GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, 2003 5BNick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Tracker Subsystem Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, A Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS A: Tracker Test Plan Overview.
Advertisements

GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, ANick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Tracker Subsystem Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT ProjectOctober 14, 2002 Tracker, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS Engineering Meeting Tracker Engineering-Model.
GLAST Large Area Telescope: Manufacturing Preparation Design Engineering Meeting Jerry Clinton 1 April 2003 Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Stanford,
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review – December 2, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren Marsh SLAC Performance & Safety.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 15 Manufacturing & Processes 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing.
GLAST LAT ProjectF2F, June 15, 2005 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Joseph Cullinan SLAC Performance & Safety Assurance Manager.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 16 EEE Parts 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
GLAST LAT ProjectTEM &TEM-PS Manufacturing Readiness Review – September 16, 2004 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Pat Lujan TEM.
GLAST LAT ProjectF-to-F, June 15, TrackerR.P. Johnson 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker, W.B.S Face-To-Face June Meeting Robert Johnson.
GLAST LAT Project May 2, 2007 NCRs and Waivers 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Systems Engineering Test Status, NCRs and Verification Status Pat Hascall Systems.
GLAST Calorimeter SLAC LAT Meeting 17Jul 2003 Naval Research Lab Washington DC wnjohnson 1 SLAC Meeting Calorimeter Subsystem 17 July 2003 W. N. Johnson.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
GLAST LAT Project PDU/GASU MRR 4 February 2005 PART 2 / 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: B. Estey, Production SLAC (650)
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem MCM Production Readiness.
9 March 2004 GIFTS Blackbody Subsystem Critical Design Review Project Plan Status Fred Best & Evan Richards 9 March 2004.
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
THEMIS Mission CDR JacksonUCB, June 14-18, 2004 Critical Design Review THEMIS Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA DAQ Peer Critical Design Review, March 19-20, 2003 Nick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Data Acquisition Subsystem Gamma-ray.
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 8 NCRs were generated during TMCM preproduction NCR #00029, CLOSED.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 N. Virmani Naval Research Lab Washington DC GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
C osmic R Ay T elescope for the E ffects of R adiation PERFORMANCE ASSURANCE BRIAN KLATT MISSION ASSURANCE MANAGER.
GLAST LAT ProjectMay 25, 2006: Pre-Environmental Test Review Presentation 12 of 12 Quality Assurance 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Pre-Environmental Test.
THEMIS Instrument PDRParts- 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 Parts Requirements Preliminary Design Review Jorg Fischer University of California - Berkeley.
GLAST LAT ProjectApril 27, 2006: LAT Pre-Ship Review Presentation 12 of 12 Quality Assurance 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: LAT Pre-Ship Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 15 Manufacturing Process 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing Process.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Schedule Summary; Critical.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 N. Virmani Naval Research Lab Washington DC GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem Gamma-ray.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: EM Mini-Tower Robert Johnson.
Tracker SSD Ladder Preproduction Review Actions and Changes Since Last Week September 16, 2002 Alessandro Brez Robert Johnson.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review – June 30, 2005 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Joseph Cullinan SLAC Performance & Safety.
MRB on SLAC NCR 226 Excess of Disconnected MCM Channels R.P. Johnson November 9, 2004.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 3-4 Sept EFW INST+SOC PDR97 RBSP Electric Field and Waves Instrument (EFW) Product.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, C Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS C: Electronics Module Testing.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 100 EFW DFB Systems Assurance Trent Taylor LASP.
GLAST LAT ProjectCAL Peer Design Review, Mar 17-18, 2003 W. N. Johnson Naval Research Lab Washington DC GLAST Large Area Telescope Calorimeter Subsystem.
GLAST LAT ProjectMonthly Status Review – December 15, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren Marsh SLAC Performance & Safety.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, E Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS E: MCM Assembly Gamma-ray.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Electronic Parts & Materials.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, B Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS B: Silicon Strip Detector.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Peer Critical Design Review, March 19-20, 2003 J. Clinton 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Electronics, Data Acquisition & Instrument.
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 LAT QA has hired a full-time on-site representative (Donald Knaepple)
GLAST LAT ProjectFebruary 10, 2004 R. Johnson Tracker MCM Production Readiness Review 1 Survey & Process Review conducted at Teledyne on Nov. 14, 2003.
THEMIS Instrument PDRMission Assurance- 1 UCB, October 15-16, 2003 THEMIS Mission Assurance Preliminary Design Review Ron Jackson University of California.
LAT-PR GLAST LAT ProjectManufacturing Readiness Review, Oct. 12, 2005 LAT Test Stand Manufacturing Readiness Review 1.Introduction Bill Olson.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
GLAST LAT ProjectFace to Face, 14 April 2004 LAT System Engineering 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: EGSE and Interface Verification Pat Hascall SLAC System.
GLAST LAT ProjectMarch 24, A Tracker Peer Review, WBS GLAST Large Area Telescope: Tracker Subsystem WBS A: Parts and Materials Procurement.
STEREO IMPACT Critical Design Review 2002 November 20,21,22 1 STEREO Product Assurance Ron Jackson
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW CDR /30-10/1 100 EFW DFB Systems Assurance Trent Taylor LASP.
GLAST LAT ProjectTEM/TPS MRR, September 16, DAQ & FSWV1 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: B. Estey, Production SLAC (650)
GLAST LAT ProjectPeer Review & CDR Preparation Document: LAT-PR Preparation Schedule Subsystems Peer Reviews –ACD January 7-8, 2003 –CALMarch.
EFW DFB Systems Assurance
EFW DFB Systems Assurance
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
THEMIS Mission Assurance
ISUAL Product Assurance
University of California - Berkeley
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Presentation transcript:

