Los Angeles Joint Regional Intelligence Center

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WMD Crime Scene Management
Advertisements

Analysis to support CALEA Standards Prepared by: Christie Goddard.
WELCOME TO INNG EMERGENCY OPERATIONS LIAISON OFFICER OVERVIEW
Integrated Justice/Homeland Security Topical Discussion: Data Fusion Centers SEARCH Membership Group Meeting July 23, 2004.
IS 700.a NIMS An Introduction. The NIMS Mandate HSPD-5 requires all Federal departments and agencies to: Adopt and use NIMS in incident management programs.
2010 Region II Conference Corporate Compliance Panel June 3, 2010
USA PATRIOT Act and Libraries Eric Johnson & Rodney Clare Jackman Sims Memorial Library.
Department of Transportation Support Services Branch ODOT Procurement Office Intergovernmental Agreements 455 Airport Rd. SE, Bldg K Salem, OR
DHS, National Cyber Security Division Overview
National Space-Based Positioning, Navigation, and Timing (PNT) Federal Advisory Board DHS Challenges & Opportunities Captain Curtis Dubay, P.E. Department.
© 2011 Delmar, Cengage Learning Part I The Nature and Setting of Police Administration Chapter 3 Police Administration and Homeland Security.
Law Enforcement Mutual Aid Quick Reference Guide Mutual Aid Defined Authorities Mutual Aid Process Mutual Aid Considerations Mutual aid is the voluntary.
1 July 08, 2010 Information Security Officer Meeting.
PPA 573 – Emergency Management and Homeland Security Lecture 9b - Department of Homeland Security Strategic Plan.
IS Audit Function Knowledge
Supplier Ethics: Program Checklist
Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force (CTITF) Open Briefing to Member States 27 July 2010 Conference Room 2 NLB.
Security Issues on Campus: Government Initiatives Rodney J. Petersen University of Maryland Educause/Internet2 Security Task Force Copyright Rodney J.
Network security policy: best practices
Database Auditing Models Dr. Gabriel. 2 Auditing Overview Audit examines: documentation that reflects (from business or individuals); actions, practices,
Chapter 7 Database Auditing Models
Complying With The Federal Information Security Act (FISMA)
California Common Operating Picture (Cal COP) for Public Safety
District Planning Council Program Overview. District Planning Concept Local Elected Officials Emergency Managers Emergency Responders Local Business Community.
National Governor’s Association September 29-30, 2003 Salt Lake City, Utah.
Part of a Broader Strategy
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
Other Laws (Primarily for E-Government) COEN 351.
Nuclear Power Plant/Electric Grid Regulatory Coordination and Cooperation - ERO Perspective David R. Nevius and Michael J. Assante 2009 NRC Regulatory.
FEMA Region IX RRCC Watch Center August RRCC Watch Center * Oakland, CA * August Mission  The Regional Response Coordination.
Programming of International Development Assistance Donor Sectoral Meeting Ministry of Interior September 17, 2007.
Why the Office of Compliance and Ethics was Created
IS-813: ESF #13 – Public Safety and Security
Introduction to the National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center (NCCIC) “A Partnership for Strength” 1.
The Nationwide SAR Initiative Briefing for the National Maritime Security Advisory Committee April 2, 2013.
Information Sharing Challenges, Trends and Opportunities
Database Security and Auditing: Protecting Data Integrity and Accessibility Chapter 7 Database Auditing Models.
1 Information Sharing Environment (ISE) Privacy Guidelines Jane Horvath Chief Privacy and Civil Liberties Officer.
Chapter 22: Organization and Coordination of Counterterrorism Investigations.
Salary Possibilities Newly assigned Special Agents start at a yearly salary of $43,441, or also recognized as a GS-10, plus multiple other pay increases.
Delaware Information Analysis Center
InfraGard A Government and Private Sector Alliance Information sharing begins with human relationships – people talking with people whom they trust. Information.
MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 12 – 14, THE RESEARCH 1.Respondents 8 respondents from SAI Indonesia : auditor, investigator, R &D 2.Time 3 weeks (Sept to Oct.
Partnerships in Information Sharing California Department of Justice Bureau of Criminal Identification and Information.
Tad and Terry Legal Issues in ILP. 28 CFR Part 23 The federal rule that governs or provides guidance for these issues. § 23.3 Applicability: These policy.
National Information Exchange Model (NIEM) Executive Introduction November 29, 2006 Thomas O’Reilly NIEM Program Management Office.
Partnerships in Information Sharing Susanne Martin Staff Information Systems Analyst California Department of Justice.
MODULE 3 Composition & Roles. TAT TEAM APPROACH UPON COMPLETION OF THIS MODULE, PARTICIPANTS SHOULD UNDERSTAND: 3 – 2  Composition of the Threat Assessment.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Disaster Planning Workshop Hosted By: Pleasantview Fire Protection District.
What is “national security”?  No longer defined only by threat of arms  It really is the economy  Infrastructure not controlled by the government.
Session 161 National Incident Management Systems Session 16 Slide Deck.
Ned Einsig III.  Domestic Intelligence & Security Service of the United States  Prime Federal Law Enforcement Organization  Jurisdiction on over 200.
November 19, 2002 – Congress passed the Homeland Security Act of 2002, creating a new cabinet-level agency DHS activated in early 2003 Original Mission.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
Establishing an Aviation Risk Context APEC TPTWG-27 Aviation Security Experts Sub-Group Meeting Denise Morgan Office of Transport Security May 2006.
SEC 420 aid Expect Success/sec420aiddotcom FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT
1 Auditing Your Fusion Center Privacy Policy. 22 Recommendations to the program resulting in improvements Updates to privacy documentation Informal discussions.
SEC 470 OUTLET The learning interface/sec470outletdotcom.
SEC 420 Entire Course For more classes visit SEC 420 Week 1 Individual Assignment Responsibilities of Personal Protection Officers.
Juvenile Legislative Update 2013 Confidentiality of Records and Interagency Sharing of Educational Records.
IACP: Inteligence Led Policing
California Cybersecurity Integration Center (Cal-CSIC)
The Vision: Invent a system to increase client success…..the medical clinic model.
Red Flags Rule An Introduction County College of Morris
The National Network of
Federal Protective Service
Electronic Surveillance, Post 9/11
County Wide Safety Program
Presentation transcript:

