Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
Advertisements

NextGen and Its Impact on Performance Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System ICAO Montreal, Quebec, Canada March 26-30, 2007 Victoria.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
October 31, Metron Aviation, Inc. Dan Rosman Assessing System Impacts: Miles-in-Trail and Ground Delays.
FAA / Eurocontrol TFM/CDM Technical Interchange Meeting
01/14/01 S2K+1 Field Training Spring /14/01 FAR 121 Air Safety PAD Operational Responsibility shared by: –P ilots –A TC –D ispatchers Enhancing.
Vastly Distributed System ATCSCC CDM net TFM hub TRACONs TRACON(s) Towers ARTCC ARTCC(s) Towers Airports Industry AOC(s) GA International.
Resource Allocations within Constrained Airspace October 31, 2001 Metron Aviation, Inc. Robert Hoffman, Ph.D.
CHARLES N. GLOVER MICHAEL O. BALL DAVID J. LOVELL Collaborative Approaches to the Application of Enroute Traffic Flow Management Optimization Models.
- European CDM - To benefit from the animation settings contained within this presentation we suggest you view using the slide show option. To start the.
Air Traffic Analysis, Inc Using WITI for Airport Arrival Performance Analysis A report on work-in-progress December 2010.
Air Traffic Management
International Civil Aviation Organization Aviation System Block Upgrades Module N° B0-80/PIA-1 Improved Airport Operations through Airport-CDM SIP/ASBU/2012.
Heather Bell GMFIR Vancouver November 9, 2010 NAV CANADA.
1 Denver International Airport Ken Greene Deputy Manager of Aviation Airport Operations June 10, 2014.
Efficiency and Equity Tradeoffs in Rationing Airport Arrival Slots Preliminary Results Taryn Butler Robert Hoffman, Ph.D.
NAS Resource Allocation and Reallocation on Day-of-Operations Michael O. Ball Robert H Smith School of Business and Institute for Systems Research University.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Evans benefits ARAM1 jee 6/4/2015 Assessment of Aviation Delay Reduction Benefits for Nowcasts and Short Term Forecasts James Evans.
1 Resource Rationing and Exchange Methods in Air Traffic Management Michael Ball R.H. Smith School of Business & Institute for Systems Research University.
NAS Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Summary Observations Wye Woods Conference Center March 19, George Mason University University of.
Airspace Resource Allocation -Operations Impact Prof. R. John Hansman, Director MIT International Center for Air Transportation
FAA Air Traffic Organization NAS Operational Analyses and Challenges to Modeling the Future.
1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing and NextGen Implementation 1 Federal Aviation Administration Mid Term Architecture Briefing.
1 Arrival Scenario 1 November, Scenario Overview Sharing of Flight and Status data via AWIMSharing of Flight and Status data via AWIM –Parking.
Federal Aviation Administration FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY (Public availability to be determined under 5USC 552) Data Communications Program DCL Benefits Modeling.
NAS Acquisition Programs
Workshop on National Airspace System Resource Allocation: Economics and Equity Organizers: Mike Ball, University of Maryland George Donohue, Karla Hoffman,
. Center TRACON Automation System (CTAS) Traffic Management Advisor (TMA) Transportation authorities around the globe are working to keep air traffic moving.
. Traffic Flow Management System Benefits Flexibility for Future Growth: TFMS provides a modern software architecture to meet future growth and support.
Presented to: NWS Aviation Weather Users By: Danny Sims, Manager of Traffic Flow Management Weather Programs, FAA Date: 18 November 2008 Federal Aviation.
Distributed Multi-Nodal ATFM Operational Trial
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
LMINET2: An Enhanced LMINET Dou Long, Shahab Hasan December 10, 2008.
FAA System-Wide Information Management Program Overview for SWIM-SUIT Public Lauch Donald Ward Program Manager FAA SWIM Program April 2007.
Presented to: NAS-Wide Simulation Workshop By: Kimberly Noonan, FAA NextGen and Ops Planning Date: January 28, 2010 Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Federal Aviation Administration Data Communications Program Operational Trials in Domestic Airspace Presented to:Data Comm Implementation Team (DCIT) By:Jerry.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Weather System Engineering Issues Friends & Partners in Aviation Wx Raymond Moy, Air Traffic Organization,
Ames Research Center 1 FACET: Future Air Traffic Management Concepts Evaluation Tool Banavar Sridhar Shon Grabbe First Annual Workshop NAS-Wide Simulation.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 6 “Collaborative Tools and Technology”
Moving toward Arrival-Departure GDP Bill Hall December 1999.
1 Departure Scenario 1 November 14, Scenario Overview Entry of Flight Data into AWIM SystemEntry of Flight Data into AWIM System –Embry Riddle.
CENTER FOR AIR TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH COLLABORATIVE DECISION MAKING (CDM) Testimony before the National Civil Aviation Review Commission Testimony.
1 REAL-TIME INTER-MODAL SUBSTITUTION (RTIMS) AS AN AIRPORT CONGESTION MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Mark Hansen Yu Zhang University of California Berkeley.
Weather Impacts on System Operations Importance of the Forecast in TFM Planning Jim Ries Oct 19, 2006.
Benefits of CDM Within AFI Region Presented by: Mikateko Chabani.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 7 “Formulating CDM Strategies”
By: Jill Sparrow Date: July 25, 2012 Federal Aviation Administration July 15, 2012 Automation Review.
How do we mitigate weather impacts to the NAS?
Presented to:GMU System-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, ATO NextGen & Ops Planning Date: 10 December 2008 Federal Aviation Administration FAA System-Wide.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
Using Simulation in NextGen Benefits Quantification
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Tradeoff Optimization at STL: a Case Study Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo tel.: (617) CDM.
Analysis of Demand Uncertainty in Ground Delay Programs Mike Ball University of Maryland.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Quantification of Benefits of Aviation Weather A discussion of benefits Friends and Partners in.
1 Surface CDM Sub-team Concept of Operations Briefing Marshall Mowery (FAA CDM Lead) Dan Allen, FedEx Express (Industry CDM Lead) Carl Calcasola, ATM PBI.
F066-B © 2003 The MITRE Corporation. All Rights Reserved. Predictability and Uncertainty in Air Traffic Flow Management Len Wojcik, Josh Pepper,
1 A General Approach to Equity in Traffic Flow Management and Its Application to Mitigating Exemption Bias in Ground Delay Programs Michael Ball University.
Presented to: Friends of Aviation Weather Forum By: Dan Citrenbaum, FAA, Investment Planning and Analysis Office, Operations Research Group Date: October.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
Presented to:Nextor NAS-Wide Modeling Workshop By: Joseph Post, NextGen Systems Analysis Date: January Federal Aviation Administration NextGen.
Federal Aviation Administration Integrated Arrival/Departure Flow Service “ Big Airspace” Presented to: TFM Research Board Presented by: Cynthia Morris.
Collaborative Decision Making Module 5 “The Collaborative Environment”
FF-ICE A CONCEPT TO SUPPORT THE ATM SYSTEM OF THE FUTURE
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
SIP/2012/ASBU/Nairobi-WP/19
NextGen and Its Impact on Performance
Collaborative Decision Making “Formulating CDM Strategies”
Collaborative Decision Making “Collaborative Tools and Technology”
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Presentation transcript:

Date: 18 February 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Collaborative Decision Making at the FAA/ATO A look at how CDM is applied in the U.S.

2 Federal Aviation Administration 2 CDM in the US - Outline Overview of the problem CDM is addressing Early successes with FAA/ATO data sharing Airport arrival constraints and managing equity thru ground delay programs Airspace flow program (AFP) focused on en route constraints CDM tools in development

3 Federal Aviation Administration Jan-00 Jul-00 Jan-01 Jul-01 Jan-02 Jul-02 Jan-03 Jul-03 Jan-04 Jul-04 Jan-05 Jul-05 Jan-06 Jul-06 Jan-07 Jul-07 Annual Ops (Million) Annual Ops Monthly Delay Avg. Total Delay Annual Delay Major US Airports - Demand vs. Delay

4 Federal Aviation Administration 4 ATO Dash Board

5 Federal Aviation Administration 5 Early CDM Accomplishments NAS status information is available on the Internet at Special Use Airspace data is available - Special Use Airspace data is available Runway visual range data is available at 28 airports Runway visual range data is available at 28 airports TRACON Radar tracks available to airlines at major airports TRACON Radar tracks available to airlines at major airports

6 Federal Aviation Administration 6 Sample Benefits of FAA Data Sharing Approach radar tracks available to Airlines –Enhanced terminal area situational awareness to Airline Operations Centers Reduced the number of diversions –Estimated diversions avoided per week during inclement weather ($5K - $100K each) Improved recovery from missed approaches –Improved gate management at ramp tower Increased accuracy on touchdown and gate times Improved management of airline/airport resources

7 Federal Aviation Administration 7 Highlights: CDM for Traffic Flow Management in the US Initial CDM concepts were developed starting in the mid- 90’s. CDM-based decision support tool (FSM – the flight schedule monitor) and information exchange network (CDM-net) became operational in 1998 for the planning and control of ground delay programs (GDP’s). Broad participation by FAA operations personnel and nearly all air carriers and more recently business jet operators. “CDM-Group” meets regularly to develop new computer- based tools and operational procedures, to analyze air traffic data and problem areas and to solve pressing problems.

