Izmir GAMIT/GLOBK Workshop Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Where do precise orbits and clocks come from? Kristine M. Larson ASEN 6090 Spring 2010.
Advertisements

EPOS GAMIT/GLOBK/Track Workshop Introduction
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences Massachusetts Institute of Technology 77 Massachusetts Avenue | A | Cambridge MA V F.
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Extraction of atmospheric parameters M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Seasonal Position Variations and Regional Reference Frame Realization Jeff Freymueller Geophysical Institute University of Alaska Fairbanks.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Survey-mode measurements and analysis M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Ground-based GPS Lecture 12
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
03/18/05OSU GAMIT/GLOBK1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Ground-based GPS.
Concepts in High-Precision GPS Data Analysis GPS observables Modeling the observations Limits of GPS accuracy Time series analysis.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Estimating Heights and Atmospheric Delays “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical more sensitive.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 20 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
GGOS User Requirements and Functional Specifications Richard S. Gross Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA Global.
Katmandu GAMIT/GLOBK Short Course Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT
SNARF: Theory and Practice, and Implications Thomas Herring Department of Earth Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
Introduction to High-Precision GPS Data Analysis: Towards a common language for the workshop.
Introduction Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke, Nigel Penna, David Lavallée Global GPS Processing strategy Conclusions and Future Work The preliminary.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 GPS Error Sources: Part 2 –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A, and A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere, multipath –Receiver:antenna,
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal (~3:1) so longer.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Error Modeling Thomas Herring Room ;
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 08 Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical.
Modeling Errors in GPS Vertical Estimates Signal propagation effects –Signal scattering ( antenna phase center/multipath ) –Atmospheric delay ( parameterization,
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
Aug 6, 2002APSG Irkutsk Contemporary Horizontal and Vertical Deformation of the Tien Shan Thomas Herring, Bradford H. Hager, Brendan Meade, Massachusetts.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Reference Frames Global Continental Local -- may be self-defined
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Concepts in High Precision Data Analysis
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Fundamentals of GPS for high-precision geodesy
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy
WGS-84 Seminar and Workshop
Understanding what sh_gamit does
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Kinematic Data Processing
Track Output Interpretation
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Track Output Interpretation
Presentation transcript:

Izmir GAMIT/GLOBK Workshop Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT

Workshop Overview Lectures and Tutorials: Day 1: 1.Introduction to GPS data processing and how processing is treated in gamit/globk 2.GAMIT Lecture: Overview of standard processing in GAMIT; daily session processing 3.GLOBK Lecture: Overview of the way GLOBK is used to analyze and combine results from GAMIT processing 4.Tutorial session: Salton Sea data analysis around time of Magnitude 5.8 aftershock to El Major Cucapah April 4, 2010 Mw 7.2 earthquake 8/9/112IzmirGGShortCourse

Workshop Overview Lectures and Tutorials Day 2 1.Modeling details, atmospheric delays, loading 2.Treatment of earthquakes, equipment changes and other effects 3.Statistics of time series and determination of error models for velocity estimates 4.Analysis of Salton Sea data over a longer period of time using time series. 8/9/11IzmirGGShortCourse3

GPS overview For GPS processing, the critical information needed is range and phase data from a receiver collecting data from multiple GPS satellites and information about the orbits of the satellites (earth- fixed frame) and some information about clocks in satellites. In GAMIT, only crude clock information needed due to double- differencing. To integrate GPS orbits, information needed about rotation between earth-fixed and inertial space. For the most accurate GPS results, other ancillary information needed (e.g., atmospheric models, ocean tides, antenna and receiver biases). Program track (kinematic processing) can use just RINEX data files and SP3 GPS orbit files but GAMIT needs a full suite of additional files (track also can use some of these file). The main GAMIT processing script sh_gamit handles getting all these files. 8/9/11IzmirGGShortCourse4

GPS overview GAMIT processes GPS phase and range data files (RINEX format) usually for 24-hour sessions of data. For newer data collection (post 1996), orbits do not need to be estimated. GLOBK combines together results from daily GPS processing and is used to generate velocity estimates and time-series products. After discussing some general GPS processing issues in the rest of this lecture, we then discuss GAMIT and GLOBK operations. 8/9/11IzmirGGShortCourse5

Instantaneous Positioning with GPS Pseudoranges Receiver solution or sh_rx2apr Point position ( svpos ) m Differential ( svdiff ) 1-10 m Your location is: 37 o ’ N 122 o ’ W 8/9/116IzmirGGShortCourse