Los Angeles Joint Regional Intelligence Center Lieutenant Robert Fox Los Angeles Police Department JRIC Co-Program Manager (562) 345-1102

Vision (Concept of Operations) The LA JRIC will collect information using an all-crimes approach, convert the information into operational intelligence, and disseminate the intelligence to prevent terrorist attacks and combat crime in the Central District of California.

Mission (MOU) The JRIC will fully integrate criminal and terrorism threat intelligence information either affecting or having the potential to affect the greater Los Angeles region and provide for intake, analysis, fusion, and synthesis of that information. The JRIC will also disseminate developed intelligence, provide analytical case support, analyze trends, and provide tailored analytical products to end users. The JRIC will operate on a 24 hours a day, 7 days a week basis. The JRIC will not be a primary investigative entity. Investigative activities will be limited to those necessary to support intelligence gathering and analysis.

Additional Functions (MOU) The JRIC will function as the State of California Regional Terrorism Threat Assessment Center (RTTAC). The JRIC will support regional and local infrastructure protection initiatives by providing analytical support and producing threat assessments. (Archangel) The JRIC will also support law enforcement training related to terrorism awareness and analysis.

JRIC Governance (MOU) The Assistant Director in Charge (ADIC) of the Los Angeles Field Office of the FBI, the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, the Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California, and the Chief of the California Department of Justice Criminal Intelligence Bureau or their designees, shall identify, agree upon, and articulate goals and objectives for the JRIC.

Responsibility for the overall policy and direction of the JRIC shall rest with an Assistant Special Agent in Charge (ASAC) or Program Manager of the FBI, who will closely coordinate with the Sheriff of Los Angeles County, the Chief of the Los Angeles Police Department, the United States Attorney for the Central District of California, and the Chief of the California Department of Justice Criminal Intelligence Bureau or their designees, on matters of mutual concern relating to such policy and direction, thus ensuring the absence of conflict.

Best Practices Multi-Agency participation Local (LAPD, LASD, TEW) State (CA DOJ, other RTTAC’s) Federal (FBI, DHS) First in Country to have DHS presence Value Added Adherence to Fusion Center Guidelines and National Criminal Intelligence Sharing Plan. Measurements are mapped to Intelligence Center Objectives Terrorism and Intelligence Analysis Training Mandate Best Practices Information Sharing IT Capabilities (Memex, Microsoft Platforms, HSIN-S/HSDN, secure remote access capabilities)

Voluntary adherence with Intelligence and privacy guidelines All new Tips recorded into the system must be scored and rated according to Intelligence Guidelines. They can’t be entered unless they are scored. All new records created must be substantiated by a tip or lead based on reasonable suspicion or criminal predicate. All new Tips and Leads automatically purged by Memex after one year and review by staff. All Intelligence files automatically receive a 5 year review date. All actions on the system are captured in an audit trail.

