Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiochemical Methods and Data Evaluation
Advertisements

Why Lab. Certification? Laboratory certification tries to insure that the laboratory is qualified and capable of analyzing the sample and obtaining quality.
LABORATORY CERTIFICATION & DATA QUALITY MICHAEL W. MILLER, Ph.D. NJ-DEP Office of Quality Assurance
Contracting for Laboratory Services Ann Mullin Cleveland US Geological Survey Presented to the Environmental Protection Agency Science Advisory Board April.
UNDERSTANDING ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY/QC REPORTS Maya Murshak – Merit Laboratories, Inc.
Chemometric Working Group Recommendations and Summary of Discussion.
1 MARLAP, MARSSIM and RETS- REMP: How is All of this Related…or NOT? Robert Litman, Ph.D. Eric L. Darois, MS, CHP Radiation Safety & Control Services,
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
Overview of the Board’s Quality Management Plan. Topics in this Session  Quality System Overview  Overview of the contents of the Board’s Quality Management.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP The Uniform Federal Policy for Implementing Environmental Quality Systems (UFP-QS) Emile I. Boulos.
CENDI/NFAIS Quality Workshop: The Importance of Quality and Integrity Kevin Kirby, Enterprise Data Architect US Environmental Protection Agency Office.
More CMM Part Two : Details.
MARSSIM Revision 2 Request for Input Public Meeting February 10, 2011 Kathryn Snead MARSSIM Workgroup Chair.
Projects to Help Implement The Monitoring Council’s Framework March 26, 2003.
Addressing Uncertainty in Radiochemistry Measurements M. C. Nichols, CHP RETS-REMP meeting.
Importance of Quality Assurance Documentation and Coordination with Your Certified Laboratory Amy Yersavich and Susan Netzly-Watkins.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT Unit 4: Module 13, Lecture 3.
Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological Instrumentation and Observations Techniques QA and QC Procedures Short Course on Introduction to Meteorological.
Quality Assurance/Quality Control Policy
DQOs and the Development of MQOs Carl V. Gogolak USDOE Environmental Measurements Lab.
ISO 9000 Certification ISO 9001 and ISO
The Molecular Diagnostics Research Laboratory University of Malaya Development and Implementation of a Quality System The Molecular Diagnostics Research.
QA/QC FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENT
REGIONAL PEER REVIEW PANELS (PRP) August Peer Review Panel: Background  As a requirement of the ESEA waiver, ODE must establish a process to ensure.
An introduction to the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program Sally Bruce, Chief for the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program.
Lecture 7 Analytical Quality Control
Implementation of DOE Order 450.1: Self-Declaration and Report Letters Steven R. Woodbury US Department of Energy March 9, 2005.
1 of 23 From Qualitative Concept to Practical Implementation Evolution of the Data Quality Objectives Concept DQO Training Course Day 1 Module 1 15 minutes.
Understanding and Implementing SWAMP Comparability: Quality Assurance SWAMP Quality Assurance Help Desk Quality Assurance Research.
WWLC Standard Operating Procedures Presented by Frank Hall, Laboratory Certification Coordinator.
A Comprehensive Computer Application for Managing Sample Planning, Electronic Data Manipulation and Data Validation and Verification in Support of the.
Software Quality Assurance Lecture 4. Lecture Outline ISO ISO 9000 Series of Standards ISO 9001: 2000 Overview ISO 9001: 2008 ISO 9003: 2004 Overview.
1 MARLAP SCIENCE ADVISORY BOARD CHAPTERS 6 & 7 Stan Morton DOE-RESL April 2002.
DOEEPADoDDOEEPADoDDOE EPADoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPA DoDDOEEPADoDDOEEPADoD 1 The Intergovernmental Data Quality Task Force (IDQTF) April 2004 Presented By: James.
Fundamentals of Writing an Effective QAP Presentation to: KWWOA April 15, 2013 Department for Environmental Protection Energy & Environment Cabinet To.
Current Inspection Process for Operators of Hazardous Liquids Pipelines Rod Seeley OPS SW Region Director May 18, 2005.
Quality Assurance Plan (QAP) Department for Environmental Protection Environmental & Public Protection Cabinet To Protect and Enhance Kentucky’s Environment.
Introduction The past, the present and the future.
Quality assurance / Quality control system for the Greek GHG emissions inventory Yannis Sarafidis, Elena Georgopoulou UNFCCC Workshop on National Systems.
FDA Recommendations: Sampling Plans for Blood Establishments Lore Fields MT(ASCP)SBB Consumer Safety Officer OBRR/CBER/FDA October 19, 2012.
Product Documentation Chapter 5. Required Medical Device Documentation  Business proposal  Product specification  Design specification  Software.
The Radionuclides Rule Analytical Issues and Considerations John Griggs U.S. EPA Office of Radiation and Indoor Air National Air and Radiation Environmental.
Quality Activity Matrix Presented by Sandra Toalston President, SanSeek 1.
1 of 36 Managing Uncertainty with Systematic Planning for Environmental Decision Making 3-Day DOE DQO Training Day 1.
Office of Pipeline Safety Integrity Management Inspection Process Louisiana Pipeline Safety Seminar August 2003.
Science Advisory Board Review of the Implementation of the Agency-Wide Quality System February 25, 1999 EPA-SAB-EEC-LTR
BPA M&V Protocols Overview of BPA M&V Protocols and Relationship to RTF Guidelines for Savings and Standard Savings Estimation Protocols.
EPA’s Bioassessment Performance and Comparability “Guidance”
National Water Quality Monitoring Council Methods and Data Comparability Board Advisory Committee on Water Information Herb Brass September 15, 2004.
P1516.4: VV&A Overlay to the FEDEP 20 September 2007 Briefing for the VV&A Summit Simone Youngblood Simone Youngblood M&S CO VV&A Proponency Leader
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
An overview of the MARPA Shared Services Best Practices Guidebook and Regionalization Best Practices Website BEST PRACTICES for SHARED SERVICES Merrimack.
Introduction to the EPA 7-Step DQO Process
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
An Overview of EPA’s Quality Assurance Guidance for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Data Data Analysis and Interpretation February 12 – 14, 2008, Tempe,
Road Map Who am I? NEFAP – A History What is NEFAP? Why NEFAP? The Standard and the FDEP SOPs How does a FSMO get accredited? 2.
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
Evaluation Requirements for MSP and Characteristics of Designs to Estimate Impacts with Confidence Ellen Bobronnikov February 16, 2011.
Overview of EPA Quality System Requirements. Course Goals At the completion of this course, you will: Understand EPA's quality system requirements Understand.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)1 II. Scoping. EIAScreening6(Gajaseni, 2007)2 Scoping Definition: is a process of interaction between the interested public,
MARLAP Measurement Uncertainty Workshop
RCA Project on Establishing a Benchmark for Assessing the Radiological Impact of Nuclear Power Activities on the Marine Environment in the Asia and Pacific.
Unified Approach to Stormwater Monitoring (UASM)
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
SDWA Collaborative Efforts Overview
European Commission, DG Environment Air & Industrial Emissions Unit
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