Observables in Data Processing Fundamental observations L1 phase = f1 x range (19 cm) L2 phase = f2 x range (24 cm) C1 or P1 pseudorange used separately to get receiver clock offset (time) To estimate parameters use doubly differenced LC = 2.5 L L2 “Ionosphere-free combination” Double differencing (DD) removes clock fluctuations; LC removes almost all of ionosphere. Both DD and LC amplify noise (use L1, L2 directly for baselines < 1 km) Auxiliary combinations for data editing and ambiguity resolution “Geometry-free combination (LG)” or “Extra wide-lane” (EX-WL) LG = L2 - f2/f1 L1 Removes all frequency-independent effects (geometric & atmosphere) but not multipath or ionosphere Melbourne-Wubbena wide-Lane (MW-WL): phase/pseudorange combination that removes geometry and ionosphere; dominated by pseudorange noise 8/9/11IzmirGGShortCourse7

Modeling the observations I. Conceptual/Quantitative Motion of the satellites – Earth’s gravity field ( flattening 10 km; higher harmonics 100 m ) – Attraction of Moon and Sun ( 100 m ) – Solar radiation pressure ( 20 m ) Motion of the Earth – Irregular rotation of the Earth ( 5 m ) – Luni-solar solid-Earth tides ( 30 cm ) – Loading due to the oceans, atmosphere, and surface water and ice ( 10 mm) Propagation of the signal – Neutral atmosphere ( dry 6 m; wet 1 m ) – Ionosphere ( 10 m but LC corrects to a few mm most of the time ) – Variations in the phase centers of the ground and satellite antennas ( 10 cm) * incompletely modeled 8/9/118IzmirGGShortCourse

Modeling the observations II. Software structure Satellite orbit – IGS tabulated ephemeris (Earth-fixed SP3 file) [ track ] – GAMIT tabulated ephemeris ( t-file ): numerical integration by arc in inertial space, fit to SP3 file, may be represented by its initial conditions (ICs) and radiation-pressure parameters; requires tabulated positions of Sun and Moon Motion of the Earth in inertial space [ model or track ] – Analytical models for precession and nutation (tabulated); IERS observed values for pole position (wobble), and axial rotation (UT1) – Analytical model of solid-Earth tides; global grids of ocean and atmospheric tidal loading Propagation of the signal [ model or track ] – Zenith hydrostatic (dry) delay (ZHD) from pressure ( met-file, VMF1, or GPT ) – Zenith wet delay (ZWD) [crudely modeled and estimated in solve or track ] – ZHD and ZWD mapped to line-of-sight with mapping functions (VMF1 grid or GMT) – Variations in the phase centers of the ground and satellite antennas (ANTEX file) 8/9/119IzmirGGShortCourse

Parameter Estimation Phase observations [ solve or track ] – Form double difference LC combination of L1 and L2 to cancel clocks & ionosphere – Apply a priori constraints – Estimate the coordinates, ZTD, and real-valued ambiguities – Form M-W WL and/or phase WL with ionospheric constraints to estimate and resolve the WL (L2-L1) integer ambiguities [ autcln, solve, track ] – Estimate and resolve the narrow-lane (NL) ambiguities – Estimate the coordinates and ZTD with WL and NL ambiguities fixed --- Estimation can be batch least squares [ solve ] or sequential (Kalman filter [ track ] Quasi-observations from phase solution (h-file) [ globk ] – Sequential (Kalman filter) – Epoch-by-epoch test of compatibility (chi2 increment) but batch output 8/9/1110IzmirGGShortCourse

Limits of GPS Accuracy Signal propagation effects – Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) – Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) – Ionospheric effects – Receiver noise Unmodeled motions of the station – Monument instability – Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water Unmodeled motions of the satellites Reference frame 8/9/1111IzmirGGShortCourse

Limits of GPS Accuracy Signal propagation effects – Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) – Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) – Ionospheric effects – Receiver noise Unmodeled motions of the station – Monument instability – Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water Unmodeled motions of the satellites Reference frame 8/9/1112IzmirGGShortCourse

Multipath is interference between the direct and a far- field reflected signal (geometric optics apply) Avoid Reflective Surfaces Use a Ground Plane Antenna Use Multipath Rejection Receiver Observe for many hours Remove with average from many days Direct Signal Reflected Signal To mitigate the effects: 8/9/1113IzmirGGShortCourse