Joint Regional Intelligence Center (JRIC)

Intelligence Products (Deliverables) Net Assessments Sit Reps (Situational reports) Advisories BOLO Warnings Alerts Bulletins Threat Assessments Executive Report TLO Report SME Analysis Reports Tips/Leads

Measurable Objectives

Measurable Objectives (Concept of Operations) Integrate the intake, analysis, fusion, and synthesis of intelligence information with an emphasis on terrorist threat intelligence. Identify patterns and trends that may be indicative of emerging threat conditions. Provide relevant and actionable intelligence in a timely manner to prevent, mitigate, and respond to emergent threats. Produce timely, relevant, and accurate value added intelligence products for the region, provide analytical case support, identify trends, and perform strategic analysis and reporting.

Operate on a 24 X 7 basis. Produce and disseminate, on a regular basis, locally relevant threat summary products to provide regionally focused situational awareness of significant criminal and terrorism events, trends, and threats. Consistent with established dissemination policy, share and exchange terrorism-related information and intelligence products with pubic and private sector organizations having public safety and infrastructure protection responsibilities.

Develop, maintain, and expand a broad liaison and information and intelligence sharing base which includes law enforcement, public safety, and critical public sector counterparts. Existing Terrorism Early Warning Group, Regional Public and Private Infrastructure Collaboration Systems (RPPICS), Public Sector Terrorism Response Groups (PSTRG), and InfraGard initiatives should be utilized and expanded upon.

Suggested Initial Measures Functions Training-Analytical and Terrorism Data Capture Tips and Leads Analysis Strategic Analysis and Intel Production/ Information Sharing # of personnel hired/contracted # of Library Documents added New tips and leads records added # of visits/visitors # of courses/name of course/topics New Account records added # of tips assigned to each user # of publications # and name of agencies trained New Location records added # of tips due to be reviewed # of presentations # of people trained New Miscellaneous records added # of tips overdue one month or less Total # of searches performed for outside agencies New Object records added # of tips overdue more than one month # performed per agency New Organization records added Total # of disseminations New Subject Records added # of disseminations by agency New Technology records added # and name of participating agencies New Vehicle Records added # of MOU’s Total number of searches performed # of requests for projects Measures Number of users that logged onto the system Customer Satisfaction Surveys and positive/negative outcomes

Intelligence vs. Privacy Rights The JRIC will not be a primary investigative entity. Investigative activities will be limited to those necessary to support intelligence gathering and analysis. (MOU) The JRIC does not maintain intelligence files. JRIC has access to files maintained by primary participating agencies for strategic analysis purposes to “connect dots.” (Memex) Each primary participating agency is subject to intelligence guidelines (US DOJ, Cal DOJ, LAPD Police Commission Guidelines). Each agency member who is a JRIC participant will be subject to the personnel rules, regulations, laws and policies applicable to those of their respective agencies. FBI participants will continue to adhere to the Bureau's ethical standards and will remain subject to the Supplemental Standards of Ethical Conduct for employees of the Department of Justice. (MOU)

The authority for entering into this MOU can be found at 28 U. S. C The authority for entering into this MOU can be found at 28 U.S.C. § 533; 42 U.S.C. § 3771; 28 C.F.R. § 0.85; and sections 2001 and 2002 of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004. All parties agree to abide by the United States Attorney General's Guidelines on General Crimes, Racketeering Enterprise and Terrorism Enterprise Investigations (AG Guidelines) effective on 5/30/2002, and the Attorney General's Guidelines for FBI National Security Investigations and Foreign Intelligence Collection, effective 10/31/03, as they pertain to International Terrorism matters. In addition, it is understood that personnel of the LASD, LAPD, USAO, CA DOJ, and the FBI shall be required to utilize only those standards and/or policies consistent with their agency's standards and/or policies.

28CFR23 28 CFR part 23 governs the basic requirements of the intelligence system process. The process includes: Information submission or collection Secure storage Inquiry and search capability Controlled dissemination, and Purge and review process

Memex Forces Compliance

Suspicious Incident Reports (Tips and Leads) Files may contain names, other personal information and locations necessary to conduct initial analysis and vetting. Memex prompts user to justify keeping record longer than one year (28CFR) If no action Memex automatically purges information Otherwise, case becomes open intelligence case by appropriate agency and file maintained by agency, not JRIC. Recommendation NCTC or other Federal Agency create a system for State and locals to dump SIR’s into that can be searched against to connect dots in the future.

Budget UASI Grant FBI Budget Lion share of future JRIC budget UASI ‘06 = $6+ million Future IT technology Contract analysts and IT consultants Salary reimbursement to 6 LA County police departments for participation in JRIC Salary reimbursement to other 6 counties of region for analyst participation in JRIC space or virtual office Analysis training On-going operational costs FBI Budget 5 year space lease

Los Angeles Joint Regional Intelligence Center Lieutenant Robert Fox Los Angeles Police Department JRIC Co-Program Manager (562) 345-1102