CSR PRESENTED BY: KELLY WILLIAMS. WHAT IS COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM? The Comprehensive School Reform program (CSR) was developed to help low- performing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Advertisements


Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Title I, Part A Developing Academic Based Accountability School Reform: The Schoolwide Model Principal Workshop Larry Fazzari, Title I/LAP Program Supervisor.
Schoolwide Programs (SWP) NCLB Regional Meetings April 2010.
1 Getting to the Core of the Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for Policy and Practice Advanced Literacy Panel.
System Safeguards and Campus Improvement
Campus Improvement Plans
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
Campus Improvement Plans (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM PROGRAM (Obey-Porter) CSR Program Overview January 2002.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
Sustaining Community Based Programs CYFAR Conference Boston, 2005.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Minnesota’s Lighthouse High Schools Connecting Action and Research.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Comprehensive Reading Model Teaching Reading Sourcebook 2 nd edition.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Schoolwide Program Presentation New England Comprehensive Assistance Center Steve Hamilton.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
Instructional Leadership Pennsylvania Reading First Eastern Regional Reading First Technical Assistance Center Florida State University and The Florida.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Sustainability Through the Looking Glass: Shifting Contingencies Across Levels of a System Jack States Randy Keyworth Ronnie Detrich 34th Annual Convention.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
MAKING A DIFFERENCE IN TOMBALL ISD TITLE I SCHOOLWIDE.
Federal Programs Northwest Independent School District.
How Do We Do This? Educate all students: – Build upon prior knowledge and experience –Address a wide range of skill levels –Instruct utilizing various.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Schoolwide Programs (SWP). Why Schoolwide? Flexibility Purpose : to provide schools with high percentages of at-risk children* the flexibility.
Pease Middle School A Title I School. Why Are We a Title I Campus? Under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), campuses with high numbers of economically disadvantaged.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
EDF 593: RTI Class 2 History of RTI Rachel Brown-Chidsey, Ph.D
Hatchett Elementary A Title I School. Why Are We a Title I Campus? Under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all campuses with an economic disadvantaged average.
Federal Early Care and Education Issues NECTAC Conference December 3, 2007 Helen Blank National Women’s Law Center.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Launching a great year! NWP SEED Grant NWP Core Principles Teachers at every level—from kindergarten through college—are the agents of reform. Writing.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANS (CIP) Schoolwide Programs.
Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
October 20 th, Beliefs and Expectations for Site Council Seek and listen to the insights of all stakeholder perspectives and groups. Deal with issues.
School-Wide Plans Presented by: Marlon Cousin, Title I Coordinator East Baton Rouge Parish School System Cheryl Landry, Title I Coordinator Lafourche.
An Expanded Model of Evidence-based Practice in Special Education Randy Keyworth Jack States Ronnie Detrich Wing Institute.
Implementing CDC’s School Guidelines: Challenges And Opportunities Joy Larson Utah Department of Health Tobacco Prevention & Control Program.
Social emotional learning
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
What IS RtI?. National RtI Model “Response to Intervention” –Born out of Reauthorization of Special Ed Law (IDEA 2004) Two Models of RtI: –Problem-Solving.
Advancing teaching: inspiring able learners every day Meeting the Challenge 14 th November 2012.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Passmore Elementary A Title I School.
Karen E. Joslin, NBCT Literacy Specialist
Constructing High Performing Schoolwide Programs
Schoolwide Programs.
Passmore Elementary A Title I School.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Adams Hill A Title I School.
Presentation transcript:

CSR PRESENTED BY: KELLY WILLIAMS

WHAT IS COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM? The Comprehensive School Reform program (CSR) was developed to help low- performing schools overcome some of the most common obstacles to effective school reform.

WHAT IS COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM? Requirements of CSR: 1.Schools focus their reform efforts on the entire school 2.Schools use comprehensive school improvement models that are proven effective by scientifically- based research 3.Improvement models provide schools with support & training for all stakeholders

WHAT IS COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM? Early prototypes of CSR programs include the Title I Schoolwide Programs and the Goals 2000 school improvement initiatives.Title I Schoolwide ProgramsGoals 2000 The CSR program of today began as part of the FY1998 Labor-HHS Education Appropriations Act.FY1998 Labor-HHS Education Appropriations Act In 1998, school districts were awarded grants in amounts no less than $50,000 a year for up three years if they selected a comprehensive model that met nine specific criteria.

