Building a Strategic Plan Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council September 11, 2014.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

WV High Quality Standards for Schools

Advertisements

SCHOOL LEADER PREPARATION: A BLUEPRINT FOR CHANGE Submitted to the Illinois Board of Higher Education by the Commission on School Leader Preparation in.

The Readiness Centers Initiative Early Education and Care Board Meeting Tuesday, May 11, 2010.

Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders Initiative School Leader Advisory Council March 27, 2009.

Follow Up and Support AACN Clinical Nurse Leader Implementation Conference June 16 & 17, 2004.

Arts in Basic Curriculum 20-Year Anniversary Evaluation the Improve Group.

High level expert meeting to develop the Near East Regional Action Plan to Implement the Global Strategy to improve Agricultural and Rural Statistics.

RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.

Selected Items from a Report of the Higher Learning Commission Comprehensive Evaluation Visit to OSU Pam Bowers Director, University Assessment & Testing.

SEM Planning Model.

1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.

School of Medicine Research Roadmap October 24, 2011.

A Project Sponsored by the McCormick Foundation Lisa Hood, LINC Project Director Center for the Study of Education Policy Illinois State University Presentation.

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing President Wim Wiewel Provost Roy Koch Leadership In 2008 President Wiewel and Provost Koch.

STRATEGIC PLANNING STATUS AND DIRECTION Report to the PPPC September 16, 2013 Michael Berman VP for Technology & Communication.

Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.

PARIS21 CONSORTIUM MEETING Paris, October 2002 Progress Report of the Task Team on Food, Agriculture and Rural Statistics  Objectives  Past activities.

Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.

Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.

Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,

Vision to Action © American Student Achievement Institute 2004 Document 1.13.

Live Healthy Napa County Creating and Sustaining a Common Agenda.

1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.

Building Superior Membership and Accreditation Value MAACBA Annual Meetig New Brunswick, NJ October 17, 2014.

School-Wide Positive Behavior Support District Planning Louisiana Positive Behavior Support Project.

GOMC Organizational Assessment Progress to Date Joan LeBlanc GOMC Council Coordinator.

Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.

District XXXX Presidents-elect Training Seminar 1 Session 8: Goal Setting.

Next Steps Forward LINC Curriculum Module Key Resources Technical Assistance Proposal.

ADD Perspectives on Accountability Where are We Now and What does the Future Hold? Jennifer G. Johnson, Ed.D.

Using Intermediary Organizations to Gain Access to Quality Internships Presented by: Deanna Hanson, California Director, NAF.

SACS Coordinators Meeting Non-Academic Units Wednesday, January 9, 2013 Timothy Brophy – Director, Institutional Assessment Cheryl Gater – Director, SACS.

Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.

1 Designing Effective Programs: –Introduction to Program Design Steps –Organizational Strategic Planning –Approaches and Models –Evaluation, scheduling,

Building Strong Geoscience Departments: A Workshop Report Cathy Manduca, Carleton College Heather Macdonald, Geoff Feiss, College of William and Mary Randy.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.

SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,

An Update on: AVATAR Advisory Committee Education Service Center Region 10 October 9, 2012 M. Jean Keller University.

Working Together to Prepare Illinois School Leaders Initiative February 20, 2009.

Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems Brevard Public Schools District Accreditation.

Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.

Presented to: [District] Staff DATE RECOGNIZING EDUCATOR EXCELLENCE [insert district logo]

IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic, Resource Teacher.

PPTA Governance Review Shorter term considerations.

Evaluation of State and Regional Water Quality Monitoring Councils September 9 th, 2003 Advisory Committee on Water Information U.S. Environmental Protection.

Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.

Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.

Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.

July 2007 National Quality Assurance and Accreditation Committee & Quality Assurance and Accreditation Project Role of Action Planning in The Developmental.

School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”

Citizen Stewardship Outcome Kick Off Meeting 11/18/2014.

Lead Agency Viability Assessment Consistent with OPPAGA Report 04-65, DCF contracted with FMHI to assist in the design and implementation of a centralized.