Simple geometry for incidence of a direct and reflected signal Multipath contributions to observed phase for three different antenna heights [From Elosegui et al, 1995] 0.15 m Antenna Ht 0.6 m 1 m 8/9/1114IzmirGGShortCourse

Multipath and Water Vapor Effects in the Observations One-way (undifferenced) LC phase residuals projected onto the sky in 4-hr snapshots. Spatially repeatable noise is multipath; time-varying noise is water vapor. Red is satellite track. Yellow and green positive and negative residuals purely for visual effect. Red bar is scale (10 mm). 8/9/1115IzmirGGShortCourse

Antenna Phase Patterns More dangerous are near-field signal interactions that change the effective antenna phase center with the elevation and azimuth of the incoming signal Figures courtesy of UNAVCO Left: Examples of the antenna phase patterns determined in an anechoic chamber…BUT the actual pattern in the field is affected by the antenna mount To avoid height and ZTD errors of centimeters, we must use at least a nominal model for the phase-center variations (PCVs) for each antenna type 8/9/1116IzmirGGShortCourse

Limits of GPS Accuracy Signal propagation effects – Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) – Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) – Ionospheric effects – Receiver noise Unmodeled motions of the station – Monument instability – Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water Unmodeled motions of the satellites Reference frame 8/9/1117IzmirGGShortCourse

Monuments Anchored to Bedrock are Critical for Tectonic Studies (not so much for atmospheric studies) Good anchoring: Pin in solid rock Drill-braced (left) in fractured rock Low building with deep foundation Not-so-good anchoring: Vertical rods Buildings with shallow foundation Towers or tall building (thermal effects) 8/9/1118IzmirGGShortCourse

From Dong et al. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 2075, 2002 Atmosphere (purple) 2-5 mm Water/snow (blue/green) 2-10 mm Nontidal ocean (red) 2-3 mm Annual Component of Vertical Loading 8/9/1119IzmirGGShortCourse

Limits of GPS Accuracy Signal propagation effects – Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) – Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) – Ionospheric effects – Receiver noise Unmodeled motions of the station – Monument instability – Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water Unmodeled motions of the satellites Reference frame 8/9/1120IzmirGGShortCourse

GPS Satellite Limits to model are non-gravitational accelerations due to solar and albedo radiation, unbalanced thrusts, and outgassing; and non- spherical antenna pattern Modeling of these effects has improved, but for global analyses remain a problem 8/9/1121IzmirGGShortCourse

Quality of IGS Final Orbits /07 20 mm = 1 ppb Source: 8/9/1122IzmirGGShortCourse

Quality of IGS Final Orbits Last Year 2010/ /07 20 mm = 1 ppb Source: 8/9/1123 IzmirGGShortCourse

Limits of GPS Accuracy Signal propagation effects – Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) – Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) – Ionospheric effects – Receiver noise Unmodeled motions of the station – Monument instability – Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water Unmodeled motions of the satellites Reference frame 8/9/1124IzmirGGShortCourse

Reference Frames Global Reference Frame quality: Center of Mass <10 mm ITRF ~ 2 mm, < 1 mm/yr Continental scale networks (e.g. PBO) < 1 mm/yr horiz., 2 mm/yr vert. Local scale ( km) depends on how “realized” and available stable sites (IGS sites in region) 8/9/11IzmirGGShortCourse25

Effect of Orbital and Geocentric Position Error/Uncertainty High-precision GPS is essentially relative ! Baseline error/uncertainty ~ Baseline distance x geocentric SV or position error SV altitude SV errors reduced by averaging: Baseline errors are ~ 0.2 orbital error / 20,000 km e.g. 20 mm orbital error = 1 ppb or 1 mm on 1000 km baseline Network (“absolute”) position errors less important for small networks e.g. 5 mm position error ~ 1 ppb or 1 mm on 1000 km baseline 10 cm position error ~ 20 ppb or 1 mm on 50 km baseline * But SV and position errors are magnified for short sessions 8/9/11IzmirGGShortCourse26

Summary High precision GPS (mm and better positioning) requires external information in additional to just the data and orbit information. Larger site separations and mixed equipment types require more care in the data analysis than short baseline, homogeneous system data collection. All of the external information needed is available and the GAMIT processing system gathers most of this information automatically. There is some information that users need to keep up to date (discussed later). The next two lectures examine running GAMIT and GLOBK. The final session today will be tutorial looking at an earthquake effected data set. 8/9/11IzmirGGShortCourse27