Berlin vs. Ljubljana Matej Gojčič. Berlin vs. Ljubljana Similarities: Similarities: new beginning new beginning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Services in the urban area Services include shops, offices, leisure, transport and welfare.
Advertisements

Housing New Housing: The city should focus on more suburban living, while making taller and neater apartments within the urban area. Old Housing: Demolish.
Rural? ? Urban?? ? Suburban??? ?.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Edinburghs Traffic Objective: To investigate traffic in Edinburgh and the problems it causes.
Is it sustainable what we call transport? Kéthelyi József április 17.
Transport & Mobility Policy Debate from the perspective of Manufacturing Brussels, 6 th September 2012 industriAll - European Trade Union.
Experiences from the QUEST project in Kranj, Slovenia Municipality of Kranj, Slovenia.
Welcome to CIVITAS. What is CIVITAS ? 3 72% of Europe’s citizens live in cities.
ELTIS TRAINING: Mobility Management and Travel Awareness PARAMOUNT Large Scale Dissemination for Clean Urban Transport Mobility Management.
MATSim Destination Choice for Shopping and Leisure Activities
Ljubljana Urban Region Development Agency meeting with Delegation of Germany - Berlin 31 May 2005 Ljubljana Mr. Miloš Bajt Adviser, City of Ljubljana,
The City of Gdynia City rights in 1926 With Sopot and Gdańsk forms the Tri-City agglomeration It has inhabitants Port city, employment structure:
West London Transit – One Track Mind or Broad Vision?
1 Maria Cristina Marolda – PRAISE Seminar – Bonn - June 14, 2011 Work Related Road Safety Policy orientations on road safety Maria Cristina Marolda.
The effects of major toll-road financed investments in private and public transport infrastructure on public transport – the “Oslo package” Thredbo conference.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
Mobility and the City Group 4 Yasmine El Alj Martin Lehner Daniel Schmidbaur Emily Sterzin Ryan Tam Alexander Weis Ryan Welsh Shiro Yamanaka.
Greener, cheaper, better Yes we can! Janet Rice Executive Officer, Sustainable Melbourne Alliance for Transport and Urbanism Former Councillor and Mayor,
6 May, 2008 Improving Air Quality in Amsterdam City Directorate for Infrastructure Traffic and Transport René Meijer Deputy Director.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Rural-Urban Migration Developed World Case Study; Dublin.
Promoting Sustainability through Mobility Management Concepts, Belgian Experience Bart Desmedt General manager Traject.
The Urban Transport Problem  Fifth Freedom Problem- auto convenience and privacy  Congestion- traffic overloads, poor infrastructure, vehicle diversity.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
COMMUTERS – OVER 25’s IT’S ALL ABOUT COMFORT, COST & CONNECTIVITY Claudia, Alexander, Jean-Luc, Laura, Jess, Yassmine, Georges.
Traffic problems in Richer countries e.g. UK Too many vehicles Most people like their car Most goods are transported by road.
13 -4 Suburbs. I. The Peripheral Model (North America Only)
Sustainable Mobility in Central Asia A call for vision, integrated planning and resources Guido Bruggeman Chief Technical Advisor of UNDP/GEF Project “City.
TIME-SPACE CONVERGENCE. What the syllabus says… Explain how a reduction in the friction of distance results in time- space convergence.
Peak Car: implications for policy David Metz Centre for Transport Studies University College London.
Group member Group member Angel Ng (group leader) Gabrielle.
Restructuring the public transport network in times of financial crisis: Solutions from Thessaloniki Prof. Panos Papaioannou, Chairman Konstantinidou Christiana,
WORKSHOP on Innovation in Accessible Transport For All Washington, 14 January 2010 Innovative approaches to land use and urban development: creating livable.
UK-IRELAND PLANNING RESEARCH CONFERENCE Oxford Brookes University September 2014 ‘Larger, denser 21 st century cities : Planning for Sustainable Travel.
From frequencies to timetables: user-friendly improvements without expenses for the tramway system in Oradea Antal Gertheis
Transport for Canberra. 1.Setting the scene 2.Public transport 3.Active travel 4.Roads, Parking, Freight and Fleet 5.Measuring our progress 6.How to have.
Business Logistics 420 Urban Transportation Fall 2000 Lectures 6: Coping with Edge City Transportation Problems: Livable Cities, Transit-Friendly Land.
Slide 1 WP D Integrating Mobility Management and Land Use Planning A good example of integration: Sihlcity, Zürich, Switzerland (D2a)
Key problems and priorities in urban transport sector in SEE Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest,
The municipality of Tønsberg: Plans for sustainable transportation systems & mobility management Birgitte Søderstrøm – MECINE coordinator.
Characteristics of an efficient transportation system - a well designed intra-city system - reasonable cost - high degree of safety and reliability - avoid.
Impacts Europe Impacts of planning instruments on suburbanisation and modal split in the Vienna Region Angelika WINKLERMunicipal Department 18.
Created by Martin Hůla T3.C, Means of Transport Basic means of transport: Bike Car Tram Train Bus Plane On foot.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
Sustainable Traffic Management: Freiburg, Germany
1 Copyright Orange Business Services HOW ITS TECHNOLOGIES CAN HELP CITIES TO REDUCE THEIR CO 2 EMISSIONS François RICHARD.
Utrecht Attractive and Accessible A new approach for sustainable urban mobility in Utrecht Paul Kouijzer, Manager Environment and Mobility.
EMTA General Meeting , Turin Tamas Dombi, ZTM Warsaw1 Actual Problems of the Public Transport in Warsaw Metropolitan Area.
Urban Transport: background, problems and challenges
Monitoring Progress in the implementation of the action plan Presentation by John Rogers 25 th May, 2006.
Transport for a sustainable future: A research perspective John Whitelegg
Urban Introduction National 5 Urban Changes in the CBD: Traffic[Date] Today I will: -Know the causes, effects and solutions to traffic congestion in Glasgow’s.
1 Impacts of the growing motorization on the transport of the Warsaw metropolitan area Tamás Dombi, ZTM Warsaw.
Road user charge, City of Zagreb Marko Slavulj Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities, Athens, 24 April 2012.
Transit Oriented Development in Practice Professor Phil Charles | Centre for Transport Strategy TOD Down Under: The Mill Albion.
TRAFFIC PROBLEMS IN GLASGOW Lesson starter:  You have a piece of poster paper in front of you.  You must draw a line down the middle of it.
“The ONE BILLION Challenge” Claire Haigh Campaign Director.
Means of transport. Means of transport Types of transport private x public Private transport – cars, motorbikes, bicycles Public transport – trams,
Three Types of Communities
Urban, Suburban, and Rural
29 October 2013 Integrating Public Transport and Land Use Planning Bus Industry Confederation Mark Williams Director, Sustainable Transport Planning Department.
Jan ILÍK Ministry of Transport, CZ Shaping the future HSR concept for the Czech Republic and CEE.
June 5th, 2009 Individual transport vs. sustainable development Ir. René Meijer (Dep. of Infrastructure Traffic and Transport Amsterdam)
Territorial Issues.
Contribution to sustainable development Caroline Beglinger
Key Facts-Ireland’s Transportation
Travel & Transport Variables
Urban and Rural Communities
Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl
Presentation transcript:

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Matej Gojčič

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Similarities: Similarities: new beginning new beginning

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Similarities: Similarities: new beginning new beginning employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places) employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places)

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Similarities: Similarities: new beginning new beginning employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places) employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places) stores opening hours stores opening hours

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Similarities: Similarities: new beginning new beginning employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places) employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places) stores opening hours stores opening hours suburbanization suburbanization

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Similarities: Similarities: new beginning new beginning employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places) employment changes (flexible working schedule, structure of working places) stores opening hours stores opening hours suburbanization suburbanization aging population aging population

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Public transport: Public transport: S-BAHN U-BAHN Strassenbahn BUS TRAIN BUS

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Difference: Difference: (public transport on Slovenian roads)

Berlin vs. Ljubljana Difference: Difference: (passengers on all means of public transport in Slovenia)

Ljubljana Reasons: Reasons: abolition of the tramway sistem abolition of the tramway sistem Tramway (Siemens & Halske) Tram 2006

Ljubljana Reasons: Reasons: abolition of the tramway sistem abolition of the tramway sistem over 90% of all infrastructural investments into roads. over 90% of all infrastructural investments into roads.

Ljubljana Reasons: Reasons: abolition of the tramway sistem abolition of the tramway sistem over 90% of all infrastructural investments into roads. over 90% of all infrastructural investments into roads. spatial planning system spatial planning system

Ljubljana Reasons: Reasons: abolition of the tramway sistem abolition of the tramway sistem over 90% of all infrastructural investments into roads. over 90% of all infrastructural investments into roads. spatial planning system spatial planning system travelling expenses travelling expenses

Ljubljana Consequences: Consequences: in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space

Ljubljana Consequences: Consequences: in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space fragile traffic system with many traffic jams fragile traffic system with many traffic jams

Ljubljana Consequences: Consequences: in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space fragile traffic system with many traffic jams fragile traffic system with many traffic jams further decline in use of public transport further decline in use of public transport Thining the number of lines Reduction of passengers

Ljubljana Consequences: Consequences: in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space in rush hour 25 cars per marked parking space fragile traffic system with many traffic jams fragile traffic system with many traffic jams further decline in use of public transport further decline in use of public transport changes in city urban structure changes in city urban structure

Ljubljana Solutions: Solutions: mind shift mind shift Thining the number of lines Reduction of passengers Improving public transport More passengers

Ljubljana Solutions: Solutions: mind shift mind shift integration of all public transport systems integration of all public transport systems TRAIN BUS ?????????

Ljubljana Solutions: Solutions: mind shift mind shift integration of all public transport systems integration of all public transport systems more investments in public transport (national transport policy) more investments in public transport (national transport policy)

Ljubljana Solutions: Solutions: mind shift mind shift integration of all public transport systems integration of all public transport systems more investments in public transport (national transport policy) more investments in public transport (national transport policy) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation)

Ljubljana Solutions: Solutions: mind shift mind shift integration of all public transport systems integration of all public transport systems more investments in public transport (national transport policy) more investments in public transport (national transport policy) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation) traveling expenses to public transport companies traveling expenses to public transport companies

Ljubljana Solutions: Solutions: mind shift mind shift integration of all public transport systems integration of all public transport systems more investments in public transport (national transport policy) more investments in public transport (national transport policy) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation) traveling expenses to public transport companies traveling expenses to public transport companies develop new public transport concept develop new public transport concept

Ljubljana Solutions: Solutions: mind shift mind shift integration of all public transport systems integration of all public transport systems more investments in public transport (national transport policy) more investments in public transport (national transport policy) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation) changes in spatial planning system (new legislation) traveling expenses to public transport companies traveling expenses to public transport companies develop new public transport concept develop new public transport concept Keep the walls down!

Questions Matej Gojčič