Social and Behavioral Sciences Assignment 2

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Why Are We Unhealthy? Adrian Dominguez Bob Lutz.
Advertisements

Kentucky Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Monitoring the health of Kentuckians: “A look at Mental Health Data” February 8, 2007.
Lindsay Chase-Lansdale, Andrew Cherlin and Kathleen Kiernan
Data Collection Methods In Transportation Planning Part 2.
Survey Research & Understanding Statistics
Washington State Prevention Summit Analyzing and Preparing Data for Outcome-Based Evaluation Using the Assigned Measures and the PBPS Outcomes Report.
Epidemiology Assignment 1
Lesson 3-1.  TSW explain the difference between life expectancy and quality of life.  TSW describe factors that can affect quality of life.  TSW assess.
Environmental Health Sciences Assignment 1 Review of an Article on Determinants of Quality of Life for People with Asthma.
Important Determinants of Job Stress. Introduction Stress is the body's reaction to a change that requires a physical, mental or emotional adjustment.
Social and Behavioral Sciences Assignment 1 Health Behavior Impact on Health- Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): Article Review and Behavioral Science Intervention.
Health Policy and Management Assignment 1 Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Surveillance Summary Policy Brief.
A Survey of Quality of Life Following Surgery for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Reflects the patients’ commitment to Learning about the Disease D A Raffle,
Chapter 12. Observational and Survey Research Methods Chapter Objectives Distinguish between naturalistic and participant observation methods Articulate.
The healthy immigrant effect in Canada: a longitudinal perspective using National Population Health Surveys Edward Ng (a), Russell Wilkins, (a, b) and.
1 Core Concepts: CDC Ethics Hypothesis Human subjects Prevalence rate Person, place, and time Surveillance Survey questions Lessons: 1-1 Introduction to.
Parents’ Overall Quality of Life is Negatively Affected by Having a Child with Feeding Problems Amy J. Majewski 1, Alisha M. Neu 1, Gustavo R. Medrano.
Sleepless in America: Inadequate Sleep and Relationships to Health and Well- being of our Nation’s Children Arlene Smaldone, DNSc, CPNP, CDE Judy C. Honig,
Tabulate, chart, map, download: Pre-tabulated health indicators.
The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2013 The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2013 National, State, and Local Data National.
Core Concepts: CDC Ethics Hypothesis Human subjects Prevalence rate Person, place, and time Surveillance Survey questions Lessons: 1-1 Introduction to.
Overview of Phase I Data: Approach and Findings Gary Bess Associates April 15, 2009.
Bureau of Nutrition and Physical Activity Leadership for a Healthy Arizona Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Weight Status Arizona Adults and Youth August.
Instrumentation.
A Comprehensive Approach to the Measurement of Health Outcomes Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine November 25, 2008 K30 Track II Module Gonda.
Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association The Way Forward Initiative - Topline Results (National vs. Ontario) February 7, 2014.
1 BA 275 Quantitative Business Methods Housekeeping Introduction to Statistics Elements of Statistical Analysis Concept of Statistical Analysis Statgraphics.
BRFSS and Caregiver Advocacy Katie Maslow Alzheimer’s Association March 18, 2009.
The Indiana Youth Survey Insert Your Name, Title and Organization.
Study of the day Misattribution of arousal (Dutton & Aron, 1974)
STAGES OF SOCIAL RESEARCH Formulation of the Research Problem Research Design Measurement 1.Select variables of interest 2.Identify types and levels of.
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Section 1 Els R. Nieuwenhuijsen, PhD, MPH, OTR.
Validity and Reliability Example of Past Paper Answer – 2007 Q6.
Los Angeles County Health Survey Department of Health Services, Public Health Assessing Healthy People 2010 Goals for People with Disabilities.
PHSB 612: Interventions Diane M. Dowdy, Ph.D. Spring 2008.
New Lesson 1-5: Creating a Surveillance Question 1 Core Concepts: CDC Ethics Hypothesis Human subjects Prevalence rate Person, place, and time Surveillance.
The Health and Wellbeing Study: An Investigation into the Perceived Health and Wellbeing of Irish Adults Living with Asthma in Ireland Dr Mary Hughes,
The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2011 The Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System (YRBSS): 2011 National, State, and Local Data National.
The experience of Denmark with global disability questions in surveys Ola Ekholm & Henrik Brønnum-Hansen, National Institute of Public Health, University.
New Lesson 1-7: Surveillance Studies – In Class Core Concepts: CDC Ethics Hypothesis Human subjects Prevalence rate Person, place, and time Surveillance.
Age Adjustment Issues in Healthy People 2010 John Aberle-Grasse, MPH National Center for Health Statistics.
Hermann P. G. Schneider, Alastair H. MacLennan and David Feeny
Obesity Trends Among U.S. Adults between 1985 and 2003 Source of the data: The data shown in these maps were collected through CDC’s Behavioral Risk Factor.
Citations Source: BRFSS, CDC. Source: Mokdad A H, et al. JAMA 1999;282:16. Source: Mokdad A H, et al. JAMA 2001;286:10. Source: Mokdad A H, et al. JAMA.
Obesity Trends Among U.S. Adults between 1985 and 2004 Definitions: Obesity: having a very high amount of body fat in relation to lean body mass, or Body.
Surveillance and Surveys Higher Blood pressure among Inuit migrants in Denmark than among Inuit in Greenland Bjerregaard et al.
Health Related Quality of Life: Prevalence and Its Associate on the Intention to Leave Nursing Career. Nittaya Phosrikham.
New Lesson 1-6: Respect – Part I 1 Core Concepts: CDC Ethics Hypothesis Human subjects Prevalence rate Person, place, and time Surveillance Survey questions.
Overlap between Subjective Well-being and Health-related Quality of Life. 3 Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. (Alina Palimaru) November 18, 2015 (11:30-12:00 noon) Geriatric.
Center for Children with Special Needs 1 What can the Behavior Risk Factor Surveillance System do for Children with Special Health Care Needs? Jacquie.
Disability, Cigarette Smoking And Health-Related Quality Of Life: NYS Adult Tobacco Survey Harlan R. Juster, PhD Larry L. Steele, PhD Theresa M. Hinman,
School of Nursing Health Literacy Among Informal Caregivers of Persons With Memory Loss Judith A. Erlen, PhD, RN, FAAN; Jennifer H. Lingler, PhD, RN; Lisa.
Bell Ringer What would you like to learn about in health this semester?
Considerations in Comparing Groups of People with PROs Ron D. Hays, Ph.D. UCLA Department of Medicine May 6, 2008, 3:45-5:00pm ISPOR, Toronto, Canada.
Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Impacts on a First Cohort of Fifth-Grade Students June 8, 2009 IES Annual Research.
Health Policy and Management Assignment 2 State and Community Health Profiles Health Disparity Policy Brief.
Healthand Quality of Life BIOPSYCHOSOCIAL MODEL OF WELL-BEING.
Epidemiology Assignment 2
Biostatistics Assignment 1 Analysis of Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA) data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 2007.
Quantitative research Meeting 7. Research method is the most concrete and specific part of the proposal.
Data Coaching Services Types of Data 1. 2 o Qualitative Data vs. o Quantitative Data o Where do student and teacher data fall within these categories?
© 2009 Pearson Prentice Hall, Salkind. Chapter 5 Measurement, Reliability and Validity.
Table 1. Methodological Evaluation of Observational Research (MORE) – observational studies of incidence or prevalence of chronic diseases Tatyana Shamliyan.
Table 1. Characteristics of generic HRQOL assessments in adult physical activity research Peter D. Hart et al. Systematic Review of Health-Related Quality.
Citations Source: BRFSS, CDC.
Obesity Trends* Among U.S. Adults BRFSS,
Summary of Slide Content
American Public Health Association San Francisco, California
Presentation transcript:

Social and Behavioral Sciences Assignment 2 Needs Assessment to Identify Disparities in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Note: CDC publications are in the public domain: that is, they are not copyrighted and can be copied and distributed without permission. The wording and the arrangement of these publications can be changed. No permission from the CDC, charges, or licensing fees are necessary to use these publications.

Presentation Overview Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL): concepts and measurement CDC HRQOL Surveillance Program’s Healthy Days Measures State trends in unhealthy days Assignment overview: Needs assessment and disparities in HRQOL Introduction and outline of the presentation. 3 primary components of presentation include an overview of QOL, HRQOL, and the CDC’s Healthy Days Measures, relevant data resulting from use of the measures, and assignment instructions.

Measuring Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Broad outcome measures designed to measure physical, emotional, and social dimensions of health (McDowell & Newell, 1996). No one definition of HRQOL is agreed upon, but generally assessed with generic measures (e.g., Short-Form 36) or disease-specific measures (e.g., Quality of Life in Epilepsy Scale-10 (Ware & Sherbourne, 1992; Cramer et al., 1996). Quality of Life Instruments Database (QOLID): Online database of generic and disease-specific measures. http://www.proqolid.org Introduce the concept of HRQOL and its measurement. There are varying definitions for HRQOL. There are many ways and scales with which to measure HRQOL depending on one’s needs. Generally, each scale has its advantages and disadvantages that make it more or less advantageous to use depending on the scenario in question. See the provided link for a database of QOL scales.