Illinois School Leader Task Force Recommendations Dr. Diane Rutledge on behalf of Illinois School Leader Task Force.

The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.

1 A Multi Level Approach to Implementation of the National CLAS Standards: Theme 1 Governance, Leadership & Workforce P. Qasimah Boston, Dr.Ph Florida.

Healthcare Coalitions. Topics and Objectives Topics  Definition  Purpose  Preparedness  Response  Members  Oversight & Structure  Resources Objectives.

Three year implementation plan Consultation Implementation Planning Ongoing Support and Progress Monitoring Partnership for Sustainability.

UTPA 2012: A STRATEGIC PLAN FOR THE DIVISION OF THE PRESIDENT Approved by the President in Spring  Provide students with a quality educational.

Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.

Overview of SACS-COC Reaffirmation Process Prepared for Reaffirmation Steering Committee April 10, 2006.

OVERVIEW OF THE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT DOMAIN TASK FORCE APRIL 16, 2015 Joan D. Nagel, M.D., M.P.H. Program Director, Division of Clinical Innovation National.

Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.

Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015

Evaluating ESD in RCEs: The Start-up Tools

Wyoming association of sheriffs and chiefs of police

IT Governance Planning Overview

The Qualitative Perspective

Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture

A two-phase, faculty and staff driven process

Presentation transcript:

Building a Strategic Plan Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council September 11, 2014

ISLAC Logic Model InputsActivities Outputs Outcomes/ Impacts Work of prior leadership task forces School leader performance standards and program accreditation criteria Preparation program redesign models Wallace & McCormick funding

ISLAC Logic Model InputsActivities Outputs Outcomes/ Impacts Work of prior leadership task forces School leader performance standards and program accreditation criteria Preparation program redesign models Wallace & McCormick funding Establish and convene Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council (ISLAC) Steering committee plans meetings and monitors progress Study teams develop strategic plan elements

ISLAC Logic Model InputsActivities Outputs Outcomes/ Impacts Work of prior leadership task forces School leader performance standards and program accreditation criteria Preparation program redesign models Wallace & McCormick funding Establish and convene Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council (ISLAC) Steering committee plans meetings and monitors progress Study teams develop strategic plan elements 5-year strategic plan for leadership implementation and support, to include strategies for: Program cohesion and continuous improvement Quality assurance Effective partnerships Training and support Network support and resources for sustainability

ISLAC Logic Model InputsActivities Outputs Outcomes/ Impacts Work of prior leadership task forces School leader performance standards and program accreditation criteria Preparation program redesign models Wallace & McCormick funding Establish and convene Illinois School Leadership Advisory Council (ISLAC) Steering committee plans meetings and monitors progress Study teams develop strategic plan elements 5-year strategic plan for leadership implementation and support, to include strategies for: Program cohesion and continuous improvement Quality assurance Effective partnerships Training and support Network support and resources for sustainability Short Term Sustainable local/state support Robust implementation within preparation programs Statewide network for continuous improvement and collective impact Long Term Improvements in student learning outcomes and other school indicators

Study Teams Diverse membership Assigned CSEP staff Draft charge – may be modified Work time during scheduled ISLAC meetings Work between meetings (via , DropBox, etc.) Document progress via template PRODUCTS: Recommendations and action steps for the five-year ISLAC strategic plan

Study Teams PROGRAM COHESION: coursework, assessments, data, continuous improvement, effective practices QUALITY ASSURANCE: coordinate requirements among various regulatory/accreditation entities PARTNERSHIPS: build and strengthen partnerships among programs, districts and regional offices TRAINING & SUPPORT: internships, principal mentors, supervisors, other faculty NETWORK SUPPORT: communication, collaboration, sharing effective tools and practices, garnering resources

Study Team Template

Strategic Plan Recommendations & Action Steps PROGRAM COHESION QUALITY ASSURANCE PARTNERSHIPS TRAINING & SUPPORT NETWORK SUPPORT Five-year Plan Collective Sustainable Continuously improving