WHEN DO YOU NEED A LAWYER IN AN OMIG AUDIT? JIM SHEEHAN MEDICAID INSPECTOR GENERAL

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter Nine: Ethical Issues for Criminal Prosecutors
Advertisements

LEGAL 101 – Two Favourite Concepts: 1.Without Prejudice and 2.Client Legal Privilege THINK.CHANGE.DO.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RESPONSE Paula Adams, King County Public Disclosure Officer.
1 WHAT CAN I DO ABOUT OPPOSING COUNSEL TALKING TO OUR EMPLOYEES? James H. Gilliam BrownWinick 666 Grand Avenue, Suite 2000 Des Moines, IA Telephone:
© The McCoy Law Firm 2012 James McCoy The McCoy Law Firm Coit Rd., Ste. 560 Dallas, Texas (214)
© 2007 Morrison & Foerster LLP All Rights Reserved Attorney Advertising The Global Law Firm for Israeli Companies Dispute Resolution in the United States.
Learning Objectives LO1 Summarize the financial statement audit process. LO2 Explain the main characteristics of an independent audit engagement. LO3 Describe.
DETERMINING WHETHER TO APPEAL RAC DENIALS Kathleen Houston Drummy Davis Wright Tremaine LLP.
© Copyright 2003 Latham & Watkins. All Rights Reserved. USC Institute for Corporate Counsel The SEC’s New Part 205 Regulations Brian G. Cartwright March.
Using Prevent Defense: Mitigating Legal Risk in Procurements Presented by Richard Pennington John Westrick.
Ethical Issues in Data Security Breach Cases Presented by Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Week Duty to keep quiet, not talk about cases By product of Fiduciary Duty 2. Right not to be forced to testify about communications --Statutory.
YOUTH ATTORNEY. GENERAL PROVISIONS, ARTICLE 1:  The primary change in the general provisions article is the establishment of an attorney for children.
Ethical Justice Chapter Ten: Ethical Issues for Criminal Defense Attorneys.
ATTACK of the RAC How to prepare and respond to RAC audits.
When You Need and Don’t Need Legal Representation for OMIG (Former) Compliance Officer’s Perspective Laurie G. Radler, CHFP.
Take the Plea: How Forceful Can and Should You Be?
Q UINCY COLLEGE Paralegal Studies Program Paralegal Studies Program Interviewing & Investigation LAW-123 Introduction to Interviewing and Investigating.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Two Hats, One Lawyer: Demystifying Privilege & Confidentiality Stuart I. Teicher, Esq.
1 Sixth National HIPAA Summit The Health Lawyer as Business Associate March 28, 2003 Session VI 3:00 pm Gerald E. DeLoss, Esquire Barnwell Whaley Patterson.
Client Acceptance. Independence Issues Second General Standard – independence in mental attitude Audit Quality = f (technical and independence) Not a.
Legal Ethics for Social Services Attorneys Institute of Government 2006.
© 2003 Rule 1.9. Duties to Former Clients (a) A lawyer who has formerly represented a client in a matter shall not thereafter represent another person.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
BIT-224 Audit Muhammad Khurshid Khan THE DEMAND FOR AUDITING Why do organizations request an audit? –Agency relationship Evidence supporting a demand.
WHAT TO EXPECT IN AN INTERNAL AUDIT OR INVESTIGATION
Purpose of the Standards
Outsourcing: The Ethical Issues Steven M. Richman November 2014.
CAMPUT 2015 Energy Regulation Course Donald Gordon Conference Centre Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario Role of Tribunal Staff, Interveners and Independent.
Chapter 4 Risk Assessment.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Investigating & Preserving Evidence in Data Security Incidents Robert J. Scott Scott & Scott, LLP
Part I Sources of Corrections Law. Chapter 4 - Going to Court Introduction – Chapter provides information on appearing in court, either as a witness or.
Navigating the Criminal Tax Fraud Investigation Meagan F. Temple Johnson, Bruzzese & Temple.
Chapter 16 Auditing Operations and Completing the Audit McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2014 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
Ethical Pitfalls of Representing Multiple Clients in a Transaction Presented by Suzanne Raggio Westerheim, Attorney, Mediator, and Counselor to the Legal.
Planning an Audit The Audit Process consists of the following phases:
Discovery III Expert Witness Disclosure And Discovery Motions & Sanctions.
Chapter 4: Legal Liability
Conducting Cross-Border International Internal Investigations Association of Corporate Counsel International Legal Affairs Committee Jeffrey D. Clark Willkie.
1 Roles of Legal Professionals Legal Professional –Judges –Attorneys/Lawyers –Paralegals/Legal Assistants –Law Clerks –Legal Secretary –Others.
Avoiding Traps in Internal Investigations H. Lee Barfield II Bass, Berry and Sims PLC November 5, 2010.
CONFIDENTIAL © 2014 Barnes & Thornburg LLP. All Rights Reserved. This page, and all information on it, is confidential, proprietary and the property of.
Procedural Safeguards. Purpose Guarantee parents both an opportunity for meaningful input into all decisions affecting their child’s education and the.
Ethical Issues for Employment Investigations on Campus Carl Crosby Lehman, Gray Plant Mooty Brent Benrud, University of Minnesota.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 4: Legal Liability.
Copyright © 2007 Pearson Education Canada 1 Chapter 21: Completing the Audit.
Unit 5 Midterm Review. What are some of the components of the ABA?
A.S. FlemingFall 2009 Acct 431 – Cost Management "Ethics in its broader sense, deals with human conduct in relation to what is morally good and bad, right.
Requirements for a Retainer Agreement Start with a Written Contract! ALWAYS!
ABA CRIMINAL JUSTICE SECTION INTERNAL INVESTIGATIONS: NAVIGATING THE ETHICAL MINEFIELD.
Carlsmith Ball LLP Confidentiality Issues and Outside Counsel Deborah Bjes October 22 nd, 2015.
HIPAA Privacy Rule Implementation Status Report Richard M. Campanelli, J.D. Director, Office for Civil Rights Before the The Tenth National HIPAA Summit.
Title of Presentation Technology and the Attorney-Client Relationship: Risks and Opportunities Jay Glunt, Ogletree DeakinsJohn Unice, Covestro LLC Jennifer.
Kaplan University - Adjunct Professor Brian Tippens, J.D. - February 23, Preview Units 4-6 Unit Three Preview Unit Two.
A. Privilege and Confidentiality  confidentiality: professional law, and the law of agency  the duty of the lawyer as agent (and fiduciary) not voluntarily.
An Overview THE AUDIT PROCESS. MAJOR PHASES IN AN AUDIT Client acceptance and retention Establish terms of the engagement Plan the audit Consider internal.
Third Party Insurance Defense Work: Who is really the Client? Michael McTaggart Counsel Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP November 7, 2015.
jasa.org Board of Directors Presentation & Training February 24 th, 2016 Corporate Compliance Program.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Risk Management Seminar Bar Association of Erie County April 15, 2016.
Improving Compliance with ISAs Presenters: Al Johnson & Pat Hayle.
The FPP Test What you need to know Commercial Transport/Tourist Flight Operators Presentation AIA Aviation Week Conference July 2011.
Midterm Review 1.  Lawyers have ethical obligations that are required by the organizations to which they belong.  Lawyers are “members of the bar”,
The Paralegal Professional
WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION
Legal Ethics of Information Governance Presented by Sean Monahan
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC DISCLOSURE RESPONSE
Compliance Matters Update on the Activities of the Payment Police
Presentation transcript:

