1837 Pine Street Project Overview 1. 1837 Pine Street - Site Plan 2.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Liberty District Workshop Sacred Cowshands off! Significant historic structures Mildred Terry Library The Liberty Theater Places of Worship Ma Rainey.
Advertisements

City of San José Distinctive Neighborhood Program Policy Options Outreach Presentation.
Agenda Presentation: Background Proposed Corridors Uses Standards & Building Examples Q & A Small Group Discussions Report Back.
Vineland Commercial Site Address: 7626 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7634 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7630 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N )
Proposed CBS Municipal Plan and Development Regulations Amendments for Backlot Development Municipal Plan Amendment No. 9, 2015 Development Regulations.
Planning Legislation – Prof. H. Alshuwaikhat ZONING Zoning is the division of a municipality, city or town into districts for the purpose of regulating.
Planning & Community Development Department 245 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council December 8, 2014.
Planning & Community Development Department Villa Esperanza Services Master Plan September 29, 2014 City Council.
C I T Y O F S A L E M Neighborhood South Salem March 18, 2008 PRESERVATION DISTRICT STUDY.
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT City Council June 3, 2014.
City of New Brighton Planning Commission Meeting October 18, 2005 Agenda Item: 6A (Public Hearing) Special Use Permit for Detached Garage Exceeding 624.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
Legal Regulations for High School Road II BAINBRIDGE ISLAND MUNICIPAL CODES & COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CONDITIONAL USES.
Planning & Community Development Department 277 North El Molino Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting May 5, 2014.
ZOM Newberry/122 nd St. PD. Applicant Request Applicant is requesting a rezoning from RE-1 (single-family residential) to PD (non-residential planned.
Preliminary Development Plan – Continuation of August 28, 2012 BoCC Hearing Board of County Commissioners September 18, 2012.
Neighborhood Commercial on 5601 North Pine Hills Road Small Scale Land Use Amendment Application for.
April 17, 2007 BCC Called Public Hearing on BZA #VA February 1, 2007 Applicant: Towanda Hannah.
3D Computer Study Model: Hillhurst/Sunnyside Richard M. Levy, Ph.D. MCIP.
Community Development Department COUNTRY CLUB HARBOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL-2 AND PARKS & GREENWAYS ZONING DISTRICTS REZONING APPLICATION #2511.
Appeal to Coastal Commission Regarding 3435 Marina Drive as Approval by Santa Barbara City Council, Planning Commission and by the Single Family Review.
Historic Review Board Continued Public Hearing: DR – th St. October 20, 2015.
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
Places of Assembly December 5, 2006 Open Discussion.
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Minor Conditional Use Permit #6003 (1528 Whitefield Road) City Council Meeting.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZREHARING To amend existing Planned Development zone district to allow for mini-warehouse storage.
Lowe’s Site Plan Application No. SP-MAJ Lot 3.
Historic Review Board Public Hearing: DR – th St. September 15, 2015.
Community Development Department Variance to 20 ft. Street Side Setback 1 Windsor Place APP. NO Variance to 20 ft. Street Side Setback 1 Windsor.
Durham Villas Planned Unit Development TSM & REZ Morris Bud Keeney Butte County Board of Supervisors December 11, 2012.
APPEAL OF MCGUIRE RESIDENCES Tuesday, January28, 2014 City Council.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
NORTH 40 SPECIFIC PLAN Advisory Committee Meeting #6 November 3, 2011.
Public Hearing Seattle Ridge Preliminary Plat/ Planned Area Development PP December 18, 2013.
Overview of Residential Reconstruction in Needham Lee Newman Town of Needham Director of Planning and Community Development.
To provide for alcohol-free commercial uses that serve as a transition between commercial districts and one- and two-family residential areas. PURPOSE.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone City Council April 25, 2016.
4650 Alhambra Circle Building Site Separation. Request: The applicant is requesting consideration of a building site separation in accordance with Section.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
Single Family Districts Working with staff, we ultimately settled on two districts.
Small Town Service ~ Community Stewardship ~ Future Focus ALBRIGHT OFFICE PARK Planned Development PD Architecture and Site S Environmental.
Residential Infill Project Scale of Houses (a primer) Stakeholder Advisory Committee October 6, 2015.
1 Gables Gateway. 2 1.Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment 2.Comprehensive Plan Map Amendment 3.Zoning Code Text Amendment 4.Change in Zoning 5.MXD3 Mixed.
Community Development Department MADISON GREEN AND TUSCAN RESERVE MASTER PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT APPLICATION #2616.
Planning and Zoning Division Jefferson County RZ Sevens Residential Memory Care ODP Case Manager: Russell D Clark.
1 City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Adjustment Committee Land Use Review LU AD Adjustment.
206 THIRD STREET DR/TRP Appeal of. Planning Commission Hearing March 12, 2014, P/C approved a Design Review Permit: - Demolition of the existing.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
City of East Palo Alto Planning Commission
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS: CLEARING UP THE CONFUSION
Zoning Code Amendment: Neighborhood District Overlay Zone
City Council Meeting July 17, 2017
Mansionization and Neighborhood Compatibility
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
rezoning Petition # The Drakeford company
Marina Del Palma Comprehensive Plan & Zoning Map Amendment
E Properties & Development Holy Family Project Community Report Back Meeting August 7, 2012 St. Mary’s Lyceum – 6pm.
File No A request for a Site Plan Review to construct a 1,425 square-foot covered balcony, a 14.5 square-foot balcony and a 5,157 square-foot.
Standards for Single Family Residences in Multifamily Zoning Districts
Hotel Conversions Background
Zoning Code Amendment - Emergency Shelters, Limited
Proposed Zoning By-law Amendment & Future Consent Application
City Council Meeting April 23, 2018
Early Experience with HAA & SB 35 Objective Standards Requirements
With funding from the Appalachian Regional Commission
City Commission Workshop
City Council Meeting April 29, 2019
Overlay Districts Presented by: Zina Lagonegro Manager of Zoning
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Presentation transcript:

1837 Pine Street Project Overview 1

1837 Pine Street - Site Plan 2

Home on Front Lot Farmhouse Design - 2,276 Sq. Ft. Main House Sq. Ft. Guest Unit 3

Home on Flag Lot Barnhouse Design - 2,345 Sq. Ft. Main House Sq. Ft. Guest Unit 4

Medium Density Residential Neighborhood Details Prevalence of detached single-family homes The agricultural history has influenced the architectural design of many buildings and homes in the area Eclectic architecture 5

Project Design Highlights Family homes Architecturally designed to keep historical character Eliminated second floor privacy concerns on both homes 6

Required Planning Commission Findings to Approve Parcel Map Creation of flag lot is consistent with neighborhood character and density. Development of flag lot will not result in significant loss of privacy for adjoining residential units. Development of the flag lot will not result in excessive noise, traffic and parking congestion. 7

Privacy 8 Loss of privacy is not a neighbor seeing the new homes.

Steps Taken to Address Privacy Concerns Eliminated and moved windows Raised second floor window sill heights Planted mature olive trees (evergreen) outside all second floor windows with adjacent living space 9

Privacy – Distances to Neighbors 10

Privacy Concerns – Tree Mitigation 11

Privacy – Home on Flag Lot 12 Facing Pott’s Back Yard

Privacy – Home on Flag Lot 13 Facing Casten’s Back Yard

Privacy – Home on Flag Lot 14 Facing Chase’s Back Yards

Privacy – Home on Front Lot 15 Facing Pott’s House

Privacy – Home on Front Lot 16 Facing Chase’s Garage/House

Olive Tree Providing Privacy 17

Why a No Privacy Impact Finding Can And Should Be Made Privacy concerns effectively mitigated by: Olive trees planted or existing trees on property outside all second floor windows with living space Raising second floor window sill heights in flag lot home facing side neighbors Home designs respect and address neighbor’s privacy concerns 18

