Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Environment of Warm-Season Elevated Thunderstorms Associated with Heavy Rainfall over the Central United States Authors: James T. Moore Fred H. Glass.
Advertisements

Winter Weather Forecasting An Empirical Approach to Winter Storm Forecasting for the National Weather Service Springfield, Missouri Forecast Area.
Analysis of Rare Northeast Flow Events By Joshua Beilman and Stephanie Acito.
Thunderstorm Ingredients ©Oklahoma Climatological Survey EarthStorm 2009.
 The main focus is investigating the dynamics resulting in synoptically forced training convective rainfall  Synoptic conditions necessary for the generation.
Lesson 1 – Ingredients for severe thunderstorms
Aspects of 6 June 2007: A Null “Moderate Risk” of Severe Weather Jonathan Kurtz Department of Geosciences University of Nebraska at Lincoln NOAA/NWS Omaha/Valley,
Visually Enhanced Composite Charts for Severe Weather Forecasting and Real-time Diagnosis Josh Korotky NWS Pittsburgh PA NROW Annual Meeting 2002.
An Overview of Environmental Conditions and Forecast Implications of the 3 May 1999 Tornado Outbreak Richard L. Thompson and Roger Edwards Presentation.
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
A tale of two severe weather surprises – The isolated event of 16 July 2010 and the severe weather outbreak of 17 July 2010 Neil A. Stuart NOAA/NWS Albany,
Thunderstorm Forecasting in NYC Christina Speciale, Rutgers University Dr. Steven Decker, Rutgers University Brandon Hertell, Consolidated Edison.
A Case Study of the August 25, 2007 Severe Weather Event in Eastern New York and Western New England Brian J. Frugis NWS WFO Albany, New York.
Warm-Season Lake-/Sea-Breeze Severe Weather in the Northeast Patrick H. Wilson, Lance F. Bosart, and Daniel Keyser Department of Earth and Atmospheric.
The Father’s Day 2002 Severe Weather Outbreak across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS WFO at Albany.
Correlations between observed snowfall and NAM forecast parameters, Part I – Dynamical Parameters Mike Evans NOAA/NWS Binghamton, NY November 1, 2006 Northeast.
Warm-Season Lake-/Sea-Breeze Severe Weather in the Northeast Patrick H. Wilson, Lance F. Bosart, and Daniel Keyser Department of Earth and Atmospheric.
Characteristics of an Anomalous, Long-Lived Convective Snowstorm Rebecca L. Ebert Department of Soil, Environmental, and Atmospheric Sciences University.
A Diagnostic Analysis of a Difficult- to-Forecast Cutoff Cyclone from the 2008 Warm Season Matthew A. Scalora, Lance F. Bosart, Daniel Keyser Department.
An Examination of the Tropical System – Induced Flooding in Central New York and Northeast Pennsylvania in 2004.
. Severe Weather Indices Variables used to ‘summarize’ the potential for Severe Weather formation Evolved over past 60 years Based on long history of severe.
Severe Squall Line over Quebec August 18th 2008 Robert Michaud QSPC – Montreal October 29th 2008.
A Storm-Scale Analysis of the 16 June 2008 Significant Severe Weather Event across New York and Western New England Thomas A. Wasula NOAA/NWS at Albany.
Characteristics of Isolated Convective Storms Meteorology 515/815 Spring 2006 Christopher Meherin.
Corfidi, et al – convection where air parcels originate from a moist absolutely unstable layer above the PBL. Can produce severe hail, damaging.
1 QPF Part 2 of 3 COMAP 99 Wes Junker Monday, 13 September 1999
Horizontal Convective Rolls MPO 551 Paper Presentation Dan Stern Horizontal Convective Rolls : Determining the Environmental Conditions Supporting their.
Christopher S. Foltz Jeremy Martin Brad Mickelson NWS WFO Goodland, KS 13 th High Plains Conference August 2009.
Lecture 2a Severe Thunderstorm Primer Synoptic Laboratory II – Mesoscale Professor Tripoli.
SYNOPTIC METEOROLOGY LABORATORY The Dallas and Fort Worth Storms of May 5, 1995 Storms of May 5, 1995 BY: Brent Crisp, Phil Grigsby, Thomas Jones, Devon.