WHEN DO YOU NEED A LAWYER IN AN OMIG AUDIT? JIM SHEEHAN MEDICAID INSPECTOR GENERAL

DISCLAIMERS I have been a lawyer Some of my best friends are lawyers I cannot give legal advice to providers about dealing with the Office of Medicaid Inspector General The Code of Professional Responsibility requires a lawyer to answer “yes” to any inquiry that starts “Should I consult an attorney about...” (a matter in which the lawyer has or represents a potentially adverse interest)

WHAT SOME LAWYERS WILL TELL YOU “It is extremely important to retain experienced counsel at the outset. Do not attempt to respond to an audit request by yourself.” “This is not the time to scrimp on legal fees or attempt to be your own attorney.” In most cases, for any appeal or any hearings on overpayment demands and fines, you will need to retain the services of an experienced billing and coding consultant as an expert witness and a health care statistician as an expert witness; you must use knowledgeable, experienced experts who have testified as witnesses in these kinds of case before.” Website of The Health Law Firm

BUT WAIT... This is an audit of clinical or financial records OMIG does not bring attorneys to entrance conferences (or usually, exit conferences) State law and regulation requires Medicaid provider to produce all relevant records on request An audit involves financial, statistical, clinical, and coding issues more often than legal ones- should outside advisor be auditor, clinician, or coder, rather than attorney?

