Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) Brief Presented By: Mr. Syd Pope Director, Contract Tech Ops March 07, 2002
DCMA Focus n What we do, n Where we are, n How we do it! Topics to Brief n Risk Management n Earned Value Management (EVM) and Technical Performance Measures (TPMs) n National Aerospace and Defense Contractor Accreditation Program (NADCAP) Pilot Study AGENDA
DCMA Focus Who is our customer? n Taxpayer n Civilian Customers n War-fighter n Program Office What is our authority? n Federal Acquisition Regulations n Memoranda of Agreement What do Program Offices want? n Predictive data analysis and mitigation of program cost, schedule, and technical risks
What We Do Provide Customer Focused Contract Management Services n Right Item = Quality n Right Time = On-Time Delivery n Right Price = Value for Money Combat Support Agency n Military Operations n Readiness of Fielded Systems n Modernization of Military Equipment n Industrial Surge – During Conflict Achieve Customer Expectations
DCMAW DCMAE HQ DCMA And DCMAI Americas Southern Europe Northern Europe Saudi Arabia Pacific 5 International Contract Management Offices covering 21 Countries and 566 Fuel Sites Where We Are: Worldwide Operations Three Districts: - Eastern U.S. - Western U.S. - International 60 U.S. Field Contract Management Offices
CAS Life Cycle Involvement PRE-AWARD COMPLETION PERFORMANCE AWARD 81 Functions Pricing / Negotiation Core Contract Admin Program Technical Support Quality Assurance Engineering Surveillance Production Surveillance Property Management Small Business â FAR (a) Standard Functions â DFARS (a) âNASA Standards â FAR (b) Additional Functions â DFARS (b) âNASA Mandatory Inspections How We Do It
Supplier Risk Management
CONCEPTTYPICAL FOCUS Risk Management Processes Quality Manufacturing Software Engineering Systems Earned Value Purchasing Property Estimating Collaborative Approach Buying Activity Supplier DCMA Supplier Risk Management Key Steps Understand customer requirements Focus on Key Processes / Systems Predictive Analysis for customer Adjusting risk based on risk changes
RISK DOCUMENTATION Required for ALL elements of risk...including UPDATES! n Risk Management Plans should reflect the operating environment: o Current, accurate, and complete o Basis for Customer decision-making o Focus should be on the quality and succinctness of the information u Where are the risks and what is the risk mitigation strategy? Method of Communication to all Stakeholders Coordination with Supplier required Supplier Risk Management
Effective Risk Management ensures program success: n Provides real-time supplier information in risk- based terms. n Provides visibility on where to focus attention. n Permits partnering with ALL stakeholders. Supplier Risk Management
Earned Value Management Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)* n Used to organize collection and analysis of detailed costs. n Establishes a structure for identifying products, processes, and data. n Is a product of the systems engineering process. Earned Value n Reporting system that tracks cost and schedule progress. n Projected performance is based on WBS. * Systems Engineering Fundamentals, Defense Systems Management College, January 2001
Technical Performance Measures and EVM Metrics and Earned Value* n Technical Performance Measures (TPMs). n Traceable to WBS elements are preferred. n When combined with product metrics, earned value is a powerful tool * Systems Engineering Fundamentals, Defense Systems Management College, January 2001
TPM Discussion: Risk Vs Problem Preventive Corrective Action May occur Has occurred Problem Strategic Tactical Thinking Long Short Time horizon Manage Risk and Future Issues (TPM Emphasis) Is it a Risk …………………………or a Problem Manage Problem and Future Impact (EV Emphasis) Link works in “slide show” mode only
TPM Pilot Desired end state… ultimate goal? n Predictive analysis of cost/schedule/performance problems n Integration of TPMs with WBS, EV, and Risk Management Did we get there? n Needed program(s) with good traceability between WBS elements, EV control accounts, requirements, and TPMs n Needed to show predictive success and/or an enhancement in program and risk management
TPM Pilot: Results Pilot program was a challenge: n TPMs not on contract; contract problems n Rqmts not defined; inadequate WBS But there were many benefits: n Greater understanding of contract/system requirements n Better insight into risk assessment n Forces a systematic approach to analyzing performance Next step is to approach industry and PMOs n Working with Northrop Grumman; making joint presentation at Lean Aerospace Plenary in March n May work with Army Excalibur and Air Force JSF programs
National Aerospace and Defense Contractor Accreditation Program (NADCAP) Pilot Study DCMA Test Sites: n DCMAE - CMO Baltimore, CMO Syracuse, and CMO Detroit n DCMAW - CMO Chicago, and CMO Van Nuys Test Areas: Welding, Heat Treating, NDT Purpose: To test the feasibility and effectiveness of relying on NADCAP Data to eliminate redundant surveillance to the maximum extent possible.
Results to date: n Limited success due to the very small ratio of active contractors currently certified. n Unsuccessful in doing a comprehensive data analysis of NADCAP audit findings for most common problems Current actions: Working with NADCAP staff to restructure database for more effective data analysis Current Plans: Continue membership in the 3 areas. NADCAP Pilot study
Summary Provide Customer-Focused Contract Management Services n Right Item = Quality n Right Time = On-Time Delivery n Right Price = Value for Money DCMA is Focused on Customer Needs! Teaming with NASA, Military Services, and Defense Contractors to ensure that tax dollars achieve mission requirements
Questions? Closing