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Tracker Subsystem Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope 5B: EEE Parts and Electronic Packaging Nick Virmani LAT EEE parts and Electronic Packaging Manager (202)

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 2 Outline EEE Parts Requirements EEE Part Implementation Plan EEE Parts Status Process Flow for ASICs and MCM Fabrication, Screening, and Qualification Radiation Testing Radiation testing Results Electronic Packaging Program ASIC and MCM Documentation Status EEE Parts Issues & Risk Mitigation Manufacturing and Test Process Flow of TKR Hardware

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 3 EEE Parts Requirements Requirements Summary –Parts screening and qualification per GSFC 311-INST-001, Level 2, –Additional requirements outlined in the LAT EEE parts program control plan, LAT-MD –Review and approve EEE Part Lists. –Derate EEE Parts per PPL-21 Review and approve derating information before drawing sign-offs. –Perform stress analysis –Parts Control Board (PCB) Approach, a partnership arrangement with NASA/GSFC parts engineer and code 562.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 4 EEE Parts Implementation Plan Part lists are reviewed and approved by the project PCB prior to flight procurements. Special considerations include: –Radiation evaluation of all active components –Radiation testing (TID and/or SEE ) when necessary –Parts stress analysis –PIND testing on all cavity devices –Destructive Physical Analysis (DPA), when applicable –Mandatory in process inspections and verification on Multi-Chip Modules (MCMs) and other devices as required –Life Testing if Quality Conformance Inspection (QCI) data within one year of the lot being procured is not available –No pure tin, cadmium, and zinc plating is allowed –Vendor surveillance where required.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 5 EEE Parts Implementation Plan Special considerations include cont ’ d: –50V ceramic capacitors require 85 0 C/85RH low voltage testing –Mandatory surge current testing on all tantalum capacitors –MCM testing and verification requires special evaluation as outlined in the EEE parts plan –Age control requirements. Lot Date Code (LDC) older than 5 years requires DPA and room temperature re-screen –Parts traceability from procurement to assembly of board and components. –GIDEP Alerts & NASA Advisories review and disposition from selection of parts until subsystem integration. –Parts Identification list (PIL) includes LDC, MFR, Radiation information on the flight lot

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 6 EEE Parts Status The TKR subsystem EEE parts lists have been reviewed by the PCB all parts have been approved except ASIC screening, MCM screening, flex cable screening and qualification, and cristek connectors. Resettable polyswitch fuse specification LAT-SS was approved by the PCB and will review test data after completion of the tests. All part test data will be reviewed prior to flight assembly by the PCB where applicable. The goal is to approve the remaining parts on the parts lists prior to the CDR Discuss EEE parts availability weekly, to support fabrication schedule. Perform 100% incoming inspection as per defined procedures.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 7 EEE Parts Status Performed stress analysis of most of the approved parts on the parts lists and they meet derating criteria after stress application. Will complete the remaining analysis by the CDR. Perform screening and qualification tests as required per approved procedure. Hold regular meeting with GSFC Parts Engineer to resolve any parts-related issues and approve parts though the Parts Control Board (PCB). Attribute data for screening and lot specific qualification/QCI data shall be reviewed for acceptance of parts for flight. Parts Identification List (PIL) and As-built parts lists is maintained and will be submitted to GSFC.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 8 Process Flow for ASICs and MCM Fabrication, Screening, and Qualification WAFERS RECEIVE FROM MOSIS USING AGILENT PROCESS INSPECTION WAFER LAPPING MOUNT PROCEDURE WAFER SAW PROCEDURE OPTICAL QC GATE 2 ND OPTICAL INSPECTION PACK DIE IN WAFFLE PACK OR GEL PACK FOR SHIPPING TO TELEDYNE WITH DATA PACKAGE & TRACEABILITY CONTROL MONITORS FOR RADIATION SAMPLE RADIATION TESTING 100% INSPECTION Wafer Probe 100% Sort dies Wafer Probe Procedure Receive/Inspect ASIC die in waffle or gel packs, PWBs and parts, record data at Teledyne VERIFY ADHESION AND INSPECTION Clean/Bake PWBs as per NASA-STD BOND PITCH ADAPTER FLEX CIRCUIT DPA & Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Inspection