Multi-Agency Radiological Laboratory Analytical Protocols Manual: MARLAP Presentation to the Radiation Advisory Committee/Science Advisory Board April 23, 2002 Presenter: John Griggs U.S. EPA

Description of MARLAP  A multi-agency guidance manual for project planners and managers and radioanalytical laboratories  Participants include: EPA, DOE, NRC, DOD, NIST, USGS, FDA, Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of California

Consequences of Current Lack of Guidance  Existing data frequently not adequate for decision making  Increased likelihood of repeated analyses and additional cost  Potential erosion of public confidence in work performed at sites

Goal of MARLAP  Ultimate goal of MARLAP is to provide guidance and a framework:  to assure that laboratory radioanalytical data meet a program's or project's specific needs and requirements

MARLAP Objectives  Providing a framework and an information resource for using a performance-based approach for radioanalytical laboratory work  Promoting a directed planning process involving radioanalytical laboratory expertise  Providing guidance on how to link project planning, implementation and assessment from an analytical perspective

MARLAP Objectives (cont'd)  Making collective knowledge and experience in radioanalytical laboratory work widely available  Providing guidance on obtaining and evaluating laboratory services

MARLAP  Written for project managers and planners and radioanalytical laboratory personnel  Consistent with relevant guidance such as ISO, ANSI, ASTM, and agency documents  Performance-based approach instead of a prescribed approach

Data Collection Activities Which MARLAP Supports  Cleanup of Contaminated Sites  Environmental Monitoring  Waste Management  Site Characterization  Post-Accident Response  Background Studies

DQOs and MQOs  Data Quality Objectives (DQOs)  Outputs of a directed planning process  Address sampling and analytical uncertainties  Measurement Quality Objectives (MQOs)  Project-specific requirement for select analytical parameters (e.g., method uncertainty, detection limit)  Analytical portion of the DQOs

MQOs  Example Analytical Parameters  Method Uncertainty  Method’s Detection Capability  Method’s Quantification Capability  Example MQO  A standard uncertainty of 0.10 pCi/g or less is required at the action level of 1.0 pCi/g

Role of MQOs  Method selection and evaluation  Criteria for method selection  Basis for method performance demonstration  Ongoing data and performance evaluation  Criteria for QC and PE samples  Criteria for select sample parameters (e.g., measurement uncertainty)  Final data evaluation  Criteria for data validation  Analytical criteria for data quality assessment (DQA)

Deriving MQOs from DQOs  Key inputs to the process  Action level  Gray region  Information on matrix and analyte  Establishing MQOS – MARLAP provides:  Mathematical framework  General rules and recommendations

Manual Outline  Part 1  Ch.1 Introduction  Ch.2 Project Planning Process  Ch.3 Key Analytical Planning Issues  Ch.4 Project Plan Documents  Ch.5 Obtaining Laboratory Services  Ch.6 Selection and Application of an Analytical Method  Ch.7 Evaluating Methods and Laboratories  Ch.8 Radiochemical Data Verification and Validation  Ch.9 Data Quality Assessment

Manual Outline  Part 2  Ch.10 Field and Sampling Issues  Ch.11 Sample Receipt, Inspection and Tracking  Ch.12 Laboratory Sample Preparation  Ch.13 Sample Dissolution  Ch.14 Separation Techniques  Ch.15 Nuclear Counting Instrumentation  Ch.16 Instrument Calibration and Source Preparation  Ch.17 Data Acquisition, Reduction and Reporting  Ch.18 Laboratory Quality Control  Ch.19 Measurement Statistics  Ch.20 Laboratory Waste Management

Manual Review Schedule  Internal federal/state February-July 2000 agency reviews completed  Manual was revised based July 2001 on 2,000+ review comments  Available for peer and Currently underway public review

Next Steps  Revise manual based on public and peer review comments  Develop an Executive Summary – “MARLAP Roadmap”  Finalize glossary  Develop implementation tools Training courses Software programs Detailed example scenarios