ADVANTAGES OF AN OUTSIDE LAWYER If you have a problem, you need their (objective) advice Secrecy for communications (but if you admit something you did wrong, they represent the organization-reverse Miranda ) Ability to predict and plan for how things can go wrong or badly If they screw up, it is not your fault (assuming you provided accurate and complete information) Diffuse responsibility for delay in responses, failure to produce documents, putting off interviews You can always fire them

RISKS OF AN OUTSIDE LAWYER Cost (for attorney to learn your business processes, personnel, and vulnerabilities) Control issues-lawyers focus on engagement and its outcome-but organization may have larger interests Independence-accountability to larger organization Delay-built into all lawyers’ DNA-need for perfect information and perfect analysis Aversion to risk assessment, analysis of range of outcomes

WHEN DO YOU CLEARLY NEED ADVICE OF OUTSIDE COUNSEL? After receiving draft audit with significant financial impact Need to assure complete record prior to OMIG issuance of a final Upon receiving NOPAA (Notice of Proposed Agency Action) could be either exclusion or censure, with significant implications not only for Medicaid, but for credentialing in other contexts

WHEN DO YOU CLEARLY NEED ADVICE OF OUTSIDE COUNSEL? Receipt of a subpoena from OMIG or from MFCU Execution of a search warrant Target letter Final audit with significant financial impact Notice of agency action Suspension of payments (withhold) Exclusion of board member, voluntary staff, affiliate, employee, contractor, or significant referring provider Identification of “overpayment” or “improper payment” with potential fraud issues Admission by employee of improper conduct –E.g., home health aide who had someone else call in, employee who created records after the fact

FINAL ISSUE:MANDATORY REPORTING AND THE ROLE OF COUNSEL Section 6402 of the Affordable Care Act provides for a mandatory duty to report, refund, and explain Medicare and Medicaid overpayments within 60 days of identification. How does the role of an attorney change when the client has a mandatory duty to disclose? What risks does client face?

MANDATORY REPORTING AND THE ROLE OF COUNSEL Potential of no privilege Risk of discovery of attorney files and conversations Potential for conflict between attorney and client Attorney obligation to advise of duty to report, refund, explain Attorney role if advice not followed (“noisy withdrawal”)

IN RE: a GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. July 23, 2002 Mass. SJC “A quintessential element of the attorney-client privilege-the expectation of confidentiality in the results of the investigation-is absent” in a case involving a mandatory duty to report. Those “involved in the internal investigation knew, or should have known, that they would have no “right to keep secret” any information disclosed by the internal investigation... ” “The plain language of § 51A leaves no uncertainty that mandated reporters have an “affirmative obligation” to report...”

IN RE: a GRAND JURY INVESTIGATION. July 23, 2002 Mass. SJC Also relevant is that the (defendant) touted its internal investigation to the public in an effort to explain and defend its actions. The defendant cannot rely on an internal investigation to assert the propriety of its actions to third parties and simultaneously expect to be able to block third parties from testing whether its representations about the internal investigation are accurate. See United States v. Massachusetts Inst. of Tech., 129 F.3d 681, 686 (1st Cir.1997)

CONCLUSION EVERY AUDITEE HAS THE RIGHT TO MAKE ITS OWN DECISION ABOUT RETAINING COUNSEL AND HAVING THEM PRESENT AT ENTRANCE AND EXIT CONFERENCES EVERY PROVIDER SHOULD CONSIDER CONSULTING COMPETENT COUNSEL WHEN THERE IS A QUESTION ABOUT DUTY OF DISCLOSURE OF OVERPAYMENTS UNDER ACA 6402