Programmes for Students: Accelerating Learning in Literacy and Mathematics Evaluation and Self-Review Day March 3, 2014

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leading Learning in the Social Sciences MARGARET LEAMY National Coordinator Social Sciences Te Tapuae o Rehua Consortium
Advertisements

Response to Intervention: Linking Statewide Initiatives.
LITERACY STRATEGY P Loddon Mallee Region.
Administration Updates
USING THE INSTRUCTIONAL BLUEPRINT TO GUIDE TIER I WORK.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
NZCER Data Gathering Process & Reporting to MoE Northland & Auckland ALL Schools Intake 1, 2015.
Nau mai, haere mai Introductory Webinar Please dial into the audio conference a few minutes before the session is due to begin. On your phone dial: At.
Early Level Transitions. Are we confident there is effective progression in children’s learning through early level ? Are we confident there is effective.
Programmes for Students: Accelerating Learning in Literacy and Mathematics Evaluation and Self-Review Day Central South 19 March, 2014
BA (Hons) Primary Education Year Three School Based Training Briefing
Learning and Teaching Using ICT Conferences Summer 2004.
CB330005S Review and Planning UND: April 2007.
Breakout Sessions Self review Preparing for ALL. Purpose To critically inquire into the effectiveness of current practices To use self-review tools available.
Leadership for Learning
Consistency of Assessment
Do we need to Assess for Learning? Concordia University Michael Pellegrin, MEESR March 2015.
Breakout Sessions Self review Preparing for ALL. Purpose To meet other schools in your ALLS cluster To critically inquire into the effectiveness of current.
Preparation for Planning workshops 2 nd March: Year 1,2,3 schools 3 rd March: Year 1 schools only.
Elementary Planning Process
NATIONAL STANDARDS. “… the most important thing about a child's performance at school is their progress. So even those children who come in, who are not.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
August 23, 2015 Education Bradford Curricular Targets Georgina Graham and Jonathan Nixon ISP Consultants, Education Bradford.
Network of School Planners in Ireland Mark Fennell 28 th April 2012 Implementing effective changes to improve student learning:
Impact & Evidence Primary Sport Premium
National Standards and gifted and talented: are they compatible? Presented 10 Nov – 5pm Webinar 4 of a series of 4 Adrienne Carlisle Evaluation.
Overall Teacher Judgements
Overall Teacher Judgements and
Programmes for students: Data collection & reporting.
‘What works’ and making it work for you Dr Graham Stoop Dr Carol Mutch Education Review Office 1 First-Time Principals’ Residential Course.
Programmes for Students: Accelerating Literacy Learning: ALL Principal evaluation and self review day Workshop 1 March 2014 Presenter – Alison Davis Vision.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Reading and Writing National Standards workshop phase 2 Term
Another New Framework Major Changes: No more satisfactory 2 strikes and you are out All criteria changed Very short notice No pre-inspection brief.
National Standards workshop phase 2: Mathematics What is important to know and understand about the Mathematics Standards when making an overall teacher.
Transforming lives through learning Curriculum Expectations Sadie Cushley HMIE Feb 2014.
A product of Project CENTRAL, 2004 Understanding the Action Research Process Sponsored by Project CENTRAL A Project of the Florida Department of Education.
Mathematics and Statistics Leaders Symposium September 2011 Waipuna Conference Centre Overall Teacher Judgments and Moderation Christine Hardie.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
Enquiring into Entrepreneurial School Leadership Sue Robson.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
The Rural Early Literacy Initiative Effective Professional Development for Rural Kindergarten and First Grade Teachers Steve Amendum Marnie Ginsberg Lynne.
Programmes for Students: Accelerating Learning in Literacy and Mathematics Evaluation and Self-Review Day (ALL) February 2015
Assessment Online. Assessment Online on TKI offers a wide range of information on how leaders and teachers can use assessment to enhance teaching and.
Ulster.ac.uk Learning at Ulster Student Learning Experience Principles.
PGCE Primary and a Mastery approach …the journey so far
National Standards in Reading & Writing Sources : NZ Ministry of Education websites. G Thomas, J Turner.
Exploring the mathematics standards through Algebra Mathematics and Statistics, Team Solutions, Northland.
Developing Leaders in Effective Teaching Diane J. Briars President National Council of Teachers of Mathematics 2015 NCTM Minneapolis Regional.
A Learning System – we’re all in this together Kapiti Collective Lead Team Day September 2010.
Developing a Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Insight into internal stakeholder learnings Beth Ferguson AES Conference Sydney 2 September 2011.
Literacy Coach Training Day 1 August 19, Outcomes Teachers will be able to: Understand their role as skillful collaborators in school settings.
Foundations for Learning Campaign Laying solid foundations for learning PRESENTATION TO THE EDUCATION PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE Mrs Palesa Tyobeka Deputy Director-General:
Programmes for Students: Accelerating Learning in Literacy
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Ko te reo te tuariki. Language is my identity. Ko te reo tōku ahurei. Language is my uniqueness. Ko te reo te ora. Language is my life.
Accelerating Learning in Literacy(ALL) National Leader messages 2016 Gaylene Price University of Canterbury Evaluation and Self-review Day – First year.
Improving Literacy and Numeracy Outcomes Geoff N Masters.
© Crown copyright 2007 Study Plus training. © Crown copyright 2007 Aims of Study plus To accelerate the progress of pupils who are not on track to attain.
Developed by the Southern Alberta Professional Development Consortium (SAPDC) as a result of a grant from Alberta Education to support implementation of.
Education Council Work Programme
Programmes for Students: Accelerating Learning in Literacy
School Self-Evaluation 
Future Directions Conference September 3rd, 2010
Topic Principles and Theories in Curriculum Development
Unit 7: Instructional Communication and Technology
Standard for Teachers’ Professional Development July 2016
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Programmes for Students: Accelerating Learning in Literacy and Mathematics Evaluation and Self-Review Day March 3, 2014