Hastings, Nebraska National Weather Service Considerations for TAF Composition UNK Aviation Department October 12, 2006.
“Effects of Pacific Sea Surface Temperature (SST) Anomalies on the Climate of Southern South Carolina and Northern Coastal Georgia ” Whitney Albright Joseph.
Henry Fuelberg Pete Saunders Pendleton, Oregon Research Region Map Types and Lightning Frequencies.
Composite Analysis of Environmental Conditions Favorable for Significant Tornadoes across Eastern Kansas Joshua M. Boustead, and Barbara E. Mayes NOAA/NWS.
An Examination of the Climatology and Environmental Characteristics of Flash Flooding in the Binghamton, New York County Warning Area Stephen Jessup M.S.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
Mark Conder, Todd Lindley, and Gary Skwira – NOAA/National Weather Service, Lubbock, Texas INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION  A complex storm system brought a.
ATS/ESS 452: Synoptic Meteorology
The Similar Soundings Technique For Incorporating Pattern Recognition Into The Forecast Process at WFO BGM Mike Evans Ron Murphy.
Northeast Convective Flash Floods: Helping Forecasters Stay Ahead of Rising Water Joe Villani - National Weather Service, Albany, NY Derek Mallia - University.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis.
Tropical Severe Local Storms Nicole Hartford. How do thunderstorms form?  Thunderstorms result from moist warm air that rises due to being less dense.
March 14, 2001 Bow Echo in Southeast Texas – A Mid-Altitude Radial Convergence Case Study Paul Lewis II.
Forecasting Technique: Pattern Recognition Associating a “weather pattern” to a “weather event” Significant weather events have patterns –surface features.
Summer Tornadoes – NWA 2015 Statistical Severe Convective Risk Assessment Model (SSCRAM) (Hart & Cohen, 2015) SPC Mesoanalysis Data Every hour from
The July 19, 2015 “Non Severe” Event in Southern New England What Happened? NROW XVI – November, 2015 Frank Nocera NOAA/NWS Taunton MA.
THE MARCH 2006 MID-SOUTH TORNADO OUTBREAK... WHY IT NEVER OCCURRED Dan Valle National Weather Service Memphis, TN.
Conditions for Convection The Ingredients Method.
Flight Planning Smoke/Aerosol Outlook SEAC4RS 2013 Prepared: 08/08/ hours PDT (21:00Z) Forecast period: Thursday (8/8) - Monday (8/12) David Peterson.
Flight Planning Smoke/Aerosol Outlook SEAC4RS 2013 Prepared: 08/10/ hours PDT (22:00Z) Forecast period: Monday (8/12) David Peterson Marine Meteorology.
Severe Thunderstorm Summary METR 361. The Pre-storm Environment On the Surface map, look for: On the Surface map, look for: 1.Warm air, T > 50 F 2.High.
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Continued.
Challenges in Convective Storm Prediction for the Coastal-Urban New York City-Long Island Brian A. Colle 1, Kelly Lombardo 2, John Murray 3, and Harrison.
Heavy Rain Climatology of Upper Michigan Jonathan Banitt National Weather Service Marquette MI.
Defining a Threat Area and Miller Techniques
Common Severe Weather Weather Soundings
A Compare and Contrast Study of Two Banded Snow Storms
Soundings and Adiabatic Diagrams for Severe Weather Prediction and Analysis Ooohhhh!!!!!!!!!!! Aaaahhhhhhhh!!!!!! Look at the pretty picture!
anelastic: Boussinesque: Homework 1.1 …eliminates sound waves
Administration through the Hollings Scholarship Program
CAE Tornado Cases Hunter Coleman Anthony Petrolito Michael Cammarata
An Investigation of the 26 July 2006 Downburst near Spearville, Kansas
Case Jan Squall line moves through early afternoon...leaving stable conditions, stratus and low LCLs over region through early night hours.
VERIFICATION – DAY CLD: 6.5/10.
Lake-Effect Snow A “Fair weather” event
Forecast Verification time!
Forecast Verification time!
Forecast Verification time!
Forecast Verification time!
De donde son ustedes? (Where are you from) Most interesting weather
Presentation transcript:

Determining Favorable Days for Summertime Severe Convection in the Deep South Chad Entremont NWS Jackson, MS

Situation / Concerns During the months of June, July and August, the primary mode of severe weather is damaging winds from microbursts. During this time, large synoptic scale forcing is pushed well to the north and the southern states are left with very subtle features to drive the daily convection.

Distribution of Severe Weather (May-Sep) Compliments of NWS Birmingham

Goal To differentiate between the days there will be severe convection to the days of just general thunderstorms.

Methodology Used 12z soundings from KJAN & KBMX from 1999 to 2003 Used 12z soundings from KJAN & KBMX from 1999 to 2003 Sample size is 326 soundings Sample size is 326 soundings Excluded strongly forced or frontal forced systems as well as tropical systems Excluded strongly forced or frontal forced systems as well as tropical systems

Methodology Modified the 12z soundings to determine certain instability parameters Modified the 12z soundings to determine certain instability parameters Used initial conditions and 0-12 hr model forecasts to locate favorable synoptic patterns that support convection Used initial conditions and 0-12 hr model forecasts to locate favorable synoptic patterns that support convection

Methodology Collected Severe reports from Stormdata Database to determine “event” days vs “Null” days Collected Severe reports from Stormdata Database to determine “event” days vs “Null” days Event days are defined as any day with at least one severe report Event days are defined as any day with at least one severe report Null days are days with no severe reports Null days are days with no severe reports There were 137 event days (42%) There were 137 event days (42%) Reports were collected within the CWA of interest for the local sounding Reports were collected within the CWA of interest for the local sounding

Sounding Modification Used 12z soundings from KJAN and KBMX from 1999 to 2003 during the months of June, July and August. Modified the 12z sounding for temperature and dew point, utilizing a sounding application called N-Sharp. The temperature and dew point used were taken from hourly observations just before and closest to thunderstorms or what best represented the area.

Key Parameters Surface Based Cape (SBCAPE) Surface Based Cape (SBCAPE) Lifted Index (LI) Lifted Index (LI) Precipitable Water (PW) Precipitable Water (PW) mb temperature difference or Vertical Totals mb temperature difference or Vertical Totals Downdraft Cape (DCAPE or DAPE) Downdraft Cape (DCAPE or DAPE) km Shear km Shear

SBCAPE Box indicates 75th and 25th percentiles Box indicates 75th and 25th percentiles Whiskers indicate 90th and 10th percentiles Whiskers indicate 90th and 10th percentiles

Lifted Index (LI)

Precipitable Water (PW) Used a “slot” range for favorable values Used a “slot” range for favorable values Values between 1.6 and 1.95 inches are favorable Values between 1.6 and 1.95 inches are favorable 67 % of all severe reports occur in this range 67 % of all severe reports occur in this range

mb Temp Difference

DCAPE Favorable values > 900 J/kg when the SBCAPE was > 3000 J/kg Favorable values > 900 J/kg when the SBCAPE was > 3000 J/kg This was done because the DCAPE could be very high but the instability would not be sufficient enough to support deep convection. This was done because the DCAPE could be very high but the instability would not be sufficient enough to support deep convection. Using the above “favorable values”, an “event” occurred on 71 of 104 days. The frequency of occurrence was 68 % Using the above “favorable values”, an “event” occurred on 71 of 104 days. The frequency of occurrence was 68 % This N-sharp program also tells you what level the parcel descended from This N-sharp program also tells you what level the parcel descended from Any parcel descending from a level above 600mb should be given extra attention Any parcel descending from a level above 600mb should be given extra attention

0 - 6 km Shear Favorable value, > 8 m/s when SBCAPE was > 3000 J/kg Favorable value, > 8 m/s when SBCAPE was > 3000 J/kg Using the above “favorable values”, an “event” occurred on 31 of 40 days Using the above “favorable values”, an “event” occurred on 31 of 40 days The frequency of occurrence was 78 % The frequency of occurrence was 78 % When the shear was 3000 J/kg, an “event” occurred 38 of 69 days, a frequency of occurrence of 55 % When the shear was 3000 J/kg, an “event” occurred 38 of 69 days, a frequency of occurrence of 55 % When the shear was > 8 m/s and SBCAPE 8 m/s and SBCAPE < 3000 J/kg, an “event” occurred only 1 of 81 days

Quantifying the Parameters Use a checklist style application to organize each parameter. Use a checklist style application to organize each parameter. Determine favorable ranges for each parameter and weight the values (point scale) Determine favorable ranges for each parameter and weight the values (point scale) Define a daily potential with the point totals. Define a daily potential with the point totals. At JAN we use: Extreme, Likely, Chance, Slight Chance and Little Chance At JAN we use: Extreme, Likely, Chance, Slight Chance and Little Chance

Microburst Checklist and Potential Scale

Distribution of the Daily Potential Number of Days that Occurred in each Potential (326 total)