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 9 Process Flow for ASICs and MCM Fabrication, Screening, and Qualification

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 10 Clean Die Bonding Surfaces of PWB Plasma and Local cleaning (IPA) Apply Die Attach Material to PWB (MCM) Die Attach Material Cure per Manufacturer’s Suggestions Plasma Clean PWB and Die Bonding Surfaces for Wedge Wire Bonding Wirebond of ASIC die and MCM PWB Die Attach Monitor In Process Wirebond Pull Testing on samples and Monitor COB Die Placement on the PWB Install connectors by hand-soldering Functional Testing and verification of MCM as per test program * Rework or replace dies if required 100% Optical Inspection * Test all register and memory locations, all I/O functions, including LVDS bias levels, all inter- chip communication, power consumption, all amplifiers by charge injection and test the trigger output, and for excessive noise or instabilities. Rework, if required Encapsulate ASIC die and bond areas Process Flow for ASICs and MCM Fabrication, Screening, and Qualification

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani % Inspection Full Functional Testing using configured software test & EGSE Pack each MCM individually in the ESD container with pigtail hanging outside of the container for testing MCM ready functional test & environmental test Conformal Coat 100% thermal cycling –30 to +85 degrees C, unpowered Clean Functional Testing 100% Visual Inspection 100% Dynamic burn-in at 85 degrees C with continuous monitoring for 168 hours 100% Inspect Review results data package Process Flow for ASICs and MCM Fabrication, Screening, and Qualification

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani % Visual Inspection Present data to the Parts Control Board (PCB) Screening & Qualification MCM ready for next step and sample selection for qualification Select 38 MCMs from screened lot Radiograph 2 samples and DPA on 1 sample Store MCM in nitrogen purge storage 100% powered thermal cycling –30 to +85 degrees C, 100 cycles Obtain approval from PCB 100% Visual inspection 100% Dynamic burn-in testing for 240 hours 100% Visual Inspection Thermal Vac testing for 10 samples, 12 cycles Process Flow for ASICs and MCM Fabrication, Screening, and Qualification

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 13 Vibration Testing 10 samples 100% Visual Inspection Review of Data PCB Approval Radiograph CSAM & DPA Functional Testing Process Flow for ASICs and MCM Fabrication, Screening, and Qualification

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 14 Radiation Testing All EEE parts are being reviewed by PCB and screened for radiation susceptibility against the radiation specification defined in GLAST IRD-433-SPEC-001. Requirements: –Total dose requirement, including standard factor of 2 safety margin is 4.5 Krad (Si) for 5 years behind 100 mils Aluminum. –Our goal is to test all parts up to 10 Krads (Si). –SEE Damage – no SEE shall cause permanent damage to the subsystem.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 15 Radiation Testing SEE Rate and Effects Analysis: –SEE rates and effects shall take place based on threshold LET (LETth) as follows: SEE immune is defined as a device have an LETth > 37 MeV*cm 2 /mg –Our goal is to test each part to this specification. Device ThresholdEnvironment to be Assessed LETth < 15 MeV*cm 2 /mgCosmic Ray, Trapped Protons, Solar Heavy Ion and Proton LETth =15-37 MeV*cm 2 /mg LETth > 37 MeV*cm 2 /mg Cosmic Ray, Solar Heavy Ion No analysis required

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 16 Radiation Testing Results Radiation testing was performed on engineering parts produced using similar processes and materials. An earlier version of ASICs tested and met requirements. No outstanding issues