8 Federal Aviation Administration 8 CDM Concepts and Features Philosophical components: –improved information and common situational awareness –distributed control and decision making: Decision made by most appropriate party Economic tradeoffs made by appropriate flight operator –strong and continuous interaction among airspace system managers and flight operators FAA—airlines airline—airline; peer pressure Technical accomplishments: –new fair allocation principles –shared decision support tool (FSM) –shared communications network (CDMnet) –Airspace Flow Program Reliance on data analysis and objective critique

9 Federal Aviation Administration 9 Motivation for Ground Delay Programs: airline schedules “assume” good weather SFO: scheduled arrivals: VMC airport acceptance rate: IMC airport acceptance rate:

10 Federal Aviation Administration 10 Flight Schedule Monitor (FSM) Decision support tool to monitor and control arrival demand at airports Receives regular flight list updates from ETMS Provides graphical and statistical displays of arrival demand Flight Lists Hourly Demand Graphs

11 Federal Aviation Administration 11 Ground Delay Programs delayed departures delayed departures delayed arrivals/ no airborne holding control = flight departure time decision variable = flight arrival time (slot)

12 Federal Aviation Administration 12 Ground Delay Programs (GDPs) Used to control excess arrival demand at airports Executed through FSM Assigns ‘arrival slots’ to flights based on airport capacity Releases each flight from its departure airport in time to meet its arrival slot Excess demand … … delayed to match capacity

13 Federal Aviation Administration 13 Equity is the Challenge in Assigning Airline Delay CDM provides a Slot Exchange: - Intra-Airline Slot Exchange -- Cancellation and Substitution Process: slot-to-flight allocation viewed as slot-to-airline allocation; airlines can reassign slots they “own” to their flights in any way possible – as part of process they may cancel certain flights. - Inter-Airline Slot Exchange -- Compression: implements a type of inter-airline slot exchange in situation where airlines are assigned slots they are otherwise unable to use.

14 Federal Aviation Administration 14 Arrival slot allocations Normal Capacity: arrival rate = 60/hr Degraded Conditions: arrival rate = 30/hr

15 Federal Aviation Administration 15 GDPs under CDM Resource Allocation Process: FAA: initial “fair” slot allocation [Ration-by-schedule] Airlines: flight-slot assignments/reassignments [Cancellations and substitutions] FAA: periodic reallocation to maximize slot utilization [Compression] Estimated that millions of minutes of delay are saved each year due to better use of available capacity.

16 Federal Aviation Administration 16 Convective Weather Problem

17 Federal Aviation Administration 17 GDPs as an Airspace Tool Control the Wrong Flights Many flights in the FCA are not controlled because they aren’t going to the GDP airports Uncontrolled flights in the FCA Many flights not in the FCA are unnecessarily delayed because they are going to GDP airports Delayed flights not in the FCA

18 Federal Aviation Administration 18 Airspace Flow Programs (AFPs) Uses FSM scheduling technology matched airspace demand and capacity problems Lets traffic managers apply coordinated delays to flights overloading en route resources Create a Flow Constrained Area ETMS manages data exchange Meter flights in the FCA through FSM FCA parametersFCA flight list Flight delaysUpdated demand

19 Federal Aviation Administration 19 AFP Operations Uses established infrastructure and procedures for distributing and maintaining controlled departure times Customers can avoid imposed ground delay by routing around constrained area –Resulting drop in demand will reduce all delay through ‘compression’ Programs can be revised as demand and weather change, to make full use of all available capacity

20 Federal Aviation Administration 20 AFP Benefits Much more precise control of airspace demand –Reduce Ground Stops, diversions and airborne holding versus Distribute delay fairly among flights contributing to the excess demand Avoid imposing unnecessary delay on flights that don’t use constrained resources Provide customers more predictability and flexibility / options The AFP is a building block for airspace congestion management Before AFPWith AFP

21 Federal Aviation Administration 21 Other CDM Activities Concept Engineering Activities –TFM Surface Data Initiative (TSDI) –Surface Traffic Count Monitor (STCM) –Departure Flow Management (DFM) –Route Availability Prototype Tool (RAPT)

22 Federal Aviation Administration 22 END