What is Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL)? For public health surveillance purposes, HRQOL was defined as…“an individual’s or group’s perceived physical and mental health over time.” (Measuring Healthy Days, CDC 2000) http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol http://www.cdc.gov/brfss This slide presents a definition of HRQOL as defined by CDC. Links: 1st link is to the CDC’s HRQOL Surveillance Program homepage; 2nd link is to the CDC BRFSS homepage. The Healthy Days Measures are administered as part of the annual BRFSS. 4

This is CDC’s HRQOL Surveillance Program’s homepage. Use this slide just to familiarize the class with the website and what it contains. Note the definition of HRQOL in the main paragraph.

Core Healthy Days Measures 1. Would you say that in general your health is excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor? 2. Now thinking about your physical health, which includes physical illness and injury, for how many days during the past 30 days was your physical health not good? 3. Now thinking about your mental health, which includes stress, depression, and problems with emotions, for how many days during the past 30 days was your mental health not good? 4. During the past 30 days, for about how many days did poor physical or mental health keep you from doing your usual activities, such as self-care, work, or recreation? These are the 4 core Healthy Days measures (HRQOL-4) used in the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) and the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). While there are other Healthy Days measures that are sometimes included in these surveys (Activity Limitations module (4 questions), Healthy Days Symptoms module (5 questions)) (see http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/hrqol14_measure.htm), these are 4 core questions that are most widely used.

Unhealthy Days = days in the past 30 days when both physical and mental health were not good = Physically unhealthy day = Mentally unhealthy day = Healthy day This graphic provides an idea as to how physically, mentally, and overall unhealthy days are calculated from the questions on the previous slide. Unhealthy days are an estimate of the overall number of days during the previous 30 days when the respondent felt that either his or her physical or mental health was not good. To obtain this estimate, responses to questions 2 and 3 are combined to calculate a summary index of overall unhealthy days, with a logical maximum of 30 unhealthy days. For example, a person who reports four physically unhealthy days and two mentally unhealthy days is assigned a value of six unhealthy days, and someone who reports 30 physically unhealthy days and 30 mentally unhealthy days is assigned the maximum of 30 unhealthy days. The majority of individuals report substantially different numbers of physically unhealthy days versus mentally unhealthy days; for example, in the 1998 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), 67.8% of the 68,619 adults who reported any unhealthy days reported only physically unhealthy days or mentally unhealthy days.

Trends in Unhealthy Days in the U.S., BRFSS 1996-2008 1996-1998 1999-2001 2002-2008 Mean number of unhealthy days Shows state trends in mean number of unhealthy days over time. The maps indicate that, generally speaking, most states are displaying a trend of increasing number of unhealthy days in an average month over time. Relevance: students are being asked to calculate mean number of unhealthy days in a small group sample and compare to state estimates. 0 - 4.9 5.0 - 6.0 > 6.0 Source: CDC HRQOL Program, 2009

Assignment Instructions: Select a group (≤ 20 people within the class or school, among friends or family members) with which to perform a needs assessment. Using the CDC HRQOL Surveillance Program’s Healthy Days measures (four core questions available at http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/methods.htm) and various demographic variables (e.g., gender, age, race), develop a questionnaire for either verbal or written administration. After completing data collection, calculate the mean number of physically, mentally, and overall unhealthy days for the sample by subgroups. Using the HRQOL Program’s Prevalence Data Page (available at http://apps.nccd.cdc.gov/HRQOL/), compare the local findings to state estimates (e.g., mean number of unhealthy days in females in your sample vs. the state estimates for female unhealthy days). Instructions for the student assignment See http://www.cdc.gov/hrqol/methods.htm#calculate for information on how to calculate number of unhealthy days

Instructions continued: Based on your observations, explain observed differences, if any, between the group findings and state estimates. According to your data, propose a theoretically-based intervention (choose a health behavior theory with which you are familiar), for the surveyed group to improve HRQOL. Write a paper (4-5 pages) that (a) describes the methods, findings, and interpretation of your findings on HRQOL in the sample you studied; and (b) explains the similarities or differences between the findings for your sample and comparable state estimates in the most recent data year available (see item #4). Student instructions continued.

CDC HRQOL Surveillance Program’s Methods and Measures page. Contains the four core Healthy Days measures and a link to an explanation on how to calculate overall unhealthy days.

CDC HRQOL Surveillance Program’s Prevalence Data page. Students will use this webpage to query HRQOL data and make comparisons with state and national estimates.