Concepts in High-Precision GPS Data Analysis GPS observables Modeling the observations Limits of GPS accuracy Time series analysis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPOS GAMIT/GLOBK/Track Workshop Introduction
Advertisements

Global Positioning System: what it is and how we use it for measuring the earth’s movement. April 21, 2011.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 19 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
04/22/02EGS G STABILITY OF GLOBAL GEODETIC RESULTS Prof. Thomas Herring Room ;
Extraction of atmospheric parameters M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Effect of Surface Loading on Regional Reference Frame Realization Hans-Peter Plag Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology and Seismological Laboratory University.
A quick GPS Primer (assumed knowledge on the course!) Observables Error sources Analysis approaches Ambiguities If only it were this easy…
Survey-mode measurements and analysis M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University.
Effects of azimuthal multipath heterogeneity and hardware changes on GPS coordinate time series Sibylle Goebell, Matt King
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
GAMIT Modeling Aspects Lecture 04 Thomas Herring
Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Ground-based GPS Lecture 12
Space Weather influence on satellite based navigation and precise positioning R. Warnant, S. Lejeune, M. Bavier Royal Observatory of Belgium Avenue Circulaire,
GTECH 201 Session 08 GPS.
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy M. Floyd K. Palamartchouk Massachusetts Institute of Technology Newcastle University GAMIT-GLOBK course University of Bristol,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
03/18/05OSU GAMIT/GLOBK1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module
Estimating Atmospheric Water Vapor with Ground-based GPS.
Izmir GAMIT/GLOBK Workshop Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Part VI Precise Point Positioning Supported by Local Ionospheric Modeling GS894G.
Estimating Heights and Atmospheric Delays “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical more sensitive.
Modern Navigation Thomas Herring MW 11:00-12:30 Room A
NGS GPS ORBIT DETERMINATION Positioning America for the Future NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service National Geodetic.
Chapter 8: The future geodetic reference frames Thomas Herring, Hans-Peter Plag, Jim Ray, Zuheir Altamimi.
How Does GPS Work ?. Objectives To Describe: The 3 components of the Global Positioning System How position is obtaining from a radio timing signal Obtaining.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 20 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Katmandu GAMIT/GLOBK Short Course Introduction Thomas Herring, MIT
Introduction to High-Precision GPS Data Analysis: Towards a common language for the workshop.
GPS: Everything you wanted to know, but were afraid to ask Andria Bilich National Geodetic Survey.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 GPS Error Sources: Part 2 –Satellite: ephemeris, clock, S/A, and A/S –Propagation: ionosphere, troposphere, multipath –Receiver:antenna,
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
Extract deep geophysical signals from GPS data analysis Signals and noises inside GPS solutions Network adjustment Time series analysis Search subtle signals.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal (~3:1) so longer.
PENDING & PROPOSED MODEL CHANGES: SESSION RECOMMENDATIONS IGS core products AC modeling documentation Troposphere modeling Higher-order ionospheric corrections.
Short-session Static and Kinematic Processing Short-session static: GAMIT processing, sessions 1-3 hours long Kinematic: TRACK processing, coordinates.
1 SVY 207: Lecture 12 Modes of GPS Positioning Aim of this lecture: –To review and compare methods of static positioning, and introduce methods for kinematic.
Survey-mode measurements and analysis T. A. Herring R.W. King M. A. Floyd Massachusetts Institute of Technology GPS Data Processing and Analysis with GAMIT/GLOBK/TRACK.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 18 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Are thermal effects responsible for micron-level motions recorded at deep- and shallow-braced monuments in a short-baseline network at Yucca Mountain,
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 09 Prof. Thomas Herring Room A;
Water vapour estimates over Antarctica from 12 years of globally reprocessed GPS solutions Ian Thomas, Matt King, Peter Clarke Newcastle University, UK.
Challenges and Opportunities in GPS Vertical Measurements “One-sided” geometry increases vertical uncertainties relative to horizontal and makes the vertical.
Chalmers University of Technology Site-Dependent Electromagnetic Effects in High-Accuracy Applications of GNSS Jan Johansson and Tong Ning Chalmers University.
Modeling Errors in GPS Vertical Estimates Signal propagation effects –Signal scattering ( antenna phase center/multipath ) –Atmospheric delay ( parameterization,
12/12/01Fall AGU Vertical Reference Frames for Sea Level Monitoring Thomas Herring Department of Earth, Atmosphere and Planetary Sciences
IGARSS 2011, Vancuver, Canada July 28, of 14 Chalmers University of Technology Monitoring Long Term Variability in the Atmospheric Water Vapor Content.
Issues in GPS Error Analysis What are the sources of the errors ? How much of the error can we remove by better modeling ? Do we have enough information.
GNSS Tropospheric Products
How Does GPS Work ?. The Global Positioning System 24+ satellites 20,200 km altitude 55 degrees inclination 12 hour orbital period 5 ground control stations.
Errors in Positioning Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
09/24/2008Unavco Track Intro1 TRACK: GAMIT Kinematic GPS processing module R King overview from longer T Herring.
Limits of static processing in a dynamic environment Matt King, Newcastle University, UK.
Thomas Herring, IERS ACC, MIT
Concepts in High Precision Data Analysis
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
Fundamentals of GPS for high-precision geodesy
Fundamentals of GPS for geodesy
Geodesy & Crustal Deformation
WGS-84 Seminar and Workshop
Elevation angle and phase residuals for single satellite
Track Output Interpretation
X SERBIAN-BULGARIAN ASTRONOMICAL CONFERENCE 30 MAY - 3 JUNE, 2016, BELGRADE, SERBIA EARTH ORIENTATION PARAMETERS AND GRAVITY VARIATIONS DETERMINED FROM.
Principles of the Global Positioning System Lecture 14
Track Output Interpretation
Presentation transcript:

Concepts in High-Precision GPS Data Analysis GPS observables Modeling the observations Limits of GPS accuracy Time series analysis

Instantaneous positioning with GPS Receiver solution or sh_rx2apr  Point position ( svpos ) m  Differential ( svdiff ) 3-10 m Your location is: 37 o ’ N 122 o ’ W Instantaneous Positioning with Pseudoranges

High-precision positioning uses the phase observations Long-session static: change in phase over time carries most of the information The shorter the occupation, the more important is ambiguity resolution Each Satellite (and station) has a different signature

Observables in Data Processing Fundamental observations L1 phase = f1 x range (19 cm) L2 phase = f2 x range (24 cm) C1 or P1 pseudorange used separately to get receiver clock offset (time) To estimate parameters use doubly differenced LC = 2.5 L L2 “Ionosphere-free combination” Double differencing removes clock fluctuations; LC removes almost all of ionosphere Both DD and LC amplify noise (use L1, L2 directly for baselines < 1 km) Auxiliary combinations for data editing and ambiguity resolution “Geometry-free combination” or “Extra wide-lane” (EX-WL) (86 cm) LG = L2 - f2/f1 L1 Removes all frequency-independent effects (geometric & atmosphere) but not multipath or ionosphere N2 - N1 “Widelane ambiguities” (86 cm); if phase or PR only, includes ionosphere Melbourne-Wubbena wide-Lane (86 cm): phase/pseudorange combination that removes geometry and ionosphere; dominated by pseudorange noise

Modeling the observations I. Conceptual/Quantitative  Motion of the satellites Earth’s gravity field ( flattening 10 km; higher harmonics 100 m ) Attraction of Moon and Sun ( 100 m ) Solar radiation pressure ( 20 m )  Motion of the Earth Irregular rotation of the Earth ( 5 m ) Luni-solar solid-Earth tides ( 30 cm ) Loading due to the oceans, atmosphere, and surface water and ice ( 10 mm )  Propagation of the signal Neutral atmosphere ( dry 6 m; wet 1 m ) Ionosphere ( 10 m but cancels to few mm most of the time ) Variations in the phase centers of the ground and satellite antennas ( 10 cm) * incompletely modeled

Modeling the observations II. Software structure  Satellite orbit IGS tabulated ephemeris (Earth-fixed SP3 file) [ track ] GAMIT tabulated ephemeris ( t-file ): numerical integration by arc in inertial space, fit to SP3 file, may be represented by its initial conditions (ICs) and radiation-pressure parameters; requires tabulated positions of Sun and Moon  Motion of the Earth in inertial space [ model or track ] Analytical models for precession and nutation (tabulated); IERS observed values for pole position (wobble), and axial rotation (UT1) Analytical model of solid-Earth tides; global grids of ocean and atmospheric tidal loading  Propagation of the signal [ model or track ] Zenith hydrostatic (dry) delay (ZHD) from pressure ( met-file, VMF1, or GPT ) Zenith wet delay (ZWD) [crudely modeled and estimated in solve or track ] ZHD and ZWD mapped to line-of-sight with mapping functions (VMF1 grid or GMT) Variations in the phase centers of the ground and satetellite antennas (ANTEX file)

