning Slow process Requires large amount of data

Inductive Learning: - Data first, rule follows - Rule is conscious - Focus on form - May occur quickly - May occur after exposure to small amount of data

Sequencing and Learning Grammatical sequencing was undesirable when the goal is acquisition. Sequencing should be based on - learnable - portable - not yet acquired.

ERROR CORRECTION Henrickson (1978) lists the “five fundamental questions” concerning the error correction. Should errors be corrected? If so, when should errors be corrected? Which learner errors should be corrected? How should learner errors be corrected? Who should correct learner errors?

Question 1 When the goal is learning, errors should be corrected. Error correction is not of use for acquisition.

Question 2 When there is time. When it doesn’t interfere with communication (no error correction in free conversation). Correction is done in written work gramamr exercises.

Question 3 We should correct the “global” errors, errors that interfere with communication or impede with the intelligibility of message. Errors that are most stigmatized, that cause the most unfavorable reactions. Errors that occurs most frequently.

Question 4 Providing the correct form / direct correction. The discovery / inductive approach.