Models of good practice for promoting staff autonomy: The Magnet Recognition Program  Karen B. Haller, PhD, RN Vice President for Nursing & Patient Care.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Magnet Recognition Program®
Advertisements

Nursing Excellence: Your Journey – Our Passion ANCC Information Brief.
Magnet Status Looking for Quality Patient Outcomes: The American Nurses Credentialing Center's Magnet Program Recognizes Excellence in Patient Care.
Patient Centered Care Model The model which was drawn from NMH’s Henderson Framework for Nursing Practice proposes to provide a healing environment centered.
Integrated Health and Social Care across Bournemouth, Dorset and Poole Better Together Programme Dorset and South Wiltshire Local Workforce Development.
Integrating Ethics Into Your Compliance Program John A. Gallagher, Ph.D Center for Ethics in Health Care Atlanta, GA.
PROFESSIONAL NURSING PRACTICE
Chapter 5- Colleen Person
You Know It, Now Show It… GET CERTIFIED! Nursing Education and Professional Development Council.
Nursing Staffing and Hospital Outcomes Julie Sochalski, Ph.D., R.N. Center for Health Outcomes and Policy Research University of Pennsylvania.
3 Delivering Nursing Care.
Staffing And Scheduling.
MUSC Nursing’s Professional Practice Model and Care Delivery System
Mahidol U. Thailand 22/01/2552 Joint Commission International (JCI) ศ. นพ. ประสิทธิ์ วัฒนาภา มหาวิทยาลัยมหิดล.
Professional Advancement Model for Nurses Office of Clinical Practice & Professional Development Copyright 2009.
CONTINUING YOUR NURSING EDUCATION. CONGRATULATIONS!
Cheryl Miller Ferris State University 2010  Provide physicians an overview of the Nursing Administrator role in relation to patient care services, present.
Healthy Work Environment Elizabeth Degelbeck, Justin Hacker, Kristine Lantz, and Courtney Wilson.
An Acute Care World without Registered Nurses Kathleen Gallo, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN Senior Vice President & Chief Learning Officer.
Healthcare Human Resource Management Flynn Mathis Jackson Langan
Capacity Task Force Virginia Health Reform Initiative January 14, 2011
GNRS 5411 Program Evaluation: Educator
Presented By Sheila Lucas Ferris State University NURS 511
Consultant Pharmacists
CHAPTER 1 Introduction to the nursing management Dr Fadwa Alhalaiqa.
by Joint Commission International (JCI)
Recognition of Nursing Excellence. What Is Certification? Certification is defined by the American Board of Nursing Specialties (ABNS) as “the formal.
Mosby items and derived items © 2005 by Mosby, Inc. Chapter 20 Managing Client Care.
1 A Global Enterprise... Caring for Those Who Care Core Ideology Core Purpose Nurses advancing our profession to improve health for all. Core Values Excellence.
A Federal Update on Title VIII Nursing Workforce Development Programs The Ties That Bind: Creating Partnerships and Collaboratives – Education, Practice,
Jefferson’s Magnet ™ Journey. Jefferson is on a Magnet ™ Journey to Nursing Excellence.
Component 2: The Culture of Health Care Unit 6: Nursing Care Processes Lecture 1 This material was developed by Oregon Health & Science University, funded.
Professional Nursing Today. Core statement according to Royal College of Nursing 2003 “Nursing is the use of clinical judgment in the provision of care.
CHILDREN, YOUTH AND WOMEN’S HEALTH SERVICE New Executive Leadership Team 15 December 2004 Ms Heather Gray Chief Executive.
Co-ordinated by: World Health Organization European Office for Integrated Health Care Services, Barcelona Technically supported by: WHO Collaborating Centre.
Xxx, 2005 Why Have a Career Ladder? Provides staff recognition Serves as motivation for career and professional growth Financial rewards for activities.
Leanne Lemon, RN, BSN, MSN Candidate Spring 2013.
Engaging the Workforce in Key Projects Leadership Symposium April 19, 2011 Linda Whaley, MS, RN, Vice President Clinical Services Amy Stark MSN, RN-BC,
Clinical Nurse Leader Impact on Microsystem Care Quality Miriam Bender PhD(c), MSN, RN, CNL National State of the Science Congress on Nursing Research.
Chapter 19: The Gerontological Nurse as Manager and Leader
Precepting New Graduate Nurses A Guide from the WV Center for Nursing.
Chapter 25 Management and Policy Copyright 2004 by Delmar Learning, a division of Thomson Learning, Inc. Quality in Healthcare: A Glimpse of the.
Magnet Recognition Program Clinical Excellence in Action
CONTEMPORARY IMAGE OF PROFESSIONAL NURSING. Core statement according to Royal College of Nursing 2003 “Nursing is the use of clinical judgment in the.
{ NOPH Unit Council Program Partnering for Excellence.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم.
Copyright © 2010 Delmar, Cengage Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Chapter 11 Planning Care.
VII. COLLABORATION/DELEGA TION A. DEFINED UNIT two: STRATEGIES for PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT.
Healthy Work Environment Ferris State Nursing 320 Group Presentation Kevin Doan, Maira Perez, Amy Lewis, Bethany Hesselink, and (Kyle) Kurt Freund.
1 Copyright © 2009, 2006, 2003, 2000, 1997, 1994 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 15 The Health Care Organization and Patterns of Nursing.
And Patient Outcomes Do Magnet organizations provide a safer work environment with better patient outcomes? By Sandra Gilman, Stephanie Gulledge, Kim.
1 Copyright © 2012 by Mosby, an imprint of Elsevier Inc. Copyright © 2008 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 39 The Advanced Practice.
Henry M. Sondheimer, MD Association of American Medical Colleges 7 August 2013 A Common Taxonomy of Competency Domains for the Health Professions and Competencies.
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
University of Missouri Health Care Nursing Professional Practice Model
Interprofessional Health care Teams
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
University of Missouri Health Care
2017 Re-designation Site Visit Preparation
Business Case for Magnet Designation
Joanne Ramadge RN PhD FRCNA STTI AAQHC
CanMEDS Roles Covered Medical Expert (as Medical Experts, physicians integrate all of the CanMEDS Roles, applying medical knowledge, clinical skills, and.
Chapter 19: The Gerontological Nurse as Manager and Leader
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
The Magnet Program from the Perspective of the Magnet Hospital
CanMEDS Roles Covered Medical Expert (as Medical Experts, physicians integrate all of the CanMEDS Roles, applying medical knowledge, clinical skills, and.
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
1.05 Effective Healthcare Teams
Chapter 2 Organizational Structure of Health Care Copyright © 2017, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Presentation transcript:

Models of good practice for promoting staff autonomy: The Magnet Recognition Program  Karen B. Haller, PhD, RN Vice President for Nursing & Patient Care Services The Johns Hopkins Hospital Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Objectives ● Review Magnet Program’s goals. ● Relate to HPH strategies. ● Discuss implementation.

Magnet designation is the highest level of recognition given to health care organizations that provide the services of professional registered nurses. - American Nurses Credentialing Center (ANCC)

Magnet Recognition Program Goals 1.Promote quality in a milieu that supports professional practice. 2.Identify excellence in the delivery of nursing services. 3.Provide for the dissemination of “best practices” in nursing.

Hospitals can use the Magnet Program ● To assess and improve their processes for achieving quality outcomes. ● To acknowledge nursing staff for contributions to positive care outcomes. ● To achieve greater recognition within the community for nursing.

Origins of the Magnet Program 1981 – American Nurses Association commissions a study of hospitals that maintained competent nursing workforces during a time of shortage – Researchers (McClure et al., 1983) publish characteristics of model hospitals and coin the term “Magnet hospitals.”

Creation of Magnet Award 1990 – Accreditation program began through the ANCC – University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, received the first award – Rochdale Trust, U.K., became the first non  U.S. healthcare organization to receive a Magnet award.

AMERICAN NURSES CREDENTIALING CENTER ANCC MAGNET RECOGNITION M Magnet hospitals must meet stringent qualitative and quantitative standards that define the highest level of nursing practice and patient care.

Forces of Magnetism 1.Quality of Nursing Leadership (visionary, knowledgeable, staff advocacy) 2.Organizational Structure (flat, decentralized, unit-based decision-making) 3.Management Style (participatory, valuing staff nurse input) 4.Personnel Policies and Programs (employee-friendly) 5.Professional Model of Care (staff nurses given authority and accountability)

Forces of Magnetism 6. Quality of Care (an organizational priority) 7. Quality Improvement (educational, with staff nurses) 8. Consultation and Resources (availability of expertise, adequate staffing) 9. Autonomy (within scope of Nurse Practice Act) 10. Community and the Hospital (hospital as corporate citizen)

Forces of Magnetism 11. Nurses as Teachers (of peers as well as patients and families) 12. Image of Nursing ( RN is integral member of team) 13. Interdisciplinary Relationships (mutual respect, collegial RN s - MD s) 14. Professional Development (education, competency)