Parameter Estimation  Phase observations [ solve or track ] Form double difference LC combination of L1 and L2 to cancel clocks & ionosphere Apply a priori constraints Estimate the coordinates, ZTD, and real-valued ambiguities Form M-W WL and/or phase WL with ionospheric constraints to estimate and resolve the WL (L2-L1) integer ambiguities [ autcln, solve, track ] Estimate and resolve the narrow-lane (NL) ambiguities Estimate the coordinates and ZTD with WL and NL ambiguities fixed --- Estimation can be batch least squares [ solve ] or sequential (Kalman filter [ track ]  Quasi-observations from phase solution (h-file) [ globk ] Sequential (Kalman filter) Epoch-by-epoch test of compatibility (chi2 increment) but batch output

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Multipath is interference between the direct and a far-field reflected signal (geometric optics apply) Avoid reflective surfaces Use a ground plane antenna Use a multipath rejection receiver Observe for many hours Remove with average from many days Direct Signal Reflected Signal To mitigate the effects:

Simple geometry for incidence of a direct and reflected signal Multipath contributions to observed phase for three different antenna heights [From Elosegui et al, 1995] 0.15 m Antenna Ht 0.6 m 1 m

Multipath and Water Vapor Effects in the Observations One-way (undifferenced) LC phase residuals projected onto the sky in 4-hr snapshots. Spatially repeatable noise is multipath; time-varying noise is water vapor. Red is satellite track. Yellow and green positive and negative residuals purely for visual effect. Red bar is scale (10 mm).

Antenna Phase Patterns More dangerous are near-field signal interactions that change the effective antenna phase center with the elevation and azimuth of the incoming signal Figures courtesy of UNAVCO Left: Examples of the antenna phase patterns determined in an anechoic chamber…BUT the actual pattern in the field is affected by the antenna mount To avoid height and ZTD errors of centimeters, we must use at least a nominal model for the phase-center variations (PCVs) for each antenna type

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Monuments Anchored to Bedrock are Critical for Tectonic Studies (not so much for atmospheric studies) Good anchoring: Pin in solid rock Drill-braced (left) in fractured rock Low building with deep foundation Not-so-good anchoring: Vertical rods Buildings with shallow foundation Towers or tall buildings (thermal effects)

From Dong et al. J. Geophys. Res., 107, 2075, 2002 Atmosphere (purple) 2-5 mm Water/snow (blue/green) 2-10 mm Nontidal ocean (red) 2-3 mm Annual Component of Vertical Loading

24-hr position estimates over 3 months for station in semi-arid eastern Oregon Random noise is ~1 mm horizontal, 3 mm vertical, but the vertical has ~10- level systematics lasting days which are likely a combination of local water table variations and atmospheric and hydrologic loading

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

GPS Satellite Limits to model are non-gravitational accelerations due to solar and albedo radiation, unbalanced thrusts, and outgassing; and non- spherical antenna pattern

Quality of IGS Final Orbits mm = 1 ppb Source:

Quality of real-time predictions from IGS Ultra-Rapid orbits mm = 1 ppb Source:

Limits of GPS Accuracy  Signal propagation effects Signal scattering ( antenna phase center / multipath ) Atmospheric delay (mainly water vapor) Ionospheric effects Receiver noise  Unmodeled motions of the station Monument instability Loading of the crust by atmosphere, oceans, and surface water  Unmodeled motions of the satellites  Reference frame

Effect of Orbital and Geocentric Position Error/Uncertainty High-precision GPS is essentially relative ! Baseline error/uncertainty ~ Baseline distance x SV or site position error SV altitude SV errors reduced by averaging: Baseline errors are ~ 0.2 orbital error / 20,000 km e.g. 20 mm orbital error = 1 ppb or 1 mm on 1000 km baseline Network (“absolute”) position errors less important for small networks e.g. 5 mm position error ~ 1 ppb or 1 mm on 1000 km baseline 10 cm position error ~ 20 ppb or 1 mm on 50 km baseline * But SV and position errors are magnified for short sessions

Time series analysis: How does the noise affect parameter estimates ? Random (“white”) noise : averages with more observations Temporally and spatially correlated noise : averaging depends on character Outliers : will corrupt the solution if not removed

Secular velocity field IID2 MINE RAMT WOMT Examples of GPS time series Repeating signals Offsets Missing data Outliers WOMT IID2 RAMT MINE Kang Hyeun Ji, MIT thesis, 2011