Accelerating Learning in Literacy… Is based on a ‘Theory of Action’… A short term intervention (15 weeks) in addition to students’ current literacy teaching... Uses a process of inquiry … Engages whānau … Is responsive to student needs … Has some external support …

Accelerating Learning in Literacy (ALL) is… ‘A school inquiry and knowledge building programme that accelerates progress for a target group of students, (Year 1) … and sustains cycles of inquiry for breadth and coherence.’ (Year 2&3 - a school curriculum and achievement programme)

Rationale for Programmes for Students There is a national problem that needs solving There is often confusion about how to respond to particular student needs There is a propensity not to respond differently The system has not developed a mediating layer to support capability building National, regional & local student achievement data show pockets of success

Equity – is it good enough?

Uncertainty about how to respond to the numbers of students that were not making progress; A culture of dependency on “second wave” interventions; A lack of capability at the classroom level to assess and provide intensive, explicit literacy instruction; A confusing clutter of mismatched, sometimes counterproductive interventions. Recommendation: That the MoE develop a conceptual framework that strengthens all aspects of literacy support. Borderfield’s Report (2008)

“ …business as usual approached prevailed….most schools were able to identify their learners who were not achieving…but continued to use the same strategies, programmes and initiatives they had tried before. Few had evidence that these actually accelerated the progress of their priority learners…” ERO Mathematics Report (2013) There is a propensity not to respond differently

ERO Report – Accelerating the progress of Priority Learners in Primary Schools (May 2013) ‘A system–wide emphasis on the strategies teachers can use to accelerated progress is needed. All teachers have an ethical responsibility to help those students that need to catch up to their peers. This is essential if we are to raise the achievement of NZ students relative to their international counterparts.’ (p.21)

Therefore… the system needs do things differently. It needs to focus on all students and build capability through a system response that is contextualised to meet individual needs.