Co-ordinated by: World Health Organization European Office for Integrated Health Care Services, Barcelona Technically supported by: WHO Collaborating Centre for Health Promotion in Hospitals and Health Care At the Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for the Sociology of Health and Medicine at the Institute for Sociology, University of Vienna Sponsored by Federal Ministry for Health and Women Health Promoting Hospitals Italian National Conference on HPH Torino, Italy, November 2003 Six Principal Health Promotion Strategies for Staff Quality developmentStrategic positioning Staff as persons STA-1: Enabling staff for healthy living at the workplace STA-5: Enabling staff for lifestyle development Staff in their professional roles STA-2: Enabling staff for healthy working in the hospital STA-4: Enabling staff for management of work related health problems Hospital / community setting STA-3 : Developing the hospital into a health supportive setting for staff STA-6 : Developing the community into a health supportive setting for specific needs of staff Pelikan et al., 2003

Magnet research shows…  Improved recruitment  Improved retention  Less agency usage  More control of practice environment  Greater autonomy  Better relationships with physicians  Fewer needlesticks  Lower mortality rate (CMI-adjusted Medicare mortality rate)  Lower disease- specific mortality rate  Higher patient satisfaction  Decrease in falls

Summary of the Research Study Job Satisfaction & Burnout Nurse- Patient Ratios Autonomy and Empowerment Education Levels of Nurses Patient Outcomes Patient Satisfaction Kramer & Schmalenberg (1991, 2002, 2003) ++ Aiken, Smith, & Lake (1994) + Aiken, Sloane, & Lake (1997) ++ Aiken, Sloane, Lake, Sochalski, & Weber (1999) + Aiken, Havens, & Sloane (2000) +++ Upenieks (2003) ++ + indicates the study variables.

Lower Medicare Mortality Among a Set of Hospitals Known for Good Nursing Care  4.6% lower mortality rate  0.9 to 9.4 fewer deaths per 1,000 (95% confidence interval) Aiken, Smith, & Lake, 1994 Aiken, Smith, & Lake, 1994

“ – a greater proportion of nursing service personnel being registered nurses – is not the sole explanation for their lower mortality. This finding reinforces our belief that the mortality effect derives from the greater status, autonomy, and control afforded in the Magnet hospitals...” Aiken, Smith, & Lake, 1994, p. 783 Aiken, Smith, & Lake, 1994, p. 783

“ The practical importance of our findings is influenced by the extent to which the organizational characteristics of Magnet hospitals can be replicated elsewhere.” Aiken, Smith, & Lake, 1994, p. 783 Aiken, Smith, & Lake, 1994, p. 783

Relationship between the practice of nursing and the mortality rates in hospitals  Aiken et al., 2002  Blegen, Goode, & Reed, 1998  Czaplinski & Diers, 1998  Kovner & Gergen, 1998  Mitchell & Shortell, 1997

Hospital Organization, Nurse Staffing, and Patient Outcomes Hospital organization Nurse patient ratios / nursing skill mix Nurse autonomy Nurse control Nurse intra- organizational status Surveillance / early detection of complications Patient outcome Medical staff organization and qualifications Nurse-physician relations Rapid institutional response Aiken, 1999

Implementing the Magnet approach StructureProcess Outcome

Characteristics of Effective Nursing  Organizational structure  Quality of nursing leadership  Personnel policies and programs  Professional models of care  Levels of autonomy Source: ANCC ( Source: ANCC (

 Organizational structure 1.Chief Nursing Officer is at the executive level. 2.Decentralized departmental structures allow strong nursing involvement in the committee structure across departments. 3.Equal attention is given to the quality of staff and the quantity of staff.

 Quality of nursing leadership 1.Leaders are knowledgeable and strong risk-takers who convey a sense of advocacy and support for the staff. 2.The nursing directors and managers are pivotal to the success of the organization.

 Personnel policies and programs 1.Salaries and benefits are competitive. 2.Shift rotation is minimized. 3.Significant administrative and clinical promotions reward expertise with both title and salary changes.

 Professional models of care 1.The model of care gives the nurse the responsibility and related authority for patient care. 2.Nurses are accountable for their own practice and are coordinators of care. 3.Nursing management is responsible for developing an environment where care can flourish. 4.Nurses are involved in the development, implementation, and evaluation of nursing care.

 Level of autonomy 1.Nurses exercise independent judgment. 2.Autonomy is viewed as self- determination. 3.Interdisciplinary decision- making is essential.

Conclusion ● The Magnet Program provides a good framework for granting high levels of staff autonomy (empowerment). ● ancc/magnet.html