Character 19

Elements of Neighborhood Character Cultural History of Area Architecture Neighborhood Amenities Transportation Proximity to Business District Common Interest with Neighbors 20

What is the Character of the Homes of West Side of Main Street? Eclectic architecture Predominantly detached single-family residences with one and two-story homes The agricultural history of St. Helena has influenced the design of many buildings and homes Various size and shapes of parcels 21

Eclectic Architecture 22

Eclectic Architecture 23

Eclectic Architecture 24

Eclectic Architecture 25

Eclectic Architecture 26

Eclectic Architecture 27

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 28

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 29

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 30

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 31

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 32

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 33

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 34

Flag Lots With Two-Story Homes 35

Why Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) is Not Appropriate for Assessing Character F.A.R. is the approved current standard for allowable square footage of a home on a specific lot size, not determination for character Using F.A.R. to determine “compatibility” changes the rules and imposes a new standard Using F.A.R. to determine character/compatibility is not approved by the City nor has it been applied to other applicants F.A.R. chart prepared by City staff is erroneous 36

37

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1837 Pine Street -Left off huge carport and garage 38

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1842 Pine Street Staff Used 2,342 Sq. Ft. House / 11,441 Sq. Ft. Lot 39

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 40

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1849 Pine Street Staff Used 1,623 Sq. Ft. House / 12,402 Sq. Ft. Lot Left off 752 Sq. Ft. Garage 41

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1849 Pine Street Staff Used 1,623 Sq. Ft. House / 12,402 Sq. Ft. Lot 42

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1852 Pine Street Staff Used 1,590 Sq. Ft. House / 13,832 Sq. Ft. Lot 43

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1852 Pine Street 44

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1853 Pine Street Staff Used 994 Sq. Ft. House / 6,147 Sq. Ft. Lot 45

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1856 Pine Street Staff Used 3,804 Sq. Ft. House / 11,532 Sq. Ft. Lot 46

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1435 Allyn Avenue Staff Used 2,000 Sq. Ft. House / 18,550 Sq. Ft. Lot 47

Errors in Staff F.A.R. Analysis 1521 Allyn Avenue Staff Used 1,160 Sq. Ft. House / 8,805 Sq. Ft. Lot Did not reduce lot size for access easement to flag lot 48

Staff F.A.R. Analysis Summary Too many errors to use as basis for decision All errors are detrimental to applicant F.A.R. is not an appropriate basis for assessing character 49

Recent Project Approvals in the Medium Residential Zone 1842 Pine Street – F.A.R. ~ 0.29 ** 1334 Stockton Street – F.A.R. ~ 0.34 ** 1318 Stockton Street – F.A.R. ~ 0.30 ** 1213 Stockton Street – F.A.R. ~ 0.32 ** 1720 Vineyard Avenue – F.A.R. ~ 0.42 ** 1611 Madrona Avenue – F.A.R. ~ 0.27 ** 1428 Hudson Avenue – F.A.R. ~ 0.34 ** City approved for two-story homes 50

One vs. Two-Story Homes – Staff Analysis 51

One vs. Two Story – Errors 52

Staff Labeled as One-Story 53

Staff Labeled as One Story 54

Staff Labeled as One Story 55

Staff Labeled as One Story 56

One vs. Two Story – Immediate Neighborhood 57

One vs. Two Story Staff Analysis Summary Mislabeled two-story homes as one-story Mislabeled two undeveloped lots as one- story homes Arbitrary area used for the analysis All errors are detrimental to applicant 58

Lot Size – Staff Analysis 59

Lot Size – Immediate Neighborhood 60

Lot Size – Summary New parcels post split are consistent with lot sizes of immediate neighborhood 61

Architectural Character of Neighborhood 62

Architectural Character of Neighborhood 63

Architectural Character of Neighborhood 64

Architectural Character of Neighborhood 65

Home on Front Lot 66

Home on Flag Lot 67

Conclusion The following findings can and should be made: Building of a two-story home on the flag lot is consistent and compatible with neighborhood west of Main Street. There is no loss of privacy, significant or otherwise, from either front or rear homes. 68