Teacher Evaluation Process Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation

Advertisements

Lee County Human Resources Glenda Jones. School Speech-Language Pathologist Evaluation Process Intended Purpose of the Standards Guide professional development.

Annual Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide.

1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,

MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information. Primary Evaluators All teachers will be assigned one Administrator to be the Primary Evaluator. The primary evaluator.

Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.

Pause for Discussion Multiple pauses are included for discussion opportunities.

North Carolina Professional Teaching Standards Lee County Schools New Hire Training

What is the Educator Development Suite? Provides teachers with the results of classroom observations and student perception surveys Suggests contextualized.

School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Overview Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction

School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public.

Human Resources Dr. Walter Jackson, III Assistant Superintendent

NC Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Online Tool 1.

Teacher PDP for the School Year

Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity A closer look at the Standards School Executive Training.

NC Educator Evaluation System Training for New Administrators Mary Keel, Ed.D Tara Patterson, MSA Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D.

ADMN 6130 Class 5 The faithful teacher is eager to find out every imperfection in the instruction, always on the alert for improvement, dissatisfied with.

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Process and Online Tool Updates Kim Simmons NCDPI Robert Sox NCDPI Lou Cicchinelli McREL October 17, 2012.

TCS Orientation. NC State Board Policy # TCP-004: “Within two weeks of a teacher’s first day of work in any school year, the principal will provide the.

 PAS…. Learning Targets: Administrators will be able to: Understand and Articulate the First Observation Cycle Review and Approve Student Achievement.

Enhancing Teacher Effectiveness Through Quality Evaluation June 9, 2011 ESU 10 Cindy Baum, Kelly Clapp and Denise O’Brien.

Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Teacher Evaluation Patrick Burk, Ph.D. Graduate School of Education Educational Leadership.

Day 1 - July 12,  HR Representatives: ◦ Mark Doane - Exec. Director of HR ◦ Dawn Madren – Dir. of Teacher Recruitment and Induction ◦ Tammy Atkins.

State Board Mission, Goals, and Policies

North Carolina Principals Council Fall 2012 Kimberly Simmons NCDPI Jennifer Preston NCDPI.

NC Educator Effectiveness System NC Educator Effectiveness System Orientation and Training Southern School of Energy and Sustainability.

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction Looking Ahead:

NC Teacher Evaluation Process

N.C. Educator Evaluation System (NCEES) Teacher Evaluation Process January 28, 2013.

Standards IV and VI. Possible Artifacts:  School Improvement Plan  School Improvement Team  North Carolina Teacher Working Conditions Survey  Student.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

MSDWT Teacher Evaluation Information.  The primary evaluator will assign the final rating  The primary evaluator will take the lead on any Performance.

Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.

Using the Online Evaluation Tool with Fidelity Mary Keel, Ed.D. Robin Loflin Smith, Ed.D. Region 2 Professional Development Leads.

Completing the Summary Rating Form and End-of-Year Summative Conferencing.

STANDARD V AND WRAP-UP: NC TEACHER CANDIDATE EVALUATION TRAINING GWU TRAINING SESSION.

Log in before presentation CTE, C & I, Early Learning login: password:

Principals and Assistant Principals New to the NCEES Process September 28, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.

Evaluating the 21 st Century Educator with Fidelity A closer look at the Standards School Executive Training.

NCEES Train the Trainer September 25, 2012 North Carolina Educator Evaluation System.

School Counselor Evaluation RubricEvaluating with Fidelity Linda Brannan, M.Ed, NBCT K-12 Student Support Services Consultant NC Department of Public Instruction.

EVAAS for Teachers: Overview and Teacher Reports Every Student READY.

1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT: PROCESS North Carolina Department of Public Instruction Department of Public Instruction.

HARDING UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL TRANSFORMATION “RAM STYLE”

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner

DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.

Rubrics Principal Evaluation Model Examples. Note… In the state examples given the Principal/Asst. Principal is evaluated by the “Superintendent” or “Designee”

The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012

1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.

Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.

Page 1 Teacher Evaluation Process & Instrument Dale Ellis Bill Long Jed Stus.

Process for Evaluating Teachers. Principal’s Responsibility ManageKnowIdentifyEnsureSupervise.

School Counselor Evaluation Rubric Evaluating with Fidelity Overview of the Evaluation Process and the School Counselor Evaluation Rubric NCDPI Webinar.

Iredell-Statesville Schools Orientation to the North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Instrument & Process

EISD Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System T-TESS

Educator Recruitment and Development Office of Professional Development The NC Teacher Evaluation Process 1.

In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.

Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process

Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

What component is the greatest barrier for you as an evaluator?

Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process

NCEES Process: End-of-Year for Teacher Evaluations

North Carolina Educator Evaluation System

Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS

NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

Presentation transcript:

Teacher Evaluation Process

Component 1: Training Before participating in the evaluation process, all teachers, principals and peer evaluators must complete training on the evaluation process. Component 2: Orientation Within two weeks of teacher’s first day, the principal will provide: A. The Rubric for Evaluating North Carolina Teachers; B. Teacher Evaluation Policy ID Number: TCP-C-004 C. A schedule for completing evaluation process. Before Week 3 of School Year STEP 1: Training and Orientation

Component 4: Pre-Observation Conference Before the first formal observation, the principal meets with the teacher to discuss: self- assessment, professional growth plan a written description of the lesson(s) to be observed. Goal: To prepare principal for the observation. Before First Formal Observation STEP 2: Self-Assessment, Goal Setting and Pre-Conference Component 3: Teacher Self-Assessment Using the Rubric, the teacher shall rate their performance and reflect on his or her performance throughout the year.

Component 5: Observations A. Formal observation: 45 min. or entire class period B. Probationary Teachers: 3 formal by principal and 1 formal by peer C. Career Status Teachers: Evaluated annually. During the renewal year: 3 total- 1 must be formal Observations shall be noted using the Rubric. Within the 1 st nine weeks STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrati ve and Peer) STEP 3: Observation Cycle (Administrative and Peer) Component 6: Post-Observation Conference The principal shall conduct a post-observation conference no later than ten school days after each formal observation. Discuss and Document strengths and weaknesses on the Rubric

Component 7: Summary Evaluation Conference and Scoring the Teacher Summary Rating Form- A. Give rating for each Element in Rubric B. Comment on “Not Demonstrated” C. overall rating of each Standard D. Provide teacher with opportunity to add comments to the Summary Rating Form E. Review completed Teacher Summary Rating Form with teacher and F. Secure the teacher’s signature on the Record of Teacher Evaluation Activities and Teacher Summary Rating Form. Component 8: PD Plans Individual Growth Plans-“Proficient” or better Monitored Growth Plans-At least 1 “Developing” Directed Growth Plans-“not Demonstrated” or “Developing” rating for 2 sequential yrs. Before the End of the School Year STEP 4: Summary Evaluation and Goal Setting