Questions to consider Is the intervention appropriate for the identified students? What is the impact of each of these interventions and what evidence do we have that they are successful? What next for the students for whom the intervention wasn’t successful?

Curriculum and Achievement Plan

Many schools already have elements of a CaAP A school wide plan showing the NZC (and school curriculum) Brings together an assessment plan – but includes responses to achievement Shows outcomes – what schools want students to achieve (graduate profile) Helps schools plan for and be accountable for all supplementary supports Keeps the focus on ‘what works’ Supports schools to pick up the pace for all students to achieve nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz (Pages 7-10 ‘Theory of Action’)

National Leader reflections on 2013 Strengths: Student achievement Student and teacher agency Appreciation of regionally based delivery High levels of engagement and positivity Uptake of the key understandings in the ‘Theory of Action’ Priority learners

So… What worked for whom? close analysis of students capabilities to determine needs … and then teaching to these innovative and exciting contexts and content chosen as the ‘vehicle’ of learning a focus on goal setting by students a focus on oral language providing opportunities for fluency and mileage well planned and structured lessons where careful scaffolding occurred (and continual modifications) quality literature as foundation material some schools had considerable success in the development of a strong home link

Areas for improvement: Scripted, shallow, skill-based programmes that can be bought and followed Acceleration Overall teacher judgements Teaching as inquiry Inquiry teams What does ‘in addition’ mean?

Intervention Logic for ALL and ALiM 2014

Enacting the Theory of Action Supplementary inquiry team Teaching as Inquiry BES Principles and Conditions of Learning Curriculum and Achievement Plan (CaAP) Self-review tool A focus on acceleration

Supplementary Inquiry Team The key role of this team is to ensure there are adequate conditions for sustaining and embedding effective practices. (e.g. one role of this group is to support other classroom teachers to inquire into the effectiveness of aspects of their practice and transfer learnings from the supplementary programme to the classroom. ) ToA Pg.12

Identify the level of support groups of students will need to access this learning focus Describe what students know and do (describe the rich resources students can bring to the next learning experiences) Using “Teaching as Inquiry” to trigger supplementary supports for some students

BES Principles and conditions of learning How well are we using what we know works? Which levers are we currently using in our work? Which ones do we need to focus more on or include?

Schools’ inquiry should be focused on doing something differently, but pedagogically sound in response to the PfS inquiry focus.

ALL 1 & ALiM 1 Inquiry “What is acceleration and how do we achieve it?”

ALL 2&3/ALiM 2 Inquiry “How do we develop effective intervention practices that sustain students acceleration and ensure intervention coherence at a school-wide level?

Our kids are …part of a system that ensures our kiwi kids can fly… He waka eke noa Ki te hoe

Reporting requirements REPORT: Inquiry and Refocus report (Developed from 2013) Completed over the intervention - forming the basis of discussion for the ‘Impact and Refocus’ day (Discuss with Mentor) Has a space for school ‘tool’ data Has a space for OTJ (and a ‘best fit’ OTJ) to Include a final OTJ!

DATA COLLECTION: NZCER will be assisting in the collection of assessment data for the project. 1.You will receive an to confirm information they have received from the MOE about your school 2.You will be asked to complete a web form link which provides NZCER with your school's initial contact and intervention focus detailsweb form link Please submit this information before the 14th March Contacts for queries: Melanie Dickinson & Sandy Robbins

DATA COLLECTION: NZCER will be collecting ALLdata for : Reading (Years 3-8) using STAR and OTJs Writing (Years 3-8) using e-asTTle and OTJs Junior Literacy (Years 0-2) using Obs survey and OTJs You need to know if you are ALL Year 1, Year 2, Year 3..

Further information about ALL… nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/system-of-support Literacy on line – system of support (look under Topics/Public Achievement Information)

Implementing a system of support

Gazette articles July 29, 2013 August 26, 2013 November 11, 2013

Rere atu, rere mai Taku manu e Rere ki tua, rere ki kō Kia whetūrangitia e Fly my bird In every direction. Attain The countless stars.