WHAT IS COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL REFORM? Reauthorizing the Comprehensive School Reform Demonstration Act, President Bush signed into law the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 with new requirements to the original program. Today, schools seeking CSR funds must address eleven criteria when adopting a CSR model.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR CSR DateEvent Ambitious curriculum reforms of 1960s Revelation that teacher’s use o new research based curriculum materials was extremely varied Development of federal programs in 1970s Research doubted whether full implementation of research based practice was possible in schools due to large scale planned educational programs like Head Start Rand Change Agent Study RAND found that mutual adaptation rather than uniform implementation proved effective and that local factors dominated project outcomes Early stages of reform in 1988 School-wide models allowed to blend Title 1 and other funds in effort to coordinate compensatory and regular programs NCLB Act 2001Title 1 moves away from an emphasis on targeted assistance toward use to stimulate school-wide programs of instructional improvement change primarily in schools serving high proportions of economically disadvantaged youth

HOW HAS CSR BEEN RESEARCHED?

Several guidebooks have been written compiling research evidence standing behind well known CSR models (the American Institutes for Research and NWREL/NCCSR). The best, most highly cited research comes from RAND study of the original NAS designs as well as such programs as the Accelerated Schools Program, the Coalition of Essential Schools, Core knowledge, and Success for All. CSR models are evolving constantly in efforts to continue to refine the models and change procedures used to support implementation. Research on CSR implementation shows great variability in local implementation like planned educational change.

EFFECTS OF DESIGN ON IMPLEMENTATION The characteristics of an educational innovation affects its prospects for implementation (ones that provide clear guidelines & technical assistance are better implemented) Include descriptions of targets of change as well as specific ideas about the people & processes involved in the change The number or type of changes targeted by particular designs affect the scope & pace of CSR

EFFECTS OF EXTERNAL ASSISTANCE ON IMPLEMENTATION External assistance providers are merely temporary linking agents that gradually decrease levels of support over time External assistance is necessary for successful implementation (just providing literature alone is not enough) Conferences & meetings are held to create systems that can be sustained after withdrawal of direct on site support According to RAND study, lack of stability in team membership provides variability in the quality of external assistance and negatively effects implementation

EFFECTS OF STAFF DEVELOPMENT ON IMPLEMENTATION Staff development is an essential component of successful implementation of CSR Successful programs include school-wide intensive staff training over longer periods of time that is reinforced by local facilitators Support goes beyond workshops to include additional strategies

EFFECTS OF LEADERSHIP ON IMPLEMENTATION Teacher’s perceptions of principal leadership are strong predictors of implementation success Principals need to have a clear vision of the short & long range goals, be actively involved in decision making, offer support for professional learning of teachers, aggressively seek resources for change, buffer unwarranted intrusions and distractions and seek policy changes at the district level in support of the school’s change efforts. Adding various instructional leadership positions, in addition to principal, contribute to success

WHERE DO WE STAND TODAY IN TERMS OF CSR? Two important ideas serve as catalysts for passage of the CSR Demonstration act of 1997: 1.Belief in utilization of research-based practices as key to school reform 2. Gradual evolution of the Federal Government Title 1 program toward focus on school-wide reform

CSR TODAY? POSITIVE CONNOTATIONS Video on Middle School Reform Some schools are experiencing success with CSR models as evidenced in the above link to a video on direct instruction.

CSR TODAY? NEGATIVE CONNOTATIONS… However, research shows that in most cases, many of the essential conditions are missing resulting in failure to fully implement CSR efforts. In the link below, Diane Ratvich discusses the negative connotations of comprehensive school reform today and the failures of NCLB. video link to speech by Diane Ratvich

REFERENCES Cross, C. T. (2004). Putting the pieces together: Lessons from comprehensive school reform research. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Comprehensive School Reform. Retrieved from