Distributions and Events

Avg # of Events for each Potential

Synoptic Analysis Important Fields to Consider 850 mb Theta E ridges, moisture transport and lapse rates (vertical totals) 850 mb Theta E ridges, moisture transport and lapse rates (vertical totals) 500 mb winds, looking for subtle veering with time (weak trough passage), increases in wind speed and positions of any shear axis 500 mb winds, looking for subtle veering with time (weak trough passage), increases in wind speed and positions of any shear axis 250 mb jet positions, diffluent areas, jet streaks, shear axis and divergence 250 mb jet positions, diffluent areas, jet streaks, shear axis and divergence Combine sfc instability (CAPE, LI) and moisture convergence with the favorable regions described above Combine sfc instability (CAPE, LI) and moisture convergence with the favorable regions described above

July 13, 2003 Case 12z JAN sounding 12z JAN sounding 850 and 500 mb RUC forecast at 18z 850 and 500 mb RUC forecast at 18z 250 mb winds and divergence 250 mb winds and divergence radar picture of a downburst radar picture of a downburst Severe weather plot Severe weather plot

12z, July 13 JAN Modified Sounding

Checklist Results of July 13 Case SBCAPE=4152 J/kg SBCAPE=4152 J/kg PW’s=1.74 in PW’s=1.74 in Lifted Index=-11 Lifted Index=-11 Lapse Rate=28 C Lapse Rate=28 C DCAPE=1056 J/kg DCAPE=1056 J/kg shear=10 m/s shear=10 m/s Checklist Total=10 Likely Checklist Total=10 Likely Events in CWA=13 Events in CWA=13

18z 850mb RH (img), Winds, Theta E, Moisture Transport

18z 500mb Winds (isotachs), Vorticity (img)

18z 250mb Winds (isotachs), Divergence

21z 250mb Winds (isotachs), Divergence

18z SBCAPE, LI, Sfc Winds

19z Visual Sat Image, LI, Sfc Obs

Downburst just North of the GWX radar Microburst 8 mi N of GWX Microburst 8 mi N of GWX 50 kts at 470 ft AGL 50 kts at 470 ft AGL Amazingly, no official severe weather reports! Amazingly, no official severe weather reports!

Severe Weather Reports, Hail, Wind

Loop of the Visual Sat Image and 5 min Lightning

Summary Try and quantify instability and sounding parameters Try and quantify instability and sounding parameters A checklist that distributes points to certain parameters works well. A checklist that distributes points to certain parameters works well. Instability does not work alone, synoptic and model analysis need to be done to identify favorable regions Instability does not work alone, synoptic and model analysis need to be done to identify favorable regions The collocation of favorable synoptic patterns and strong instability point you in the right direction The collocation of favorable synoptic patterns and strong instability point you in the right direction

Parameter Summary Values > 3500 J/kg are favorable for SBCAPE Values > 3500 J/kg are favorable for SBCAPE Values between 1.6 and 1.95 are good for PW Values between 1.6 and 1.95 are good for PW Values < -8 are favorable for Lifted Index Values < -8 are favorable for Lifted Index Values > 27 C and especially >28.4 C are favorable for mb temp difference Values > 27 C and especially >28.4 C are favorable for mb temp difference Values > 900 J/kg and especially > 1200 J/kg or favorable for DCAPE when SBCAPE is > 3000 J/kg (give extra consideration when the parcel descends from a level 900 J/kg and especially > 1200 J/kg or favorable for DCAPE when SBCAPE is > 3000 J/kg (give extra consideration when the parcel descends from a level <600mb) Values > 8 m/s for 0-6 shear are favorable when SBCAPE is > 3000 J/kg Values > 8 m/s for 0-6 shear are favorable when SBCAPE is > 3000 J/kg

Future Work Continue to experiment with new parameters, emphasis on atmospheric moisture, mainly mid and upper levels Continue to experiment with new parameters, emphasis on atmospheric moisture, mainly mid and upper levels Investigate radar data to try and improve on traditional radar techniques that are precursors to damaging wind and severe weather during the warm season Investigate radar data to try and improve on traditional radar techniques that are precursors to damaging wind and severe weather during the warm season Incorporate lightning data and trends with radar (using SCAN, storms with CG rates >17 strikes/min should strongly be considered for warnings) Incorporate lightning data and trends with radar (using SCAN, storms with CG rates >17 strikes/min should strongly be considered for warnings)

Another Microburst! Intense microburst near DGX, Brandon radar, on Aug 6 th 2003 Intense microburst near DGX, Brandon radar, on Aug 6 th 2003 Several pixels of >62 kts, max output of 68 kts! Several pixels of >62 kts, max output of 68 kts! Numerous trees and powerlines were blown down. A billboard was also blown down along I-20. Twenty homes sustained minor damage Numerous trees and powerlines were blown down. A billboard was also blown down along I-20. Twenty homes sustained minor damage

The End