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 17 Electronic Packaging Program Electronic Packaging, Manufacturing, Test, and Process Control program –Manufacturing, Assembly, and Quality Control of electronic system will be in compliance to the NASA technical standards: NASA-STD , NASA-STD , NASA- STD , NASA-STD , NASA-STD , and IPC & Rigid MCM PWBs shall meet the requirements of LAT Procurement Specification, LAT-DS based on Mil- PRF-55110, Revision F, and GSFC S-312-P-003 with a minimum internal annular ring of 0.002”. Flex circuit and cables shall meet requirement of LAT-PS and IPC 6013 class 3. Coupons shall be submitted to GSFC for evaluation.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 18 Electronic Packaging Program PWB Coupon will be analyzed by GSFC prior to flight assembly. Particular attention will be paid to the quality of workmanship, soldering, welding, wiring, marking of parts and assemblies, plating and painting. Verification of flight hardware will be performed by NASA certified and qualified personnel other than the original operator. An item inspection will be performed on each component to verify: –Configuration is as specified on each component drawing/specification. –Workmanship standards have been met. –Test results are acceptable

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 19 ASIC and MCM Documentation Status Wafer Procurement from MOSIS / Agilent –LAT-PS-1279: Overview –LAT-PS-1201: Front-end readout chip (GTFE) approved by PCB –LAT-PS-1222: Readout controller chip (GTRC) approved by PCB –LAT-PS-1250: wafer probing, review in process –LAT-PS-01321: wafer lapping, dicing, and inspection, review in process. –LAT-TD-1325: Radiation testing, to be reviewed. Several other documents such as MCM assembly, SMT assembly, part procurements are in draft format and shall be released by CDR. Final board prototypes were recently produced and are being tested: –PWB: loaded with parts and new ASICs for functional testing –Pitch Adapter: Teledyne is bonding 3 of them to MCMs to check that the new design works –Bias: sent to Italy for review

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 20 EEE Parts Issues & Risk Mitigation MCM board qualification and handling. –To mitigate this risk, processes, procedures, qualification plan, and vendor verification plan is in process and will ensure they are implemented successfully. Pitch adapter flex gluing and alignment accuracy when bonding to PWB. –To mitigate this risk, processes will be verified and controls will be implemented at Teledyne. Flight ASICs testing –To mitigate this risk, all processes and procedures are being approved. Test software is being improved, which will be used for verification. MCM Assembly and Verification –To mitigate this risk, manufacturing readiness reviews will be performed and mandatory inspection points will be selected.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 21 EEE Parts Issues & Risk Mitigation Flex Cable to LAT-PS-01132, defines procurement and qualification requirements. –To mitigate this risk EM flex cable will be manufactured to this specification and will be qualified. –A visit to the vendor (Parlex) is planned for early April, together with GSFC representatives. Flex Cable Assembly. –To mitigate risk a detailed procedure being written & EM flex will be assembled and will be tested prior to flight production. Radiation Testing & Plans –To mitigate risk GSFC is involved in approving plans but radiation plans yet not approved.

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 22 Connectors Nano-connectors: Omnetics was recently approved and the parts are now on order, including the connector savers. Micro-D connectors: Kristek connectors are not yet approved, but we don’t expect any difficult issues. On MCM On cable Larger 080 screws

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 23 SMT Parts HV capacitors: Novacap – –Procurement spec: LAT-PS – –On order for the Tracker and Calorimeter Polyswitches: Raychem (Tycho) – –Procurement spec: LAT-SS – –A sample lot was already procured and all testing performed, so no surprised are expected in the flight lot – –Recently finalized and approved, and the parts are on order – –Long process of testing at UCSC and discussions with the vendor 100% of parts: screening after thermal cycle 10% of parts: more extensive tests after soldering Smaller sample for qualification testing at UCSC Ceramic & tantalum capacitors: approved with no issues Resistors: approved with no issues Thermistor: approved with no issues

GLAST LAT ProjectTKR Peer Design Review, Mar 24-25, BNick Virmani 24 Manufacturing and Test Process Flow for Tracker Hardware Pre-ProductionProcurementFabricationAssembly - -Initial Quality Planning - -Design Reviews - -Critical Components - -Documentation Reviews - -Lessons Learned - -Quality Criteria - -Design Requirements - -Workmanship Standard - -Training and Certification - -Pre-award surveys - -Supplier Evaluation - -Purchase Document Review - -Source inspection where applicable - -Critical Components - -Nonconforming Material Control - -Manufacturing Reviews - -Work instructions and procedures - -Calibration - -Process Readiness - -Nonconforming Material Control - -Inspection - -Material Review Board - -Audits - -Work instructions, procedures, and travellers - -Audits - -Configuration verification - -Inspection Integration & Test - -Test Readiness Review - -Nonconforming material control - - Previous Operation Audits - -Component Data/Subsystem packages - -Test Procedures - -Test Monitoring - -Data Review - -Closeout of open NCMRs. Storage & Shipping - -Storage and Shipping Requirements - -Inspection and storage shipping controls - -Data Package Reviews - -Audits